Kill as many as you can. Get more money that way.
Tom Renz: Hospitals are now becoming killing fields – Brighteon.TVTom Renz accuses hospitals of taking advantage of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to make more money while ignoring the actual needs and requests of their patients. He says hospitals across the U.S. “are now becoming killing fields.”
“When you go to a hospital, even if you don’t have COVID-19, you’d be construed that way,” says Renz during his program “Lawfare with Tom Renz” on Brighteon.TV. “They get hundreds of thousands of dollars for putting you on remdesivir, putting you on ventilator and letting you die. And if you don’t follow, they’ll just intimidate you and coerce you.”
His guest on the program, Nancy Ross, has experienced that firsthand. Ross has been given the power of attorney to act on behalf of Veronica Wolski, a known patriot from Chicago who recently died from COVID-19 at AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center.
The Cook County Medical Examiner’s Office has confirmed Wolski’s death was due to pneumonia caused by a COVID-19 infection, with hypothyroidism as a contributing factor.
Hospital wants to put patient on ventilator
Ross says the hospital wanted to intubate Wolski and put her on ventilator, and the doctors kept telling that every time they see the patient. “They kept reminding her of that instead of talking about other possible treatment,” says Ross, referring to the ventilator. “I just couldn’t get it.” (Related: Overreliance on ventilators led to coronavirus deaths, study shows.)
According to Ross, Wolski had been asking the hospital to give her ivermectin but her requests had been repeatedly denied.
For the uninitiated, the only treatment for the disease approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) involves remdesivir. It is approved for use in adults and children at least 12 years old who weigh at least 88 pounds (40 kilograms).
Remdesivir is an antiviral medication that targets a range of viruses. It was originally developed over a decade ago to treat hepatitis C and a cold-like virus called respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Remdesivir is not an effective treatment for either disease, but it has shown promise against other viruses.
It works by interrupting the production of the virus. Coronaviruses have genomes made up of ribonucleic acid (RNA). Remdesivir interferes with one of the key enzymes the virus needs to replicate RNA, preventing the virus from multiplying.
However, up to 31 percent of patients who received remdesivir have developed multiple organ failure and/or acute kidney failure. “Remdesivir was pulled from clinical trials because it’s too dangerous. It’s just a disastrous drug,” says Renz.
Doctor admits 99 percent of intubated patients die
Renz also shares a message he has just received about a recording from a doctor admitting that 99 percent of the patients they intubate have ended up dying. “These are just bad treatments. They just kill people,” he says
...  Why do you even go to the hospital? Why not pray to your God? BTW, you can refuse the treatment and go home to pray to God and die. You said covid is a myth, so why bother going to the hospital? Man up, drink bleach, 'inject some sun light into your lungs', take any drugs you want, pray to your Bronze Age God, and go to heaven. |
|
|
|
Giving someone the choice to get an abortion is one thing. It is very different when people encourage others to get an abortion, to end a life that would not otherwise have ended.
A mother should have all the relevant facts when deciding if she wants an abortion.
An abortion is ending a human life for the convince of another. To encourage an abortion is comparable to ending a human life for no reason, or perhaps for fun.
For fun? I think you might be exaggerating a bit. It is a tough decision. No doubt. Most women don't want to do it because it is very taxing on the body, or the pregnancies might interfere with their school or work. Can you blame them? It is not just for convenience like you say. They want to get ahead in life. Get a better education or get a promotion at work. That is why they might not want to have a baby at that time in their life. I think women should be the ones deciding it, at least until the fetus becomes viable. At that point, I agree, it is kind of cruel to kill that life. There is nothing special about terminating a non-viable human (or any other) life; you can make another one in no time. No big deal. Humans are not some special or endangered species. We are just slightly smarter than chimpanzees. I would describe someone terminating a pregnancy because it will interfere with school and/or work as being for "convenience". I don't judge them, that is not my place. I also won't sugarcoat what is happening. Both school and job opportunities will still be here after a pregnancy (they will also still be around if the mother decides to take some time off to raise the child, and will still be around for the father if the father decides to take some time off to raise the child). I doubt that any living being that depends on you for support would appreciate it if you suggested that you could just "make another one" if their lives were to end. This would apply to your dog just as much as it would apply to your child. Why are you talking about the killing of children? What is wrong with you? A fetus is not a child. A fertilized chicken egg is not a chicken. BTW, did you even raise children? Not only your 'single plans' are on hold for decades, but they are also replaced by taking care of children. Talk to pregnant women about how 'wonderful' their pregnancies were. Forcing women into having children they do not want is just inhumane. Condoms break, shit happens. Grow up! |
|
|
|
Ok, captain obvious. If you break a fertilized chicken egg, it is the same thing as performing a human abortion. Put a fertilized egg in the incubator and you'll get a chicken, no hen required. If you buy farmer's eggs and eat them, you are not only performing abortions but also eating the chicken embryos.
As for comparing plants and animals to humans, well, do you know anything about biology? We evolved from plants and animals.
All life on Earth has some human DNA in it. Bananas have 60% of human DNA in them. Chimpanzees have 99% of human DNA.
But you are right, comparison of a human fetus to a self-sustaining, alive plant or animal is not quite right, a human fetus is much less structured and is a non-functional, developing life form. You pro-life guys brought the 'fetus is a life' argument, I just followed it to its conclusion.
If your argument is 'protect life', then you have to stop eating and protect all life.
If your argument is 'protect human life only' then, where is your empathy for other animals, including humans?
Why are you supporting tribalism (religions/nationalism) that leads to wars? Why are you supporting the death penalty (for humans)?
If your argument is 'protect human life only because humans are special', I would say prove it to me that we are.
From what we observed in nature, we are just another species, fundamentally no different than 5,400 other mammal species out there, and we are almost identical to about 350+ species of primates.
From what we see, the human population is growing exponentially, doubling every 70 years or so. We don't really need more humans.
We should probably keep the human population growth at zero percent so that we can figure out a way out of this rock.
Lieutenant, I do not know what your beliefs are but your argument about man coming from plants and animals does not match with mine. Man was created by God. That's all I have to say to this. Another thing concerning the egg example you kept using is that I want you to realize that there is something called 'table eggs'. Eggs like that will not hatch even if you leave them in the incubator for a year on a hen sits on it for that long. What that means is that an egg is just an ordinary egg until a hen sits on it or it is put in an incubator but a foetus is a growing baby in the womb already. I called you lieutenant because you called me captain. Now you can salute! Oh, boy. You said plenty. No need to discuss it any further if you think Homo sapiens were created by God. |
|
|
|
I totally know what you mean. With the CDC showing that people are dying by the truckloads from the vaxx: 15,000 deaths, which is only 1% of what is really happening,why would anybody write a paper on it?... to say nothing about getting the paper peer reviewed? And all this when the CDC is shouting how safe the vaxx is... why would anybody trust them or the medical for anything, right? I mean, get people to the hospital, put them on ventilators to destroy their already-weakened lungs, so you can say, "But I WAS giving them oxygen." More money for the hospital, right? Didn't you read the article linked in the OP? It says in the article this way and that, that it is speculation. If you had simply read the title, you would have seen that... maybe. I mean, are you so scared that the medical might be wrong, that you are almost peeing your pants so that you can't think? The medical ISN'T wrong. All they are saying is that they are self-contradictory, so that none of what they say really makes any sense. Even the medical isn't wrong when all they spout is gibberish. Get over and get a few more jabs. Put yourself out of your misery. Make it easier on us all. Do you even read the documents you post? The document you posted is for "Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients,
and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these
doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average
of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. These data were
presented at the 2009 AMIA conference."Nothing to do with the covid vaccine. How about you check the number of confirmed covid deaths? People are dying from covid, by the truckloads. In Canada, many covid deaths are unreported as older people simply die from 'pneumonia'. Do you even post what you are talking about? If you found some document with all that info that you are talking about, you have showed us that vaccines are simply dangerous and should be abandoned. How about you show us the actual isolation of the Covid virus so that we can all see that there even is one. People are dying from the poisonous Covid vaxx by the truckloads. How many times do I have to show you the CDC's own info? Right here https://openvaers.com/covid-data. This is for Covid. Plus the Lazarus report https://openvaers.com/images/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-20116.pdf shows that the-CDC/VAERS is only getting 1% of the reports. Perhaps all 15,000 dead people could be squashed into one of those monster dump trucks that they do strip mining with, so it wouldn't be truckloads, but only one truckload, right? And if that isn't enough, you add "In Canada, many covid deaths are unreported as older people simply die from 'pneumonia'." Are you trying to tell us that Covid is pneumonia? Well, you are half right. It's flu and pneumonia. There isn't really any Covid. If there were, somebody would have isolated it. Or are you able to find the isolation report and notebook and video like franky1 couldn't? What's the matter? Too lazy to post a few links? It was from your link (bolded in your post): https://openvaers.com/images/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-20116.pdf |
|
|
|
Once again a clueless BADecker shitpost where NO PROOF is provided (as usual).
Get a proof or GTFO!
Are millions of vaccine victims disappearing into mass graves?
No. People are not going to work because social assistance coffers are wide open.
Why would you go to work and risk infection from all the non-maskers, anti-vaxxers when you can sit at home and watch
the pandemic on TV?
Get vaccinated, you stupid fucks.
I am fed up with all you 'freedom' fighters. If I were in charge, I would go door to door and vaccinate you all.
Fuck your 'freedom', you stupid imbeciles.
Thanks to fucks like you, people are still dying from covid.
So you jokers really think that there is some kind of Covid thing that is killing people off. Come out of your shells and face reality. Did all your buddies on Bitcointalk just quit? Have you followed their reasons for quitting? Can you find them on other forums? If you do find them, do you have proof that it isn't somebody else that has taken over their handle? They're simply gone, by the truck-loads. It ain't Covid. It's the liberal, ostrich-head-in-hole mind-set that got them to take the vaxx, and now they are gone. And you will be gone, too, shortly... unless you wake up. Cite one peer-reviewed article to show that people are dying by truckloads from the covid vaccine. From what I have seen people are dying by truckloads from complications caused by covid infections. Lack of oxygen can kill even the strongest athlete. I totally know what you mean. With the CDC showing that people are dying by the truckloads from the vaxx: 15,000 deaths, which is only 1% of what is really happening, why would anybody write a paper on it?... to say nothing about getting the paper peer reviewed? And all this when the CDC is shouting how safe the vaxx is... why would anybody trust them or the medical for anything, right? I mean, get people to the hospital, put them on ventilators to destroy their already-weakened lungs, so you can say, "But I WAS giving them oxygen." More money for the hospital, right? Didn't you read the article linked in the OP? It says in the article this way and that, that it is speculation. If you had simply read the title, you would have seen that... maybe. I mean, are you so scared that the medical might be wrong, that you are almost peeing your pants so that you can't think? The medical ISN'T wrong. All they are saying is that they are self-contradictory, so that none of what they say really makes any sense. Even the medical isn't wrong when all they spout is gibberish. Get over and get a few more jabs. Put yourself out of your misery. Make it easier on us all. Do you even read the documents you post? The document you posted is for "Preliminary data were collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. These data were presented at the 2009 AMIA conference." Nothing to do with the covid vaccine. How about you check the number of confirmed covid deaths? People are dying from covid, by the truckloads. In Canada, many covid deaths are unreported as older people simply die from 'pneumonia'. |
|
|
|
That is a logical fallacy. False equivalence. A fetus is not a person.
A chicken egg is not a chicken.
BTW, we are killing life all the time.
All the food you eat is life killed; plants and animals.
I am not sure why you find it distasteful what others do with their bodies. It should be none of your business.
While it is nobody's business what another person does with their bodies, we also have to know that what others do also has a way of affecting us. Why do you think there are traffic lights and regulations for drivers? It is to prevent reckless drivers from harming others. Look at your comparisons you will find out that they are wrong too. A chicken egg that has not be sat on by a hen is a plain egg without life inside the shell but a foetus is a life growing in a womb. It is a baby unborn. Comparing plants and animals to humans is a wrong analysis. Ok, captain obvious. If you break a fertilized chicken egg, it is the same thing as performing a human abortion. Put a fertilized egg in the incubator and you'll get a chicken, no hen required. If you buy farmer's eggs and eat them, you are not only performing abortions but also eating the chicken embryos. As for comparing plants and animals to humans, well, do you know anything about biology? We evolved from plants and animals. All life on Earth has some human DNA in it. Bananas have 60% of human DNA in them. Chimpanzees have 99% of human DNA. But you are right, comparison of a human fetus to a self-sustaining, alive plant or animal is not quite right, a human fetus is much less structured and is a non-functional, developing life form. You pro-life guys brought the 'fetus is a life' argument, I just followed it to its conclusion. If your argument is 'protect life', then you have to stop eating and protect all life. If your argument is 'protect human life only' then, where is your empathy for other animals, including humans? Why are you supporting tribalism (religions/nationalism) that leads to wars? Why are you supporting the death penalty (for humans)? If your argument is 'protect human life only because humans are special', I would say prove it to me that we are. From what we observed in nature, we are just another species, fundamentally no different than 5,400 other mammal species out there, and we are almost identical to about 350+ species of primates. From what we see, the human population is growing exponentially, doubling every 70 years or so. We don't really need more humans. We should probably keep the human population growth at zero percent so that we can figure out a way out of this rock. |
|
|
|
Giving someone the choice to get an abortion is one thing. It is very different when people encourage others to get an abortion, to end a life that would not otherwise have ended.
A mother should have all the relevant facts when deciding if she wants an abortion.
An abortion is ending a human life for the convince of another. To encourage an abortion is comparable to ending a human life for no reason, or perhaps for fun.
For fun? I think you might be exaggerating a bit. It is a tough decision. No doubt. Most women don't want to do it because it is very taxing on the body, or the pregnancies might interfere with their school or work. Can you blame them? It is not just for convenience like you say. They want to get ahead in life. Get a better education or get a promotion at work. That is why they might not want to have a baby at that time in their life. I think women should be the ones deciding it, at least until the fetus becomes viable. At that point, I agree, it is kind of cruel to kill that life. There is nothing special about terminating a non-viable human (or any other) life; you can make another one in no time. No big deal. Humans are not some special or endangered species. We are just slightly smarter than chimpanzees. |
|
|
|
Humans say it is a human right not to be excluded from medical procedures based on sex. Not allowing women access to medical procedures is discrimination.
Science says when a fetus is viable based on the study of human developmental biology.
There are many abortions performed when the fetus would have been able to survive if it had been delivered rather than aborted. These abortions are the most clearly wrong. With advancements in medical technology, viability outside the womb has become increasingly earlier in pregnancy over time. Restrictions on abortion are not prohibiting women from receiving abortions based on their sex. Abortions until viability is a decision only the mother should be taking. Science tells us that viability is around 22-24 weeks. If you want to be on the side of caution, make the laws allowing all abortions until 16 weeks, or thereabouts. Restrictions on abortions implicitly discriminate against women. Imagine if states had different laws against receiving cancer treatments based on the size of your prostate. Some states would allow treatments as soon as the cancer is detected, others will say that your prostate has to be larger than 4 inches. Most men with prostate cancer will be prevented from receiving their treatment in that state. The laws would discriminate against them without explicitly stating that men are prevented from receiving their cancer treatment. I would not compare an abortion to cancer treatments. One is a life saving treatment and one is, what I don’t think anyone would disagree with is an elective procedure. I would also describe an abortion as not medically necessary. (If there is serious, credible medical evidence that the mothers life is in serious danger, she should have the right to decide if she wants an abortion). There is perhaps a valid argument regarding viability. However if you make this argument. However anyone who makes this argument has their credibility go away when they advocate for abortions up until the baby is delivered. I would counter however that it is illegal to take actions that induce someone to harm or kill themselves. I will admit that 6 weeks pregnant is probably earlier than appropriate to limit abortions due to the time it takes a women to realize they are pregnant. However, viability is well past the time it takes a women to realize they are pregnant and make the decision to get an abortion (or not). I would also say that it is not uncommon for men to pressure women to get an abortion of an unwanted baby. I don’t have data, but I think an outsized percentage of abortions in late stages of pregnancy are the result of this pressure. Does it matter if the procedure is medically necessary? How would you feel if the government passed a law to ban hair transplantations for men or breast augmentations for women? BTW, I did not try to imply that babies are cancer (although many parents would probably agree that they can suck the life out of you, especially during the first five years, lol). The point of the example was that both growing fetus and cancer cells multiply rapidly inside one's body. One should have a choice to be able to get the necessary medical procedure done to stop that growth. I would be ok with an abortion ban after 16 weeks, but until then women should have a choice of what to do with their medical issues. I think it does matter if something is medically necessary and it matters that cancer treatment is potentially life saving. Greater consideration should be given when restricting a life saving procedure. There are a lot of restrictions on procedures that are not medically necessary, for example it is illegal to sell your organs. I am not a fan of breast implants, and really don’t understand why people get them. I am sure there restrictions on hair implants. Both are cosmetic procedures and I would be okay, and even support restrictions on extreme procedures of either. When restricting a medically necessary and life saving procedure, especially those that do not harm other lives, you are potentially killing a person. An abortion is something that ends a life, while providing convenience to another. Arguments about viability are fair as are the morals of abortion before and after viability.
This is not an argument you are making personally, however I find it particularly distasteful when some pro abortion advocates almost encourage mothers to get abortions. That is a logical fallacy. False equivalence. A fetus is not a person. A chicken egg is not a chicken. BTW, we are killing life all the time. All the food you eat is life killed; plants and animals. I am not sure why you find it distasteful what others do with their bodies. It should be none of your business. |
|
|
|
Once again a clueless BADecker shitpost where NO PROOF is provided (as usual).
Get a proof or GTFO!
Are millions of vaccine victims disappearing into mass graves?
No. People are not going to work because social assistance coffers are wide open.
Why would you go to work and risk infection from all the non-maskers, anti-vaxxers when you can sit at home and watch
the pandemic on TV?
Get vaccinated, you stupid fucks.
I am fed up with all you 'freedom' fighters. If I were in charge, I would go door to door and vaccinate you all.
Fuck your 'freedom', you stupid imbeciles.
Thanks to fucks like you, people are still dying from covid.
So you jokers really think that there is some kind of Covid thing that is killing people off. Come out of your shells and face reality. Did all your buddies on Bitcointalk just quit? Have you followed their reasons for quitting? Can you find them on other forums? If you do find them, do you have proof that it isn't somebody else that has taken over their handle? They're simply gone, by the truck-loads. It ain't Covid. It's the liberal, ostrich-head-in-hole mind-set that got them to take the vaxx, and now they are gone. And you will be gone, too, shortly... unless you wake up. Cite one peer-reviewed article to show that people are dying by truckloads from the covid vaccine. From what I have seen people are dying by truckloads from complications caused by covid infections. Lack of oxygen can kill even the strongest athlete. |
|
|
|
Humans say it is a human right not to be excluded from medical procedures based on sex. Not allowing women access to medical procedures is discrimination.
Science says when a fetus is viable based on the study of human developmental biology.
There are many abortions performed when the fetus would have been able to survive if it had been delivered rather than aborted. These abortions are the most clearly wrong. With advancements in medical technology, viability outside the womb has become increasingly earlier in pregnancy over time. Restrictions on abortion are not prohibiting women from receiving abortions based on their sex. Abortions until viability is a decision only the mother should be taking. Science tells us that viability is around 22-24 weeks. If you want to be on the side of caution, make the laws allowing all abortions until 16 weeks, or thereabouts. Restrictions on abortions implicitly discriminate against women. Imagine if states had different laws against receiving cancer treatments based on the size of your prostate. Some states would allow treatments as soon as the cancer is detected, others will say that your prostate has to be larger than 4 inches. Most men with prostate cancer will be prevented from receiving their treatment in that state. The laws would discriminate against them without explicitly stating that men are prevented from receiving their cancer treatment. I would not compare an abortion to cancer treatments. One is a life saving treatment and one is, what I don’t think anyone would disagree with is an elective procedure. I would also describe an abortion as not medically necessary. (If there is serious, credible medical evidence that the mothers life is in serious danger, she should have the right to decide if she wants an abortion). There is perhaps a valid argument regarding viability. However if you make this argument. However anyone who makes this argument has their credibility go away when they advocate for abortions up until the baby is delivered. I would counter however that it is illegal to take actions that induce someone to harm or kill themselves. I will admit that 6 weeks pregnant is probably earlier than appropriate to limit abortions due to the time it takes a women to realize they are pregnant. However, viability is well past the time it takes a women to realize they are pregnant and make the decision to get an abortion (or not). I would also say that it is not uncommon for men to pressure women to get an abortion of an unwanted baby. I don’t have data, but I think an outsized percentage of abortions in late stages of pregnancy are the result of this pressure. Does it matter if the procedure is medically necessary? How would you feel if the government passed a law to ban hair transplantations for men or breast augmentations for women? BTW, I did not try to imply that babies are cancer (although many parents would probably agree that they can suck the life out of you, especially during the first five years, lol). The point of the example was that both growing fetus and cancer cells multiply rapidly inside one's body. One should have a choice to be able to get the necessary medical procedure done to stop that growth. I would be ok with an abortion ban after 16 weeks, but until then women should have a choice of what to do with their medical issues. |
|
|
|
|
People are not going to work because social assistance coffers are wide open.
Why would you go to work and risk infection from all the non-maskers, anti-vaxxers when you can sit at home and watch
the pandemic on TV?
Get vaccinated, you stupid fucks.
I am fed up with all you 'freedom' fighters. If I were in charge, I would go door to door and vaccinate you all.
Fuck your 'freedom', you stupid imbeciles.
Thanks to fucks like you, people are still dying from covid.
|
|
|
|
It's hard to argue that Soros hasn't been involved in some shady social dealings in order to further his financial interests. I think he does it purely out of greed though. I don't believe he is inherently evil or trying to do bad like some sort of supervillain. I think he's just a guy who has spent his life growing his bag and he considers it his legacy so he wants to do everything he can in order to make that happen. Sadly, it takes a lot to move the needle at his level so there are certainly under the radar things that occur in order to help specific market bets.
No, I don't think it's greed. It's purely hate for "edom", and the rest of the world too. he is a dangerous supremacists, some kind of imperialist seeking to impose his rule over the whole earth, using his vast networks of financial and propaganda. He tries to white genocide me, control all the AG in all the american states... And his legacy goal is to attempt to place his son as ruler of the world. Happilly he made a giant mistake, by wanting to attack the Chinese State? it's more than any men can chew, and they (him, his son, his family, his friends, his employees) could ever dream to chew... Who has won against the CPC? and it won't be "sorros" the first one to achieve the impossible, to defeat us... We are more, deadlier, smarter, kinder, and reallly know the price of being subjected to a foreign power, be it sorros, or the whole usa post ww2 nuclear armed power... So where ever he wants for battlespace, we are here, ready, as he never could imagine... the march foward, and rejuvenation won't be stopped, by him, or anyone from this earth. Wanna bet? Furthermore should alll people who worked directly or indirectly for any of his organisation, be classified as their master?
I think it would be interesting to move thing legally, and ban them from the universe, him, his family and more importantly minions, worldwide.
To hunt them down for what they are in my own little opinion : enemies of mankind.
His organization and all people working for him will be crunched.
Time is irrelevant.
edit : furthermore I firmly actually believe that anyone getting close to his son (alexander sorros) has to be flagged as an EoM & and if putting down sorros means to have to obliterate ivanka trump or nato, so be it. to be crystal clear.
Why do you hate George Soros? Because he is a rich Jew and a capitalist? Are you a communist? I think I have answered before, and no I don't hate my enemies, I understand them, what counts for them, and I know that by wanting to enslave, enserf, occupy, rule and dominate the Chinese People this man, his son, family, friends and employees have crossed the "yellow lines", and there is no way back, but death. bet? you know my side of it. wait & watch. edit : the cia and whole western intelligence combined, even with their biological weapon release on the chinese people, are already crushed inside PLA / MSS areas of dominance, however, if they push to far, there may be a call back, the kind that will targets islands and yachts, the one where softies who pretend to be rulers of the world will learn what warfare active real front lines looks like... mr zuckerberg can have 64 sec guards, how many does sorros have? a thousand? we are in the thousands of millions ready to fight and die for our independence, at all cost, our sovereignty and security won't be much longer trespassed by foreigners. Got it. You are against capitalists. Do you even realize that there is more than one 'George Soros' out there? Slow down and think, before you do something stupid. Leave your cult. |
|
|
|
Vaccination horror stories by the thousands https://www.worldtribune.com/unexpected-and-heartbreaking-thousands-flood-abc-affiliates-facebook-page-with-vaccination-horror-stories/Why not? Vaccination at the first time is a manifestation of being responsible for one's own life.
Let's correct some of the junk It is being irresponsible for one's own life to inject toxin with unknown short or long term health effects. Vaccine does NOT provide immunity to the virus Vaccine does NOT protect from getting the virus Vaccine does NOT reduce deaths form infection Vaccine does NOT reduce circulation of the viurs Vaccine does NOT reduce transmission of the Aka not a vaccine, back in the days people were smart and ask money for medical experiments Vaccines help your immune system fight the infection once you get infected. The immune response of vaccinated individuals is always better than unvaccinated ones. The spread is reduced as you end up having fewer symptomatic cases. That is the MO of all vaccines, not just the covid vaccine. |
|
|
|
Many countries have laws that imprison people who have abortions. Abortion is directly taking the life of a person that he or she deserves even if he or she has not yet been born. If an abortion because a medical test shows the fetus to have a mutation is acceptable for ethical reasons and avoids suffering later on.
To end abortion, it is necessary to educate young people about sex and raise awareness. Birth control pills also need to be widely advertised for everyone to use. Need government intervention with legal documents and social attention. Ban on medical facilities from performing abortions.
Abortion terminates non-viable life, not a person. Whoever told you that abortion is directly taking the life of a person is a certifiable moron. It amazes me when the so-called conservatives talk about freedom of choice to vaccinate or not (even when they are directly affecting/endangering the lives of others), but then advocate/legislate to prevent pregnant women to have a choice. But then the fetus will become a person. Every year, thousands of couples seek infertility treatment. So why are these people having abortions? Anything other than medical screening is unacceptable. They have to take responsibility for what they did. A fetus is a soul and deserves to enjoy life. Will does not mean is. re: A fetus is a soulProve it. What is a soul made of? |
|
|
|
Furthermore should alll people who worked directly or indirectly for any of his organisation, be classified as their master?
I think it would be interesting to move thing legally, and ban them from the universe, him, his family and more importantly minions, worldwide.
To hunt them down for what they are in my own little opinion : enemies of mankind.
His organization and all people working for him will be crunched.
Time is irrelevant.
edit : furthermore I firmly actually believe that anyone getting close to his son (alexander sorros) has to be flagged as an EoM & and if putting down sorros means to have to obliterate ivanka trump or nato, so be it. to be crystal clear.
Why do you hate George Soros? Because he is a rich Jew and a capitalist? Are you a communist? |
|
|
|
These ways listed can solve the world problem.(1) Ensure good water and sanitation for all.(2)Ensure quality education.(3) promote well being for all ages.(4) Ensure access to modern energy for all.(5) End poverty.(6) achieve gender equality.(7) eradicate hunger and replenish with nutrition and sustainable agriculture.with these factors the problem of the world can be solve.
The question is how not what. |
|
|
|
Many countries have laws that imprison people who have abortions. Abortion is directly taking the life of a person that he or she deserves even if he or she has not yet been born. If an abortion because a medical test shows the fetus to have a mutation is acceptable for ethical reasons and avoids suffering later on.
To end abortion, it is necessary to educate young people about sex and raise awareness. Birth control pills also need to be widely advertised for everyone to use. Need government intervention with legal documents and social attention. Ban on medical facilities from performing abortions.
Abortion terminates non-viable life, not a person. Whoever told you that abortion is directly taking the life of a person is a certifiable moron. It amazes me when the so-called conservatives talk about freedom of choice to vaccinate or not (even when they are directly affecting/endangering the lives of others), but then advocate/legislate to prevent pregnant women to have a choice. |
|
|
|
My World and I, how can I Help?
The planet, Universe, Earth, Biosphere, and world we are living in that we all called "HOME" is faced with different problems,
challenges, neglected norms, degraded cultures and values, and all have summed up together and inflicting severe negative impacts
on us in different ways, thereby making us ask ourselves "What can I do"?
What are some of these challenges we are facing?
The earth and world are faced with these critical problems;
1. Insecurity as there is [constant expression of who has the most powerful weapons].
2. Fluctuations in Economic sectors of almost all nations of the earth.
3. Health challenges and the high influx of diverse kinds of ailments, diseases, and viruses.
4. Threats to Religious beliefs of many, and initiation of acceptance of single religion in some nations of the earth.
5. Constant threatening of the Environment [Environmental Degradation and Climate Change] and loss of bio-diversities in all areas and all part of the world.
[/font][/b]
Now with all these challenges, one will begin to wonder and ponder "Where can I come in to solve these devastating rising issues in our dear World"?
Most of our issues are rooted in our inability to abandon tribalism (nationalism, religions, etc.) and reduce the human population. Improvements in science and technology help improve our standard of living but cannot solve our underlying problems due to the exponential growth of the human population. How can you contribute? Do not reproduce, teach your children to not reproduce. Vote for globalists and environmentalists. Support science, teach young people science. Advocate against nationalism, religions, or any other form of tribalism. Do not buy products that harm the environment. Limit your personal carbon footprint. |
|
|
|
Because they have had it for a couple of decades, now. Not because they are a bunch of doctors who don't have the evidence and the proof that they isolated anything. 2017-2018 was worse. Even the CDC said that 94% of the Covid deaths were from comorbidities. That means that they don't really know what all those Covid deaths were really from. Have you forgotten that already? Most of the covid deaths are related to organ damage due to the lack of oxygen. People who have a solid VO2 max, are generally fit and have strong immune systems, survive the havoc covid causes. The damage to one's lungs caused by covid infection is irreversible. This is exactly why the medical is against ozone injection therapy and peroxide injection therapy. Oh sure, a few doctors do it successfully here and there, but if they promote it widely, they can lose their license to practice medicine. The medical wants to keep you just healthy enough so that you can work, but sick enough (especially mentally) so that you keep paying them to keep you in their slave-spot. This way, they keep on making money. It is not the medical establishment that does that. Obesity is an epidemic in North America and is spreading to the rest of the world. The problem is that majority of people don't read. They are scientific illiterates. They don't know what diet is good for them. What are macros and micros? How much of each do they need? They watch too much TV, drive their cars everywhere, they don't walk or run. How many Americans can do 20 consecutive pull-ups, bench press their body weight for a 1x10 set, or run 400m in under 100 seconds? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
