Yes but I diversify into different types of assets, not shitcoins.


Okay, but with the qualification that having more than 6 months of expenses in liquidity is usually a loss in real terms due to the opportunity cost. Better to have a maximum of 6 months of expenses and the rest invested.


Agreed.


For most people it is better not to use leverage at all.

And that's one thing that can't change, right? Motorola and Nokia also had a great reputation and prestige.


There is no problem currently. I am giving an objective description of what happened and what could happen if more signature bans are imposed in the future. And it is that after 15 days of mixer ban here you have a lot of forum members who have gone to another forum to advertise mixers there. You say that as this is Satoshi's forum there will always be traffic here and I say that maybe yes maybe no, I'd better wait and see.


Well, not exactly, I am saying that what can happen if more restrictions are imposed, as could happen in the future with casino signatures, for example, which is something that theymos did not rule out but said he did not foresee in the near future, is that the traffic will go elsewhere. To think that if more and more campaigns are banned here the traffic is going to stay because this forum has a prestige nowadays seems to me quite naive.

And competition seems great to me, because I am also quite capitalist in ideology, but precisely the competition makes things change.


Today. Do you think that is something that can't change?


I think you are the one who has best understood what I have said but I would qualify that that's what happened at the moment, just 15 days after the mixer ban.


Agreed.


That is mainly what is happening. But there will also be some members who have run out of campaign here and are now posting only or mainly there. Two casino campaigns recently ended here.


Keep on dreaming.


If in the first thing you say you show that you haven't understood what I'm saying, I'm not going to waste my time with you.


That remains to be seen.


It's not that traffic would just slow down here, it would go elsewhere.


Merit "exchanged" for agreeing to disagree. That basis has long since been reduced to the bare minimum in the forum.

I would seriously consider visiting a psychologist or psychiatrist because it is one thing to be funny and another to be contradicting yourself continuously.

First you say that you wouldn't accept a good offer for signature campaign when you were working for one and you already had the tags and then that the troling of the signature is a way of protesting something you agreed to, the mixer ban. Since this is not the exception, but something quite common with you, I would seriously consider going to get my head checked.

For some reason I had missed this thread. Don't you get tired of making a fool of yourself? You have several tags for trolling, and you call yourself a troll so they are true to reality. You've even done a lot worse than trolling, so behaving like a little kid isn't going to get them removed.

No, but it has posts by examplens, tranthidung, dkbit98, hugeblack, bitmover, Stompix, Rikafip, Igebotz and BlackHatCoiner among others. And so far I have counted 4 managers of signatures campaigns of this forum also there.


You look at the still photo, and I'm talking about the possible evolution.


At $40 to $45 a week when campaigns here pay between $70 and $120 for Legendary doesn't sound like peanuts to me.


A complete spamfest by examplens, tranthidung, dkbit98, hugeblack, bitmover, Stompix, Rikafip, Igebotz and BlackHatCoiner? Yeah sure. And every day new users are teleported.


I don't know why you're responding if you don't even read what I'm saying, and the other one talking about spamfest. I quote it to you to see if it is clear to you:

As I just said in another thread, I think this topic deserved its own thread.

The main effect that the ban has had is that the mixers have gone to advertise in another forum (shitcoinstalks.com), and with it the campaign managers here as well as a lot of forumers that have been "teleported", being currently active in both forums. I put here the quote of mine from the other thread that I think sums it up well:


This is not to criticize theymos' decision to ban mixers, which I understand in order to prevent greater evils in the future, but it is important to be aware of the danger of traffic transfer if further restrictions are introduced in the future.

Of course it works that way. If you create a forum today and get the traffic and advertisers there, the advertising will have the same effect as here, but it will be a slow process of change, it will not happen overnight.

I don't have data to know the effect that advertising is having there but if the campaigns are paying about 1/3 of what they were paying here it is because they have made a calculation based on the traffic there and other factors.

Now, once you open the pandora's box you don't know how this can end. If as a result of the increase in traffic and there start to advertise more campaigns and increase rates, then we will see a transfer of traffic from this forum to that, which so far has not happened because most of those who have been teleported are writing campaigns in the two forums and giving priority to this forum because in these campaigns they get paid more.

If in the end the campaigns there, mixers or whatever, in a hypothetical future, will pay as the mixers paid here before, with up to $250 per week and here the ones that are left pay no more than $100 then we will see a real migration of traffic.

This is something theymos should take into account for future restrictions on campaigns, and I think it deserves its own thread. He said he did not expect more restrictions in the near future, as it could be on casino campaigns for example, but he has to be aware that more restrictions in this sense would simply mean that traffic would migrate elsewhere, surely the shitcoinstalk forum, which has seen a business opportunity in this and makes it easier for people to go there "teleporting" which is to keep the rank they have here by simply creating an account with the same name.

If you go to that forum the first thing you see is a link at the top saying:

Yes, but in order to be a streamer you have to be successful. As you say, people who play poker, and I would add sports betting, can take it as a job but today if they start from scratch it's going to take a lot more time and effort than it did 10 years ago. The normal thing is to start learning while doing other activities, such as work or studies, and when you see that you are progressing and earning more money there is a moment when you can consider becoming a professional and dedicate yourself to it. Being a streamer, or influencer, is an addition to the income from the game, because what you earn by broadcasting, making videos or advertising is extra income.

It is actually a quite rational analysis of the situation that Vod has made. Needing $30 to eat and promising to pay double that is what is stupid because no one is going to give you a loan for that since not only do you have no guarantee that you will pay them back but there is a clear high risk that you will not. And if you actually promise to pay back almost twice as much, all you are doing is making your financial ruin worse.

It is not clear to me. Do you mean financial accounting?

Financial accountability: being responsible with your finances.
Financial accounting: keeping track of your finances.

Anyway, I think both are important and it's difficult to be responsible if you don't keep track, so it would be a previous necessary condition.

What I had yet to see. I mean, you're a Republican and you say that the liberals in the USA have lost their minds and you have to come up with a socialist proposal for this?

I don't know why I'm not surprised.


Again, and I'm not surprised either, you're jealous. Because we keep getting hired and you don't get hired.

I believe it would be 99%+.

Just look at the increase in traffic to the shitcoinstalk forum with the mixer ban here. What has happened is that the mixers have gone to advertise elsewhere and with it many forum members who mostly now write on both forums, but if paid campaigns were banned here what would happen is that virtually everyone who writes here would go to write about the same topics to shitcoinstalk, which also has a Bitcoin section, increasingly active.

Does anyone pay attention to these predictions? I think only newbies are impressed by them. No one knows what the price of Bitcoin will be in 2030, although those of us who are into this believe that it is extremely likely to be much higher than it is now. So the best thing to do is to forget about the noise and keep buying and holding.

I feel the same way. The most normal is to start with crypto, or better just Bitcoin because it requires less capital. And especially if you have less than $2.5K to invest like the OP. Of course you can have some exposure to real estate by buying REITs for example, but I think it is better to invest in other assets and only when you raise large capital move to real estate.

This would be without counting buying the house you live in and paying it off with a mortgage, which for some would not be an asset but it is an investment, it is part of the net worth that you build as you have more equity.

That is what I have defended in this section. The bitcoin can not be created or issue at will, only mined and there is a finite amount, plus it is a demanded good. Therefore it is a commodity, regardless of whether a given country recognizes it as such or not. If it recognizes it for what it is, so much the better.


Precisely this I have also defended in other threads in this same section.

So some of us didn't overlook it at all, OP.

People forget that ETFs add volatility and that just as they can drive the price up faster, they can also drive it down.


Yes, I also believe that the positive impact will be felt in the medium and long term, along with halving. But I would have expected a clearer upside with the approval, followed by a downside to catch minnows, surely the approval was already discounted by the market.

What a combination, cocaine, which is not exactly cheap as electronicash says, and gambling. A straight road to ruin.


In the end he was left with nothing, no gambling, no business and no drugs. Probably now he will do other more unethical things to get money and continue with his vices. These stories usually end fatally, with the protagonist in jail and dying young.

At the moment, the price has made a clear upward move as a result. We will see how this turns out, because it will be followed by a downturn in which many retail investors will lose money playing short term at the hands of the whales. In the medium term, this together with the halving I expect will push the price up quite a bit, although it may add volatility as well.

Hey guys, those of you who are trying to convince people about bitcoin and the forum, it wouldn't hurt to read about what happened to a forum member recently.

Bitcoin Robbery

There are several of us who have said in the thread that we are not trying to convince anyone, or even talk about it, to avoid things like that.

Because of these things I don't tell anyone I have bitcoin, unlike some people on the forum, it's a security issue.


Not exactly. He says he is self-employed. He probably advertises his services saying he accepts payment in bitcoin and that's where the criminals deduced that he would have. They called him to perform a job and the rest we already know. It is a clear risk of "we accept bitcoin here". It's one thing if you have a website, you put it there and nobody knows you are the owner of the website, but if you do work in person it's a risk to even say you accept bitcoin payments.