Id check with your power company since you already have a significant investment before you spend anymore (im sure you have but better safe than sorry). Not sure where you live/laws there..but what your doing is illegal in most states, and all it takes is a neighbor to snitch on you and theyll shut you down fast. Just an FYI since I know alot of people that have build garage farms and found out the hard way, and its a good thing to know for new people thinking about doing the same.
Anything past 10-20 KW continuous in a residential zone is a red flag and youll get investigated eventually.
|
|
|
Seems like claymore is in the same spot...wouldnt be surprised if his recent "eureka" moment is from the discussion happening in this thread.
|
|
|
So looks like they are still waiting on fab for chips on their next batch, and they are saying another month before they can place my bulk older. I'll update here when I get more info.
|
|
|
Yes especially in the beginning of a new coin /algo.
|
|
|
I wonder if anyone has tried what is the max hash/s witha n OCed RX 470 with Modded bios?
280 stable, can run over 300 if I don't care about auto reboots.
|
|
|
The ROCm OpenCL driver doesn't seem to support inline GCN assembly and I have to use HCC after all. Grrrrrrrrrr...
Yea their OpenCL implementation is pretty barebones...the current release was the first and it was just a developer beta. Will probably be a while before OpenCL matures on that platform. It makes a perfect sense that AMD's commitment to OpenCL seems half-hearted if AMD wants to promote HCC over OpenCL in a long run. I'm not entirely sure if I want to rewrite the kernel, but their ROCm stuff looks pretty neat... Yea but HCC does not make much sense for mining algorithms unless you find a speed up by utilizing inter-gpu memory and data sharing between gpu cores on multi gpu systems. Could be interesting to explore for more advanced Algos like ethash and equihash.
|
|
|
The profit is too low. We need a faster version .
Excuse me but when you have seen any better profits with faster version coming out? If you would try to remember, then the best ZEC profits were during first days, when only very slow miners were available. They had low power usage that contributes to good profit, but key factor is how much miners are on it vs populariy among coin buyers. Can you name any single coin where it has not been this way? Yea not many people can wrap their heads around that concept. People see MOOOR SPEED and immediately think that means more profits. These are probably the same people that are buying GPUs now and think they can still ROI in a few months Of course these updates to public miners have a single major advantage, and thats leveling the playing field for home miners vs large farms that have been running 100 sol/s + since day 1
|
|
|
The ROCm OpenCL driver doesn't seem to support inline GCN assembly and I have to use HCC after all. Grrrrrrrrrr...
Yea their OpenCL implementation is pretty barebones...the current release was the first and it was just a developer beta. Will probably be a while before OpenCL matures on that platform.
|
|
|
how much is dev fees at these miner???
He finally reduced it to a reasonable 2.5%, but was running at 10% in earlier versions. Most of the gains in his last two releases have probably been from him reducing his fee.
|
|
|
The miner runs good with NV too.Just CPU usage is not so good. But hell yeah..nvidia rocks..
one GTX1080 is doing 1.2GH+ :-D eat that AMD lovers :-D
Lol, the logic of some people on these forums is quite interesting. Please explain how a 2x470 that costs $340 and hashes 1.3GH is so much better than one 1080 that costs $600 and does 1.2GH??? I can buy almost twice the hashpower, or ROI twice as fast with AMD cards than nvidia...but yes those big hash numbers are everything even though it makes no mining sense. because you need to compare $200 x 2(470) to $400 for a 1070 with the CUDA miner which will be even faster, $170 for a 470 is not in all the place of the world lol not sure where you looking at prices for 470s. The best 470 for mining is right here and currently its at 165 (155 if you count the rebate). https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202230You can even grab the powercolor for 155 (135 after rebate) if your fine with a slightly less clocked GDDR5
|
|
|
here is linux miner with 470s...got it up to nearly 700MH not bad.
How did you manage run miner on linux? Suprnova has an sgminer. This 470 4gb or 8gb My 470 4gb 610 m/h Its 4GB but it does not matter for this coin...its straight SHA256 compute, so its 100% dependent and scales linear with core clock speed. That speed was at 1160mhz
|
|
|
here is linux miner with 470s...got it up to nearly 700MH not bad.
|
|
|
The miner runs good with NV too.Just CPU usage is not so good. But hell yeah..nvidia rocks..
one GTX1080 is doing 1.2GH+ :-D eat that AMD lovers :-D
Lol, the logic of some people on these forums is quite interesting. Please explain how a 2x470 that costs $340 and hashes 1.3GH is so much better than one 1080 that costs $600 and does 1.2GH??? I can buy almost twice the hashpower, or ROI twice as fast with AMD cards than nvidia...but yes those big hash numbers are everything even though it makes no mining sense.
|
|
|
Are you running this off a single phase 230v line? Id love to see this work, but hate to say that running a 300-400 line string would surely end in disaster. There is a reason why most ASIC boards have very short strings, and some multiple strings in parallel. Its hard enough to provide clean power to the asics with a clean 12v DC power input...trying to do that with an a single phase AC line on a 400 line string is insane lol. The ONLY way this would be possible is if you have some very sophisticated startup and hash phase loop control down to each asic (I guess this could be implemented fairly straighfoward by controlling the PLL clock for each chip seperatly, but that would still be a coding nightmare, and not sure what kind of device you would need to have to control 400 I/Os in sync .
|
|
|
Is there something specific in the ASM that requires modification for linux? Or do you just mean you haven't compiled that linux version yet...if thats the case I can easily compile it myself.
|
|
|
You need 7GH currently to get 1 block a day on average. At your hashrate I wouldnt be concerned unless you havent gotten a block after 48 hours.
Hi, how did you calculate this? Tnx. Current hashrate = ~2,000GH Blocks per day = 288 1/288 * 2,000 = 6.9 GH
|
|
|
almost 24 hours with 10 x 470 8gb, but no trace of the block, all the cards reach a speed of 575 MH, 575 x 10 = 5750 MH = 5 gh / s. can not even 1 block? there is something wrong? the wallet and opened only 1 pc, You need 7GH currently to get 1 block a day on average. At your hashrate I wouldnt be concerned unless you havent gotten a block after 48 hours.
|
|
|
Solo mining is very sensitive with your network/time setup. Youll lose blocks even if your time is off by a few seconds. Make sure you have very low latency to other node, and you have NTP running.
|
|
|
I've compiled the Linux miner I'll post the repo and binary as soon as I fix some bugs.
|
|
|
Yeah I melted that psu exactly like that.
USE EVGA p2's they work better
Dosent have to do with PSUs...he clearly overloaded his Molex line with 3 or 4 riser cards.
|
|
|
|