Looking forward to a pool, soon... Great, Thanks!
But WHAT happends to the account numbers? Will the pool keep them as rake??
Or will the person that found the block get to keep the accounts as a bonus?
Fairest thing would be, if the pool is selling it to the pool users with mined coins. The profit can be shared after. |
|
|
|
Who is account 86646-64 , with 4.7 million coins ? how are they mining so much ?
or am i reading this wrong ?
poloniEx wallet Noone, that bought the coins there has actually an account, thats why they are kept on polo. I guess we need a possibility to safely buy accounts soon, otherwise people will loose interest. |
|
|
|
Interesting silence of the dev. No word after listing at poloniex anymore.
I bet he make his cash and that it is.
Of course he is getting his lambo right now, but I guess he deserves it. And after some (short) time with the hookers he will for sure come back and go on. Inventive people get bored fast with those low level amusements, if they don't work on further inventions... |
|
|
|
Can't check right now (firewall blocks slack) - but I think somewhere around 13 BTC per Terra Current Ti to BTC price is? Thanks! Is Iota on an exchange ? Or coinmarketcap?
It is only on Yassin-DEX provided within slack (slack.iotatoken.com -> channel #trading). I believe it will be on famous exchanges soon (maybe it's last time you see such low prices), because the light-wallet is extremely easy to use and will be stable-released soon. I guess coinmarketcap follows immediately after, as happens with other coins. It's been sitting around 11btc per TIota. The units are denoted by uBtc (micro) and GIota on Yassin-DEX. So around 1100 uBtc per GIota. I agree that this could be the last time we see it at this price. It's very under the radar at the moment in the bigger picture. seems like it found its bottom 2017-01-24 09:11:30 | Up | 90 | 11'499 | 1'034'910
2017-01-24 09:11:37 | Up | 123 | 11'500 | 1'414'500
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 250 | 11'400 | 2'850'000
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 14 | 11'300 | 158'200
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 35 | 11'000 | 385'000
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 691 | 10'200 | 7'048'200
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 19 | 10'069 | 191'311
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 250 | 10'003 | 2'500'750
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 9 | 10'002 | 90'018
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 1 | 10'001 | 10'001
2017-01-24 11:06:13 | Down | 10 | 10'000 | 100'000
2017-01-24 16:29:11 | Up | 42 | 11'499 | 482'958
2017-01-25 17:20:46 | Up | 50 | 11'499 | 574'950
2017-01-25 17:25:23 | Up | 52 | 11'499 | 597'948
2017-01-25 21:45:55 | Up | 100 | 11'499 | 1'149'900
2017-01-26 08:42:11 | Up | 298 | 11'325 | 3'374'850
2017-01-26 08:44:44 | Up | 152 | 11'499 | 1'747'848
2017-01-26 16:37:57 | Up | 10 | 12'500 | 125'000
2017-01-26 16:38:42 | Up | 27 | 12'500 | 337'500
...
ASK | 1'880 | 14'498 | 27'256'240 | #1 @ifinta
ASK | 99 | 14'000 | 1'386'000 | #0 @eugene
ASK | 100 | 13'500 | 1'350'000 | #0 @juliansarokin
ASK | 48 | 13'499 | 647'952 | #0 @scryptominer
ASK | 19 | 13'400 | 254'600 | #0 @albert
ASK | 99 | 12'900 | 1'277'100 | #0 @ifinta
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BID | 1 | 11'500 | 11'500 | #1 @adamvp
BID | 41 | 11'250 | 461'250 | #0 @onebackslash
BID | 10 | 11'200 | 112'000 | #0 @allyourbase
BID | 26 | 11'200 | 291'200 | #0 @phideas
BID | 166 | 11'100 | 1'842'600 | #1 @highlander
BID | 445 | 11'050 | 4'917'250 | #0 @highlander
... |
|
|
|
|
Buying low digits accounts. Please offer.
Escrow only.
Edit: Bought. Maybe interested in 1-3 digit accounts, if reasonable price
|
|
|
|
Christoph Bergmann schreibt immer verständlich: JA aber nur wenn es um PilePale geht… braucht sowieso kein Mensch  dennoch da wo er richtig Lösungen bringen soll, kommt leider nichts raus s. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1730727.0Fast 2 Monate vergangen und... NICHTS - die Trader werden einfach im Regen gelassen (BTC weg und Kohle weg) einfach unfassbarIst ein "Entschuldigung" verständlich genug? Ich denke mal nicht und kann auch nachvollziehen, warum nicht. Mehr kann ich dazu aber leider nicht sagen, und mein Job ist es auch nicht, "Lösungen zu bringen". Im coinform wurde das Thema ein wenig intensiver und mit mehr Beteiligung von Leuten, die dazu mehr als ich sagen können, behandelt, aber ich fürchte, auch das wird nicht wirklich weiterhelfen. Ich kann hier nur wiederholen, was Oliver schon gesagt hat: die Situation und der Ablauf ist uns selbst sehr unrecht, aber es besteht kein Grund, zu übertreiben. Der einen, kurzen Serie von verpatzten Trades stehen mehr als zwei Jahre sicherer Express-Handel gegenüber, mit dem es Bitcoin.de und der Fidor-Bank gelungen ist, trotz eines anspruchsvollen regulatorischen Umfeldes am Standort Deutschland (oder sagen wir: am Standort Eurozone) eine Handelsplattform aufzubauen, die all die Vorteile des Standorts mit der Bequemlichkeit eines mehr oder weniger in Echtzeit stattfindenden Handels vereint. Hinzufügen möchte ich noch, dass Bitcoin.de seit 2011 operiert. Es dürfte im Ökosystem keine andere Handelsplattform geben, die über einen so langen Zeitraum so verantwortungsvoll mit den Kunden-Bitcoins umgegangen ist. Aber, wie gesagt, und um das nochmal zu wiederholen: Das entschuldigt oder rechtfertigt nicht, was passiert ist. Das Einzige, was wirklich weiterhilft in solchen Situationen ist, wenn jemand die Verantwortung und den entstandenen Schaden (zumindest teilweise) übernimmt. Ohne jetzt Schuldzuweisungen zu streuen aber in dem Fall trifft die Geschädigten sicherlich die geringste Verantwortung. Wie Du sagst, hat Bitcoin.de über Jahre hinweg hervorragende Arbeit geleistet und dementsprechend auch Gewinn erwirtschaften können. Es ist einfach logisch, dass man für solche Fälle Rücklagen. Für den Schaden (teilweise) aufzukommen kommt Bitcoin.de und Fidor garantiert günstiger als der jetzt entstehende Imageschaden. Seh ich ähnlich und ich würde nicht mal das wort teilweise benutzen wollen. Bitcoin.de und Fidor haben über lange Zeit ein Geschäft mit Bitcoinhandel gemacht und dabei auch kräftig kassiert. Ein Geschäft hat aber immer auch ein Risiko, was man tragen muss. Und hieß es nicht, dass alle Bitcoinguthaben versichert sind? Warum wird das bei Bitcoin so flachsig gehandhabt? Wenn heute jemand die Bank ausraubt bekommt sie das Geld doch auch von der Versicherung... |
|
|
|
Hopefully a lot forget to claim so the foundation gets more funding and will be stronger than ever  I suggest to burn them instead. So every iota is more worthy. Also the ones of the foundation... |
|
|
|
...
KV coin is an example of how I see the komodo ecosystem developing. As coins such as KV get established and succeed, KMD will gain value as the underlying coin.
Somehow I have the feeling that the underlying coins can suffer from ICOs. For example NXT had a steady decline, since it was massively used as ICO relay. I also can somehow understand why. People, that had a lot of NXT, became rich. Some cached out already, but the people, who still held were investing a high percentage of their NXT in assets. But those asset distributors were of course caching out a lot, because they need the money... so it can only lead to decline... |
|
|
|
keine Ahnung, wollt nur auch mal ein paar Linien zeichnen :-) edit: aber vielleicht kommt ja tatsächlich noch so ein schöner grüner Block ;-) |
|
|
|
The nodes outside of the lan don't have to connect to you, if you want run a local node/wallet. They only have to know your public ip in order to "allow" your access.
But the nodes you are connecting to have to be public, of course...
Edit: if you want to make your computer public available you have to configure your routers routing tables.
byteball advertisement byteball advertisement byteball advertisement  i wonder if advertisement of other projects is not trolling.... If we implemented an optional "isPublicNode" parameter in the configuration, as I already suggested multiple times, everyone can decide for its own, not to stay "hidden" any more. And this dubious talk would have been not even possible... |
|
|
|
This is because chinese traders have a keen interest in NEM. Maybe it's not as secure as u have been told.
Where's the evidence for that? I haven't seen or heard of many peeps out of China, plenty elsewhere in Asia though. The Chinese seem to be more conservative when it comes to alts compared to other bits of the world. But what is a clear lie for us, is considered competition in china, if it comes to products. Didn't you see the numerous highest electrical and quality standard products for 9.99?  |
|
|
|
Guys, I have a short question:
can IOTA wallet be successfully run on PC behind a NAT router, or should it be run on a machine with public IP only?
I mean if I want to exchange peers while being behind a NAT, will it work, or I'll need to add static mappings on the router to forward some ports IOTA uses?
Guys, is my question above too hard to nobody can answer, or it is too stipid, so nobody want to answer..?  I basically ask whether there is a way to have a IOTA-enabled machine running in the corporate LAN, or in a home network behind a NAT router..? How peer-adding needs to be done in that case? I suppose that is a common scenario, so there should have been discussions about that. Many (I would assume - the majority of) IoT devices will run in a private LAN, being protected by NAT firewall, so botnets cannot infect them. So if we want IOTA wallet to run on them, they need to be able to connect to other nodes outside the LAN, and (the most tricky part) the nodes outside the LAN need to connect to them! With current manual peer-discovery (where the other peer needs real public IP:port to connect) it could be tricky. Opening a static mapping for any single IoT device could be a tiresome task for the net admin. UPNP then? But does IOTA client have a UPNP? Could anyone point me to some discussion or paper about this? yes, you can run the wallet behind a NAT router http://iotasupport.com/tutorials.shtmlVery kind of you . But I see not a single page on those tutorials answering my questions above, or even touching that topic (running without static ip is completely different topic). Is there anybody here who is familiar with network administration and can answer my questions/concerns? I suppose there should be one...  The nodes outside of the lan don't have to connect to you, if you want run a local node/wallet. They only have to know your public ip in order to "allow" your access. But the nodes you are connecting to have to be public, of course... Edit: if you want to make your computer public available you have to configure your routers routing tables. |
|
|
|
Wow! Very nice graphics rnr!
Yes they do a great job and are very enthusiastic. But isn't that a little risky, if a big amount of notary nodes is in the hand of only 2 people? Maybe I am overanxious because I don't know all the facts and numbers... How much power do they have after election? Official rules, 4 nodes max per candidate. We backup each other, but both of us are independent. Together we are able to work more efficient (just one example: our common campaign has additional value for the whole project) in the interest of Komodo. In case one of us (or both of course) are unreliable or some other bad things happen the other operators are able to "kick" us out. EDIT: The electorates need to vote for rnr OR kolo! In the elections we are two separate node operators. And there´s no way to vote for both of us in the same region in the same time/with the same ICO account. ok understood, sorry for bothering. und an scheena gruas nooch foikastoa ;-) |
|
|
|
Wow! Very nice graphics rnr!
Yes they do a great job and are very enthusiastic. But isn't that a little risky, if a big amount of notary nodes is in the hand of only 2 people? Maybe I am overanxious because I don't know all the facts and numbers... or just don't understand them... sorry... How much power do they have after election? |
|
|
|
Do all existing byteball addresses will be granted bytes in the second round or we have to register them somewhere?
All bytes in your wallet at time of the snapshot will receive new bytes and blackbytes, you don't need to register them. Registering is only for linking BTC addresses. and the linked addresses stay linked for the second round? |
|
|
|
wie oft hab ich sowas schon gesehen, dass etwas 3 mal das selbe war und es dann beim 3. mal doch anders gelaufen ist? |
|
|
|
Aber: der 800 US$ Widerstand steht wie'ne 1 … Zumindest noch. Schaun'ner mol, dann seh'n mer schon.
Anschnallen. 785 ist gefallen … es wird holprig ja und irgendjemand sitzt vorm chart und reibt sich die hände... z. B. ich … Hab mit dem Abverkauf heute schon 50 US$ gewonnen und bin bei 785 nochmal größer short gegangen. nichts für ungut, aber ich hoff, dass all diese shorter kräftig auf die schnauze fallen ;-) |
|
|
|
Aber: der 800 US$ Widerstand steht wie'ne 1 … Zumindest noch. Schaun'ner mol, dann seh'n mer schon.
Anschnallen. 785 ist gefallen … es wird holprig ja und irgendjemand sitzt vorm chart und reibt sich die hände... |
|
|
|
|
Bin echt gespannt wieviel Jahrzehnte sich die Anleger noch von den Wales verarschen lassen wollen...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
