https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YREZSZ1XPgAt first this seems a bit crazy, but I can see why they did it... It seems like a response to the recent legislation in NC, MS, and other states... NC, for example... passed a law in certain cities which allows trans-gender to use the restroom for whichever gender they identify with... In response, the state passed a law which repeals every anti-discrimination law that is not on the state level (basically, fuck you... you can't make a law that doesn't discriminate against gays)... forcing transgender to use the restroom of the gender they were born with (regardless of whether they currently have a penis or vagina) So, in response to the response, we'll just take all the signs off all the bathrooms... touchι motherfuckers
|
|
|
Here's the problem. People are religion creatures. If you took all religions away from all people, they would simply create more religions to fill the gaps. Even the few people who suggest that they don't have a religion, still do have a religion. Their religion is simply a religion of non-religion.
You can't get away from religion, and you really don't want to. When I say "you," I don't mean the general audience. I mean YOU, Nevis.
So if you believe people will just make up religions for some reason, you don't think there's "one true god"? +1 He basically just admitted all religions are man-made to fill the gaps in knowledge/understanding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps
|
|
|
If you go back to Genesis it mentions that their are other people outside of the garden. They were called son's of Gods, daughters of men, and the Nephilim.
http://www.crystalinks.com/nephilim.htmlIn the Hebrew Bible and several non-canonical Jewish and early Christian writings, nephilim means the fallen ones are a people created by the cross-breeding of the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men". The word nephilim is loosely translated as giants or titans in some Bibles, and is left untranslated in others.
The phrase "sons of God" is sometimes translated into English as "sons of gods". The Hebrew word, "Elohim", is a plural form... So yeah... Genesis 1:1 In the beginning [Elohim] created the heavens and the earth... If you have 1 demi-god father (Elohim) and 1 human mother... you get a Nephilim... basically, Jesus... There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
|
|
|
The birds have spoken
|
|
|
Trump SuperPAC Advisor Quits, Admits Candidacy Is a Jokehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y57q1PxvQSQAlmost a year ago, I sat in Trump Tower being told that the goal was to get "the Donald" to poll in double digits and come in second, that was it
|
|
|
i think anti god posting should be illegal and punishable too.
I think religion should be categorized as the mental disorder that it is... and religious people put in an insane asylum for their own protection Good thing nobody makes laws based on what you or I think, eh?
|
|
|
I only hate Muslims who support the following:
. The killing of apostates
. The stoning of adulterers
. Cutting the hands of thieves
. Throwing gays off rooftops
. Jailing or killing people who draw the prophet Mohammed
. Jailing or killing people who burn or otherwise destroy or deface the Qu'ran
. Attacking or harassing non-believers purely because they don't follow their faith
. Raping or enslaving non-believers
. Killing or jailing people who drink in public
. Circumcising children ( Chopping off bits of their genitals )
. Establishing Sharia Law within Democratic countries
If you're a Muslim and believe any of these things and think that you can only be a Muslim and believe in this bullshit, then of course I hate you, however if you're a Muslim and find these things horrendous and will do everything to stop this, then you're more than welcome.
Honestly, except for the part about Muhammad, the rest of that is all in the bible... Christians have the same texts... read them Most Muslims don't believe in raping or enslaving non-believers any more than Christians do... This evil shit is in the bible too, but you don't actually believe/follow it do you? FYI, Christians have their own equivalent of Sharia Law, and try to impose it on Americans daily... Anti-gay bigotry (previously slavery and segregation) Teaching religion/creationism/intelligent design in school Passing laws that let a person discriminate based upon "sincerely held religious beliefs" Exemptions for killing your child because you prayed to God instead of taking him to the hospital, etc...
|
|
|
Funny how the guy you claim is a "cuck"(sp) and a berniebot... is actually a Trump supporter... Standing next to mohawk man with the fabulous self-made Trump shirt... HAHAHAHA... he took a black marker and wrote "Trump is the best(?)" on his shirt!
|
|
|
The problem with encryption is it can be broken...
Apple had some hardware/software which erases the data after 10 failed login attempts
But, anything they add, can be removed... If you remove the software/hardware that does the deleting... you can proceed to brute force crack the password all day long
I assume this is what the FBI did...
It's like taking the platters out of a Hard Drive, and putting them in a new drive to read the data... you bypass the security
|
|
|
In Earth's history, CO2 levels have been above 8000 PPM... we are currently at 350 PPM and worried?!? WHY?
Maybe because the earth was very different then? And nowhere we want to go back to. I think its a complete scam to swindle tax-payers out of $20,000,000,000 every year (that's a lot of money for a claim with such poor evidence... like religion)
So you're saying scientists that look at the evidence are all in on it? Or incompetent? Maybe the 97% isn't accurate. But the vast majority agrees with anthropogenic climate change. Not saying your wrong but..97% might want to keep there jobs?All about the money.. But i am all for believing just in case the 97% are right..Car fumes are like smoking if we can quit then why not.. That assumes a conspiracy. That any scientist with evidence man made climate change isn't real wouldn't be hired anywhere else. Anywhere in the world. Hard to believe. Would need coordination and cooperation of too many people. And in very different countries. It only assumes a conspiracy if you are ignorant of the facts... The 97% claim is not based on all scientists, it is based on 73 hand-picked "climatologists"... Who are all paid by the IPCC... It's as much of a conspiracy as asking 73 priests if they believe God exists and 97% saying yes... The evidence for anthropogenic global warming is lacking... I do not need to prove it doesn't exist until you first prove it does exist... I am not making the positive claim and am not obliged to provide the burden of proof... A pseudo-consensus among 73 people on your payroll does not evidence make... In what field of science does a scientist's opinion/belief count as evidence/proof? Why must I prove gremlins don't exist when you haven't proven your claim that they do exist?
|
|
|
...feel free to stop responding rather than continuing to scream and shout, while tripping over your own logical fallacies and evidence-less (as well as sourceless) claims that seem to be primarily backed by the "I know, trust me" confirmation.
(I'm not trolling)
You are one to talk about "I know, trust me confirmation"... you keep making claims that I've never even heard another Christian make, without anything to back it up... I have provided numerous links and bible quotes to back up every claim I have made I think that anybody who advocates infinite punishment or infinite rewards for finite crimes and deeds is morally inferior. I think that anybody who is supposedly omniscient and omnipotent and omnibenevolent who creates a system knowing that people are not going to be able to live up to its standards, spends an eternity punishing them
and the only loophole that the creator of all the laws of the universe can come up with - why didnt he just forgive everybody or change the laws? - but instead he has to create a loophole where he comes down bodily and sacrifices himself to himself to act as a loophole for a rule that he created. Its absurd. It is laughably absurd. And its immoral.
|
|
|
You cannot possibly say you believe the creation story, flood, exodus and 10-commandments are 100% true and accurate, but the other 603 commandments in the Old Testament don't count... that's bullshit cherry-picking to the extreme The general consensus seems that it is not to be used for moral purposes , but more as a "prophecy" that was already fullfilled. As metaphors for creation of the universal system (governed by the laws of physics, chemistry, biology, etc.) and a conscious species within said system, the downfall due to conscious species' inability to control itself and then the humanity's search for purpose. I believe that part of it was either lost as history progressed (there isn't an original copy in existence, just a bunch of early copies) or lost in translation as it went through numerous people with different cultural backgrounds. Complete nonsense... General consensus?!? Where do you get that idea? Have you met other Christians before? There is no consensus about anything... Ever heard of a Fundamentalist? They take the bible literally... they absolutely believe the old testament is 100% literal, no metaphors at all... Who are you to decide what verses God meant to be literal vs metaphor? How do you claim any of it is metaphor? Do you speak for God? God writes literally, he does not claim anything is a metaphor in the entire bible... if you think it's a metaphor, that is your personal interpretation and you do not speak for God or all Christians... sorry... Also, in terms of the 10 commandments: This is love for God: to obey his commands. And his commands are not burdensome (1 John 5:3). The Ten Commandments were essentially a summary of the entire Old Testament law. Nine of the Ten Commandments are clearly repeated in the New Testament (all except the command to observe the Sabbath day). Obviously, if we are loving God, we will not be worshipping false gods or bowing down before idols. If we are loving our neighbors, we will not be murdering them, lying to them, committing adultery against them, or coveting what belongs to them. Source: http://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-law.htmlAlso complete nonsense... Do you seriously believe the 10-commandments are a summary of the entire Old Testament law?!?!? WTF do you get this crazy bullshit that no other Christian has ever said? Have you read the Old Testament? Are you familiar with the 613 laws? And you think the 10-commandments are a summary of the 613 laws?!? NO... NO... If you make me prove this to you... fuck you... you don't know shit and are not worthy of my time Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_commandments#Maimonides.27_listTo burn a city that has turned to idol worship Deut. 13:17 Not to rebuild it as a city Deut. 13:17 To circumcise all males on the eighth day after their birth Gen. 17:10 Not to slaughter an animal and its offspring on the same day Lev. 22:28 To cover the blood (of a slaughtered beast or fowl) with earth Lev. 17:13 To send away the mother bird before taking its children Deut. 22:6 To release the mother bird if she was taken from the nest Deut. 22:7 To wear tefillin (phylacteries) on the head Deut. 6:8 To bind tefillin on the arm Deut. 6:8 To put a mezuzah on the door post Deut. 6:9 Each male must write a Torah scroll Deut. 31:19 The king must have a separate Torah scroll for himself Deut. 17:18 The courts must carry out the death penalty of stoning Deut. 22:24 A judge must not have mercy on the poor man at the trial Lev. 19:15 Appoint a king from Israel Deut. 17:15 Not to appoint a foreigner Deut. 17:15 The king must not have too many wives Deut. 17:17 The king must not have too many horses Deut. 17:16 The king must not have too much silver and gold Deut. 17:17
Yeah, sounds exactly like the 10-commandments...
|
|
|
http://www.nj.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2016/03/bernies_yearning_bernie_sanders_ice_cream.htmlBernie Sanders ice cream is now a reality, thanks to Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, founders of Ben & Jerry's.
Called "Bernie's Yearning," the ice cream which Cohen describes on BerniesYearning.com, a website devoted to his support of Sanders for president is mint, topped with what he calls "a thick disc of solid chocolate, which represents the huge majority of economic gains that have gone to the top one percent."
While the company is not selling the ice cream, Cohen and Greenfield are giving away samples of the flavor in free sundaes today in New York City's Union Square, Gothamist reports.
Sanders, who has long represented Vermont home to Ben & Jerry's headquarters as a United States senator, recently tried the ice cream flavor on "The View."
Bernie's Yearning, a flavor in which 'all the chips have gone up to the top,' symbolizes the divide between the 99 percent and the one percent in America. (Ben Cohen/YouTube) Print Email Amy Kuperinsky | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com By Amy Kuperinsky | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com Email the author | Follow on Twitter on March 31, 2016 at 5:17 PM, updated March 31, 2016 at 5:25 PM
Bernie Sanders ice cream is now a reality, thanks to Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, founders of Ben & Jerry's.
Called "Bernie's Yearning," the ice cream which Cohen describes on BerniesYearning.com, a website devoted to his support of Sanders for president is mint, topped with what he calls "a thick disc of solid chocolate, which represents the huge majority of economic gains that have gone to the top one percent."
While the company is not selling the ice cream, Cohen and Greenfield are giving away samples of the flavor in free sundaes today in New York City's Union Square, Gothamist reports.
Sanders, who has long represented Vermont home to Ben & Jerry's headquarters as a United States senator, recently tried the ice cream flavor on "The View."
"Excellent! Really good," he said. "And I'm not just saying that because it's Bernie's Yearning."
Cohen gave away 40 pints made in his home kitchen to those who entered a drawing.
"It's essentially mint chocolate chip ice cream, but all the chips have gone up to the top," Cohen said in a YouTube video. "That's where all the money is. And below it is nothing." Like Sanders, both Ben & Jerry's founders, who sold the company to Unilever in 2000, live in Vermont but were born in Brooklyn and grew up in New York. Greenfield also sells lit Bernie Sanders campaign signs via the Bernie's Yearning website.
The look of the flavor chocolate melting down to a creamy base inspired Cohen to come out with limited edition "Bernie's Bowls." Anyone who wants one can enter to win a bowl on the site.
|
|
|
So, you are claiming that although the bible condones slavery, it was "the good kind of slavery"? That's your defense? My defense in said post is that the bible regulates the situation back then (when slavery was common), however expressed no support of the act of enslavement. Where is the support for this? You claim it's in the bible, but it's not... slavery in the bible is very cruel and quite descriptive... it included things like, "you are allowed to beat your slave so long as he does not die within 2 days" That's Old Testament. When referring to the Christian bible, the New Testament is implied. The Old Testament was meant for the time before the coming of Christ (which by those practicing Judaism is THE bible since they don't consider Jesus as the son of God and are still waiting for one (the reason for 2 religions - Christianity and Judaism - instead of one)). I already linked it in this post but here's a rather brief explanation in regards to the Old Testament: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1412734.msg14336544#msg14336544That's the dumbest argument christians have ever made... This whole notion of the New Testament overwriting the Old Testament is complete horseshit nonsense that is not supported anywhere in the bible or dogma of christianity You cannot possibly say you believe the creation story, flood, exodus, and 10-commandments are 100% true and accurate, but the other 603 commandments in the Old Testament don't count... that's bullshit cherry-picking to the extreme Besides, Jesus himself said, "Not a jot or tittle of the Law will change until I return" (speaking of Mosaic law, the Old Testament laws!) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
|
|
|
Christianity has also preached that slavery is lawful and not a bad thing... in both the old and new testament Since, I'm rather bored to wait, I'll get the Wikipedia mention on the New Testament out of the way. It is said in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slavery: In several Pauline epistles, and the First Epistle of Peter, slaves are admonished to obey their masters, "as to the Lord, and not to men". However, masters were told to serve their slaves "in the same way" and "even better" as "brothers", to not threaten them as God is their Master as well. First of all, I've looked at the passages that refer to this: In several Pauline epistles, and the First Epistle of Peter, slaves are admonished to obey their masters, "as to the Lord, and not to men" And all the passages linked, the translation in several English versions seems to use the word "servant" rather than "slave", which could be both interpreted as lost in translation (beneficial to your side) and as to cover (regulate, not approve of ) slavery back in the day of Christ (which was a common practice at the time) as well as the current voluntary employment. There is however no positive (a.k.a. reinforcing) mention of the act of enslavement. From what I can logically deduct, said writings were meant to address the status quo, rather than encourage the act of slavery (taking new slaves). This view is also reinforced taking in consideration the following part of the quote: However, masters were told to serve their slaves "in the same way" and "even better" as "brothers", to not threaten them as God is their Master as well. FINALLY!!! something with a tiny bit of substance (albeit completely wrong) So, you are claiming that although the bible condones slavery, it was "the good kind of slavery"? That's your defense? Where is the support for this? You claim it's in the bible, but it's not... Slavery in the bible is very cruel and quite descriptive... it includes things like, "you are allowed to beat your slave so long as he does not die within 2 days", and "you can pass your slaves to your children as property"... how can you defend either of those? Slavery: As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are around you. You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with you and their clans that are with you, who have been born in your land, and they may be your property. You may bequeath them to your sons after you to inherit as a possession forever. You may make slaves of them, but over your brothers the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another ruthlessly. When a man strikes his slave, male or female, with a rod and the slave dies under his hand, he shall be avenged. But if the slave survives a day or two, he is not to be avenged, for the slave is his property.
|
|
|
Are you ready to debate slavery in the bible, or are you still trolling as if you won some fictitious argument that never happened?
|
|
|
|