As a player yes, he did play well. As a team, they didn't deserve the cup neither did the kiwis. I wish Austalia or India could have won as these are the strongest teams out there. Nz clearly didn't belong there, they played the worst game for a cricket team playing in the finals.

Plot Twist : Op will get scammed by all the domain sellers who will transfer the ownership back again after receiving the payments from him.

Every website calculates it differently. Like there are no general conditions involved in calculating a domain's price. It will depend on how badly the buyer wants it.

Not sure if you're being sarcastic or whatever but was the supposed to mean that I'm behind the new account and managing the campaign? If that's the case, I don't think the admins should waste their time finding my IP's, I'll just give them on my own lol for a terrible manager I'm. You're defending them and I can clearly see why's that.

A very interesting read indeed. Love the breakdown on github as well. The Gambler's Fallacy is well known and there are books, movies, shows based on it.

How many humans do you personally know who are good at gambling? Like do the math and you wouldn't be surprised what is the ratio of good gamblers compared to bad gamblers.

From the explanation given above, it's very hard to make out who was supposed to send bitcoins? Wouldn't the bitcoins be already in the LBC escrow so if the person on the other end doesn't send money you can dispute the trade? The bitcoins are still in the escrow correct? It'd be stupid of you to release them without receiving the full amount and I doubt a lawyer will turn out to be a good help.

I doubt it's just the new account. Someone from the forum secretly wants to earn some money and avoid getting a bad reputation on the forum. It's obvious someone experienced here is managing the account. Regardless, right flag. Supported.

When would you understand that it is not just about bitcoin but crypto-enthusiast as a whole? I like to be anonymous, I like to have freedom over my transactions, I like to have the code-open-sourced. I don't care what market value is of the coin as long as I don't want to use banks. I don't like someone watching over my transactions. Read all that and think about Libra again, "Libra created by FACEBOOK".

He's asking for "Help" which I believe usually mean something that would be done but would not be paid for. Sorry OP, it's hard to find good developers even by paying money, you're asking such help for free. Pointless. Post your project here maybe someone interested in creating their portfolios will be interested.

I think one of your sources is parsing the wrong response. Like got directed to this article which has nothing to do with Bitcoin or crypto https://bitcoinfeed.news/ccn/2019/07/19/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-uncut-footage-flaunts-newfound-maturity/

- Also, do you have permissions to show articles from other sources on your website? This isn't allowed if the company doesn't want to.
- https://bitcoinfeed.news/tools/ is the most helpful section I found about your website. Very straightforward.

Do we have a shill here? Move this damn thread to Shit-Coin discussion already.

@op : I would have taken your argument into account if you could compare them based on the technical specifications. But for peanut brains like you who judges a coin by it's market value, I don't have much to discuss. Let me guess, you created your first ever bitcoin wallet on Coinbase? And got fucked over by one of these scammy exchanges.

Move it to service discussion as it's the proper board at the moment.

From the looks of it, I would not assume it is a sheer scam just yet. Having said that, I wouldn't go all trusting it either. They have an invite based sign-up. There is an additional filed called "Fund Password" which is asked while signing up and I don't know what that means. The website is poorly written in English and is not meant for the English crowd at all.


On the other hand, are you the author of this site?

To be honest, I still believe in the good old trust system. I will base all my conclusions on a person's negative trust. Flags are good to have but they don't necessarily prove whether it is safe to trade/trust a member.

Money - It's proven time and again that it has the capability to change people in seconds. Take masterP's case for example.

All the casinos operated under Curacao or other sub-gambling licenses have no rights to ask for KYC from any of their players. If they do so, the site is a scam and players should avoid it.

KCY? Really cunt? It is important for the operators to know who uses the site but not the other way around that is the customers should also know who owns the site?

Stop wasting time on the OP. I suspect the service/project is fraudulent and not run with any serious intentions. I've sent them a message on their telegram account a week ago and the message is not even delivered yet or maybe the account is not active at all. Time wasters. 

You're wrong chap. You don't have to respect the ideas and opinions coming from people who are dumb as fuck and don't know what they're talking about. I'm not a US citizen either but it doesn't take a genius to understand how dumb he is as a human being. He clearly sees Bitcoin as a threat for his banking economy and that is why he wants to pressurize laws to stop its regulation but that's not how democracy works correct.

I don't think bans are given out for providing such services. Even if they could, your logic still wouldn't work here because they're huge account farmers and it really doesn't make a difference if one of their accounts get banned. Negative rating will stand as a warning for projects who hire these ANN bumpers that by using such services you're risking your project' future on bitcointalk.

Hypocritical much?

---

You've based your decision by taking only a few selective occurrences into consideration. There were other high paying campaigns which operated smoothly and still continue to do so. As long as ChipMixer is concerned, I wouldn't be surprised if they disappear tomorrow considering the massive takedown of illegal bitcoin-related operations.

Informative merit deserving post except for the part where you started to promote Trust-Dice. Not heard about the website before and definitely, it is not one of the popular dice sites around. Just in case anyone looking for alternative and better options, don't hesitate to visit crypto-games.net.

Those pictures depict the reality of modern capitalism and slavery. Donald Trump is an idiot and Zuckerberg is a business-minded theif. I don't care if Donald Trump shuts facebook's Libra down. It was supposed to be data-stealing money making machine for facebook.

CEX/DEX/ every other fancy term out there is of less importance compared to the KYC policies and support of the exchange. Most of the exchanges fuck customers over in the name of KYC policies. Is there a way your DEX/CEX can solve that? People have to wait for days to get a reply from support. Can this be taken as a priority?