Top Definition
Religitard
The term used to describe a religious-retard who is closed to the views and opinions of others, and who also voices their own opinions as fact; whilst commiting crimes against human intelligence in the name of religion.
( henke37 ) Im a christian through and through, god owns you.
( scenestar ) I concur henke37, god is indeed ownage.
( lolage ) Damn religitards.
( xenon ) Religitards make baby seals cry.



2
religitard
A religious person, someone who does not know that the sole purpose of religion is to scam you out of your hard earned money in exchange for telling you whatever you want to hear about what will happen after you die.

The Catholic Church (as one example) has profited for nearly two millennia and continues to profit financially by making one feel guilty for ones biological urges and begging for any amount of money at every service they offer globally, even offering 'indulgences' in the middle ages, which amounted to being able to sin as long as you paid them for it afterward.

Is it pure coincidence that 'pray' and 'prey' are homonyms? How about 'prophet' and 'profit'?
(middle ages) peon: "Father I need forgiveness, last night I raped a 10 year old boy."

Priest: "Give me all your money and say two hail marys and you will be forgiven, my son."
peon: "I don't have any money."
Priest: "Give me all your livestock and say two hail marys."
peon: "But my family will starve to death."
Priest: "Then it's god's will. If you don't do this you'll roast in hell for all eternity!!1eleventeen"
--example of a religitard being taken advantage of by a priest

Your popcorn, with extra butter, is waiting for you in the BERNIE SANDERS, WEIRDO IN CHIEF thread...

What it mean is, "you're too much of a fool. Once you're out on those mean streets, you'll be eaten alive."

In other words: "Sorry, but you're too much of a sucker for a sob story. We don't have time to shake you out of your gullibility."

I'd more-or-less second that. Studies indicate that for practical matters, like business, an IQ of around 125 is the sweet spot. Many folks with higher IQs get hung up with logical consistency to the point of being "impractical." Also, they tend to be more foolish (gullible) than most because abstract thinking is more "real" to them than for ordinary folks. A shy-high IQ is great if you're the right person at the right time in a certain kind of right place: a tech-type boom. Bill Gates was at the start of one, and he sure did seize his chances. That's why he became a billionaire at the age of 29 - without the use of a single dime in long-term debt - instead of becoming a math professor or living off the million-dollar trust fund his dad had set up for him.

Warren Buffet once said, "Every I.Q. point above 125 is wasted." This from a fellow who got the only A+ from Benjamin Graham in the entire history of the class.

Now I know I'm generalizing: it's not that hard to find exceptions. Here's one that really stuck in my memory: according to the Mega Test, a test designed to flush out the ultra-high IQers, the "second-smartest man in America" as of 1985 was none other than John H. Sununu! It's pretty counterintuitive to find out that a man with an IQ arguably higher than Einstein's is the former governor of New Hampshire.

Given his achievements, I would guess that Trump would pull 140 or higher on Stanford-Binnet IQ tests.  That's not extremely unusual though.

GW Bush would probably do in excess of 120 by my estimation even after substance abuse took it's toll.  Probably somewhat higher before that.  He did learn how to fly a jet aircraft and got through school albeit with help from a powerful crime family pulling some strings.

I would say 'less'.  The simple reason is that it is a lot safer and easier to just continue to be a billionaire.  The promise of being made into a billionaire as pay-back for taking the risk and pain of being a 'leader' for a while will attract from a much wider group of people.  Many of them quite awful.

If I were 'designing' things, I would try to make sure that people who choose to go into government basically take an oath of poverty and forever give up their right to privacy.  I am pretty sure that there are as many 'leaders' as we need from a pool of people who would be willing to do so, and those who would take the helm under such conditions would be much more healthy for our society.

You’ve got to be shitting me…

This is literally money being taken out of the education budget in order to fund the promotion of religion.

Hey, please.  There's no need to push the hard sell, you know you are not convincing when you do that.

Just for fun, take a look at where you are wrong.  An IQ of 100 is not "Stupid," it is exactly "average."  "Talks at an IQ level of 100" is not equal to "has an IQ of 100," it simply means "attempts to communicate effectively with the average person."

Are we having fun now?  And not insulting anybody.  How about that?

Understand that being muslim is not a race, it's a religion. Therefore meaning, even if he said that he hated all muslim he still wouldn't be racist
...
Regardless of what he does, let's get the facts straight, being anti-muslim is not being racist