Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 09:28:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 ... 139 »
501  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CRW] CROWN (SHA256) | Masternodes (Thrones) | DGW | Mergedmining | etc on: January 31, 2017, 08:57:08 AM
Just thought this would be a good time to collect everyone's thoughts on what would make it easier to operate thrones/nodes?

There are different resources which it would seem that Crown should develop in terms of installation scripts, and possibly also downloadable / torrents of images of installed systems with a checksum and where one would just need to know where to mount the image and how to create the crown.conf file...

The setup / support task is made more complex because the preference for the network would be to have a diversity of operating systems, cloud providers and home servers running thrones.  The goal is to create a diverse network which will be more complex to maintain - but should also be more robust over time.

Any specific thoughts / suggestions from anyone -- from newbies to folks running node businesses for Crown and/or other networks?



Users tend to fall into these categories:


-Total newcomers to crypto (not many at the moment hopefully this is a growth crowd)
-Crypto users with some experience but who have never operated a Throne or Masternode before
-Crypto users with significant experience of Thrones/Masternodes.

We need to make sure we have all bases covered.

A good starting point would be to work on a series of guidance documents to be stored in the appropriate place.  (The Knowledge?) We can detail the basics through to more complex areas. 

I'm particularly interested in providing update scripts and instructions for effective and efficient compilation under Linux. We need to make it as easy as possible for people to update.  Step one for this would be to agree that we only use Git Master for upcoming releases.

One other thing I want to look into is a downloadable Raspberry Pi image containing Crown wallet, a recent sync of the chain and easy instructions on how to set up a throne.

502  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: January 28, 2017, 10:12:29 PM
I know about three people who you suspect being e1ghtspace of!  As far as I can tell, you have no reason to connect all of those accounts apart from the fact some of them were created at a similar time to each other.

Yes, some of them are clearly sock puppets but most are real accounts and I think it is ludicrous to assume it is e1ghtspace controlling them over any of the other people in that list!

Somehow I don't doubt that...

Code:
Name: 	stonehedge u=360508 http://archive.is/qihYF
Posts: 2269
Activity: 882
Position: Legendary
Date Registered: 29 July 2014, 23:51:19
Last Active: 28 January 2017, 22:14:28

I don't think Wendigo put much though into the UID's s/he's selected...

19 May 2014, 04:00:12 Date Registered:    CryptoCanary u=332653 http://archive.is/CGlCi
29 May 2014, 20:12:14 Date Registered:    russiacoin u=336982 http://archive.is/tAVTe

16 June 2014, 03:27:23 Date Registered:        BiPolarBob u=343899 http://archive.is/Z6led
21 June 2014, 19:13:39 Last Active:    ra1nb0wdash u=249569  http://archive.is/hOVHf
02 July 2014, 22:49:48 Date Registered:    allah u=351062 http://archive.is/66GDa
04 July 2014, 20:30:58 Date Registered:    Sterlingcoin u=351953 http://archive.is/JDHgg
12 July 2014, 04:29:04 Last Active:    russiacoin u=336982 http://archive.is/tAVTe
13 July 2014, 15:46:25 Date Registered:        orryde u=354974 http://archive.is/yOlqp
16 July 2014, 04:34:45 Date Registered:    superSTAR777 u=355868 http://archive.is/lwHSE
19 July 2014, 08:35:22 Last Active:    allah u=351062 http://archive.is/66GDa
19 July 2014, 08:42:05 Date Registered:    z3r0coin u=357026 http://archive.is/GpA5U
20 July 2014, 05:29:56 Date Registered:    ACCTseller u=357263
20 July 2014, 06:40:20 Date Registered:    deluxeCITY u=357282
21 July 2014, 01:31:08 Date Registered:    Panthers52 u=357487
22 July 2014, 15:51:40 Date Registered:    Quickseller u=358020
25 July 2014, 20:45:44 Date Registered:    Hero1 u=359157 http://archive.is/IEQug
28 July 2014, 02:04:54 Date Registered:    josef2000 u=359905 http://archive.is/hJXTB <-- Could just be a coincidence, but let's throw it in anyways...
31 July 2014, 08:38:11 Last Active:    z3r0coin u=357026 http://archive.is/GpA5U

01 August 2014, 18:39:15 Date Registered:    twister u=361475
02 August 2014, 03:32:43 Last Active:    hiroo u=324656 http://archive.is/MdGWc
02 August 2014, 03:34:51 Last Active:    shitcoins.info u=317533 http://archive.is/gMgGy
02 August 2014, 03:36:26 Date Registered:    bitsta_2 u=361647 http://archive.is/prnXF

josef.2000 u=433547 is also an alt of Zeroxal u=508748 and josef2000 u=359905 (who is banned) Roll Eyes

29 July 2014, 23:51:19 Date Registered:    stonehedge u=360508 http://archive.is/qihYF

That's quite a rogues gallery of alts you're sitting smack bang in the middle of...
Roll Eyes

So you're suggesting that I'm operating lts now? Based on what exactly? This is beyond preposterous
503  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CRW] CROWN (SHA256) | Masternodes (Thrones) | DGW | Mergedmining | etc on: January 28, 2017, 10:03:20 PM
My interest is peaked wit this project as I have a lot of respect for members of this community. Which exchange has the most liquidity?

Thanks for the kind words. C-Cex is basically the only choice. Hoping to change that soon.
504  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: January 28, 2017, 07:23:39 AM
I know about three people who you suspect being e1ghtspace of!  As far as I can tell, you have no reason to connect all of those accounts apart from the fact some of them were created at a similar time to each other.

Yes, some of them are clearly sock puppets but most are real accounts and I think it is ludicrous to assume it is e1ghtspace controlling them over any of the other people in that list!
505  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 27, 2017, 08:49:01 PM
...
I agree with you but didn't Georgem reject this model on the basis it isn't cryptographically secure? At least I think that is what he said before I quit the team last year...

I'm pretty sure I said, where and when, not if and how.

But I am adopting a wait and see for now approach.

You did say that. I was just pointing out it bears little relevance to spreadcoin now.

It's a cracking idea, or at least I think it is.

You're certainly more likely to be able to deliver it on a second tier rather than part of bitcoin core which is what the cryptographic approach proposes.
506  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 27, 2017, 05:51:43 PM
Good summation, it lacks when he mentioned he would be working exclusively on spreadcoin full time...As an early adoper, it's beyond the point of frustration or believability. Georgem is taking a more holistic approach rather than building on anything and as a result the price has suffered and confidence has wavered to the point where delisting from the only exchange it's currently on remains a possibility. There are some great minds behind this project though, like coins101- a visionary in this space, who was instrumental in the early success of dash.

 It ultimately is a coin of low risk high reward potential. Let's look at its price history. Servicenodes in testnet before mr. Spread's departure .0003. A mere mention of georgem's implementation within reach .00018; Almost an order of magnitude from where we currently stand. Imagine where we will be once, 100 more soons from now, servicenodes are actually released to mainnet.

People involved in crypto are generally myopic. That's a dim game to play. I'd rather georgem not address any of this and keep doing what he's doing. I'll wait.

From my perspective, 10m people use Blockchain.info to host a Bitcoin wallet (or they have 10m wallets, whatever your specific point of view), which is a sign something is wrong when you consider there are about 5,500 full Bitcoin nodes.

This is, by its very definition, a market imbalance. Not in terms of technical fear of the network not being able to cope. While there is that. My point of view is that this is a f huge opportunity. It's not a technical imbalance its a market distortion waiting for a solution.

* People don't want to run full nodes. But it's the safest option.

* People do want to run SPV's, in particular through their mobile, but it's the least safe option.

Do you see what I see in that diametrically opposed position?

No?

There are about 1.5bn PC's, but we are approaching 2.5bn smart phones. While PC adoption will plateau, the smart phone will continue to grow towards 5bn users.

So my design for a decentralized (bloody American spell checker on BCT) servicenode network that will create an encrypted link between an SPV and a full node, and then have those full nodes on a super fast rely network, is smack bang in the right space.

In fixing the SPV security model, you fix the Bitcoin lack of full nodes security model. The two positions are no longer diametrically opposed, they are aligned. You've fixed the market distortion, in a decentralized way.

So, I'm waiting to see what will happen before releasing this whitepaper.

The whitepaper is done, I've checked for available technology, it's a great commercial opportunity and it looks like it can address a market distortion enough to generate a business model around it.

Which is why I say, one way or another it will be built.

But lets see what happens next.



This particular option doesn't need proof of node, because there is an element of payment and service provision involved which is a sybil resistant model.

I agree with you but didn't Georgem reject this model on the basis it isn't cryptographically secure? At least I think that is what he said before I quit the team last year...
507  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 26, 2017, 01:24:32 PM

The points on that graph show the number of addresses with a balance, not the number of users. But fair enough, that could indicate more than 1m users.  Not many people use 15+ addresses. 
508  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 26, 2017, 10:57:19 AM
All I said, as did Coins101, is that Bitcoin has failed its biggest goal...to be useful to the masses. Its adoption rate is poor and its practical applications, at the moment, are narrow.  That is not the same as calling it a shitcoin.


Well that's not exactly true. Check out all the countries that hit ATH for volume on localbtc in just the last month.
https://coin.dance/volume/localbitcoins

Being an early adopter means you wait until the masses finally get how something is useful. There will likely be another year or two before some app or other big idea makes it known by even the non-tech savvy people in society.

I appreciate that it is a contentious view but I stand by it.  Bitcoin is not useful enough to people yet. It is virtually entirely an investment vehicle at the moment with a smaller subset of payment uses.

I'm not so sure that Bitcoin is going to be the first to be widely adopted.  If it is, it won't be in only one to two years imo.

Some people have deduced that less than one million people use Bitcoin globally.  I don't know if that is true or not, it is very hard to estimate but it is a long way from the 200 million Paypal users, 100 million instagram users or one billion whatsapp users.
509  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 26, 2017, 07:45:08 AM
Incidentally, cryptographic proof of bitcoin node has reportedly been solved by another project.

What project has reportedly solved it?

Its going to be tabled as a BIP paper to give anybody the chance to implement it I believe.
510  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (official thread) on: January 26, 2017, 07:42:26 AM
I'm not comfortable filling this thread with petty arguments so I'm going to stop now.  A reminder of what Geroeg is working on to cleanse the palate:

So finally here it is, the update about the current state of work regarding servicenodes and spreadcoin.

I'm happy to report that development is going very well, much better than before,
also because finally there is a very clear vision about the direction we will take with servicenodes.

Contrary to previous estimations that saw "blank servicenodes" (whatever that meant) arrive on testnet at the end of 2015,
the insights I gathered during nov/dec 2015 led me to the invention of an actually useful first service which will allow us
to build a network of servicenodes that will be valuable way beyond just the spreadcoin community.

So, instead of you further waiting for "Something something servicenodes" to arrive soon, you will now know exactly what to expect as the first basic service, namely a...

Decentralized Blockexplorer

I'll let a few Screenshots of the current wallet speak:



(the ugly welcoming screen of the old wallet has disappeared, and people are directly seeing the input field of the decentralized blockexplorer, ready for immediate use)



(As an example I show one of the top Bitcoin addresses. It works exactly as you would expect from the many hundreds of centralized blockexplorers out there)



(And one of the top Dash Addresses.)


So what does this mean?

The first fully functioning service that will be enabled through servicenodes is a distributed decentralized blockexplorer, accessible thrugh the spreadcoin wallet (and spreadcoin daemon / RPC)

People who run a servicenode can host any other coin they like on the same server and register it with the servicenode.
Any such coin will then be searchable through the decentralized blockexplorer. (If a coin isn't atleast hosted by a certain amount of servicenodes (to be determined) the coin isn't considered.)

All hosted coins need to be full node daemons, but they can run without tx-indexing and disable their wallet-functionality.
The only requirement is that those daemons create and maintain a full blockchain by themselves, on the same server.

Since anyone is allowed to host any coin they like (power to the people!), we are going to see a spread of different setups of course.
See for example this servicenode overview screen that lists all the current servicenodes that I run in my small homework right now:



(People can add completely new coins, or drop old ones, it's completely their own decision)


So how does it work?

Within every servicenode runs a tool called Universal Blockchain Analyzer (UBA).
It is capable of identifying and dissecting any blockchain (as long as it doesn't divert too much from current standards, but this can be further improved),
and creates its own optimized datastructure from all the data it gathers, for every coin that is registered with the servicenode (happens through the .conf file)

While this process happens, the UBA communicates and compares key data elements with other servicenodes in the network.

That's the job of the UBA: to convert relevant blockchain data for fast and easy distributed access thru the servicenode network.

The coin daemons themselves run without any disturbance. In fact the admin needs to start / stop them himself, the servicenodes won't interfere in any way with that procedure.
It is merely required that the servicenode daemon has read access to the blockchain folder of each coin, and nothing else!



Now a few more details about the servicenodes themselves.

Servicenodes that host full nodes and distribute derived blockchain data to the network to be used in the decentralized blockexplorer will earn a certain percentage of the mining reward (to be determined).

As has been planned for a long time, servicenodes won't require a fix collateral, instead the collateral will be determined by the free market.
An artificial competitive situation is created by only allowing a certain maximum amount of servicenodes to exist.
This limit isn't fixed either, it grows slowly over time.

As an example, in my home network I implemented a limit that is calculated with this formula: (total coinsupply) / 2000:



This means that with every 2000 coins that are mined there is one servicenode allowed.
(But 2000 is just an example, and will have to be determined in testnet. A few months ago we used 2880 to make a few interesting calculations.)

As you can see in the screenshots I currently run 9 Servicenodes on 9 computers.
Current total coinsupply in my very new fork is 19119, which divided by 2000 allows for 9 servicenodes to exist (or fewer, but not more).

As you can see each of these Servicenodes has its own idea about the collateral it wants to use, and this diversification creates yet another spread!

All Servicenodes are sorted according to the collateral they are willing to invest, from smallest to biggest. (the more the better)
In my example, the weakest Servicenode uses just over 100 SPR, and the strongest about 3000 SPR.

As seen in the last screenshot (Spread Distribution Screen) the distribution will probably most of the time look similar to a ski-jump.

Now why is the Servicenode with the smallest collateral called "weakest link"?


("weakest link")

Well, because an available seat isn't assigned to the same servicenode forever.
All seats are constantly on sale even the ones that are currently occupied (  Grin )

This means that when a newcomer arrives and he finds no empty seat, he might decide to grab one of the seats away from someone else's arse.
(but he can also come a little later when a new additional seat was created, but so will others... )

Let's imagine a few scenarios, using my example.

The 9 Servicenodes in my home network use these collaterals:

100.001
107.001
120
190.3122
335
425.1
502
1010
3000.191998


Now, imagine a newcomer arrives and wants a seat.
He could be a cheap shot and just invest 100.002, but this would be enough to "kick" the servicenode currently sitting at the weakest seat out of the race.

(BTW, "kicking" in this context merely means that the servicenode doesn't receive any rewards anymore. It does not shut down the server or any full node, or anything like that.
But what happens is that the UBA stops working, since it doesn't recognize its servicenode as valid anymore.)

What then happens, is that the newcomer becomes the new weakest link with his 100.002 collateral.

But say he would want to invest 2000 as collateral.
Now the same weakest link loses the seat, but the next 7 seats all slip down one seat, since they all must make room at the second highest seat, because that's where the 2000er is going to sit.

In this situation the servicenode that was sitting at the second lowest seat now suddenly finds itself in the weakest link position and runs the risk of losing its status next time someone appears.

And that's basically how this game will be played: a continuous switching of seats, particularly in the lower area.
If you hate this situation already, I suggest you invest lots of SPR as collateral.

Because there is a way how you can basically completely secure a seat for the foreseeable future.



This symbol indicates a servicenode that has such a high collateral, that it would require more than the current total coinsupply to kick this node 9 seats down!
Since this servicenode has a collateral of 3000 and it would require 9 newcomers to each invest MORE than these 3000, this would add up to an amount larger than all money that currently exists.

And therefor this seat can be considered truly secure.

BUT!
... since the total coinsupply continues to grow everyday (but slower and slower) even a now truly secured servicenode can easily be dropped down a few seats, the more free money is around and gets locked in servicenodes.

It is important to understand that "holding a high seat" has no benefits whatsoever, other than keeping you away as far as possible from the weakest link (the only "point of departure").

So the best place to actually be in is somewhere in the middle, as indicated by this symbol:



This symbolises the seat that represents the arithmetic mean of the sum of all money locked in servicenodes divided by amount of servicenodes.

It can be argued that this seat (and seats close to it) are very secure, and a user that keeps adding to his collateral so that he keeps being near this mean will basically never lose his reward.


....


Alright, I could go on forever, but it's getting late.

Last thing I wanted to mention for today is the actual "servicenode manage screen":



It's where you will create new servicenodes and control the ones you already run.
(ofcourse everything will also be possible through commandline)
My goal will be to make the handling of servicenodes very easy and straight forward.
I do have a few fancy ideas about this that I want to further explore.

There is much more to mention and discuss but that's for another day.
(particularly how we tie an actual logo and name to a hosted coin is interesting)

The future looks very clear now for spreadcoin.
What I just presented is what the first testnet version will look like.

By implementing this first service we are going to build the perfect playground for the further development of the servicenode network (which will see the likes of "Proof of Bitcoin Node", a decentralized searchengine and exchange, and possibly Big Data Services in some form or another. There is lots to explore and only one rule: it needs to follow the principles of "true decentralization").

And last but not least:

I expect that I need another 50 hours or so to finish everything and put all the loose ends together before we can start testing it.

This could mean best case, that I will be ready in 1 week, or worst case by the end of january.


I will keep you updated about the progress in much more detail from now on!

Stay tuned!

P.S. I will update roadmap, website, etc... tomorrow!
511  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 26, 2017, 07:30:46 AM
Pretending is exactly the key word here.

au contraire, mon amie, au contraire.



It was a cryptic reference to another great pretender who shall be dethroned.

Perhaps a non-binary approach might be helpful to everyone.

tete de veau

For you non-French speakers, translations can be found here


Mate, you're really better than this.  With you posting very subtle crown related hints and georgem with delusions of grandeur that there is an organised attack against Spreadcoin on this thread, it is really painting a paranoid picture.

If you have something to say about Crowncoin or any of the small number of ex-SPR supporters involved over there, go and say it on their thread.

Crowncoin has no interest in Spreadcoin at all.  Its just that some of the CRW team are/were emotionally and financially invested in SPR.
512  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 26, 2017, 07:26:40 AM
...if he decides he does't like you then you won't get anything in return!

Believe me, if I don't like you I will very clearly explain why.
And I will ask you to explain yourself.
And if you don't give me a good explanation but behave like a petulant child, I will NOT waste my time.

If I see you misbehave (troll, fud, try to derail the situation) why should I continue to cooperate with you?  Roll Eyes

Agreements like that work both ways.

You already told me that you don't care about principles and that bitcoin is basically a shitcoin. (oh wow)
So my expectations are not very high.
But maybe you will surprise me.  Cheesy


Plenty of people have asked you calm and sensible questions about your work in the last 25 pages or so and you deflected almost all of them, or ignored them altogether.

All I said, as did Coins101, is that Bitcoin has failed its biggest goal...to be useful to the masses. Its adoption rate is poor and its practical applications, at the moment, are narrow.  That is not the same as calling it a shitcoin.

I have no idea what you are talking about when you say I have said I don't care about principles.  Maybe our discussion about the need for cryptographic proof of bitcoin node where both coins101 and myself argued that cryptographic proof wasn't needed, simply, massive economic dissuasion would suffice. Incidentally, cryptographic proof of bitcoin node has reportedly been solved by another project.



513  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 26, 2017, 04:42:35 AM
Doesn't the 150,000 SPR donation plus and months of my time combined with no FUD and trolling buy me anything?

I invested a significant amount of FIAT too although I can't complain about that because I had the foresight to sell my stack when you first started to insult me and indicate that you weren't going to deliver so I'm the rarest of things....a Spreadcoiner who profited.

Since donating you those SPR you actually haven't shown me anything other than pictures.

Or are you going to write me off as a troll or FUDder because I'm questioning your commitment to the project?

Her everybody, donate to georgem and he might show you a preview of what he is working on but if he decides he does't like you then you won't get anything in return!
514  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 25, 2017, 09:19:31 PM
If somebody wanted to see the preview wallet, how much would they have to pay you?
515  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 25, 2017, 06:39:06 PM

coins101 has been very supportive.
And what's even more important: I have never seen coins101 overreact or throw a tantrum or something like that.


Some might think he has invested a huge amount of time and money into this project and wants to see some return for his money. Being publicly supportive of you is the only chance he has.  And, to be fair, he's a very loyal chap.
516  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CRW] CROWN (SHA256) | Masternodes (Thrones) | DGW | Mergedmining | etc on: January 25, 2017, 04:47:04 PM
I'm just building the Linux QT.  Or at least I will be soon.

Which repository should I be using?

Currently we're on the dash-merge-0.12.0.x branch. Later this week we'll be moving everything into the master repo.

Ta.  Compiling
517  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CRW] CROWN (SHA256) | Masternodes (Thrones) | DGW | Mergedmining | etc on: January 25, 2017, 04:27:11 PM
I'm just building the Linux QT.  Or at least I will be soon.

Which repository should I be using?
518  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 25, 2017, 08:42:33 AM
In summation,  there is no financial incentive to run servicenodes in the event they are ever developed, or even hold coins for that matter. The developer wants to dump all of his. Want a preview of the wallet? That's pay per view. You'll need to provide donations in a means that absolves him from the success of this project.

Rest assured, there's no way the developer would ever abandon the project after dumping all his coins though, he holds the principles of decentralization far too dear to his heart. You can totally take his word for it too, because everything he's said so far in this thread has been completely accurate. Also, dash is a scam. Thank God I divested from dash to support georgem, otherwise life would be far too easy as my daughter's college tuition would be paid and I would have passive income for the rest of my life.

I divested from another investment that would have netted me about 60K - enough to pay off my own schooling.

Feels bad...

At least we might have some nodes that might be profitable some of the time, that is, whenever miners allow it.

Absolutely. they say you never realize a loss until you sell, so I guess I'm taking this bag of spr to the grave!

Guys I think we need a support group to help deal with our depression.  CBG for short, better known as "Cucked By Georgem."

This is my fault, not Georgem's. Please stop attacking him.

The deeper or bigger picture idea was something I wanted to see happen. I thought there was consensus on that, but perhaps I was mistaken.

I truly believe in the future potential of crypto and like it or not Bitcoin is the mothership at this point. It would be a gift to the corporate world if Bitcoin fails because a model for incentives after mining can't be found. Fees are the long-term, but there are currently problems with implementing fees.

I was at fault because I didn't put forward a strong enough case to counter the long standing position that devs know everything and they rule all. I should have put forward a strong argument that the keyboard is not mightier than the pen.

Dash's next big play, Evolution, was something I thought about and posted as something in SPR's long-term future many months before it was announced by Evan (yes, I do think Dash has used stuff pouring out my head meant for SPR - but I could be 100% wrong because I don't know how Evan come to think about Evolution).

And please remember, Apple's fortunes were linked not to its devs but to it's PR-investor.



If I can come up with a credible proposition (you tell me, is it?) for solving one of Bitcoins biggest long-term structural problems, something that will be exposed by the next halving, I can come up with a solution to the next steps to get there.

But first, I do need to address this incessant crypto dev idol thing head on. That is why we are where we are. Stay tuned.

Good luck with that mate. I though you were one of the cockroaches!
519  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CRW] CROWN (SHA256) | Masternodes (Thrones) | DGW | Mergedmining | etc on: January 25, 2017, 08:36:27 AM
I'm having a bit of a bromance moment watching our slack Dev channel.

Infernoman is a freaking bug squashing machine! He never sleeps, and just churns out the fixes. I have huge respect for his skills.

I thought we were a little short in some areas of Dev expertise on his project but I'm not so sure now. At least the gaps are getting smaller.
520  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming) on: January 24, 2017, 08:37:45 AM
People are talking about the 150k SPR that I donated to you ...

Those aren't people, those are sock puppets.



Good luck with your project George.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 ... 139 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!