A stavio sam ovaj   na kraj  

Pa eto, išo iz zezancije sa dutchcoinom i reko idem uguglati sigurno ima nešto slično i ono stvarno bio nekakav shitcoin. Nisam mislio da ćeš ozbiljno shvatiti...

Bumping this because I am not satisfied with answers posted by the-one-above-all. I believe you had enough time to go trough trust feedback, can you come here and clarify questions asked a month ago?

Perhaps you should focus more on the content of topic which is clear enough or you think everyone except you is stupid and can't see what is content of this topic?
It is not speculation, unless you want to share which DT member and signature campaign manager did this:
Which reminded me, I need to bump something.

To ti je isto kao da pitaš jednog bitcoinera što misli o bankama. Sigurno bi rekao sve kontra. Eto, recimo, ja smatram da crypto ulazi u masovnu upotrebu i da će ići u korist svima jer neće morati toliko koristiti banke i njihove usluge.
Najnoviji hard fork od Dashcoina, naravno, nazvali ga Ducthcoin, jedini problem što su se zajebali kod forkanja i nije više privacy coin   (edit: LOL nisam ni znao da je postojao https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dutch-coin/)

Here you go https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=308

Someone who is keeping other people's money without their will should not be advertised. Not only it is theft by exchange, it is morally wrong to advertise such service and campaign should be stopped until they resolve this.

DT system is decentralized so DT1's can exclude DT members who are doing what you said they are doing.
You literally posted this in topic:
Only red flag I am aware of that is opposed by dt members which are in that campaign and manager managing campaign is livecoin's campaign so you are pretty much talking about this. So why trying to keep publicly available information as secret?

Smiješ staviti u signature i u "personal text" koliko sam upućen.

Vjerovatno im kampanje ne dozvoljavaju da stave, na primjer fortunejack ne dozvoljava ref link ili bar nije dozvoljavao. Možda neka ogranićenja sa znakovima a moguće da se ljudima jednostavno ne da stavljati linkove u signature.

Maybe OP should check how many merits user Goran has shared in one of threads before and after post number #90753.

I don't think he is full of shit but with lack of proofs we can assume he is full of shit. This thread reveals nothing

Yes, that is exactly what I think.

This moron has actually sent me PM to remove negative because he wants to join signature bounty. Who gives a shit about you joining a signature campaign. You are responsible for links you share, I don't care if you did not check them because of your greed to get some fake tokens. GTFO you idiot.

Supported. I am not sure who gave these random accounts idea to ask non collateral loan(note - I don't think bitcointalk account is valid collateral due the fact that many scammers took loan giving accounts as collateral and run away after).

Why do you call it faucet? There is investment option:


So it is nothing but a ponzi scam.

Any proof yet?

Ovo mi baš i nije najjasnije.

Uložim bitcoin koji holdam od 2016. u ICO, ICO skoči 10X, zamjenim tokene za fiat i nema poreza jer je u principu bila zamjena crypto za crypto.

Primjer 2. Zamjenim taj token što je skočio 10X nazad u bitcoin i imam 10X više bitcoina nego što sam imao, zamjenim bitcoin za fiat - i opet, nema poreza zato jer je sve bilo mjenjanje crypto za crypto.

Nešto mi tu baš ne štima sa ovim boldanim dijelom.

Prvo kažu da je bitcoin WoW gold, ne treba voditi evidenciju za WoW gold
Onda kažu trebalo je voditi evidenciju jer bitcoin ipak nije WoW gold  

That is lovely, but when provably fair? When bankroll? When security?

Whoever is thinking to gamble here, read scam accusation first https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157280.0 and stay away from this site.

my prediction 11327 $

it is autumn
vacation ends
why not

@Eddie I will try to do my best to answer your questions, sorry for late response.
It was unethical. I don't like sting operations.
It does not. There was no contract.
I can only say that I would not share any info with bob. I also think it is good that some accounts are exposed, especially that account with green trust.

Hm....can you understand this?

^ here you go http://archive.is/Wv096. We obviously have different view of what charity is and what such organizations are - if we talk about sending money to charity org, web archive will be the last place. I just don't see how web archive fits in helping people who need food, cloths, toys...or perhaps money for operation or medics, or maybe education of children in Africa. Probably it is just me and my way of thinking.
It is not up to me to judge that. I simple wanted to know how did you calculate contribution in and for this thread.
That is for thread started by Lauda. So what's about that thread? I don't see how it is related to this one.

So how did you do it, was it based on post count or number of found alts or helpful posts? Because, according to your way of calculation(post count) this account contributed 2 times in this thread(and is entitled to 2000 satoshi):




Simple math:

1580 posts are posted before this post.

101 post is ~6.4%.

6.4% of 0.017975 BTC == 0.0011504BTC =/= 0.001BTC  So you didn't do calculation right.

---

Timelord, who is "us"?  

I can also make conclusion that you are trolling https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg51506691#msg51506691 so what gives you idea that I am trolling? Asking money related questions is not trolling.

Now I am out of this thread.

I said I won't so I won't, but, I am not satisfied the way you handled funds so I have to break this for a moment.



This is not charity organization (I didn't check other links yet, but judging names they look like they are charity organizations)

I believe "send funds to charity organization" was more than enough info.

That was something you were supposed to do.

"Let's say" is not proper way to handle funds. Besides, you have received funds for another thread and that is irrelevant for this thread.
Explain me based on what have you calculated my share of donations?

You are not allowed to have a life. If you are going to take some days off post it in Important Announcements, of course, if you are not very important person you won't be able to do it, so send PM to thermos to post your very important announcement in important announcements and then you are allowed take a break  

---

20 people took a break and 50% "were DT farmers". Isn't that 10 accounts then?

Now you think you are inside my head.

Crazy.

As I have already told you, I am not interested to listen to your assumptions neither I will respond to them.

Here you go, chat history https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157334.0:
Can you post accounts which SeW900 tried to sell and can you quote exact agreement?

These are not accounts Sew900 tried to sell! He tried to sell 2 accounts.

Read read read:


trustedseller =/= SeW900 according to SeW900


Again, what was part of agreement between SeW900 and Bob123?


Seems you didn't do research properly before placing that support.