...
So, what's left.
Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers. If there really was a pay-off, prove it Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist. |
|
|
|
.....
The CV cure is coming out into the open. Btw, quinine works better than hydroxychloroquine.....
Well, that's fucking nuts. No, it's quinine, not nuts. Can't you even read?  there is a family in your own state that will disagree. they have proof medical records and a death certificate.. its not far, maybe you should visit them and get first hand witness testimony from them. you might learn something Are you talking about nuts or quinine? 1 Hydroxychloroquine 2; Azithromycin 3 Zinc Thats the combination but still under researh Right! But there are those medical doctors who think that quinine is way better than hydroxychloroquine. I agree completely. There are those (one, at least) medical doctors (or pizza delivery boys paid to address up like a medical doctor) who think (or are paid to say they agree with this crazy) quinine.... |
|
|
|
...
So, what's left.
Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers. |
|
|
|
... the penalty of 20 years to execution for lying. Why execution? Because this is important. Or do you have proof? reverse transcription |
|
|
|
I don't have a clue as to what you may refer to as "this kind of technology".
After you answer basic questions about watts and frequencies, I'll take it from there regarding it's possible application in phased array. Don't need your help and certainly wouldn't trust your conclusions on that (assuming they are non-numerical, on the same level of your assertions on the 911 event. But be my guest and show the actual calculations anytime). I don't agree with your conclusions about leprechauns, therefore all your other arguments are invalid. Your questions have already been answered. You have fun repeatedly eating your own vomit and puking it back up again though if that is what you want to spend your time doing. Okay, I will assume then that 5G is perfectly safe, fine if it stays out of control of our Chines and Iranian adversaries, and shows great promise for a better Internet experience, and has no "dual use potential as a weapons system."' Also I hear the 5G will vastly improve self driving car routing. And that's important because I'd like to send the Cybertruck out for BBQ all on it's own. |
|
|
|
The university model talked about in the OP, is a peer reviewed study that shows that fire didn't bring Building 7 down. the university done 2 models one where the whole building tumbled over like a tree.. (never gonna happen even in natural disaster) and THEY said thats what happened in non explosive situation... but that has been disproven by science and architects.. and even by badecker himself by saying building suppose to be built to withstand certain things. the other model was just a fall flat model. but it was not a model that resembled the actual fall of the building seven.. and THEY said this model was(facepalm) and then said it can only happen in a explosive used scenario.. again wrong the models didnt accurately show actual events. and the summary of how the results of the models occured were not realistic either .. sorry badecker. but try to actually do some research and compare info you find to actual events and other info available WELL, WHAT ABOUT THOSE HUGELY MASSIVE BEAMS THAT GOT TOSSED 500 FEET LIKE NOTHING, HUH? THAT COULDN"T POSSIBLY HAPPEN WITHOUT EXPLOSIVE LEVELS OF EXPLOSIVELY EXPLOSIVE EXPLODERS. YOU KNOW I'M RIGHT BECAUSE, HUGHLY HUGE, AND EXPLOSIVELY EXPLOSIVE. BECAUSE, SHUT UP. |
|
|
|
EM weapons don't exi... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1w4g2vr7B4Oh wait this is more than 12 year old technology. Also, if they were showing the public this technology, they already had something several generations more advanced that is not public as is standard military procedure. Well, what is the weapons system that 5g allegedly can function as? Simple question. No YouTube links please. No, just a demo of how dense you are pretending as if this kind of technology is not possible. I don't have a clue as to what you may refer to as "this kind of technology". After you answer basic questions about watts and frequencies, I'll take it from there regarding it's possible application in phased array. Don't need your help and certainly wouldn't trust your conclusions on that (assuming they are non-numerical, on the same level of your assertions on the 911 event. But be my guest and show the actual calculations anytime). |
|
|
|
The university model talked about in the OP, is a peer reviewed study that shows that fire didn't bring Building 7 down. Virtually no one believes any of the conspiracy theories about 911. They are just too nutty. Nano-explosives built into concrete from the day the buildings were constructed? Crackpot. |
|
|
|
EM weapons don't exi... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1w4g2vr7B4Oh wait this is more than 12 year old technology. Also, if they were showing the public this technology, they already had something several generations more advanced that is not public as is standard military procedure. Well, what is the weapons system that 5g allegedly can function as? Simple question. No YouTube links please. |
|
|
|
More "answer by YouTube."
Watts and freq please. Actually that wasn't a response to this question, it was just to demonstrate that your understanding of current technology available to the consumer market is antiquated. Frequency was already provided. Wattage is only a matter of how quickly you want the effect to take place, and how much damage you want to do, just like any other transfer of energy via EM waves. You have fun jerking yourself off asking questions that were already answered over and over again though if you like. The claim is made that 5g has dual use as a weapons system. Can it be used to decapitate enemies and at what distance? A couple kilometers away? If not then how is a 5g tower a "weapons system"? |
|
|
|
- that the buildings came down by demolition. Demolition experts express this, and have for the last almost 18 years.
....
Only the few "demo experts" paid off by the anti-American, foreign enemies say these lies. All of the other demo experts, all of the other people laugh at these ridiculous crazy ideas. One more time. Why would anyone run planes into the towers, and then after a while, blow them up? You assume it is the case, so it must be true! Am I anti-American? Do you really believe that? Just for the sake of argument assume my assertions of what happened on 9/11 were true. Which of us is REALLY anti-American here in that case? Duck and dodge the question, AGAIN? The ONE conspiracy theory that makes perfect sense about 911 is the continued funding and internet promotion of various schemes in which the US Government was behind the attack on the twin towers and the Pentagon. Why, for those who hate America it's just the gift that keeps on giving, isn't it? |
|
|
|
I have no idea what that is. But okay, so if it's not a deathly ray deal, then you you maybe cut an arm or two off with the 5G tower?
That would be useful.
How about targeting and vaporizing mosquitos? ...5 minutes on YouTube.... More "answer by YouTube." Watts and freq please. |
|
|
|
...
I have no interesting in "other similar things."
Just want some numbers of frequencies and power required to use 5G towers as death ray machines.
You should have gotten your ass into the Talpiot program then. Some guys have what it takes and others do not. I have no idea what that is. But okay, so if it's not a deathly ray deal, then you you maybe cut an arm or two off with the 5G tower? That would be useful. How about targeting and vaporizing mosquitos? |
|
|
|
What's bullshit is what you are doing in your response. You're ignoring the very fundamentals and making outrageous claims, then when asked to support them with evidence, you're trying to be clever and avoid answering.
So, there are no death rays from 5G towers.
I never said anything about 'death rays' (although there is actually little doubt in my mind that they could be used to kill people.) It is well known that a vast amount of research has gone into the manipulation of humans using EMF. .... Another set of goal shifting. I have no interesting in "other similar things." Just want some numbers of frequencies and power required to use 5G towers as death ray machines. |
|
|
|
...
Youtube search on "MMS malaria Africa." There are tons of video clips ...
Youtube proofs! No need for the scientific method WE GOT YOUTUBE!!! |
|
|
|
- that the buildings came down by demolition. Demolition experts express this, and have for the last almost 18 years.
....
Only the few "demo experts" paid off by the anti-American, foreign enemies say these lies. All of the other demo experts, all of the other people laugh at these ridiculous crazy ideas. One more time. Why would anyone run planes into the towers, and then after a while, blow them up? |
|
|
|
It's funny how people call the story about it being an inside job "made up by conspiracy nutjobs" but they completely ignore that buildings that were not hit by planes on 9.11 collapsed to the inside, just like a normal demolished buildings do and witnesses heard explosions. It's the good old "if it looks like a duck..." case. Also, I haven't even seen the government try to prove that it wasn't a demolition. They just gave their version that it was all due to fire damage. How many often do you see buildings collapse and turn into a pile of rubble just hours after a fire breaks out? Never?
Building 7 had been extensively changed prior to these tragic events. The interior had been hollowed out into a large atrium. It's not exactly like the water pressure, fire sprinklers were working. Steel under heat becomes weak. It doesn't have the strength to hold buildings up. .... witnesses heard explosions. ...
It's hard for most people to tell the difference between a firecracker, a car backfiring, or a gunshot. After all, all three ARE explosions, of a sort. |
|
|
|
Why does so much pseudo-science get posted here? ...
Because the forum moderator will censure and delete posts that are contrary to his political view, but not pseudo science even when the assertions have killed numerous people that were foolish enough to believe them. Go figure. |
|
|
|
now lets see how many parts
take a number like 10m = 10,000,000
'6 drops per 4oz' of MMS = 00,033,333
standard swimpool water = 00,000,030
house tap drinking water = 00,000,005
so badecker, based on his church website
is advising to drink something over 1000x higher than pool water, 10,000x more than tap water
utter idiot
i know he personally doesnt drink that much.. or it would burn his throat.
i bet those snail oil salesmen are just selling little viles of water and calling it chlorine and then shouting how remarkable ithat it doesnt burn throat(coz there is no chlorine in it)
anyone who ventures out of a basement and swims in a pool and accidently drinks pool water knows how the sting feels.. now imagine it 1000x worse by using amounts badecker links adverts of suggestions
utter idiot
He doesn't have a clue about the rate of disassociation of chlorine dioxide, either. Or its implications. |
|
|
|
...
Again, no double talk please. I asked about as simple a question as could be asked. I would like to know the frequencies and power of such a death ray. ... It's a bullshit question/demand. You know it, and so does everyone else. Here's an analogy. I'm going to totally ignore the possibility that a suicide bomber even exists because intel cannot tell me to the microgram how much explosive is in how many pouches on his vest. Yes, suicide bombers have bombed other places before. Yes, this individual is bragging that he's going to do a certain market. Yes, he's on the bus and heading that way. But since your sources could not determine exactly which one of the 5 known vest he strapped on when he was gearing up in the back room, I'm going to ignore that a problem even could exist and not even try to evaluate it. What's bullshit is what you are doing in your response. You're ignoring the very fundamentals and making outrageous claims, then when asked to support them with evidence, you're trying to be clever and avoid answering. So, there are no death rays from 5G towers. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
