This guys works as a contractor for places lie NASA, the FBI, etc, he can't have his name thrown around this shit site
But he told YOU, one of the least trusted member on this forum, who he is? Also, I'm rather sure no bitcoin dev works with an fed agency  And you guys can't vote to take my coin away. I paid for it, it is my property. Are you people stupid. That's theft.
Hey, lets vote to take bitcoin away from the current owners.
Actually anybody can All it requires is majority of people following you Surely plenty of people would follow you |
|
|
|
Why did you lie?
Answer: cause your mother is a fat ugly cow. Still wondering why people make fun of you and doesn't trust you? Do a majority of the people on this thread want the repo returned to Vlad's control/ownership?
-MarkM-
Definitely not me Eat him, r3! |
|
|
|
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut up Idiot, shut your gash. Not until you answer to this Seriously do you realise how what you say is dumb?  |
|
|
|
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut up Idiot, shut your gash. Not until you answer to this Seriously do you realise how what you say is dumb? ANSWER ME VLAD!1. SHUT UP FFS! I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded! from the beginning this coins has been botched up in every way and all the blame was put on me even though I did everything in my power as right as could be. I've been warning anyone who knows how to program, all night tonight, but nobody cares cause they see this coin is gaining traction 2. Do you really think that if the hijacker make a hard fork, keeping your wallet in a cold wallet would help?? I'm unplugging my laptop even though my wallet is encrypted and I'm behind a mother of all firewalls cause I had enough NUGs stolen from me, I can't lose the little I have left for bounties.
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.' "The fork is not done right. It will take away everyones nuggets the way it was done. It was a hijack, not a fix, and I am not sure why markm is not expressing it as such. See how they changed the readme to something like 'all your nuggets are belong to us'.
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer? 5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name! I found a PhD programmer who actually worked on the original Bitcoin code
Answer: Your fat ugly mom. QFP |
|
|
|
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut up Idiot, shut your gash. Not until you answer to this Seriously do you realise how what you say is dumb? ANSWER ME VLAD!1. SHUT UP FFS! I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded! from the beginning this coins has been botched up in every way and all the blame was put on me even though I did everything in my power as right as could be. I've been warning anyone who knows how to program, all night tonight, but nobody cares cause they see this coin is gaining traction 2. Do you really think that if the hijacker make a hard fork, keeping your wallet in a cold wallet would help?? I'm unplugging my laptop even though my wallet is encrypted and I'm behind a mother of all firewalls cause I had enough NUGs stolen from me, I can't lose the little I have left for bounties.
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.' "The fork is not done right. It will take away everyones nuggets the way it was done. It was a hijack, not a fix, and I am not sure why markm is not expressing it as such. See how they changed the readme to something like 'all your nuggets are belong to us'.
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer? 5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name! I found a PhD programmer who actually worked on the original Bitcoin code
|
|
|
|
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut up |
|
|
|
Actually all the coins will be lost as the repo-guy changed the subsidy of block 1
Again that is only in the repo. Each miner gets to choose whether to run that code or a version they prefer. Does the blackmailer have enough hashing power to catch up to the currently running blockchain? Even if so, is he or she going to spend that much hashing power on doing so? -MarkM- if this new code becomes the accepted chain. |
|
|
|
So far there still does not seem to be any hijacking happening, the chain still seems to be rolling smoothly along with the fix that was published way back before block 250 first happened... Is there any sign that block 250 happened more than once?
-MarkM-
The change, can't really call it a fix, was put into the repo two days ago it looks like. Pretty sure that was long after block 250. But was anyone even using the repo by then? Due to all the drama is seems more likely everyone either shut down to wait for the dust to settle or put the fix published in the thread into their copy of the code and ran with that fix, which was available to them right here in the thread long before block 250. Would you sit there running broken code that come block 250 was not going to give you any lucky blocks to wait for some purportedly evil github-repo-maintainer to get around to merging the patch into the github, or just go ahead with what the founder wanted regardless of the procratinations of the purportedly evil repo-guy? Maybe by block 250 all nodes running old broken code had already shut down? -MarkM- I never ran the code, so no I guess I would not have run it. However some people did, and whoever has coins after the new code hits the first superblock will lose them if this new code becomes the accepted chain. Actually all the coins will be lost as the repo-guy changed the subsidy of block 1 |
|
|
|
Great  Good luck |
|
|
|
Needs more dramah. Whoever controls the github repo:  Deleting the repo would lower the drama IMO |
|
|
|
A binary for what platform?
The github already stated non intent/ability to compile for Windows. Do you think they are using Mac, maybe?
-MarkM-
For all platforms Who 'they'? The hijacker can compile and put links in readme.md Maybe he is a Tor user, so that neither this forum nor github knows his actual IP address, so he feels untouchable?
I kinda hope this is the case just so that this entertaining drama can continue. Implying Vlad actually did anything |
|
|
|
But no one, except maybe the blackmailer, is running that code. All the nodes actually running seemed to be running the version I quoted in my previous post. Though as soon as he gets this new code he has on github now compiled and running maybe I will finally start to see conflicting nodes out there... his. -MarkM- Yes I was only wondering about his client I hope he'll fix it before releasing a binary |
|
|
|
this should be in advertising
Agreed OP please move it |
|
|
|
Man I was drinking, you owe me a monitor |
|
|
|
The guy is fast Nuggets (NUG)
ALL YOUR NUGGETS ARE BELONG TO US
This project does not belong anymore to fuckers and computer illiterates. Post your suggestions in the Nuggets thread. I will not answer but I will take them into account.
I do not have Windows so that would be great if a person builds a binary each time a new version comes.
The old version will be replaced soon. The new version will have 0 premine and a working block reward algorithm.
Donations: 1Nw7oXGui4Y551v3wAbvT3vCzDY2NPuYuB No more premine, this lead to the old blockchain be incompatible with… …
… newer clients
nuggets-project authored 5 minutes ago
I still have you blackmail letter. Now you're trying to squirm your way out of it. You touch my coin and I will press charges for back mail. You will pay dearly. MY blackmail? What the hell? |
|
|
|
ANSWER ME VLAD!1. SHUT UP FFS! I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded! from the beginning this coins has been botched up in every way and all the blame was put on me even though I did everything in my power as right as could be. I've been warning anyone who knows how to program, all night tonight, but nobody cares cause they see this coin is gaining traction 2. Do you really think that if the hijacker make a hard fork, keeping your wallet in a cold wallet would help?? I'm unplugging my laptop even though my wallet is encrypted and I'm behind a mother of all firewalls cause I had enough NUGs stolen from me, I can't lose the little I have left for bounties.
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.' "The fork is not done right. It will take away everyones nuggets the way it was done. It was a hijack, not a fix, and I am not sure why markm is not expressing it as such. See how they changed the readme to something like 'all your nuggets are belong to us'.
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer? 5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name! I found a PhD programmer who actually worked on the original Bitcoin code
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
