Well, no. I can't feel the been and never will. I consider myself to be fairly anti-communist, something Bernie is not.

Same in France, there is a minimum age...

Which I don't understand. Why? I bet I'd do a much better job than all those old stupid corrupted old faggs...

But doesn't really matter. People wouldn't vote for a young, it would seem too dangerous for them. much better to give power to the same old white rich man...

Lol,

Not exactly Moloch. You're talking about IQ but the map is talking about education. Not the same thing you know?

Well, socialists ideas are quite new in the USA.

And all candidates are fucking old. Don't know why people don't have the balls to vote for a 25/30 years old. He would be much better with lots of new ideas to deal with things.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-WKdGymBuA

i will not buy american food again

Bernie Sanders, who is not, in fact, a pot-smoking socialist, would nonetheless be proud of Vermont. As Reuters reports, the liberal-leaning state might become the first to legalize marijuana through legislation rather than through a voter initiative, as was the case in California, Colorado, Washington, and Alaska. In those four states (and Washington D.C.) voters put the issue on the ballot, but in Vermont, state representatives are set to vote on a bill passed by the Senate that would allow adults older than 21 to buy and smoke the drug beginning in 2018. The law would also prohibit residents from growing their own marijuana plants or selling edibles and would impose a 25 percent sales tax on the drug to fund state programs.

Voting on legalization this way "makes for a much more thoughtful and measured approach," State Senator Jeanette White, one of the bill's sponsors, told Reuters. "We got to work out the details, we got to ask the questions first and put the whole infrastructure in place before it happens." What's more, it would monetize a substance that a study reports one in eight Vermont residents (and one in three people ages 18 to 25) already use. "If it's one in eight, to me that tells me that society for the most part is accepting it," said Windham County sheriff Keith Clark. "If 12 or 13 percent of the population isn't being open with law enforcement when we're trying to investigate serious crimes, that's holding us back from working with our communities."

Of course the bill faces a certain amount of opposition, especially from House Republicans wary of legalization. Lawmakers have until May, when the current legislative session ends, to pass the bill.

Moloch,

You did such a good job predicting Michigan, what are your predictions for tonight's voting?

Seems it's NOT just the liberals and the left who hate him for it.

Very curious things going on now. 

If the berniebots believe the clinton machine won't do the same thing to them they are wrong...

NBC reporter Katy Tur has confirmed various local media sources’ initial reports that investigators in North Carolina may charge Trump with “inciting a riot” after the events of his Fayetteville Rally, according to the Cumberland County Sheriff’s office.

This is following one of the violent Trump rallies in which Trump supporter John Franklin McGraw beat a black protester to the ground and later threatened to kill him to the media.

“We are looking at the totality of these circumstances, including any additional charges against Mr. McGraw, including the potential of whether there was conduct on the part of Mr. Trump or the Trump campaign which rose to the level of inciting a riot,” Sheriff’s Office lawyer Ronnie Mitchell said to The Fayetteville Observer.

McGraw’s violence came after Trump demanded of his audience “Can’t we have a little more action than this?” in response to protesters. “See, in the good old days this didn’t use to happen, because they used to treat them very rough. We’ve become very weak.”

The violence has only escalated since this North Carolina attack, with protesters being beaten and pepper sprayed in Chicago and Kansas City. A pro-Trump “informal militia” has recently been formed to “protect” Trump supporters from protesters willing to “forcefully protect people if need be.”

How does atheism make sense for high IQ?

I thought that was the agnostic thing, you know like high IQ people without knowledge would assume agnostic until measurement with instrumentation occurs.

Or maybe it's about the laws of physics. Are you all atheist because of the laws of physics? How life of maximum nature isn't as "heavenly" as you want it thus everything goes to "not everything is possible" burn in hell instead?

I like how semi-smart people parade themselves around as smart while being effectively complete retards.

That's cool though that you think that around me. I didn't think my life was that godly either despite it being the thing.

You know what's poison? Me.

It makes sense though to put a bunch of NPCs around to keep the religion at bay, you know, so the religion has an offset for the life.

Whether or not that life is God is kind of... depends on how good of a life it needs to be to qualify as God. This life is probably more torture bear than God. Since it's max nature life of max nature shape it's kind of lacking in the other "perfect orientations".