I've posted about it months ago. No admin or moderator even bothered with it. There is this idiot, Buzzlieve1992 who have literally spammed THOUSANDS of negative feedback lines to legit people, yet nothing happened to him, nor was the trade rating spam removed. So I can tell you from personal experience ( with proof ) that nothing will be fixed.
Only theymos (maybe Cyrus too, I don't know) can remove spammy Trust ratings. Maybe they missed your post or thread, send theymos a PM then. I'm not sure I agree that was a positive as it gave them the ammo for the shady shit they have pulled since then, like clams from all the wallets that were unclaimed. I had no Idea they even had that shitcoin listed, If I cared I would go back and see if they added it later just so they could pull this move.
I think he meant 'good', as in it was good for their wallets, they made easy money by stealing from their users. |
|
|
|
Speaking of trust flags and nuked users, is there a way to get their absurd 200 lines long, abusive (like "I hope your mother burns in hell") fake "untrusted trust" removed? Maybe a nuked user should have all left trust removed since they technically no longer exist anyway especially if they are these serial-scammer alts who only had 1 or 2 posts to begin with. I know "untrusted trust" isn't harmful but it's just annoying.
Trust ratings aren't moderated, and afaik currently there is no policy of removing ratings of nuked accounts, but if someone is literally spamming you can contact theymos to have the spam removed. |
|
|
|
Such a lovely person aren't you?
Why are you so against upgrading to a new version that will provide the very options someone is asking about? Even if you still decide to switch to different software in the future at least people get the options they want now rather than years down the line.
Upgrading to the newest SMF version might not be that easy if many changes were introduced by theymos to SMF currently used by bitcointalk over the years. It's also likely that upgrading would increase the attack surface, bitcointalk hasn't been hacked for several years now, newer SMF versions are unlikely to be as tried and tested as bitcointalk's with how big of a target it is. |
|
|
|
How much proof of "victimhood" do we expect? For example, is this sufficient: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153934.msg51455373#msg51455373Not trying to put eddie13 on the spot here, just want to know if I can re-flag some old scams (GAW, hashie, etc) where I lost some money but there is no way for me to find TX IDs or any other tangible proof of that. Looks good enough to me, no one really has to 'prove' anything, an honor affirmation checkbox is sufficient. If others think they're wrong or lying, they can always oppose a given flag, distrust them, and in the worst cases theymos can have them removed from DT (I assume only from DT1). And I'd definitely flag exchanges engaging in KYC withdrawal denial scams (type-1 flag, type-2 or -3 flag if you were victimized by the exchange). |
|
|
|
So how should we doing it with som kind of the " Fake Ann creators " that posting links to there Malware Software in there text ?
In addition to the mentioned type-1/newbie-warning flag you can still report these topics, luring unsuspecting people to run malware is still a bannable offense. And a nuked user has all of their posts removed automatically anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Brzmi jak totalny idiotyzm nie do wyegzekwowania. Ale mimo wszystko jeśli to prawda, to w takim razie można się co najmniej spodziewać dalszego dokręcania śruby.
|
|
|
|
@Malevolent chciałem zapytać czy coś wiadomo z moim postem?
A dodatkowo mam kolejne pytanie techniczne dotyczące plagiatu i znowu bardzo liczę na Twoją odpowiedź.
No i teraz moje pytanie: Czy powinienem dodać link do źródła zdjęcia, czy też plagiat na forum, dotyczy tylko treści pisanych?
Czekam na odpowiedź, tylko Cyrusowi wysyłałem wiadomość, bo theymos i tak ma teraz co robić. Dawanie źródła nigdy nie zaszkodzi, ale ja tam nie widzę problemu. |
|
|
|
The PM leaked a minute after it was sent, that's how much they trust him.
Are you surprised it leaked after it was sent to ~110 users? I don't think he cared it would leak anymore than sharing his thoughts in the same way any other user could. |
|
|
|
Showing what is essentially a scammer flag to people with account ages only less than 7 days essentially just opened the door to 10,000's of scammers. There are so many accounts that I've previously tagged that I no longer can, because it doesn't fit into the narrow definitions.
It's 7 days of logged-in time, not 7-day-old accounts, and guests will also keep seeing this flag. Everyone else knows they should check a user's Trust page before sending them any money. |
|
|
|
|
It's a commonly used honorific in countries of the Indian subcontinent, in other English-speaking countries it's a bit odd seeing it being so overused by some people. English isn't my mother tongue and I too find its (over)use kind of jarring, even though where I'm from we use similar honorifics (albeit not necessarily in the same contexts/situations).
|
|
|
|
I got lots of answers to my question recently,
Does this forum have a facility to thank respondents or add them to a friend list? I did not see one thanks
You can send them some merit if you have any, or you can send them some bitcoins if they have an address in their signature, or on their forum profile. |
|
|
|
|
The website is down for me too, but even it goes online again I'll stay away, I don't consider him trustworthy enough to run anything more than an altcoin bounty campaign...
|
|
|
|
|
Pierwsza flaga może być też zaznaczona przez dowolną osobę, która uważa, że dany user może z dużym prawdopodobieństwem kogoś oszukać.
|
|
|
|
Well, that's a change  I'll need some time to process this, maybe probably it's for the better, but it looks like theymos now officially got himself a part-time job as a quasi-lawyer? |
|
|
|
What is this "Telegram"? Can this be accessed directly from web browser?
You can download an app: https://telegram.org/ or you can run it in your browser: https://web.telegram.org/#/loginI don't have an account, either, but I believe that if you create a Telegram account, then you will be able to view the content that is linked in malevolent's above post.
You need a phone number to use Telegram, that's it, you get a text with code you have to enter to authenticate. Passwords are optional. |
|
|
|
Typically, new boards (child-boards) are created when there is adequate demand for them. Right now, I'm seeing five LN-related topics on the 1st page in Development & Technical Discussion, zero such topics on the 2nd page, four topics on the 3rd page, three on the 4th, and two on the 5th, and there are forty topics per every page. Post more LN-related content if you have something meaningful to say or ask, and in time a new child-board will be created. My only concern is who will be the moderator? AFAIK most moderators are busy. That shouldn't be a problem, probably current Dev&Tech board mods + Global mods if a dedicated LN/L2 board was to be created. edit: typo |
|
|
|
They're most likely caving to US regulatory pressure, I think all the blocked coins/tokens/whatever had ICOs and have little to no real utility, and therefore there's a high likelihood they'll be treated as securities by the US SEC, which means it's either not possible or it requires more red tape to allow so-called unaccredited investors buy or sell them. |
|
|
|
This is true but there is also another apsect, according to Raja_MBZ Bittrex is an excellent exchange that he never ever had issues with, just a few people come here to post negative things about Bittrex but on the whole it seems pretty solid exchange to me. Bittrex also suffers from 'wallet maintenance' problems much more frequently than Binance. Seeing thhe whole KYC scam with people from 'bad' countries being locked out of their accounts overnight left a very sour taste in my mouth. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4930438.msg44493874#msg44493874 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
