i got red trust when i was bounty hunter , i couldn't see the bounty thread that luptin announced that the bounty was scame but i send my weekly working report in the thread, so that I got red trust,

I see that they do not meet anyone even here, but they are active.

do not deposit, do not bet on this site jetwin.com.
I do not see where I can complain, but I will look

Some gamblers just really need to watch "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels" movie to see what borrowing can lead to.

Long story short if you haven't seen that one - a guy who was really good at poker borrowed money from all of his friends and some gangsters too and lost the game (the main problem was that he was kinda good at reading people's faces and so he usually knew what cards they had on hands, but this time his opponent was cheating). Eventually, not only he has set up all his friends and owed LOTS OF MONEY to gangsters, but he was also threatened that if he doesn't return his debt he and his friends will be killed. 
I don't know how realistic this situation is, but every gambler just has to keep in mind that owing someone may end up very bad, so it's better to be left with nothing.

If we are going to let them decide on participating or not then we should also let others decide whether they want to lend money to newbies asking for a loan with no collateral, why do we have DT members tagging them?
IMO, only trusted bounty managers should hold the tokens, meaning if a newbie started to manage a bounty then they should receive negative trust for not using escrow because they are not trustworthy enough.

Digibyte is a sleeping giant. The prudent thing to do is buy, buy, buy and hold, hold, hold. The future will reap you the rewards of wisdom and patience boys and girls.

Any ideas how profitable a review site can be? I've been writing for news sites and review sites for the past year and now dream of starting a review project. Ideas are welcomed.

Hello guys, when i first access gg.bet (i don't have an account yet.) i asked one of the support if i need to verify my identity if I'm using BTC then one of those guys from the support (i forgot the name) said that i don't need to verify my identity. Then i created an account and deposit but then when i'm gonna withdraw its been incomplete for 5 hours then i chat support what's wrong and then they are now asking me to verify my identity? What do you guys think about this?

The escrow would then have to validate whether everyone deserves to get paid. There will be inactive users that don't fulfill the requirements, and I don't think the person hiring the campaign manager would be happy when their funds are given to users that aren't deserving.

Escrow should always be used. But, its not as simple as it sounds, and a lot of the escrows only hold the money currently, and still rely on the campaign manager doing their job. Which in the vast majority of the times they aren't. Especially, within the altcoin scene.

I want to know if any DT member would consider not using an escrow for large amounts in bounties as something untrustworthy and red tag worthy?

What these bounty managers are doing is not using any escrow to hold the coins/tokens, they expect you just to trust them to pay you at the end, they are not reputable forum members and sometimes they claim that they are paying Millions of dollars in coins/tokens to their participants.

There's no easy way for an escrow to decide whether or not the bounty manager did a good job. That means the escrow has to do the bounty manager's job all over again, checking thousands of entries to determine who should be paid.

I hope they start using escrow. Bountyhive escrows the bounty pool for its projects

that is why it is  better to gamble in sports betting where winning is small but in long term ROI you will be in good profit. I have lost lot of my wealth when was playing casino and dice but thank god I joined sports betting and almost recovered my loss

If he cares about his own reputation then he would certainly pay all the participants of the campaign with money out of his own pocket. but as in the world of the ICO only has person with bad character and person without dignity and dishonest, I doubt very much that this guy would take his money from the pocket to pay the participants of the campaign

this: " Participants already take some sort of risk the moment they enroll " It should not happen at all. Often ICO owners forget that thanks to the hard work of these guys who participate in the bounty campaign that they (the ICO owners) manage to raise funds for the projects they create. another thing that ICO owners forget is that they have made a commitment to the participants of the bounty campaign, even if this commitment is not formal. example:

It can not be said that I will to allocate $200.000 of funds for the bounty campaign and the campaign will have a duration of 5 months for example and before 5 months change the value to  $100.000 for example, this is something very bad and shows lack of planning by the creators of ICO.

So let me get this straight. You have a completely new exchange, but you expect users to pay 0.5% fees, on a site that is barely loading in, and that has mandatory KYC for any trading amount?

"I really like Kineticex. I am also interested in the plan of ATM machines to access and cash out payments and its a great platform for payment solutions.  Love it."

I am also a communications manager

You need to notify Google, their hosting address will be banned

Well if the team exists and still one of them is a billionaire then it means that they are people who should at least have some sense and show some honesty,

I would advise you to unite all people who somehow consider themselves unfair about this project, to post their problems in this thread.