I don't think gays should be parading their homosexuality in the streets for my children to watch and be indoctrinated with. I don't think anyone should parade anything and force their views on anyone. Including what you're doing now.
A Christian who doesn't want to force his beliefs on anyone? That's new Don't you ever fucking call me a "Christian", nor an "Atheist", nor anything else for that matter. If anything, you're forcing your beliefs on me telling me I should hate the bible because it has fucked up shit in it. That's not very Christian of you, nor is it what I said... why are you putting your words in my mouth? |
|
|
|
I don't think gays should be parading their homosexuality in the streets for my children to watch and be indoctrinated with. I don't think anyone should parade anything and force their views on anyone. Including what you're doing now.
A Christian who doesn't want to force his beliefs on anyone? That's new |
|
|
|
Wow, 600 posts, you're just an encyclopedia of information. Please, it's 4am, I'm literally going to pass out. I've made my point: You guys are being hateful. Once again, we are still trying to educate you... you are the one who keeps calling us names and shit Keep talking smack about my 600 posts without even reading a fucking one of them too At least the guy who started the "Atheism is Poison" thread has a fucking clue... go read it before you humiliate yourself further |
|
|
|
Hey, listen. What if people would just randomly start posting some bullshit about you personally? Would you be pissed? The audience you're targeting here is everyone who believes in the bible, denominations aside. You're personally targeting users on this forum telling them that they're fucking retarded and disgusting vile human waste.
For what? What the fuck do you benefit from this? Some sick fucking pleasure, you're just as bad as those priests.
I believe this topic was started as a response to the 50+ anti-atheist topics on this forum... The atheist bashing on this forum has been going on for quite a long time Is that a reason to continue spreading hate? We aren't spreading hate... where do you see hate? We are trying to educate you... so you stop hating fags, etc I ask that you go through the posts that are in this thread, I've already named a few examples in the initial post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1367154.msg13979448#msg13979448Assuming you didn't even read my post, here's what I'm referring to: "unless you are already a psychopath"
"a collective work of some sick, bronze age psychopaths"
"you are a despicable human being"
Truth hurts, cry me a river af_newbie refuted most of your points... it was td;dr for me to bother reading all that rubbish Did you bother to read his responses to your post? It looks like it took a long time for him to respond to you |
|
|
|
Hey, listen. What if people would just randomly start posting some bullshit about you personally? Would you be pissed? The audience you're targeting here is everyone who believes in the bible, denominations aside. You're personally targeting users on this forum telling them that they're fucking retarded and disgusting vile human waste.
For what? What the fuck do you benefit from this? Some sick fucking pleasure, you're just as bad as those priests.
I believe this topic was started as a response to the 50+ anti-atheist topics on this forum... The atheist bashing on this forum has been going on for quite a long time Is that a reason to continue spreading hate? We aren't the ones spreading hate... where do you see hate? We are trying to educate you... so you stop hating fags, etc |
|
|
|
Hey, listen. What if people would just randomly start posting some bullshit about you personally? Would you be pissed? The audience you're targeting here is everyone who believes in the bible, denominations aside. You're personally targeting users on this forum telling them that they're fucking retarded and disgusting vile human waste.
For what? What the fuck do you benefit from this? Some sick fucking pleasure, you're just as bad as those priests.
I believe this topic was started as a response to the 50+ anti-atheist topics on this forum... The atheist bashing on this forum has been going on for quite a long time https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.0 |
|
|
|
There was actually a rumour that Manny once had gay relationships when he was just starting his career in Manila. Due to his poverty it was a gay man who gave him home and financial support when he has nowhere to go.  He didn't say he hates gay he only said he don't like marrying gays  and i guess the homo he was with before is responsible enough that he didn't got HIV. What makes you think Manny doesn't already have HIV? Perhaps that's why he's acting so homophobic? Charlie Sheen knew he had HIV years before he told anyone http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/11/17/charlie-sheen-admits-i-am-hiv-positive/ |
|
|
|
|
It never ceases to amaze me the things people assume about that which they have done zero research
|
|
|
|
I have no denomination, but I believe in righteousness and have a strong moral code. What you folks are doing is purely hateful, calling out others for the sake of attacking them and their beliefs.
I'm ashamed to share this forum with you.
Nobody asked you to come in here and make a fool of yourself... you did that voluntarily |
|
|
|
You misunderstand: God created the angels, Jesus was one of them, he sent Jesus to Earth, we crucified him.
You misunderstand your own dogma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrinityThe Christian doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three consubstantial persons, expressions, or hypostases: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit; "one God in three persons". The three persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature". By that same article: "According to this central mystery of some Christian faiths," which means, some, not all. Name a denomination that does not believe in the Trinity He is frantically searching...What a bozo? Jesus was an angel, WTF? That is a new low, even for a Christian. Why do the Atheists always prove they know Christianity better than the Christians? Christians are so eager to spout bullshit that they look foolish |
|
|
|
You misunderstand: God created the angels, Jesus was one of them, he sent Jesus to Earth, we crucified him.
You misunderstand your own dogma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrinityThe Christian doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three consubstantial persons, expressions, or hypostases: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit; "one God in three persons". The three persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature". By that same article: "According to this central mystery of some Christian faiths," which means, some, not all. Name a denomination that does not believe in the Trinity |
|
|
|
You misunderstand: God created the angels, Jesus was one of them, he sent Jesus to Earth, we crucified him.
You misunderstand your own dogma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrinityThe Christian doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three consubstantial persons, expressions, or hypostases: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit; "one God in three persons". The three persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature". |
|
|
|
The existence of Santa Clause can be disproven, but the existence of God can only be speculated.
I'd love to see this proof... considering it's impossible https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence#Proving_a_negativeIn 1992 during a presentation at Caltech, skeptic James Randi said "you can't prove a negative". He claims that he cannot prove a negative (such as that telepathy does not exist), but he argues that an individual who claims telepathy exists must prove it... Santa was created by the Coca-Cola company Santa is 300+ years older than the Coca-Cola company You're right, I retract my statement. Santa Clause still does have an origin and story based off people who existed in time, my point is still valid. You said you could DISPROVE Santa He's dead, I win. So is God, I win |
|
|
|
The existence of Santa Clause can be disproven, but the existence of God can only be speculated.
I'd love to see this proof... considering it's impossible https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence#Proving_a_negativeIn 1992 during a presentation at Caltech, skeptic James Randi said "you can't prove a negative". He claims that he cannot prove a negative (such as that telepathy does not exist), but he argues that an individual who claims telepathy exists must prove it... Santa was created by the Coca-Cola company Santa is 300+ years older than the Coca-Cola company You're right, I retract my statement. Santa Clause still does have an origin and story based off people who existed in time, my point is still valid. You said you could DISPROVE Santa You don't know the origins of the Santa myth... nobody does Now you are just looking (more) foolish |
|
|
|
I can't agree with the statement that science "does however not give you any values or instruction how to live your life whatsoever". Plenty of scientific disciplines do just that; from the social sciences to ecological sciences. Philosophy is also in a way a science (or maybe a meta-science) since it's the study of the nature of knowledge. There are many philosophical writings about how to live a happy life (see Alain de Botton's "Consolations of Philosophy"). Social sciences, ecological sciences and philosophy are much better able to inform us about the various possible life choices that may or may not make us happy than a brittle, unchanging and dogmatic social construct created thousands of years ago. Seriously... science is the only method for discovering morals... Could you imagine if people actually acted on biblical morality? Have you read Leviticus? Everyone would be a murderer! What would morality be without philosophy? Emmanuel Kant gives a great method for discovering right from wrong behavior... basically, ask the question, "What would happen to society if everyone did xxx"... What would happen if everyone was a thief, or murderer?... easy peasy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperativeAristotle wrote the book on Ethics (literally) in 350 BC! (Before Christ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethicshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethicshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groundwork_of_the_Metaphysic_of_Morals |
|
|
|
The existence of Santa Clause can be disproven, but the existence of God can only be speculated.
I'd love to see this proof... considering it's impossible https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence#Proving_a_negativeIn 1992 during a presentation at Caltech, skeptic James Randi said "you can't prove a negative". He claims that he cannot prove a negative (such as that telepathy does not exist), but he argues that an individual who claims telepathy exists must prove it... Santa was created by the Coca-Cola company Santa is 300+ years older than the Coca-Cola company |
|
|
|
The existence of Santa Clause can be disproven, but the existence of God can only be speculated.
I'd love to see this proof... considering it's impossible https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence#Proving_a_negativeIn 1992 during a presentation at Caltech, skeptic James Randi said "you can't prove a negative". He claims that he cannot prove a negative (such as that telepathy does not exist), but he argues that an individual who claims telepathy exists must prove it... |
|
|
|
|
tl;dr
Anyone want to handle this schmuck?
|
|
|
|
Moloch that video is 2 hours long. Since I am not Catholic will my watching it really contribute to the discussion. If you truly think it will I will watch it but I don't have time today. If you have already heard what Christians have to say, you could skip the Catholic parts and just listen to Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry... that should save you an hour (Christopher Hitchens starts at the 14 minute mark) Although some of his arguments are Catholic specific, Hitchens could have just as thoroughly ripped any Protestant denomination a new one... he's an amazing orator |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
