I think the Rich dude deserves to live anyway that he likes as long as his or her style of living doesnt kill anyone. Its not his duty to give money to the less fortunate in society.
The point is that money is limited... For example... let's say there is a total of $1,000,000 on the planet... If one person takes $500,000, and another takes $250,000, and a third takes $125,000... 3 people now control 88% of all the money on the planet... leaving the other 7,500,000,000 people to fight over the remaining $125,000 (anyone see Hunger Games?) This is the current situation... 5 people control HALF the wealth on the PLANETit's the hoarding of money that screws poor peopleWhen one person has so much money they can shit on a solid gold toilet... and an entire country (Yemen) is starving to death because they can't afford to buy food to feed their children... something is FUCKED UP It's like the new American health care bill the republicans are trying to pass... it will kick 23,000,000 people off health insurance, more than double the insurance costs for elderly and people with pre-existing conditions (which they can't afford so they will die)... only to give a tax break of $500,000,000,000 to rich fucks who don't need the money This health care bill WILL kill people for money... period... that's all it is... it's a tax break for rich fucks and people will die because of it... this is what happens when you let greedy fucks have all the money... they only want more money, and don't care who they kill to get it This is a serious fucking problem Is money really limited, it is very true that Bill Gates and the rest have half the wealth of the entire world, But he is doing a very good humanitarian job with his foundation, remember he donated half of his wealth some time ago to help the poor and he is doing a great job at that if only the other wealthy guys would follow suit, thats going to be good for the entire world because they aint gonna take the money to their graves when they die. Money is limitless, if you can have a good idea that people are willing to pay for, you can have all the money you want. The problem with the situation today is that the accumulation of wealth has made the playing field quite uneven. It's fine if they'll play fair but no, you see them doing hostile takeovers, killing off competition that won't agree to a buy out, and lobbying for preferential treatment.
Money is limited... not by numbers, but by value/buying power You can always create more money, but it devalues the money which is already in circulation... If there is $1,000,000,000 in the whole world... a cheeseburger might costs $1... but if the money supply doubled, so would the cost of a cheeseburger... If there is $10,000,000,000, a cheeseburger would cost $10... that's just how it works It's not about the amount of dollars you have, it's about the % of the total you own If 5 people hoard 50% of the money... the rest of the 7,500,000,000 people have to fight over the other 50% (but prices are double because half of the money supply is being hoarded)... and since prices are double, it hurts poor people the most, who spend their entire income just to provide food for their families... food they buy from the rich people, making them even richer It's a vicious cycle... which is normally solved by high taxes on the rich... but here in 'Murica, the effective tax rate on wealthy has dropped from 35% to 15% since 1980... wealthy people have stopped paying taxes (like Donald Drumphf) |
|
|
|
Prayer is the spiritual need that man needs in his life. Man is the one who needs God, not the other way around. By praying and remembering Allah our hearts are serene, avoid spiritual diseases such as anxiety, fear, anxiety, hesitation and so on.
Anxiety, fear, (anxiety again), hesitation... are not diseases... Anxiety and fear are based on the fight or flight response... it gets your adrenaline pumping so you can think faster and make a good/fast decision, particularly when your life depends on it Hesitation is not a bad thing either... you certainly don't want to make rash/uneducated decisions... it's usually best to hesitate and critically think about a decision, weighing the pro's and con's, etc (assuming you have time and aren't in a life/death situation, but then you'd be in the fight/flight mode as described above) Serenity is not a good thing either... it's complacency... it causes the biggest problem of them all... the one which currently threatens the long-term health of the planet... " The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" "Religion is the opiate of the masses" Religion encourages you to be happy with doing nothing, so that evil will triumph |
|
|
|
I would not do it first if I am right in the 10 commandments of god one of those 10 are thou shall not kill,
So basically if it ever happens then it is not god that commanded you to kill homosexuals.
God can not order someone to kill, because he gives life to all people even if they become gay.
God will not order anyone to be killed, God is powerful and strong to do everything by HIMSELF. He is a loving God and takes no delight in the destruction of People.
God has never done so and it will never do so.
No. Because god will not command us to murder someone. Murdering someone is a sin. Only god, only him can take the lives of anyone not us people. I think hes not the one to command that, the evil will do that thing.
Did none of you bother to read my OP? You can't claim god wouldn't command you to murder homosexuals, because he already did... it's in the bible... I quoted it (I assume you believe the bible is "the word of god"?) God commands the murder of millions of people in the bible... it's not just homosexuals... it's witches, unruly children, blasphemers, idolaters, other religions, etc... If you haven't heard of god ordering the murder of people, you have not read the bible There is one part where god orders the Israelites to murder everyone in 60 cities... 60 cities at once! They were ordered to kill all the males and women over 12... the women 12 and under were taken as sex slaves... by the command of god (according to the bible) You guys don't know shit about what is in your "holy bible" do you? |
|
|
|
Yup. If I believe an omnipotent, omniscient being told me to do something, I would do it. If I get caught and punished as a result, then obviously that being wanted me to get punished; or I'm so far gone that any punishment done to me at that point would not matter. Once again, murder is murder... good luck explaining the voices in your head to the police
I don't think you understand the concept of voices in your head... god doesn't exist Besides the fact it would be contradictory to the "do not murder" commandment... how would you even solve such a dilemma? God told you to both murder and not murder... how could you follow contradictory commands? If it was a test, you fail by murdering your child... that's obvious, right? EVERY person who has been on trial for murder claiming, "God made me do it", has been convicted and sentenced... and they all believed in the voices in their head... they were convinced god told them to kill their children or someone else... But god didn't actually tell them to do it, right? Can we at least agree that every person who has claimed, "God made me do it" is either a liar or insane? It is amazing that we consider insane people insane only when they commit murder, not before. Before that, they are "religious", after they murder someone they are insane. They were insane before they committed the murder!!! Anyone who hears "God voices" should be locked up pronto, before he/she harms themselves or others. Good point... Society will lock a person in a mental institution if they hear voices of Scooby Doo in their head But, if the person claims they hear god's voice... they become a preacher and scam 10% of their congregation's income |
|
|
|
I think the Rich dude deserves to live anyway that he likes as long as his or her style of living doesnt kill anyone. Its not his duty to give money to the less fortunate in society.
The point is that money is limited... For example... let's say there is a total of $1,000,000 on the planet... If one person takes $500,000, and another takes $250,000, and a third takes $125,000... 3 people now control 88% of all the money on the planet... leaving the other 7,500,000,000 people to fight over the remaining $125,000 (anyone see Hunger Games?) This is the current situation... 5 people control HALF the wealth on the PLANETit's the hoarding of money that screws poor peopleWhen one person has so much money they can shit on a solid gold toilet... and an entire country (Yemen) is starving to death because they can't afford to buy food to feed their children... something is FUCKED UP It's like the new American health care bill the republicans are trying to pass... it will kick 23,000,000 people off health insurance, more than double the insurance costs for elderly and people with pre-existing conditions (which they can't afford so they will die)... only to give a tax break of $500,000,000,000 to rich fucks who don't need the money This health care bill WILL kill people for money... period... that's all it is... it's a tax break for rich fucks and people will die because of it... this is what happens when you let greedy fucks have all the money... they only want more money, and don't care who they kill to get it This is a serious fucking problem |
|
|
|
|
If you really think about it, you are being a total douche when you pray for anything
You are basically telling god... that you know what is best, more than god does
By praying, you are saying...
"Hey god, I know you don't want to give me a new car, but I want it anyway"
"Screw your perfect/divine plan god, I want a new car... me me me me me me, it's all about me"
If it is god's will... why are you trying to change god's will?
Do you really think you know better than god does?
Or, are people just selfish and don't care what god has planned?
|
|
|
|
|
I can imagine a flying teapot which is hiding behind Uranus so nobody can see it
That does NOT mean it exists
But, you can't prove it doesn't exist, can you?
So maybe anything I imagine exists... or maybe I'm not solipsistic?
Either way, it doesn't prove shit about god
This article only proves that people are super gullible and will believe anything which reinforces their preconceived ideas without critically thinking about it... what else is new?
|
|
|
|
,,,,,,,,Literally speaking, God doesn't really exist in real life and even if you ask modern people. It is all about faith, faith exist because we believe god, if we believe god then he really exist, just like what other people are saying there is no proof that he really exist but we have faith in our minds and hearts it is our weapon we got.
Faith is stupid Faith literally means believing in something without, and/or contradictory to all evidence Why would you believe in something that is contradicted by evidence? It is many times harmful to believe in something which does not exist... people have died... thousands of people have died because they had faith god would heal them or their child... people can be seriously stupid, even to the point of death God does not answer prayers, god does not heal people... if you are sick, go to the hospital... faith in god's healing power will only kill you |
|
|
|
If God, appeared in all of his power and glory, commanded anyone to do something - I doubt anyone would refuse.
I am a religious person, and I regularly attend Hindu temple services. Even then, if my god ask me to kill someone, then I'll refuse instantly. Human life is more precious than anything else in this world. As much as I hate religions... Hinduism seems fairly benign... I can't recall any Hindu terrorists, at least not in America/Europe I've never had a Hindu tell me I'm evil and going to hell... I've never seen a Hindu be hateful towards homosexuals, or any of that bigoted christian/muslim crap I have little respect for people who choose to believe in fairy tales, but at least Hindu's keep to themselves and don't fuck with everyone else |
|
|
|
So that He can masturbate to all the suffering that He's caused?
Just kidding; God's not a sexual sadist[citation needed], He's actually an exhibitionist, and gets off on flashing His privates to His prophets. See Exodus 33:23 (in which God famously moons Moses) and Ezekiel 1:27 and 8:2 (in which Ezekiel actually gets a good look at God's genitals, and describes them as being made of fire, though that just raises further questions).
My genitals were on fire once... antibiotics cleared it right up As for god... well, god doesn't exist! Until there is physical evidence of a god which can be studied, there is no reason to believe in one You might as well ask what color dress the tooth fairy likes to wear... it doesn't matter... it's a fairy tale |
|
|
|
|
Is this btt?
Why are you asking for help here?
Nobody here can help you
Other than perhaps offer advice like don't use the same password in multiple places... don't download suspicious software... don't open suspicious email attachments... don't click email phishing links and enter your username/pass in a website that is spoofed
I'd bet $1,000,000 "your friend" did one of the above, and handed his password to the thief
|
|
|
|
They will never die dude, religions depend on our existence.
I disagree... religion is dying on the vine Thanks to the internet, people can see how bullshit religions are This "hockey stick graph" looks as bad as the one used to scare people about global warming  Pew Research Center says non-religion will be the top religious affiliation by 2050!  |
|
|
|
Look you know i am right so stop please .. Lets just agree to disagree..  I say a science theory is not fact because they even use the word theory in the sentence .. You are still being intentionally ignorant, so I'll clarify again A fact is one piece a data... a theory is a collection of data... it could never be called the "fact of evolution" because there is more than 1 piece of data... the best it gets is the "theory of evolution" I'm sorry you fail to understand the word theory in a scientific context... theory is the BEST it gets, it does not get any better... you cannot prove it more than theory... theory means it is proven beyond any reasonable doubtThere is zero debate whether scientific theory should be treated as fact or "just a hunch"... among scientists, anything called a theory can be relied upon to be an accurate description of reality... scientists will stake their life on a theory (and do so every day)... theory does not mean hypothesis... theory means it has been proven as well as possible given the entirety of information available to the planet... and zero people have come up with a justifiable reason to doubt the theory So yes, a scientific theory is a reliable fact that explains the data and predicts future outcomes with 100% reliability... scientists do not debate this, because they all understand this simple concept If a theory could not 100% reliably predict future outcomes, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, and not called a theory Scientists don't debate evolution because there isn't really anything to debate... It's a collection of facts from several different sciences leading to an obvious conclusion... |
|
|
|
I am ENGLISH we wrote the word THEORY..
A theory is not FACT IT'S A THEORY ..
You do know many things might need to be wrote again ..
Like light speed..
LOL, ok then. Except we are talking not about "theory" but about "scientific theory". If you rewrite light speed you'll have to rewrite the definition of a meter. Have at it, maybe you can successfully revive the concept of aether. You are new so I'll enlighten you... BADlogic and popcorn understand they are wrong... they are simply trying to perpetuate their misinformation Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists. Only ignorant religious sheeple talk about "theory isn't fact" or some such... many of them understand they are wrong, but do not care because their religion is more important to them than the truth Personally, I don't understand their problem with evolution... most christians believe in evolution and have found ways for it to make sense in their own minds... For example, the church I went to as a child... I had asked about dinosaurs and how millions of years meshed with the 6k year old earth of the bible... the answer I got was 2 Peter 3:8 - "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day"... so basically, there could have been a million years between day 1 and day 2 of creation... and dinosaurs could have existed and been extinct before man was even created by god Basically what I'm saying is, the bible says so much shit, it's always possible to make whatever science discovers fit with their beliefs... so I really don't understand why they actively fight against science... it's not like evolution disproves god, they can always claim god invented evolution or some such Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists.. no debate among scientists ..So how do they talk about a theory if no debate?.. You are being intentionally ignorant, but I'll clarify anyway There is zero debate whether scientific theory should be treated as fact or "just a hunch"... among scientists, anything called a theory can be relied upon to be an accurate description of reality... scientists will stake their life on a theory (and do so every day)... theory does not mean hypothesis... theory means it has been proven as well as possible given the entirety of information available to the planet So yes, a scientific theory is a reliable fact that explains the data and predicts future outcomes with 100% reliability... scientists do not debate this, because they all understand this simple concept If a theory could not 100% reliably predict future outcomes, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, and not called a theory Scientists don't debate evolution because there isn't really anything to debate... It's a collection of facts from several different sciences leading to an obvious conclusion... What aspect of evolution do you believe is debatable? What aspect of evolution do you believe is debatable? Did we come from the sea or land .. Life originated in the ocean Did we start from plant life or bacterial life ..
Bacterial Did we all start at one point like Africa or other places ..
Yes, one point Did we come from apes or did aliens seed apes to turn us into humans ..
Apes and Humans shared a common ancestor, we did not come from apes, we are genetic cousins of apes Did aliens put us here ..
No Did we come from mars and many years someone put us here ..
No Is another planet behind the dark side of the moon?
No, that makes zero sense... a planet could not possibly have a stable orbit while staying behind the moon... what sort of idiot are you? Any of these could have been googled... you aren't the first to ask any of these questions, and there are abundant facts about each of your questions if you bother to take the time to do the smallest amount of research into a subject you wish to debate Darwin was right! Study shows life on Earth DID begin on land and not ... www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Darwin-right-Study-shows-life-Earth-DID-begin-land-sea.ht... 14 Feb 2012 - Life on Earth really did start on land in a 'warm little pond' and not in the ... 'I do not think the oceans were a favourable environment for the origin of life .... Interestingly, at least one creationist website now recommends that .... For evolution to be true all we need is reproduction, mutation and inheritance. SEE so many SCIENTIST WITH THEORIES ..But who is right until you prove it to be FACT.. Life may have begun in 'warm little pond' on land, not sea...just as ... www.telegraph.co.uk › Science 9 May 2017 - Charles Darwin speculated that life started in a pond, not in the sea Credit: ... Yet until now the earliest evidence for microbial life on land came from South ... I still think that the biologists have been right all along with ... Human race is doomed if we do not colonise the Moon and Mars, says Scientist suggests life began in freshwater pond, not the ocean https://phys.org › Earth › Earth Sciences 14 Feb 2012 - Life began in the ocean and evolved into all of the different organisms that exist today. ... hard to imagine they got their start in water that was far saltier than it is now. ... on land during the time period when life is believed to have started, .... The problem these questions is that even if we What I meant by ocean was water, not dry land... It is clear from the evidence that humans, and all animals, originated in the water... our earliest stages of life (among other things) show this...ex. sperm ~ tadpole It is likely that it was a puddle of some sort that could dry out and get wet again, as this type of cycle promotes abiogenesis We really don't know if it was salty or not... your articles suggest it was fresh water because salt might penetrate a single-cell life and kill it, but we don't have any evidence to suggest either way... unfortunately the fossil record does not go back to single-cell life 3 billion years ago (yet) It is certainly possible that the first cells had a tougher cell wall to adapt to the harsher conditions... we really don't know, and it doesn't matter does it? |
|
|
|
I CALL IT SCIENCE PROPAGANDA ..
How do you know a lot of technology never come from a crashed spaceship and they want to make billions for themselves ?..
I simply don't understand how someone can believe in god, and aliens... things which there is zero evidence for... And be anti-science... the only method of discovery based on facts and evidence Why would you rather believe fantasy over reality? Why do you choose fiction over fact? Is it more comforting somehow? |
|
|
|
God is a fairy tail, it's not real. Weak minded people believe in him because they are weak and scared of death and can't accept that death is the end, there is nothing else.
That belongs on a poster or something... well said Religion was invented for a few obvious reasons: 1) People wanted to know what happens after death, and believe there was something more 2) People wanted to make sense of the world; where we came from, etc 3) People needed a set of rules to keep themselves out of trouble Some of it made sense at the time, like don't eat pork... they didn't understand the reason why people were getting sick after eating pork was because of Trichinella Spiralis... or that cooking the pork to a proper temperature would kill the parasite... so they wrote "don't eat pork because god said so" to keep their followers from getting sick A lot of the old testament rules are based on a lack of science... though some of them make no sense at all, like not being allowed to wear clothing made from 2 different fabrics... why? Whose dumb idea was that one? Excellent written .... So far, it has been proven that all religions have been made only by the thought of how they have more followers, and none of them do not bother to become a better human in general. Well sure... religion is a job... you have to get paid... originally it was the "sacrifices" people brought to god as "burnt offerings" (cooked meat)... which were eaten by the priests... then they started charging 10% because well... you get more money that way Once that happened it became all about the money... more followers paying 10% = I'm rich beyotch! Why do you think Jesus made such a fuss when he stormed into the temple and saw how much money they were taking from poor people? Religion has been scamming people for thousands of years... even Jesus had a problem with that bullshit |
|
|
|
I am telling you SCIENCE THEORIES are not FACT  ...  You do realise that's why they use the word science THEORY because it's a theory NOT FACT.. Because they wouldn't put the theory after the word SCIENCE.. It's why they say SCIENCE THEORY because they need to theorise what they talk about to be proven to be FACT.. I am ENGLISH we wrote the word THEORY..
A theory is not FACT IT'S A THEORY ..
You do know many things might need to be wrote again ..
Like light speed..
LOL, ok then. Except we are talking not about "theory" but about "scientific theory". If you rewrite light speed you'll have to rewrite the definition of a meter. Have at it, maybe you can successfully revive the concept of aether. You are new so I'll enlighten you... BADlogic and popcorn understand they are wrong... they are simply trying to perpetuate their misinformation Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists. Only ignorant religious sheeple talk about "theory isn't fact" or some such... many of them understand they are wrong, but do not care because their religion is more important to them than the truth Personally, I don't understand their problem with evolution... most christians believe in evolution and have found ways for it to make sense in their own minds... For example, the church I went to as a child... I had asked about dinosaurs and how millions of years meshed with the 6k year old earth of the bible... the answer I got was 2 Peter 3:8 - "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day"... so basically, there could have been a million years between day 1 and day 2 of creation... and dinosaurs could have existed and been extinct before man was even created by god Basically what I'm saying is, the bible says so much shit, it's always possible to make whatever science discovers fit with their beliefs... so I really don't understand why they actively fight against science... it's not like evolution disproves god, they can always claim god invented evolution or some such Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists.. no debate among scientists ..So how do they talk about a theory if no debate?.. But at the end of the day A THEORY IS NOT FACT because it would not be called a theory..
You are still being intentionally ignorant, so I'll clarify again A fact is one piece a data... a theory is a collection of data... it could never be called the "fact of evolution" because there is more than 1 piece of data... the best it gets is the "theory of evolution" I'm sorry you fail to understand the word theory in a scientific context... theory is the BEST it gets, it does not get any better... you cannot prove it more than theory... theory means it is proven beyond any reasonable doubtThere is zero debate whether scientific theory should be treated as fact or "just a hunch"... among scientists, anything called a theory can be relied upon to be an accurate description of reality... scientists will stake their life on a theory (and do so every day)... theory does not mean hypothesis... theory means it has been proven as well as possible given the entirety of information available to the planet... and zero people have come up with a justifiable reason to doubt the theory So yes, a scientific theory is a reliable fact that explains the data and predicts future outcomes with 100% reliability... scientists do not debate this, because they all understand this simple concept If a theory could not 100% reliably predict future outcomes, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, and not called a theory Scientists don't debate evolution because there isn't really anything to debate... It's a collection of facts from several different sciences leading to an obvious conclusion... What aspect of evolution do you believe is debatable? (please do some research before answering this time so you don't embarrass yourself further) |
|
|
|
I am ENGLISH we wrote the word THEORY..
A theory is not FACT IT'S A THEORY ..
You do know many things might need to be wrote again ..
Like light speed..
LOL, ok then. Except we are talking not about "theory" but about "scientific theory". If you rewrite light speed you'll have to rewrite the definition of a meter. Have at it, maybe you can successfully revive the concept of aether. You are new so I'll enlighten you... BADlogic and popcorn understand they are wrong... they are simply trying to perpetuate their misinformation Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists. Only ignorant religious sheeple talk about "theory isn't fact" or some such... many of them understand they are wrong, but do not care because their religion is more important to them than the truth Personally, I don't understand their problem with evolution... most christians believe in evolution and have found ways for it to make sense in their own minds... For example, the church I went to as a child... I had asked about dinosaurs and how millions of years meshed with the 6k year old earth of the bible... the answer I got was 2 Peter 3:8 - "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day"... so basically, there could have been a million years between day 1 and day 2 of creation... and dinosaurs could have existed and been extinct before man was even created by god Basically what I'm saying is, the bible says so much shit, it's always possible to make whatever science discovers fit with their beliefs... so I really don't understand why they actively fight against science... it's not like evolution disproves god, they can always claim god invented evolution or some such Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists.. no debate among scientists ..So how do they talk about a theory if no debate?.. You are being intentionally ignorant, but I'll clarify anyway There is zero debate whether scientific theory should be treated as fact or "just a hunch"... among scientists, anything called a theory can be relied upon to be an accurate description of reality... scientists will stake their life on a theory (and do so every day)... theory does not mean hypothesis... theory means it has been proven as well as possible given the entirety of information available to the planet So yes, a scientific theory is a reliable fact that explains the data and predicts future outcomes with 100% reliability... scientists do not debate this, because they all understand this simple concept If a theory could not 100% reliably predict future outcomes, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, and not called a theory Scientists don't debate evolution because there isn't really anything to debate... It's a collection of facts from several different sciences leading to an obvious conclusion... What aspect of evolution do you believe is debatable? What aspect of evolution do you believe is debatable? Did we come from the sea or land .. Life originated in the ocean Did we start from plant life or bacterial life ..
Bacterial Did we all start at one point like Africa or other places ..
Yes, one point Did we come from apes or did aliens seed apes to turn us into humans ..
Apes and Humans shared a common ancestor, we did not come from apes, we are genetic cousins of apes Did aliens put us here ..
No Did we come from mars and many years someone put us here ..
No Is another planet behind the dark side of the moon?
No, that makes zero sense... a planet could not possibly have a stable orbit while staying behind the moon... what sort of idiot are you? Any of these could have been googled... you aren't the first to ask any of these questions, and there are abundant facts about each of your questions if you bother to take the time to do the smallest amount of research into a subject you wish to debate |
|
|
|
I am ENGLISH we wrote the word THEORY..
A theory is not FACT IT'S A THEORY ..
You do know many things might need to be wrote again ..
Like light speed..
LOL, ok then. Except we are talking not about "theory" but about "scientific theory". If you rewrite light speed you'll have to rewrite the definition of a meter. Have at it, maybe you can successfully revive the concept of aether. You are new so I'll enlighten you... BADlogic and popcorn understand they are wrong... they are simply trying to perpetuate their misinformation Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists. Only ignorant religious sheeple talk about "theory isn't fact" or some such... many of them understand they are wrong, but do not care because their religion is more important to them than the truth Personally, I don't understand their problem with evolution... most christians believe in evolution and have found ways for it to make sense in their own minds... For example, the church I went to as a child... I had asked about dinosaurs and how millions of years meshed with the 6k year old earth of the bible... the answer I got was 2 Peter 3:8 - "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day"... so basically, there could have been a million years between day 1 and day 2 of creation... and dinosaurs could have existed and been extinct before man was even created by god Basically what I'm saying is, the bible says so much shit, it's always possible to make whatever science discovers fit with their beliefs... so I really don't understand why they actively fight against science... it's not like evolution disproves god, they can always claim god invented evolution or some such Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists.. no debate among scientists ..So how do they talk about a theory if no debate?.. But at the end of the day A THEORY IS NOT FACT because it would not be called a theory..
You are still being intentionally ignorant, so I'll clarify again A fact is one piece a data... a theory is a collection of data... it could never be called the "fact of evolution" because there is more than 1 piece of data... the best it gets is the "theory of evolution" I'm sorry you fail to understand the word theory in a scientific context... theory is the BEST it gets, it does not get any better... you cannot prove it more than theory... theory means it is proven beyond any reasonable doubtThere is zero debate whether scientific theory should be treated as fact or "just a hunch"... among scientists, anything called a theory can be relied upon to be an accurate description of reality... scientists will stake their life on a theory (and do so every day)... theory does not mean hypothesis... theory means it has been proven as well as possible given the entirety of information available to the planet... and zero people have come up with a justifiable reason to doubt the theory So yes, a scientific theory is a reliable fact that explains the data and predicts future outcomes with 100% reliability... scientists do not debate this, because they all understand this simple concept If a theory could not 100% reliably predict future outcomes, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, and not called a theory Scientists don't debate evolution because there isn't really anything to debate... It's a collection of facts from several different sciences leading to an obvious conclusion... What aspect of evolution do you believe is debatable? |
|
|
|
I am ENGLISH we wrote the word THEORY..
A theory is not FACT IT'S A THEORY ..
You do know many things might need to be wrote again ..
Like light speed..
LOL, ok then. Except we are talking not about "theory" but about "scientific theory". If you rewrite light speed you'll have to rewrite the definition of a meter. Have at it, maybe you can successfully revive the concept of aether. You are new so I'll enlighten you... BADlogic and popcorn understand they are wrong... they are simply trying to perpetuate their misinformation Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists. Only ignorant religious sheeple talk about "theory isn't fact" or some such... many of them understand they are wrong, but do not care because their religion is more important to them than the truth Personally, I don't understand their problem with evolution... most christians believe in evolution and have found ways for it to make sense in their own minds... For example, the church I went to as a child... I had asked about dinosaurs and how millions of years meshed with the 6k year old earth of the bible... the answer I got was 2 Peter 3:8 - "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day"... so basically, there could have been a million years between day 1 and day 2 of creation... and dinosaurs could have existed and been extinct before man was even created by god Basically what I'm saying is, the bible says so much shit, it's always possible to make whatever science discovers fit with their beliefs... so I really don't understand why they actively fight against science... it's not like evolution disproves god, they can always claim god invented evolution or some such Science theory is as close to fact as it gets, there is no debate among scientists.. no debate among scientists ..So how do they talk about a theory if no debate?.. You are being intentionally ignorant, but I'll clarify anyway There is zero debate whether scientific theory should be treated as fact or "just a hunch"... among scientists, anything called a theory can be relied upon to be an accurate description of reality... scientists will stake their life on a theory (and do so every day)... theory does not mean hypothesis... theory means it has been proven as well as possible given the entirety of information available to the planet So yes, a scientific theory is a reliable fact that explains the data and predicts future outcomes with 100% reliability... scientists do not debate this, because they all understand this simple concept If a theory could not 100% reliably predict future outcomes, it would be downgraded to a hypothesis, and not called a theory Scientists don't debate evolution because there isn't really anything to debate... It's a collection of facts from several different sciences leading to an obvious conclusion... What aspect of evolution do you believe is debatable? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
