1901
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What would happen to bitcoin if someone went ahead with a 51% attack?
|
on: September 07, 2013, 12:58:05 PM
|
It does not take if you have 0% - 1% or 90% of the bitcoins. What matters is if you have more than 51% of the mining power. Miners are accepting transactions. It is a decentralized currency. If you have more than 51% of the power, you can freely choose which transactions can proceed or not. No matter if the owner of the bitcoins wants to send them or not. You can do whatever you want, because you are the majority. That's like if you got 51% of the voting power, you can choose the president, no matter what.
There is some option to reduce the risk of 51% attack, you can do some research about it.
You really don't have a clue what is a 51% attack...
|
|
|
1906
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: 25LC reward,,,,lost wallet.dat
|
on: September 07, 2013, 09:52:45 AM
|
File deleted or formatted HD? If NTFS, GetDataBack for NTFS. If FAT32, GetDataBack for FAT. If ext3 or 4, get http://www.deftlinux.net/, it has some file recovery tools. ============================================================ YES !! I reformatted the drive then remembered I had the wallet on that PC. <headbang> Think it may work? 1. What kind of format did you do? (Standard, Gutmann, etc.) 2. Did you reinstall your OS or anything on your HDD after you formatted it? Yes, I did simple format that is on my WIN7 dvd. And yes again that same drive was reloaded with win7. Thanks for the replies everyone If you're very lucky, your wallet.dat could still be uncorrupted. Don't install anything, don't download anything. I used the Stellar recovery program to recover some of my lost files in the past. http://www.stellarinfo.com/ Hopefully Win7 or any other programs you installed didn't already overwrite your wallet file. The problem is that if it is partly corrupted you can either recover an unreadable file or even not recover the file at all Whereas pywallet looks for private keys, not files
|
|
|
1907
|
Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.1.37
|
on: September 06, 2013, 06:35:48 PM
|
Thanks for the suggestions! 1/ I know... It was planned but I started to lack time before I had the chance to do it. 2/ That's great. That makes me think that would be cool to make "auto load next page", like with google image. For threads or whatever. I'll look at both when I have some time. 3/ Ok, why not. If nobody's against I'll change that in the next update.
By the way guys: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-securityI'll (try to) implement a system replacing SSL in the server. Would this be an overkill for a tiny script like BT++? Absolutely. The idea behind that is more selfish, it's to develop and debug such a system. This would be opt-in of course.
I'll implement a pic uploading form right in the bitcointalk pages See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=288728.0
|
|
|
1908
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Will the US strike against Syria cause a world war?
|
on: September 06, 2013, 06:22:03 PM
|
It could cascade into a world war.
The US says "Hey, chemical weapons are bad!", so they lob some missiles at Syria. Russia says "Hey, US, mind your own business!" and starts lobbing missiles at US targets. China says "Hey, US, mind your own business, and by the way the South China sea belongs to us", and they start lobbing missiles at US targets and invade Malaysia. India then says "WTF are you doing, China, that's disrupting our supply routes" and they start lobbing missiles into China. Then Pakistan says "mind your own business, India, and by the way, the northern part of India should be ours anyway", so they invade India. Then some central African nation will join the US side, but their neighbor will take the opposite side and so they will start fighting. So on and so forth, until everybody is fighting.
I love that way of describing things
|
|
|
1910
|
Local / Actualité et News / Re: Revue de presse bitcoin en français
|
on: September 06, 2013, 09:37:47 AM
|
Article dans Grazia (signal par une copine ;o)): diabolisation du net. Consternant. Article Grazia page 1Article Grazia page 2On savait déjà que la presse écrite considère le net comme une menace pour les intérêts et les pouvoirs centralisés qu'elle représente mais la "campagne de presse" coordonnée des groupes de presse (salut les actionnaires de la presse française: Financière Bazire, Silvio Berlusconi, Yves de Chaisemartin, Jean-François Kahn, Maurice Szafran, Alain Weil, Principauté de Monaco) est évidente en cette rentrée 2013. Ouah pas mal celui-là! Deep web=Tor. Freenet et I2P, pas de soucis on vous connait pas, vous devez faire partie du deep deep web je suppose... Bitcoin="Monnaie virtuelle du deep web". Rien que ça. Et d'autres, lisez
|
|
|
1911
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcoin Wallet generation by hand
|
on: September 06, 2013, 07:43:00 AM
|
My trying to increase the probability by multiplying by 10 billions proves suggests that I have no idea how the numbers evolved here. Evidence of a proposition is not the same as a proof of that proposition within a model.
In fact, I admitted that I only skimmed your calculations, and I'll further admit that throwing in all humans as workers was a sorta off the shoulder comment made without consideration of the specificity of your calculations. I'm focusing on the categorical difference between impossibility and improbability.
If your argument is basically this: X is improbable. And my reply is this: X is improbable doesn't imply X is impossible. And your reply is this: no, X is very very improbable. Then it seems like we're talking past each other.
You said you like semantics. So do I! Perhaps we can find some agreement here:
1) An event with probability > 0 is not impossible. 2) A proposition supported only by inductive evidence is not deductively proven.
Cheers!
Again Calculating something is also being sure your result is right. And that is precisely impossible. It's not impossible to correctly get a hash by hand once, it's impossible to calculate it in the sense of being sure you have the right result
|
|
|
1912
|
Other / Meta / Re: Forum Down
|
on: September 06, 2013, 07:37:28 AM
|
btc-e was DDoSed today. Any connection?
millions of them that's how a ddos works That's funny
|
|
|
1914
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Gold Coin (GLD) Info Thread - The Gold Standard of Digital Currency [NEW THREAD]
|
on: September 05, 2013, 09:58:05 PM
|
•Total number of coins to be mined 123,423,900 . so its less scarce than litecoin/bitcoin (worth less) •Faster transactions than LTC and BTC - 2 minutes. wow, a whooping .5 minutes less •Faster difficulty adjustment time - 60 blocks. great, that's just what I wanted, a more erratic difficulty setting •Coin generation rules modeled after physical gold. how? •A genuinely unique coin not just another litecoin clone. lol okay Yeah, all their advertising is about "the name contains Gold!" With some "gold standard of digital currency"
|
|
|
1919
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcoin Wallet generation by hand
|
on: September 05, 2013, 07:15:10 PM
|
Hashes are impossible by hand... Wouldn't a LiveCD on an offline HDD-less PC enough?
I haven't looked at the details of the hashing algorithm used to generate the public address from the private key. However, I don't think impossible is correct. I mean, everything a computer does can (in principle) be simulated using a very long tape and a pencil (see universal Turing machine). Im just saying, difficult/tedious != impossible. You want to play with semantics? Ok, let's play. [snip] Basic maths gives that Q > 1 - 7604/2^1000 = 1 - 10^(-297.149) > 1 - 10^(-297) So R < 10^(-297) < 1/2^986 Yes, R < 1/2^986 TLDRIt's easier to crack 6 different bitcoin addresses with only 6 guesses than to a human to calculate a correct bitcoin address hash in his lifetime Yes, I call that impossible Really, all I have to do now is employ the 6.5 billion humans in the world at this task and implement a reasonable work-sharing scenario. Yeah that would make R<1/2^953 It's still easier to crack 6 different bitcoin addresses with only 1000 guesses than to 10 billions humans to calculate a correct bitcoin address hash in their lifetimes. Your trying to increase the probability by multiplying by 10 billions proves that you really have no idea about the numbers evolved here. Calculating something is also being sure your result is right. And that is precisely impossible.
|
|
|
1920
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: OMG OMG 51% attack?!?! 88.208.1.24
|
on: September 05, 2013, 06:53:48 PM
|
Funny that people have no idea what a 51% attack is.
IF a 51% attack occurs you will see no increase in hashing power. If a 51% attack occurs the attacker will generate 100% of block. If a 51% attack occurs there will be a long (at least 6 block) reorganization. If a 51% attack occurs the new chain will replace transactions of an existing chain.
51% = boogeyman for clueless Bitcoiners. Bad crop harvest = must be the 51% attack. Bitter winter lasting longer than normal = must be the 51% attack. Downpour on the eve of a battle = must be the 51% attack. The king has no sons and five daughters = must be the 51% attack.
Thank you... My thoughts exactly. It was funny months ago. Now it's irritating.
|
|
|
|