Those are some bold words dude! Don't use the 3rd world and first world to discuss a global matter which is governments going against the crypto users. The entire point of using crypto assets is to avoid falling for the GST crap. You pay thousands in taxes and what do you get? A country with not enough toilets? Well, that is the Indian government for you.

No one really gets second chances around the forum? Ask every account that has been tagged by the DT who was begging for the second chances? Why special privileges for the accused here? @Pharmacist - You are actively tagging alt the alt-accounts and account sellers in the forum, why haven't you left your tag here when the case is clearly to be of owning multiple accounts, scamming and other stuff. This isn't a rational judgement. If you think he deserves a second chance, why not all those accounts who have been tagged by you don't?

To conclude -  Don't be a bunch of biased hypocrites, if you stand by a principle, support it regardless of the accounts involved. I have nothing against the OP but rules should be equal for everybody.

Since the account is already tagged and they're running two signature campaigns which I believe are self-escrowed, has anybody given a thought that they might just run away with the escrow money and still have nothing to lose? I mean they have shown the tendency to come back again with new accounts.

As I said, there's a different bitcointalk inside the bitcointalk for the bounty hunters. Own set of 'good' managers, own rules and basically a totally different purpose. I wish theymos just starts a different sub-domain for the bounty hunters. He'd make millions from the traffic. (Provided he spams that forum with as many adds as possible since giving the best user experience for the bounty hunters is not a necessity)

Have you tried using localBitcoins for the US? As far as I know, the location wouldn't really matter if you can wire transfer the money. Much more secure, reliable than going through the hassle of finding someone trusted here and the escrow stuff.

No, they should just stop taking accounts as collateral if they don't know the lender personally. You can never truly know who's the real person behind the account. Take Atriz == Zapo or pinkman12345 == ChevasRegal for instance. Don't let the rank and green trust of the account blind you.

Don't make it about the forum when it's clearly about you and JollyGood lol I don't really care what the issue is but he has all the rights to express his views and as far as I know, he doesn't look like a troll. Maybe you should rather sort it out with him and end it for once?

Hardly there are 5-10 sites which run businesses legitly, rest of them look for ways to scam users and hence harassing them to ask for proofs or to pay people who they have ripped off is not bad. Technically, it's not harassing but asking proofs/conclusions on the issues raised.

You can have 10, but without posting valid references it all seems irrelevant. By looking at your English skills, I doubt any brands would really be interested in promoting them through you. Prove me wrong by posting valid work experience.

So everybody gets free $100 and $300 if they refer 5 friends? Are these amounts withdrawable? If yes, you're gonna lose that amounts to some undeserving members. Maybe you can keep some criteria to participate in your testing process?

The only features I would like to see implemented are - No KYC for amounts up to 10BTC, support tickets should be solved within maximum 48 hours. Rest everything is offered by every existing exchange out there.

lol - I don't know which world do I live in but seems like there is a different world for altcoin projects in bitcointalk. Man, those mentioned are are fuckin rule breakers, multi-accounting cheaters, and most importantly, terrible bounty managers. It takes real scammers to recognise scammers. I'm certain why cunts on this thread like these managers.

They should be escrowing ETH. They have enough money to put into marketing and other stuff. Escrowing 5-10 ETH depending on the bounty pool wouldn't look bad. Moreover, that money will be returned once the ICO is over and the bounty participants are paid.

A dedicated team of 6 developers or 6 front-end developers? I have known the biggest projects who literally have just 2 talented front-end developers on a team. I mean check out Whatsapp, kIK's front-end team. They are maximum 2-4. Wonder why an 8 years + experienced developer need 5 other front-end developers on a team.

I usually like your inputs on the altcoin projects but you are taking this one too far up a rat's ass. The market works on numbers, statistics and trading volumes. Psychological factors aren't enough to manipulate the market. Only small-ballers, illiterate traders do the panic selling. Actually, I have no idea where are we goiung with this topic.

Are you talking about the same gambling site? This one ends with .US, are they operated by the same team? They can't be in the US. The US doesn't allow running online bitcoin gambling sites.

Open a scam accusation in the relevant board with proper details. At this point, it's unclear how you have been scammed.

Mayweather makes money, Mcgregor make fans! Their fight was most likely a paid event with more money paid to Gregor for losing. These fighters are never allowed to play at their own will.

It wouldn't suck to watch because the organisers will create the event in such a way that it raises the table of bets on every move, every minute and every round. So unpredictable, so interesting. In the end, the fixed match will be concluded with predefined results.

That's logically flawed. Robbing a bank could be successful too, without getting caught or risking your life. The shady businesses on the streets guarantee a profit. If one sells drugs on the street, he's guaranteed to make money. The case is not the same with gambling. You may or may not.

In India, localbitcoins is the only p2p network used widely. The in-house exchanges are the shittiest service providers. They wouldn't let you withdraw a penny without verifying KYC documents, their rates are usually higher than the normal market rates, the service fees are high and security is next to a fuckin garbage bin. I don't see a single reason why anyone in India should use cuntpay or cuntsecure when they have 1000 better cunts in the market. Fun Fact: The panel that takes decisions on the financial stuff in India are the biggest scammers themselves.

We are going nowhere with that service. The main page has all the prices listed in dollars instead of BTC/ETH. I would never use a service which thinks pricing their products in cryptos is not important. There is practically no information of cryptos/p2p marketplace on the website.

Yes, it totally depends on the service on when to down the wallet for scheduled maintenance.

That is not fair. Most of the exchanges either provide new wallet/addresses for transactions or keep a dedicated address for every user. These details are obviously public and could be seen on any block explorers. I'm not sure what offline indicates here but technically it is never offline since money could still be sent to it and the details will always be on the chain.

Honestly, the future of cryptos in India will be great in terms of adoption and publicity but the governments will never approve of it until they are ready to tax it which again will be opposed by the leftists. It's more like a never-ending battle in the court but outside court, everything is fair and legal.

I hate Indian exchanges and they are a curse to the Indian bitcoin eco-system. Look what Coinsecure did to the poor bitcoin holders. Bribed the cops and stole all the bitcoins due to their own fuckery.