Speaking of 1000, does anyone know who runs AGENTSMITH bot in #burst-coin on freenode - I think he stole/lost/borrowed like 1000 coins from me. I haven't been on irc in a week or two, but I definitely had between 900-1000 coins in the irc bot, and now it says I have zero  Maybe database was reset or something? Hacked? You sure it was the AGENTSMITH bot? I'm not sure that bot even allows you to deposit coins. I think it could be the other bot that is in there, and that is run by someone I know. I can get in contact. I deposited some coins to it as well, but I had completely forgotten until you just brought it up, but I don't think it is the AGENTSMITH bot, unless I am unaware of AGENT's ability to accept coin deposits. |
|
|
|
WOW! Everyone start offloading ur HDDs now lol! right into my hands! heh. |
|
|
|
|
Hello XAI community. I think I'll buy in to your coin. Continue with the nice development work. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
-[http://burst.ninja POOL UPDATE ANN]- -We believe we have fixed all issues! The pool should be 100% stable and error free now!!! (crowd cheers!)
-We implemented a "miner detector" that will tell you which miner the miner is running, right now it picks up who is using blago's miner. We will add more later!
Thank you!check it out! http://burst.ninja**new UI coming soon  ** ALSO Just to let everyone know. You can watch the miners with the name "BURSTCITY" (with a number, i.e. BURSTCITY1) to see the miners that are mining for the ByteEnt asset currently. Those will be mining for ByteEnt asset until we launch our ByteCloud service, then they will mine partially for that and partially for ByteEnt. Thanks! Can you give a key for which miner each word relates to? The Blago miners are obvious with version number, but does poolmining refer to dcct's miner or a different one? A key would prevent future questions similar to this one. Currently the only miner that is noticed is Blago, we will add functionality for other miners soon. edit- actually, it looks like cat already added uray and java miners too. |
|
|
|
-[http://burst.ninja POOL UPDATE ANN]- -We believe we have fixed all issues! The pool should be 100% stable and error free now!!! (crowd cheers!)
-We implemented a "miner detector" that will tell you which miner the miner is running, right now it picks up who is using blago's miner. We will add more later!
Thank you!check it out! http://burst.ninja**new UI coming soon ** ALSO Just to let everyone know. You can watch the miners with the name "BURSTCITY" (with a number, i.e. BURSTCITY1) to see the miners that are mining for the ByteEnt asset currently. Those will be mining for ByteEnt asset until we launch our ByteCloud service, then they will mine partially for that and partially for ByteEnt. Thanks! Thanks for this nice pool! It's stable and paying good... glad to hear! Let me know if you have any suggestions for changes. This goes for the whole community, suggest any changes and if we deem them good, we will add them! |
|
|
|
-[http://burst.ninja POOL UPDATE ANN]- -We believe we have fixed all issues! The pool should be 100% stable and error free now!!! (crowd cheers!)
-We implemented a "miner detector" that will tell you which miner the miner is running, right now it picks up who is using blago's miner. We will add more later!
Thank you!check it out! http://burst.ninja**new UI coming soon ** ALSO Just to let everyone know. You can watch the miners with the name "BURSTCITY" (with a number, i.e. BURSTCITY1) to see the miners that are mining for the ByteEnt asset currently. Those will be mining for ByteEnt asset until we launch our ByteCloud service, then they will mine partially for that and partially for ByteEnt. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
I look at http://burstcoin.eu/poolsWhen I follow the link to the pool, I see other numbers of "Active Miner" E.g., for burst.ninja it shows 93, but on their web site it says 272 "Miners" for cryptomining.farm it shows 266, but on their web site it says 1237 "Total Miners" for mininghere.com it shows 39 and on their web site it says 39 "Total Miners" How are these numbers calculated? Active Miner = Miner that receive a payout for this day Total Miner = All accounts that have reward assignment to pool address (including inactive miners) Also, the way that burstcoin.eu calculates things is basically based off how many miners consistently submit shares to the pool (from what I have read) So, what this means is... the calculations on burstcoin.eu will not be accurate as far as how many miners are actually mining on the pool. It will only show the number of consistently submitting miners. (big miners) The number shown on the pools themselves, is the number actually having their reward assignment placed to the pool's wallet. |
|
|
|
|
is there anywhere I can dump these useless LAT? lol.
|
|
|
|
|
All the people I trust
OgNasty
drukoz2
TheButterZone
philipma1957
waldohoover
xjack
MsCollec
arnbrd
Blazedout419
devthedev
achtung082
cexylikepie
pokeyjones
quakefiend420
thresher
myk3916
HerbPean
Blago
AnonymousEconomist
Cipa
|
|
|
|
I need to take some time and update that guide, but it has been moved away from my original location and I lost edit rights, who owns this? There is a lot of useful info @ www.burstforum.com |
|
|
|
yes! 18 to be first!
what good it brings if the burst be added to the AltcoinsFoundation.com? free promo! |
|
|
|
|
I find it funny how people compare the bitcoin forums to eBay when it comes to pricing miners.
People here are trying to help out the community and give the best prices when selling.
If that isn't what you're trying to do, then go sell your miners on eBay and don't post them here.
I recently sold 10 S3s for 40 dollars a piece+shipping. That is a good deal. 600 for an S5 is not a good deal.
just my thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Vote People!!!! We just have 39!!! at least 20 more needed to be first.Are there some conditions for voting? The vote board seems not active for me. Your rank is newbie, I believe you have to reach Jr. Member to be able to vote Yup, you need 30posts to vote... count me in |
|
|
|
|
I must say, I love all of this usage of ATs going on, and BURST dedication!
|
|
|
|
Less than 57 hours until my zRMicroArray crowdfunding AT expires. During the previous six weeks it got 32% funded. If you feel like this project matters, please show your support even with a tiny donation. It could be the starting bit of the successful funding of the project. You could send BURST to BURST-P8C8-4N7P-2L5E-CXYYH in order to fund this AT. You could find more details about the project in my signature. Thank you!  I will donate 100k to you via direct transfer to your wallet shortly. edit: sent. Good luck! |
|
|
|
I seem to have missed this whole "burstbank" thing.
care to explain?
If only there was some type of forum were the Burst community could gather and organize information in topic specific threads. If such a place existed then information from assets, to mining software could be kept up-to-date in a manner that would allow for quick and easy review..... I image such a place could be called Burstforum.com... I think if you start reading from here you might be able to piece together a decent picture of BurstBank. I've kinda ignored it, so I have nothing to offer other than a link and my sarcastic attempt at pushing the forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=731923.msg10841362#msg10841362Good-Luck Lol. Nice work. Yes, I should use my own forum a little more, I know. xD |
|
|
|
Oh well. Just too easy to be a scammer dev anymore. And why not just do that? You'll make more money in the short term than working on a coin for months and months and not get much for it. It's easy. Just set up a newbie account here, create a new coin with promises, you'll get people buying, then slowly dump what coins you have, maybe the premine, and move on to the next coin. Create a new newbie account here, new coin, rinse and repeat. You'll always get people who are willing to suspend disbelief to buy your coin.
If you're a fuckhead it's perfect! Sadly most people are. Bye Bye EUPH. RIP. |
|
|
|
|
I seem to have missed this whole "burstbank" thing.
care to explain?
|
|
|
|
Also I may have found a bug with Blagos latest version. It's not showing confirmations from dev v2 even though the pool is giving me shares.  Come give us a shot, if you don't like it, let me know what you don't like and we can take a change into consideration.
Curiously, why doesn't it just tabulate the amount of space you hashed for a block and then do a proportional payout for it regardless of your deadlines? Since it's random, users have no control over their deadlines and can't really 'tweak' them. The only thing they can tweak is speed. How much you can hash within a given time frame is a good indicator of 'hashrate', since size alone doesn't determine how effective your Burst miner is. A block itself simply could be used for the time frame of hashing and the proportion of work for that block. I don't know if pools can see how much storage someone has, but if they could this seems like the overall best method. Big miner or small it really shouldn't matter, it's all about the amount of work you can do. Block winner and second best deadlines shouldn't matter again as it's random and the whole reason for being on a pool is to average everything out. You could add a 'historic' element in there too to prevent pool hoping, but that's really not a thing in Burst and it honestly doesn't matter. Someone hoping on the pool for five minutes is just as effective as someone hoping on for 10 days relatively speaking per block (as long as they stay for the full block). It is not possible to see exact amount of size a miner has, our pool estimates and that is as good as it gets. Basing payouts off a rough estimation is a bad plan. Right now we base payouts on how many good submissions and how many of the good submissions are lower numbers, and that is how it is paid out. I believe this to be the only fair way to pay miners in a BURST pool. payment based on what you give, you get what you give. The better you do, the better the pool does, the more you get. The lower shares you submit, the more you get. Basing payouts (even if we could estimate size perfectly) on size alone is simply not a good way to do things. What if a miner has a ton of space but can't read through it all correctly because they don't have a great processor, they should be paid more than someone who has less actual space but yet provides more useful share submissions to the pool? I'm sorry, I just don't agree with this method of payout at all. Feel free to clarify if I'm not correct in your suggestion. It is all about how much you give to the pool. When you base it off share submissions, and give the better shares a better pay, this is how it works, then the miners who consistently submit better shares, get a little extra bonus with the Historic pie, because they give more overall good work to the pool. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
