LMAO is this the final shark jump for Dash The Instamined Shitcoin?  Just look at this lulzy garbage and ask yourself "Where is the code? Where are the github pull requests and merges?" ..... Why are you so upset about DASH, could it be because you are a cheerleader for Monero and it's currently not doing so well? Maybe some conflict of interest, like you are supporting DASH's competitor?
Here is the source code: https://github.com/dashpay/dashYou totally misunderstand the masternode concept, you should educate yourself first before spewing such bullshit. And why not put forward constructive arguments and not hostility if you want to criticize a project like a gentleman? Monero is back around ATH at $50. In what universe is that "not doing well?" Do you really have to lie and exaggerate to make your whiny little pout noises? I'm asking for the Dash *Evolution* code, not the horribly outdated Bitcoin/Litecoin code Evan used to launch his Instamined scam. That was perfectly clear from the parts of my post that you didn't quote. BTW, Tezos is going to bury Dash and its crappy Fake Governance Evolution Vaporware. According to Tezos.com, they've raised >$100MM so far.  Tezos' self-amending ledger is superior to Dash's self-Instamining blockchain.  |
|
|
|
Icebreak, I gotta give it to you. Now that all conversation has moved to slack, the official forums, reddit and the like, and this thread is nearly dead...you still show remarkable dedication in coming here and posting your FUD.
Since Amanda left, the entire Dash conversation is nearly dead. You show remarkable dedication coming here and posting your GIANT SHITTY GENERIC CLIP ART SPAM. Also, the entire 'Muh Shitcoin is Too Pure & Precious to Sully with Nasty Bitcointalk' narrative is well known as 100% proof-of-scam. See this example from Dash's old partner-in-scamming, XC. Cults generally have an easier time keeping their sheep indoctrinated when they are able to more fully control the flow of information they receive.
Both Dash and XC agreed to stop drawing attention to each other's scam and leave each other alone to scam in peace: DRK and XC Communities,
The toxic back and forth between our two communities has reached a level with which neither of us are comfortable or impressed. The competitive space for our coins lies in the results, and the results will speak for themselves as they are brought online. Whatever mistakes or provocations were undertaken by either side are in the past, and we would like them to remain there. We are all interested in one thing: the advancement of anonymous cryptocurrency. Let go of the tribalism and start thinking of how you can positively contribute to that end.
Evan and Dan
 could not help myself. Damn those logo's look seXC! Probs to georgem (would donate if he had a XCurrency adres)  Let's see how that worked out for the bagholding victims: Oh dear God these guys again How's Jasinlee doing synechist? Who's Jasinlee? So thus project is scamming us out of our money? The first litecoin asics that he scammed millions from. With these goons fully backing his good name. Then they dumped the premine after saying they'd be transparency with it. A "closed source anon coin" (trust us guys) Then told all their investors who were upset about being dumped on with the promises of notification "uh guys we just meant you could see it on the blockchain". Their lead dev was losing his house and likely needed the money. Huge circlejerk around xcoin while the devs raped the investors. Then the blocknet ico. Looks like they're gonna pump and dump.
Then after losing every last shred of credibility they deleted their threads in bitcoin talk because of "toxic community" and moved to slack to let their exit scam die quietly.Proceed at your own risk. tl;dr "we're moving to Slack" is actually euphemistic coded language for "we're ready to exit-scam" |
|
|
|
The WO thread just got locked. Theymos want to solve the problem of the wonderful rudderless ship.
It was locked because the OP abandoned it and mods are tired of deleting all the off-topic posts. That sets an interesting precedent. Perhaps if users consistently report all the low-content, spam graphic heavy, and price speculation posts from the Dash [ANN] thread it will likewise be locked until someone volunteers to help move all the offending posts to the proper thread in the Speculation subforum.... |
|
|
|
Problem with DigibyeMarket has been resolved.  Will I be refunded the full 2*$16.00 for the Riot Points I never received, or the just the (now greatly depreciated 2*387 DGB) used for the transactions?
Please PM us your details and we will make sure you are refunded in full. Also, just to clarify we are not able to delete anyone's posts on here. And yes we fulfilled many orders over the past 12 months. Once again, some people made orders between 100 -200 satoshi. Which means a $10 card now cost them $100 - $200. Some people made orders when DGB was at 2600 sat. Which means a $10 card costs us $20. It is only fair we return everyone's DGB. Also, we are only talking about a couple dozen orders here. We will be closing DiigByteMarket down as we do not want to be in the e-commerce business. It served its purpose when DigiByte was not widely known. We have to much other exciting stuff to be working on. We would love to get bigger e-commerce platforms to add DGB. More importantly, DGB needs a good payment processor to handle automatic transactions. Does anyone have any recommendations? DigiByte reached out to me via PM and got my refunds sorted. It wasn't a significant amount of DGB; the principle is more important and I'm happy to be able to take DGB off my blacklist. DGB has the properties (PoW, fair launch, active development and community) I look for in a buy-and-hodl coin. Although I ragedumped my stash (at >%100 profit thanks to all the stupid greedy mondkinder ) I'll keep tabs on the project and may buy back in when the price finds a floor. |
|
|
|
Dash's time is coming back soon be ready guys.
Never forget:  Read the responses if you are new to Dash.  iCEBREAKER if you criticise every coin and name it as shitcoin why dont you launch your own 100% flawless coin or is it your profession to criticise every coin  . I don't have time to criticize "every coin" but I understand you wish to deflect my specific criticisms of Dash (LOL custom Masternode hardware? Rly? ) by repeating the irrelevant, distracting phrase "criticise every coin" as a red herring. As for 100% flawless coins (nice strawman, mind if I use it to talk my book?  ) I know of three: Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Monero. Dash is the most flawed, BTW. |
|
|
|
Over the short term yes Litecoin could do very well if Bitcoin seizes up even more due to the 1 MB blocksize limit; however from the long term fundamental point of view Litecoin has the same issue as Bitcoin. Think Bitcoin with a 4 MB blocksize limit. This only kicks the can down the road.
By failing to account for the effects of the Lightning-type payment channels which segwit enables, your scenario assumes (within circumstances which may be avoided) facts not yet in evidence. With segwit LTC already quadrupled its effective block size once, so what makes you think they couldn't do it again if/when necessary? PS Bitcoin has not seized up for anyone paying market rates for priority processing. I've been particularly pleased with the next-block confirmation and very low fee of withdrawals from Poloniex. "Seizes up" is just your intentionally inaccurate, technically meaningless FUD phrase; it's merely a provocative, emotionally laden term falsely implying Bitcoin is not working within established functional parameters. Thanks for getting me to look up the origin of the Bitcoin Paralysis trope; Gavin's May 26, 2015 article "Analysis Paralysis" fairly epitomizes its genesis. Note the date of Gavin's post is May 2015, which was more than two years ago. Now focus on the insinuation in Gavin's conclusion: I dont think we should adopt the Silicon Valley mantra of move fast and break things. But I do think we need to move stay still and watch things break is just as bad. Gavin's entire point was that the "Core Bitcoin project has been suffering from analysis paralysis over the block size issue for at least three years" and that it will break if we don't embrace his vision of a contentious hard fork. But that prediction was wrong. Very wrong. Bitcoin in 2017 works better than it did in 2015. As a fellow man of science, presumable subscribing to the philosophy of empiricism, how long are you willing to tolerate Gavin & Co's failed doomsday predictions before you reexamine and reevaluate their hitherto unvalidated models? Of course absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but IMO you are falling for what Prof. Szabo calls Pascal's Scams. http://Http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2012/07/pascals-scams.html explains why the Gavinsta "hardfork right meow or d000m!11!" scam and global warming, etc. are parasitic memes feeding on artifacts of human (ie not strictly logical) cognition. The Chicken Littles have been wrong for 5 years about Bitcoin's sky falling absent a contentious hard fork. That half decade of experience has provided reams of new evidence and information about Gavin/Hearn's "Bitcoin has failed" hypothesis. Time to adjust your Bayesian inference accordingly. |
|
|
|
Will I be refunded the full 2*$16.00 for the Riot Points I never received, or the just the (now greatly depreciated 2*387 DGB) used for the transactions?
Please PM us your details and we will make sure you are refunded in full. Also, just to clarify we are not able to delete anyone's posts on here. And yes we fulfilled many orders over the past 12 months. Once again, some people made orders between 100 -200 satoshi. Which means a $10 card now cost them $100 - $200. Some people made orders when DGB was at 2600 sat. Which means a $10 card costs us $20. It is only fair we return everyone's DGB. Also, we are only talking about a couple dozen orders here. We will be closing DiigByteMarket down as we do not want to be in the e-commerce business. It served its purpose when DigiByte was not widely known. We have to much other exciting stuff to be working on. We would love to get bigger e-commerce platforms to add DGB. More importantly, DGB needs a good payment processor to handle automatic transactions. Does anyone have any recommendations? DigiByte reached out to me via PM and got my refunds sorted. It wasn't a significant amount of DGB; the principle is more important and I'm happy to be able to take DGB off my blacklist. DGB has the properties (PoW, fair launch, active development and community) I look for in a buy-and-hodl coin. Although I ragedumped my stash (at >%100 profit thanks to all the stupid greedy mondkinder ) I'll keep tabs on the project and may buy back in when the price finds a floor. |
|
|
|
Has anyone ever actually used digibytemarket.com to successfully purchase anything, or has it been a scam the whole time?
I'm pretty sure it was all a setup to steal $32 from some sucker fool. Looks like it worked..(just having a laugh..seriously though, $32? I loose that much per trade on fees alone). Are you saying that given small amounts of money, it's OK for a business to not provide the advertised product?  Looks like Jared disagrees with your (stupid) POV, because he disabled digibytemarket.com's scamming functionality. Before Scam Accusation: After Scam Accusation: See how that works? Now where are my refunds? |
|
|
|
thanks for posting this. I was looking for Jared's response on the digi thread but i couldn't find it. This icebreaker guy is just salty.
Responded here:
[*excessive Happy Talk and pumpy marketing pablum omitted*]
Finally, a few housekeeping notes. All recent orders on DigiByte Market will be refunded due to the recent price fluctuations.
How insulting that Jared considers non-fulfillment of PAID CUSTOMER ORDERS to be merely dead-last-priority "housekeeping." Good to know he cares much more about chasing Citi unicorns than actual paying users of digibytemarket.com. Jared's response fails to adequately address the following questions/problems: 1. Why were the Market and Gaming sites abandoned in failure modes rather than being shut down gracefully after a proper public announcement? Citi hype perhaps? 2. Why is "muh hectic price fluctuations" being used to excuse those failure modes? Is Jared unaware crypto prices are volatile? 3. Will I be refunded the full 2*$16.00 for the Riot Points I never received, or the just the (now greatly depreciated 2*387 DGB) used for the transactions? 4. Has anyone ever actually used digibytemarket.com to successfully purchase anything, or has it been a scam the whole time? PS I'm not "just salty." I get shit done. EG, digibytemarket.com has been SHUT DOWN thanks to my salt. Here's the 'Before iCEBREAKER' vs 'After iCEBREAKER' of the site: THEN: NOW: |
|
|
|
[*excessive Happy Talk and pumpy marketing pablum omitted*]
Finally, a few housekeeping notes. All recent orders on DigiByte Market will be refunded due to the recent price fluctuations.
How insulting that Jared considers non-fulfillment of PAID CUSTOMER ORDERS to be merely dead-last-priority "housekeeping." Good to know he cares much more about chasing Citi unicorns than actual paying users of digibytemarket.com. Jared's response fails to adequately address the following questions/problems: 1. Why were the Market and Gaming sites abandoned in failure modes rather than being shut down gracefully after a proper public announcement? Citi hype perhaps? 2. Why is "muh hectic price fluctuations" being used to excuse those failure modes? Is Jared unaware crypto prices are volatile? 3. Will I be refunded the full 2*$16.00 for the Riot Points I never received, or the just the (now greatly depreciated 2*387 DGB) used for the transactions? 4. Has anyone ever actually used digibytemarket.com to successfully purchase anything, or has it been a scam the whole time? |
|
|
|
Your post fails to mention much less account for massive overall growth of the crypto sector, which puts in proper context BTC's relative decline. In other words, you are lying by omission (that's a nasty habit). Now that I have your attention, here's a tweet that did not age well AT ALL....  |
|
|
|
Huge increase in net hashrate, difficulty was from BOTNET. it's clearly seen on the graph of monero net hqashrate (A sharp increase in network hashrate by more than 10Mh within few hours). Same thing was in May, when was found another trojan. Or do you really think that 200K+ machines was connected to the monero network within a few hours and this is not botnet? LOL. The sad side of all of this - the fallen profit by 18-20% due to the increased net difficulty on same amount. It's not sad for hashrate to go up. It is sad that some people don't understand the only things more fungible than Monero's coins are Monero's PoW hashes. But hey, M04R CH33P C01NSZ 4 US iamirite?!? |
|
|
|
can someone explain why dash is worth more then others altcoins?what is the tech?what are the fees?what about the network? Two tiered network, masternode backbone Instantsend Privatesend Self funded Distributed and decentralized governance Soon to come; evolution that transform crypto and makes it accessible to nearly everybody - not the technically advanced users only. In a sense it is surprising that the price is as low as it is. By this time next year things are likely to be very different in the top of coinmarketcap That explanation (it's actually just a list of marketing buzzwords) is not based on facts or logic. It's 100% pure Evan's Gate cargo cult doctrine. Dash's 2nd tier is a fatal flaw, not a feature, because it requires users to trust 3rd parties controlled by unknown entities. Also, the Masternodes are a Ponzi scheme and HYIP in violation of the Howey act, and thus ripe for aggressive law/regulatory enforcement actions. Dash's trusted 3rd party "backbone" is a security hole and presents the .gov JBTs of the world a fat juicy target. Instantsend isn't any faster than Ethereum and Digibyte's 15-second blocks, and utterly obsolete compared to Litening (Lightning on Litecoin). Privatesend hasn't been audited in years despite many code base changes, and is shit-tier garbage compared to Monero's state-of-the-art RingCT. The "self-funding" is also misleading, given the funding is created by inflation and comes at the involuntary expense of existing bagholders. Many printing-press funded projects lack accountability and have made a mockery of Dash's entire approach to throwing money at every charlatan who asks for a handout. That's why there are multiple try-hard efforts underway to heap atop Dash's broken enterprise logic more convoluted bureaucratic epicycles. See https://forum.getmonero.org/8/funding-required for an example of a proper 'skin in the game' approach incorporating best practices such as voluntary donation, escrow, and deliverable milestones. Monero's FFS is why it doesn't suffer from a litany of failures (which constitute dis-proof of concept) like Dash's. EG: 1. Dash Delinquents: Charlie Shrem's Dash Debit Card2. Dash Delinquents: Dash Play AwardsIt sounded like a great idea: Dash sponsorship of a big fancy awards show for Youtube content creators. It would be targeting a well aligned market (online content creators who earn off the internet), and the proposal creators had some great ideas on how to integrate an aggressive Dash campaign throughout.
There was just one problem. The entire awards show was fake. It never happened. The Dash treasury got scammed. 3. Dash Delinquents: Dash Branded ATM'sWhere did the ATM's actually end up? Nowhere. They don't exist.
These proposal owners have at least posted a few updates on their progress, but it's looking more and more like the Dash treasury didn't actually buy deployment of Dash ATM's. Instead, we've provided startup capital to individuals who would like to deploy ATM's but are not yet prepared to do so.
This is another example of where the Dash treasury could have benefitted from having a vetting manager supervise and investigate these projects. 4. Dash Delinquents: Developer DocumentationDash desperately needs some developer documentation.
QuantumExplorer was paid a substantial sum of money with the expectation that he would either provide value or return the money. He has provided no services, and now he is audaciously refusing to return the funds as promised.
The proposal owner was fairly active on the Dash.org forum up until the day he got paid. Since then, he's gone totally dark. No progress updates, no forum activity, not a single completed page of documentation. This is what you might call "dine and dash", or rather "dash and dash".
QuantumExplorer is refusing to honor the terms of his proposal not only in providing zero work product but also in his pledge to provide transparency over the application of the funds and in his promise to return any unused funding:
Did he spend any of those funds to hire documentation writers for his project? Did he use any of those funds to even advertise to hire writers? Did he live up to his commitment to be "transparent" with the use of the funds? No, no, and no. A mere 12 hours after he was awarded his payment, at 15:43 that same afternoon, he swept 100% of the money away to top off the remaining coins he needed to start a new masternode, which has earned him an additional 12.6 DSH to date.
How could this have been avoided? First of all, think about in what strange world a newly hired employee would be fronted three months' wage before showing up for a single day of work and without even providing the employer with a single valid piece of contact information. Even Basicpop the cult enforcer agrees Dash's current approach is stupid, broken, and a giant fail. The biggest, fattest lie of all is that Dash's governance is somehow "distributed." Nothing could be further from the truth. Dash is 100% centralized, as amply demonstrated by Evan's arbitrary Instamine-intensifying cut of Dash's total emission as well as his sudden top-down decision to rebrand Darkcoin to Daesh Dash. He's even written on this very forum an admission that "nothing in Dash is fixed." This is what it looks like when a shitcoin focuses more on marketing than development:  Evolution is not "soon to come." That's another lie. Evolution has no whitepaper, much less peer review and alpha/beta code. Github or GTFO you goddamn snake oil salemen! |
|
|
|
Very strang!e, every time DGB shows progress in development, you always come with the words envy and hate, no wonder if you love monero, one thing i want, do you have proof of transaction there? From the way you say is very clear you are a liar and jealous, for two years watch this forum, I have never seen you complain post something before and why just come up now?Liar and mouthed, But do not worry people like you would be worse than trash. The right steps you create a thread and get together with fellow junk
Because of your gambling on the price of the coin, you are triggered by me reporting the fact digibytemarket.com is a broken website with no working support options. I just want the Riot Points I paid for. 
Why is it expecting too much for Digibyte Market to either fulfill customer orders or shut down until fixed? |
|
|
|
My response to being called a "frustrated little bitch" because I dared to complain about Digibyte Market stealing customers' money has been deleted. So I'll repost it in a Scam Accusation thread. SCAM ACCUSATION: DGB Digibyte DigibyteMarket.com DigibyteGaming.com fly-by-night operations
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1979215.0Everyone be sure to thank Jared's white knight for instigating this outcome. OMG what a fish! You are piece of shit. Go hell you TROLL! You are complaining about me reporting the fact digibytemarket.com is a broken website with no working support options, just because of your gambling on the price of the coin. I just want the Riot Points I paid for. Why is it expecting too much for Digibyte Market to either fulfill customer orders or shut down until fixed? |
|
|
|
what's OCN?
Overclock.net. Huge, old PC performance enthusiast community. They banned discussion of Bitcoin for years, until they had to concede defeat by Honey Badger. But now they love getting paid XMR to benchmark their 1337 rigz! |
|
|
|
scam? ...
hmmm ...
im guessing that word is being used to much in the wrong context ... BUT - if these are facts - and as such factually speaking - then a few of these points raised need to be responded to in a more civil manner ...
so jared just deleted the posts? ... without warning and response? ...
not a good way to market a product at all i guess ...
a civil valid response would have been a much more functional way of either rebuking - or agreeing and rectifying the points made ...
ill watch the outcome of this ...
#crysx
If you are willing to waste $10 worth of DGB, you may personally verify that DigibyteGaming.com takes coins but doesn't fulfill customers' orders. When advised of this fact, Jared waved his hands around and said some meaningless crap about how the site isn't "really abandoned" (whatever the fuck that means). Because Jared knows digibytemarket.com is scamming yet he leaves it up to keep scamming rather than take it down, he is a scammer. |
|
|
|
Is the network fucked up?
Yes. Totally. after the BTC fiasco, we might witness the begining of the end for ethereum also...way too many problems even at this very little scale...lot's of transactions that are pending..to many delays..1 bloody ico and everything is fucked up It looks like with these massive ETH network congestions competitive platforms will have more opportunities.
Hopefully all this unpleasant situation with transactions will be over soon. I also have sent one ETH based token about 2 hours ago and it is still nowhere going. Once the main blockchain which is Etehreum will be fully functional it will be back to normal everything. I am aware of this but waiting when all this is happening.
It is glorious to see what's become of the smug ETH heads as they suddenly lose their appetite for talking shit about how 'slow' and 'crippled' and 'obsolete' Bitcoin is. Where is your arrogant vapor hyping now? Did it die with the first ICO disaster? Was it buried with this latest one? You were warned ETH doesn't actually scale better than Bitcoin. You didn't listen. How's that working out? |
|
|
|
That looks awesome. Guess the next few days are going to be exciting for DGB holders! Jared can't even keep Digibyte Market's simple DGB-based shopping cart working, much less be bothered to shut down the site when it starts stealing money. Yet he feels entitled to run Citi's identity project? LAAAAWWWWL G. T. F. O. That's never going to happen. Not in a million years. Don't believe me? Go to https://www.digibytemarket.com/ and try to buy something. You will spend your coins and get nothing in return. If you try to use the online Help option, it fails. If you email info@digibytemarket.com it won't even acknowledge getting the email. That (along with the abandoned and probably insolvent Digibyte Gaming platform) is the essence of DGB. This is why you should learn to walk before trying to run. If you don't, you trip and smash your face all over the sidewalk. The coin should be renamed DinduByte or perhaps DingyByte. Per Jared in case you missed it; "Please note we have received thousands of messages across bitcointalk, twitter, telegram, Reddit & email this past week and we are trying to respond to people's questions and concerns as quickly and orderly as possible. We also have a few of us traveling at the moment preparing for upcoming events and meetings. We are working to consolidate marketing & tech information for new people in one place on digibyte.co. Organizing a new team, hiring people and preparing a new coordinated marketing strategy will take some time. We have had our heads down coding away on several projects up until this point. You must have the technology ready before people can use it. We are just about there now and are going to be shifting gears as well as expanding several projects and the team. Stay tuned and thank you all for supporting DigiByte." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- People don't listen to the fudders. Either they want cheap coins or just frustrated little bitches. Keep calm. More nice things to come.... Well they're getting cheap coins today. Looks like the frustrated little bitches have DGB in the toilet. My response to being called a "frustrated little bitch" because I dared to complain about Digibyte Market stealing customers' money has been deleted. So I'll repost it in a Scam Accusation thread. SCAM ACCUSATION: DGB Digibyte DigibyteMarket.com DigibyteGaming.com fly-by-night operations
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1979215.0Everyone be sure to thank Jared's white knight for instigating this outcome. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
