Percentage wise Christians almost don't do this. But it is one of the major activities of gays.

For Christians it is a little mistake. For gays, it is a lifestyle.

part of the problem is u.n. agreements signed by federal gov'ts prohibiting it being legal, except under "controlled substances acts" , they have no choice now but to lower its classification, and foot drag, the biggest dr's group  in California will no longer testify as experts for federal govt eliminating the propaganda that's been peddled by big pharma over the years and the reefer madness crowd,   since Terry parker vs Regina in Canada (grand mal seizures stopped/for long periods of time to almost never) backed by 3 experts who testified they had no treatment that came close to being as effective) governments are forced to recognize legit uses for pot, now in mexico over last year or two a few cases have been won (at least 2) by non-pot smokers as having the human right to possess, grow and use pot, a few more cases (need 5) won and it really will allow that case to be made everywhere. Best way around all this is to appeal to U.N. to abolish all related prohibitions under human rights cases

Almost the only reason why anyone is an atheist is, he wants to be. Proof for God is all around us in nature, and is available in science, and is even available in the ways that atheists suggest that there is no God.

There might be slight chance that there is an honest atheist who isn't knowledgeable enough about science or nature to understand that God exists. But the knowledgeable people who suggest that they are atheists, do so simply because they think that they would like to be atheistic, at the same time that they know that atheism is completely incorrect.

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unpleasant impulses by denying their existence while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It can take the form of blame shifting.

According to some research, the projection of one's negative qualities onto others is a common process in everyday life.

Wallace asked Trump, "What evidence do you have, specific evidence, that the Mexican government is sending criminals across the border?"

Trump cited conversations with "border patrol people" who told him that it was true: "Our leaders are stupid, our politicians are stupid, and the Mexican government is much smarter, much sharper, much more cunning, and they send the bad ones over because they don't want to pay for them, they don't want to take care of them. Why should they, when the stupid leaders of the United States will do it for them?And that’s what’s happening, whether you like it or not."

I knew a junkie that said he flied every night on a horse through the skies.

One of the biggest surprises of his life was when he saw a horse at a time he wasn't high: it had no wings! This seems to be enough evidence that he was sincerely convinced that he indeed flied on a horse every night and was telling the truth.

Therefore, under the burden of evidence used by some of the believers that post on this thread, it seems that it's scientifically proven that flying horses do exist.

Oh please. You're an incompetent moron.

Yeah I just called you a fucking name. Why don't you read all my previous posts that I wrote. They all had points in which you could've provided rebuttals yet you didn't. I wonder why.

Maybe it's because you just want to suck ALL the money for yourself because you think that government will work better when it funds money to YOU. Sorry, that's not how it works.

Stop saying you know everything and no one knows anything and read a fucking history book. Everyone who lives with socialized medicine HATES it. Free college tuition is a joke. Socialism doesn't work.

This is the problem with leftists (because you hate it when I say liberal). You're all too fragile to handle a tough debate and need a safe space. All my posts were fine yet you rebutted them with shit saying I didn't know what I was talking about. Grow the fuck up.

Can't wait for Trump to win.

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.

The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e. "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.

This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery, entertaining "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or understanding both sides of the issue.

I must repeat this. GO TO VENEZUELA. GO TO CUBA. LIVE THERE. Let's see how much you like "Democratic Socialism" after you've been robbed of your soul after being there for less than a month.

The amount of bigotry, hypocrisy and double standards that exists inside of you Liberals is baffling.

Please quote any alleged personal attacks. As far as I can tell you aren't providing any evidence yourself, you are just producing more rhetoric. Why don't you try debating me instead of arguing with those guys? I noticed you haven't bothered to respond to anything I have said. Are you afraid you can't hang?

Edit: He sure got quiet pretty fast didn't he?

Socialism already lost and its capitalism's turn

Socialism is a FAILED system that has never proven to work, not once.

You are absolutely right The private central bank known as The Federal Reserve Bank destroyed the economy. You know who was a big proponent of central banks? Karl Marx. You don't even know the basis of your own ideologies.

So what you are telling me there are no Islamic banks which comply with the Muslim laws against usury?