Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 01:04:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 »
2481  Other / Off-topic / Re: How much time have you logged into bitcointalk forum? on: August 16, 2011, 09:38:04 PM
Total time logged in: 20 days, 4 hours and 10 minutes.
Oh, it's ON now!
My 19 days, 16 hours and 4 minutes WILL defeat you!
2482  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: I admit to being a scammer, and having multiple accounts. on: August 16, 2011, 08:34:20 PM
Ordinarily, you'd be right on, however in this particular instance you're mistaken. The OP is not only a minor but has no previous history of fraud as far as I have found.
That is incorrect. The only reason you haven't found evidence of previous fraud is because he paid off the person he scammed before and threatened legal action for it to be taken down.

When you say "paid off", do you mean the money was returned to them? I'm curious how long ago this was.

I have PM'd you the info, to protect Jake's privacy.
2483  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: I admit to being a scammer, and having multiple accounts. on: August 16, 2011, 08:14:34 PM
Ordinarily, you'd be right on, however in this particular instance you're mistaken. The OP is not only a minor but has no previous history of fraud as far as I have found.
That is incorrect. The only reason you haven't found evidence of previous fraud is because he paid off the person he scammed before and threatened legal action for it to be taken down.
2484  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Feature request: RPC command to get the estimated txfee / block negative txs... on: August 16, 2011, 08:21:26 AM
This recent post by Gavin should summarize the current state of the code you are requesting:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37126.msg456222#msg456222
2485  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Projected BitCoin difficulty drop on: August 16, 2011, 04:56:51 AM
Looks like someone reset the poll (was 8 yes, 0 no), so I've re-opened the poll for the next difficulty change.
2486  Other / Off-topic / Re: Bank Of America lied about being FDIC insured on: August 16, 2011, 04:20:27 AM
It doesn't really matter, since the FDIC insurance itself is a lie.
2487  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Pascazi Scores +1, Internets Are Anonymous No More on: August 16, 2011, 03:38:18 AM
Let's fix that for SEO purposes....
Michael Pascazi is a scammer
2488  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Diablo III replace Real-money ah with BTC on: August 16, 2011, 03:17:47 AM
So Diablo 3 is implementing a real-money auction house. Someone discuss with blizzard to replace with BTC ;p
Give me a well-written proposal and I'll pass it on. In this proposal, I'd like to see sites like bit-pay and btcinch mentioned, as they are great examples of BTC to USD processing.

Do you know someone at Blizzard? Higher up or eng? I feel this will be a C-Level/board type decision, an agreement reached by both Activision and Blizzard. Tongue
Yes. I have PR contacts as well as some Battle.net engineers. I realize that I won't be able to reach the people who would make this decision directly, but I suspect that I have the best contacts out of everyone here. There's only one person outside of Blizzard that I know has more contacts than me, and I'm personal friends with them.
2489  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Diablo III replace Real-money ah with BTC on: August 16, 2011, 02:46:36 AM
So Diablo 3 is implementing a real-money auction house. Someone discuss with blizzard to replace with BTC ;p
Give me a well-written proposal and I'll pass it on. In this proposal, I'd like to see sites like bit-pay and btcinch mentioned, as they are great examples of BTC to USD processing. I'd also like the ability for gamers to spend their processing power to make Bitcoins mentioned as a main reason why they should support BTC.
2490  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So, did the people who whined about early adopters buy cheap BTC? on: August 15, 2011, 10:28:34 PM
Maged - I don't know what the exact number is, but since you said it isn't true, you must know?
It seems that 1.5 million might be accurate after all, if we assume that the rate Satoshi mined the first 10 blocks was representative of his total hashing power. What I find interesting, however, is that mining speeds slowly dropped from that initial speed during the first few months. I almost wonder if Satoshi pulled a Satoshi and foresaw this very issue. It's quite possible that he slowly pulled out of mining in order to spread the wealth.
2491  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So, did the people who whined about early adopters buy cheap BTC? on: August 15, 2011, 06:00:59 PM
The 1.5 million BTC that Satoshi holds now...
Where is that number coming from? It simply isn't true.
Or maybe it's just me.  Can someone please explain the lack of relationship I mentioned above, without resorting to "Satoshi designed the system so he/she deserves those coins," or, "whiners be hatin'," or, "RALLY!!!, etc."?  In fact let's make it really clean by leaving miners/investors out completely-- I just want to know why Bitcoin is designed this way.

This is actually a very simple question to answer. This design allowed to solve bootstrap problem, also known as catch 22 or chicken and egg problem.

i.e. it is not a bug it is a feature as are many other properties of bitcoin.
This. It was needed in order to make Bitcoin irresistible to people early on. Without it, we wouldn't have nearly as many people today, ESPECIALLY MINERS. Thanks to an ever-increasing difficulty, it applied the very important "BUY(mine) NOW!!!" rule of advertising. If you knew that you could make the same tomorrow as you could today, would you be in that much of a hurry to secure the Bitcoin network? Even if the only thing we wouldn't have had much of today was miners, we'd be screwed. Bitcoin was officially attacked a few months ago. If it wasn't for the inflated security of the Blockchain that was caused by keeping the block reward the same, Bitcoin would have been successfully destroyed, instead of a few Bitcoin-related sites.
2492  Other / Off-topic / Re: How much time have you logged into bitcointalk forum? on: August 15, 2011, 06:12:25 AM
19 days, 9 hours and 11 minutes. Which explains why I was made a mod  Undecided
2493  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Scammed by Ryanwebber/Zem? Come here. on: August 15, 2011, 06:04:29 AM
Damn this is annoying, apparently I can't edit a post with a scammer tag.

The rest of you making claims here I need wallet addresses.
I added this to your OP:
"Be sure to include a wallet address for the Bitcoins to be returned to, if that was how you paid."
2494  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why so many OP codes are disabled? on: August 15, 2011, 04:34:08 AM
If I understand correctly: if I want an OP code to be re-enabled, I'll have to make it secure
You'll also have to mathematically prove it.
2495  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Scammed by Ryanwebber/Zem? Come here. on: August 15, 2011, 04:19:48 AM
is this the ryanwebber from florida that posted the scam listing for 2x 6990? if it is, i would like my money please

You were never scammed by these two accounts. Nice try though.
too many scammers on here with too many accounts, i can't keep track of them all. how do i know ur not the same guy? other dude also scammed me of 2 6990, and is also from florida.

btw, why are you helping this RyanWebber make everything right? he's the one that scammed people, why don't he take some responsibility and make thing right himself.
You were scammed by Leon. Here's the thread if you forgot:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=29636.0
2496  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: I admit to being a scammer, and having multiple accounts. on: August 15, 2011, 04:11:34 AM
I just wanted to admit that yes, I would have kept going if Theymos didn't message me, or didn't rack up a ton of evidence.
Ha! I just realized what that evidence was. I didn't make the connection until I looked over my PM history, though.
2497  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why so many OP codes are disabled? on: August 15, 2011, 02:44:29 AM
gmaxwell's post addresses that point.
2498  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Lost Savings Wallet Addresses?! on: August 15, 2011, 02:24:36 AM
The sad part about this story is that, even though he securely deleted the wallet, we now know that there's most likely still some remnant there that can be recovered with today's wallet recovery technology. Only a full wipe of a drive can permanently destroy a wallet.
2499  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why so many OP codes are disabled? on: August 15, 2011, 01:06:08 AM
This thread answers some of your questions:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28861.0
2500  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mt.Gox: How Long Does Verification Take? Its been 10 days on: August 14, 2011, 09:13:18 PM
this guy called "magicalTux" on this thing called "irc" can fix your problem in like 10 minutes i hear.

I know this isn't what you want to do, but you can try contacting MagicalTux on IRC when they wake up in a few hours.
irc://freenode/mtgox
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=mtgox

Both would be great advice if I hadn't sent him Query's for the past few days  Grin
Are you sending them during Japanese business hours?
Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!