Really, having a blackjack token will really be great fun for the community and network a lot has been expected and from the look of things blackjack fun team is busy right now cooking up something big for their community, as the wait for the updated new version of their platform is underway a lot of new and incredible features are expected and if the team choose to create their token along the line, that will help to build their ecosystem.

oeleo loves to go to extremes to then explain away why he thinks he should not care about real world things..

Personally, I think making mixers illegal would have a tremendously positive effect on this forum.  It would likely cut down on wannabe scammers, spam, and harassment from bored signature spammers looking to stir up drama for more reasons to post. 

There are privacy coins people can use already.  Tangling Bitcoin up with money laundering and defending it so you can make a couple bucks to spam here while pretending it's a privacy issue seems pretty selfish to me.

I think it is a design of Web3 casino. You control your keys, you control your tokens. You will have to connect your wallet to Owl games site, give it access to your coins and here you go to be able for betting.

I want to know how to do it too. Did not care about Bitcoin deposit so your question reminds me about that. Previously I only use tokens to play games at Owl.games.

There’s an option to signup using email when you click the connect button. They will require to provide user id and email address to create account. Your password will be sent to your email and you can change it on the in game option. I’m currently using email address on my account to make sure that I can recover it just in case my wallet got hack.

I agree that it always better to make a good DCA strategy for trading. I also agree that there is no specific dip on trading and you have know that Dip , buy and sell amd hold these all are the part of DCA strategy. Now if one wants to trade for long term then he must buy and hold at good dip and for that also there is a long term dca strategy. You will see how bitcoin holders are profited. Buy in the dip and hodl word for the long-term traders.

It could be also implemented as a skill based game if the casino somehow manages to turn the game into a contest against other playes, like Poker is.

That way it could be a skill based game and do not translate to losses to the casino but rather to the player who plays the worst.

Trader applies strategies to conduct trading business. Here those strategies often fail because those may not have been adjusted with time. But there is one strategy that is always effective is to buy low and sell high. But there is no specific limit to the dip. It is better to buy from a possible stage by doing market analysis on the other you can buy it from any bear market which is currently on going.

A first shooter game like CS where every user can join a server and get paid for every user he got. I'm not sure if there is something like this yet but it might just be fun.

I saw a play-to-earn game like this bit it's about ranking wich user fights for thier rank because everyone who ranks up to 200 will be rewarded with the revenue-sharing program.

Bitcoin is likely to dip below $20k soon,

The stocks market have been pulling up recently while Bitcoin is now acting a lot weaker than the SP500 and the stock market. So you need to trade carefully. But it's still a buying opportunity in my opinion. If NASDAQ go down 2-3% this week, Bitcoin might go for a Small Splash.

you love the word gaslighting. but you have no clue.
try to do your own research and stop relying on buddies/peoples teachings..
funny part is i am the one that provides actual data from actual sources of actual things that are actually related.
its your buddies that just quote another buddy who quotes another buddy all with similar mindsets as their "sources". which makes them the gaslighters

go check the FATF policies
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Updated-Guidance-VA-VASP.pdf
heck i even linked them to your lil buddy group. heck i even sumarising a few paragraphs of importance to them.. i even made them colourful to really show the things in a way that might tempt them to read..
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409206.msg60729993#msg60729993
(its in blue)
and guess what..
the FATF do mention about layered networks promoted as scaling solutions but used as privacy enhancing tools.. so yep FATF are well aware of LN


..
i know your buddies are whispering to you to ignore regulations. dont do research and try to stroke your head back to sleepy land of utopian dreams that LN is the best thing ever and regulators dont know about LN.. all becasue one of their buddies told them so they should tell you that your in a good place with them

but your wrong
to save another if trying to battle your buddies groups ignorance. ill just repeat myself in the same post giving you 2 oppertunities to be brave and do the research by checking
something that is diferent to what your buddies have told you
 
here i picked out just some of the hundreds of things in the wall of text policy(your buddies never read walls of text so i know they did not read the FATF regulations)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409206.msg60729993#msg60729993
the blue writing will show you that they know of LN and they consider these 'layering systems' and 'scaling solutions' that are promoted as privacy tools as suspect and red flag triggers

HENSE why i said stop advertising things as "privacy enhancing" and instead call a new smart contract network (with less flaws as LN has) a "property rights" network
then you will have more legal bases to defend against certain things. while then offering a feature that still (without mentioning it) does the functions you need

its called being smart. to find the loop holes of regulations. like how uber disrupted the taxicab industry without calling themselves a taxi service

rather then pretending regulations are not real and then advertising things as the very thing regulators are watching out for/actioning against

---

this topic is about the topic creator wanting to do a function without it being easily spotted as doing that function..
i gave actual advice..
the certain few people  of a certain group however.. are just saying "dont worry just use a service publicly promoted as doing the function"
(facepalm).. thus they are the ones giving bad advice

LOYCE..
you are kind of realising things. but afraid to step over the line and go against your buddies rhetoric.

the feature of a service that gives out change for a meter. is not regulation red flag.. because.. wait for it.. i think you know. but if not take a seat and wait for it.. [drum role]:

although the function is the same.. ITS NOT ADVERTISED as a mixer. its not promoting itself as a privacy enhancing tool..

get the idea yet? the loop hope i was talking about you guys seem to not get

stop advertising that people should use things defined as mixers, knowing that the use of mixers are the things that get people on watchlists

become smarter. start a new smart contract network without the LN flaws/bugs and bottlenecks.. dont advertise it as a privacy tool. call it a property rights protection network. (secretly it can function to swap coins between users without being on a ledger) and dont advertise it as a mixer/privacy enhancing tool. and so regulations are then not going to go after it.

yep a service giving change for a meter would be red flagged if it continued doing the same service. but started calling itself a privacy enhancing tool/mixer/tumbler(all the keywords of regulation red flags)

its not red flagged because its not advertised as such..
.. simple

For sure, I am not going to presume to know how long our current consolidation might last, if we might get lower BTC prices from here, or how far lower any such dip might go. 

You are correct Wind_FURY that this whole down market could last into 2023.. and sure it could last anywhere between another day and another 18 months, so in that regard, there can be quite a bit of uncertainty regarding how much time that any of us has to stack up on sats at these prices and potentially lower BTC prices.

Of course, many of you realize (including you Wind_FURY) that I emphasize buying rather than HODLing, and for sure HODLing would be the second best scenario in the event that you do not have any money left to buy, and I do realize, as Wind_FURY mentioned, that there are going to be quite a few current bitcoiners (HODLers/Newbies) who could well get shaken out of their coins in the coming months as long as the BTC price does not go up from here...   Yet this way of thinking about the future presumes either that BTC prices are going down from here, or the amount of up (perhaps flat) that we get from here, will not be enough to inspire confidence in continuing to HODL whatever BTC that the current HODLers happen to have... These could be signs of either being over-invested or just NOT having enough conviction in regards to having had bought BTC in recent times and likely being in the negative for a decent amount of time while bills are coming due and fear continues to linger about whether the BTC price is going to go up from here at any point in time in the near future.

I'm more than that: There's absolutely no sign from governments and AML services that a Wasabi CoinJoin is the holly grail of bitcoin outputs. Just because they've hired one chain analysis company to tell them which outputs they've analyzed completely shadily and non-transparently, and have reached the conclusion that are likely, according to their undisclosed measures, to be suspicious, it doesn't mean the rest of the world thinks likewise.

I honestly don't know how it works,

don't know how reliable that was,

and neither how they identified that the outputs come from Tornado Cash. I have never used Ethereum.

I'm afraid they'll just block lots of transactions, some of which are going to be "illegal", and leave it there. You can't know for sure they've avoided sanctioning, but they're doing fine so far by bootlicking the authorities' beloved analysis company.

What the fuck. Truly untainted, based on who? By default, every output is "truly untainted", because bitcoins are fungible. That's what we're saying pages now.

No. If 10 out of the 300 inputs that are used in CoinJoin are "tainted" according to the chain analysis company, they can't file a lawsuit to every user who's part of the CoinJoin, that's just nonsense. Zero protection there. That's probably why they're implementing blacklisting in the first place.

You're going off-topic again. Show me what protection do the users gain. The ability to send money to anti-privacy and pro-censorship services that treat bitcoin as non-fungible and enforce claptrap rules is irrelevant.

shower with some soap thought

locking funds up. and then using said references to then do some offchain swaps where the utxo to unlock of someone elses (random person) then goes to you. is better than spamming the network with traditional mixer span..
.. but if you then advertise that other network(LN) as a privacy enhancing tool (like regulators already recognise LN as a privacy enhancing tool) still gets all the locks to LN  red flagged
yep all them locks listed on 1ml are red flagged as suspicious.

so you would need to create a whole new smart contract network. NOT advertise it as a privacy enhancing network (while physically ensuring you dont ask for info that breaks privacy) but where the other network facilitates legitimate usage and more then just a niche things. oh and also where the routing/payment process does not require a gossip policy to publicly displaying fund locks as part (because yea thats not actually privacy in the first place) to ensure its not super easy to know which locks are tied to LN channels.. because yea common sense..
a network advertising itself as a privacy tool but by default publicly gossips all the utxo's linked to its network references of channels.. is not really then private

Gamblers prefer games that can be won easily compared to challenging games because of the small chance of games that are difficult to win, so it doesn't matter if the game will be boring but can get passive advantage from games that are easy to play, but because it includes dice games, the team will update resource game for hard-to-win levels with high bets.

Mixers that mix bitcoin without letting it be obvious that it came from a mixer?

They will have more surprising things in the upcoming version. Hopefully, we will see the update sooner. It's delaying but we know late is always better than never. The team is very hard working. In the near future, I hope this will be bigger than Top

Lightening network is not what much casinos are in a look after and same is applicable to the gamblers as well, using a lightening network is by far a better option as long as the conditions warrant such which will help the payment system more faster and to cover as mny as possible transactions within a shortest time but users will always prefer using their altcoins in gambling because they have some varieties of them which are mostly supported by the casino they use.

I do think that it is highly because of the nature of the game itself.

Unlike other card games such as blackjack, etc., they fairly end quickly and the process is relatively simple compared to the techniques involved in poker. In addition, poker is one of those card games that mix luck, skill, and technique in order for you to win the game. Either you win due to the overwhelming card quality that you have on the pool, or because you bluffed the opponent even if your hand is bad.