Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:27:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 110 »
921  Other / Meta / Re: WTF is this? on: November 20, 2015, 11:31:28 PM
Bitcoin Forum > Remove Proxyban
Your IP address has previously been used for evil on this forum, or it is a known proxy/VPN/Tor exit node, so you are required to pay a small fee before you are able to post messages or send PMs. You can still use all of the read-only features without paying.

Your account contains 5.22 units of evil. To atone, you must pay a total of 0.00021008 bitcoins (0.21008 mBTC; 21008 satoshi). Pay to the address 16PuptUtnPWW2LH1uD3gQdn2TGCvgxF9XA. Once you have paid the full amount, wait a few seconds and then reload this page. If the fee is so small that your wallet is unable to send it, you can send any larger amount, though you will not be refunded the difference.

Alternatively, any forum staff member and some other notable members can manually whitelist you. Paying the fee is probably easier/quicker, though.

If you don't have any bitcoins, you can get small amounts of free bitcoins using the sites listed here. It is recommended that you give the free bitcoin sites the address listed above. Do not collect money in your own wallet and then send the bitcoins to the forum -- this will likely result in significant network fees.

If you find any bugs in this system, email pbbugs-...@.... For example, send email here if your payment is not registered an hour after sending it. You will be permanently banned if you send email here requesting free whitelisting.


 Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Grin Shocked Angry Sad Sad Angry Grin Grin Grin Cheesy

i'm not on proxy, and if i was i would'n pay a cent for access

Its a proxy ban, it means your current IP was banned by proxy for the banwothy actions someone else comitted while using said IP. The account created will have to pay the fee in order to post. The evil points decay over time.

Maybe the message in the IP ban should explain in more detail what could have been the cause or possible causes so people wont have to open a post in the meta section everytime they get their ip ''banned''
922  Other / Meta / Re: Promoting Competition in Gambling on: November 20, 2015, 01:22:35 PM
Yes you can, there is no other gambling section in the forum so it would be appropriate, you wont break any rules, dont worry.
923  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion regarding "newbie forumula". on: November 20, 2015, 12:41:05 PM
Actually, I don't/didn't know that.  I read technical stuff, and I'm not really interested in behind the scenes formulas of a web forum.  I don't post when I have nothing of value to say.  If that makes me a "newbie" so be it.  I value quality over quantity.

It was just intended as a suggestion, because the documentation of the formula I found seemed to equally weight time on forum and posts.  Guess not.


Then someone could create 1.000 accounts, leave them there and come back in 1 year to have them all ranked up, that would be stupid. As I said this is a forum, you are supposed to participate in a forum. Quality over quantity it's good but 2 years for 10 posts it's just well..
924  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: The 10 bitcoin traders you must follow on Twitter on: November 20, 2015, 12:38:54 PM
What benefit does following Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss give people? Nothing. 75% of the things they tweet about are things we already know.

Do you reall think you would have any benefit for following any of them? Even if one of them knew exactly what will happen with bitcoin, having a lot of followers would just change it because they would all do what he told them to do and that would change the outcome of the bitcoin price.
925  Other / Meta / Re: Need your opinion on this post of mine being deleted. on: November 19, 2015, 02:23:21 PM
It is possible that the post from luckyflop was reported and deleted because it is a useless post. Since yours was a direct response to that one, it got deleted as well. However, this is just my guess. You will have to wait for the one who deleted it to respond (which might take time).

Can't you guys make a system that tells you exactly why your post got deleted? I mean if your post gets deleted because the main post your responded to got deleted you should get a specified message for that so you know why it got deleted.
926  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion regarding "newbie forumula". on: November 19, 2015, 02:19:59 PM
I have just checked your potential activity and got the report here: http://www.bitcoinrates.in/bitcointalk/getactivity.php?token=1447928485e5ec657549
It said that you have 140 potential activity points, which means you can reach that amount of activity (i.e. Full Member rank) if you make 126 more posts (you have 14 posts now). However after your activity reached the limit then it won't increase again until another 2 week period start (a list of the periods is here).
However when you are making posts, please remember that you can't spam, or you'll easily be banned by moderators here.

He has been here for 2 years, he knows about that already. I think his idea is kind of bad. Your account could gain other type of points instead of activity points but in the end this is a forum and you are supposed to post in a forum not to just read and expect to gain something from it.
927  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: The 10 bitcoin traders you must follow on Twitter on: November 19, 2015, 02:15:42 PM
You would think they all agree in what to do next but they all seem to have different opinions so in the end, which one of them are we going to follow? If you have a lot of money it's going to be way easier to trade anyways. You should have posted the link for each twitter aswell, I know you posted the name, im just saying.
928  Other / Meta / Re: Positive Trust Reviews not being counted on: November 19, 2015, 10:12:56 AM
Because they aren't on DefaultTrust depth 1 or 2.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0
+1 for link Smiley

appreciate the help guys!

You have a single positive untrusted feedback from ZEFUXEPH a newbie account with 2 posts[1], not sure why you would call that person trustworthy. All other feedbacks towards you are "neutral". You also only got one negative rating worth 2 points

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=560923

It's obvious that he was trying to give positive trust to himself. OP is most likely a scammer or wants to be one.

pd: you got negative trust rating ''Knowingly giving a Rep. Loan. You basically sold your feedback for dust. Congratulations.'' Didnt you read that? Or it wasnt clear enough. You dont trade with rep here.
929  Other / Meta / Re: Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys) on: November 18, 2015, 10:16:02 PM
So you expected me to constructive and long posts in games and rounds like sections?
You forgot that a post depends on the context.What more do you expect me to write there?
There,in some threads, even a number or just a username will suffice.
And Yobit has no any restrictive exclusions on their campaign page.


   
That(allowing advertising in games and rounds) was a wrong move by Yobit, and if you do want to post in games and rounds do so without a signature. As for your posts, if you're here just to farm giveaways, I believe you shouldn't be here.
If that is so,then,you,JUDGES,put ALL those who post in sections like games and rounds on your so called spammers list.
JUDGING WITHOUT TAKING CONTEXT IN TO ACCOUNT IS JUST UNJUST!
Or let there be a rule that signature promoters shouldn't post in those sections.

What is your point exactly? Others are spammers as well? True, if you want to do something against it, help expose them. The forum will not create rules for signature campaigns to do their job right, if at all the forum will ban paid signatures entirely. This will not only affect the (recreational) spammers, but also everyone else[1], those who are just happy they get a few coins for something they would do anyway.

Also there are no judges here, just users posting their opinions. The decisions are made by BadBear.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
It's true.I agree.
But a few look like judges here making lists of spammers and don't see how a few who post according  to the context of the threads are also certaily affected.So I asked them to take the context/section of posting into account before they are posting their so called reports.If it's just for yobit earnings(as per mexxer-2 and XinXan),making 20 posts is easy....but I never did that.

Check your stats:

   
Games and rounds      570
Micro Earnings      88
Investor-based games      87


This is a BITCOIN forum, people come here to talk about bitcoin. Yes there are other sections that have less to do with bitcoins and some that have nothing to do with bitcoins like off-topic BUT you can't come here and post only in the off-topic section and expect not to be in this list.
Do not understand how YOU decide/dictate my taste and interest.
You just need to see,in your so called judgemental reports, if I violated any of yobit campaign rules and if I posted any thing 'less' in the respective threads of my posts.
If so,let me know,if you can.


What are you even trying to do? Everyone agreed that your posts had low quality and IT'S OBVIOUS THAT YOU ONLY POSTED IN GAMES AND ROUNDS FOR THE YOBIT CAMPAIGN. DONT EVEN TRY TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE IT IS YOUR ''TASTE'' taste in what?? In games and rounds?? How does that even make any sense. I explained to you everything. I don't know what else do you want.
930  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling can be profitable in the long run! It is possible! on: November 18, 2015, 10:13:46 PM
I doubt OP understands correctly what "the long run" means.
Nobody is luck or unlucky in the long run and the house always wins unless they have an incredibly poor bankroll management.

Well OP is right, mathematically it can happen, maybe you dont know what you are talking about. It's definitely unlikely to happen but it can. The house always wins but that doesn't mean someone can't profit in the long term.

Not even the house always wins.

If there were 1 billion casinos, i guarantee you that some of them would go bankrupt, even if they would manage their bankroll conservatively.

Why? Because the odds dictate so, and many jackpots in a row can bankrupt anybody.
not really, in a real life casino, there's plenty of staff to kick anyone out who wins too much. and i dont mean "wins too much" as in a few hundred thousand, but those people that come in with never before seen luck and actually endanger the casino's profits. big winners are great for the casino's advertising too.
this can include anyone who's suspicious of cheating as well of course.

Even if they don't kick people out, kicking someone who is winning a lot it's not doing anything really. I have never heard of any casino going bankrupt because the players started winning too much. He said ''the odds dictate so'' But the odds dictate that the casino will never go bankrupt if they manage their bankroll carefully enough.
931  Other / Meta / Re: The Definition of a Low Quality Post on: November 18, 2015, 04:35:01 PM
-snip-
I can't understand it very well. If there's no problem on posting then why there are people who are judging me because I am posting a lot?
I am not a spammer though. I am just working because I need to earn a lot for my studies.

What is it you do again? I mean you have 408 posts in off topic currently.

Edit: ...and you repeat already given answers on threads that have already died down.

A hero member needs a long time before he can get that position or rank.
He needs 480 + activity.

I want to know in detail about potential account and how it gets mature with less effort?
When you start as a newbie, you are given the 14 activity if you posted.
Then after that, you will be given another 14 activity for every 2 weeks after if you posts during that time.

Which was exactly my point. I mean he asks why he is being judged, everyone is judged in this forum, it's not only you. I just said that you had an insane amount of posts without wearing a signature which is weird since most of your posts as shorena said are on off-topěc. Why are you even in a BITCOIN forum?
932  Other / Meta / Re: Chinese spammer on: November 18, 2015, 04:32:13 PM
It also seems that only 3 people actually start threads there: btcshop, nextblast and So perfect, they are literally the only people who are posting things there and all of them have the bitmixer signature so..
933  Other / Meta / Re: Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys) on: November 18, 2015, 04:22:53 PM
So you expected me to constructive and long posts in games and rounds like sections?
You forgot that a post depends on the context.What more do you expect me to write there?
There,in some threads, even a number or just a username will suffice.
And Yobit has no any restrictive exclusions on their campaign page.


   
That(allowing advertising in games and rounds) was a wrong move by Yobit, and if you do want to post in games and rounds do so without a signature. As for your posts, if you're here just to farm giveaways, I believe you shouldn't be here.
If that is so,then,you,JUDGES,put ALL those who post in sections like games and rounds on your so called spammers list.
JUDGING WITHOUT TAKING CONTEXT IN TO ACCOUNT IS JUST UNJUST!
Or let there be a rule that signature promoters shouldn't post in those sections.

What is your point exactly? Others are spammers as well? True, if you want to do something against it, help expose them. The forum will not create rules for signature campaigns to do their job right, if at all the forum will ban paid signatures entirely. This will not only affect the (recreational) spammers, but also everyone else[1], those who are just happy they get a few coins for something they would do anyway.

Also there are no judges here, just users posting their opinions. The decisions are made by BadBear.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
It's true.I agree.
But a few look like judges here making lists of spammers and don't see how a few who post according  to the context of the threads are also certaily affected.So I asked them to take the context/section of posting into account before they are posting their so called reports.If it's just for yobit earnings(as per mexxer-2 and XinXan),making 20 posts is easy....but I never did that.

Check your stats:

   
Games and rounds      570
Micro Earnings      88
Investor-based games      87


This is a BITCOIN forum, people come here to talk about bitcoin. Yes there are other sections that have less to do with bitcoins and some that have nothing to do with bitcoins like off-topic BUT you can't come here and post only in the off-topic section and expect not to be in this list.
934  Economy / Speculation / Re: Has anyone ever predicted bitcoin price 100% of the times? on: November 17, 2015, 11:11:28 PM
Back in 2011, I urged people to hold, calling them greedy and stupid for selling at single digit prices.

As the price peaked in 2013, I urged people to switch their BTC to physical goods that would maintain exposure to BTC and cushion a fall, saying it was "worth selling your soul for."

In 2014, when the price hit a dead cat bounce up to $600 from $400, I warned about the dangers of only valuing investments in BTC during a period of inflated BTC value (or a bubble).

Early this year when the market was dipping under $200, I gave encouragement to those who feared they were mining at a loss.

Just before the latest price jump from $220 to $490, I predicted we will see a coming $800/BTC within 2 years.

Well those predictions are pretty ''wide'' predictions. Saying bitcoin will be 800$ in 2 years is not a very good prediction is it. And the others arent even predictions at all.
935  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling can be profitable in the long run! It is possible! on: November 17, 2015, 11:09:50 PM
I doubt OP understands correctly what "the long run" means.
Nobody is luck or unlucky in the long run and the house always wins unless they have an incredibly poor bankroll management.

Well OP is right, mathematically it can happen, maybe you dont know what you are talking about. It's definitely unlikely to happen but it can. The house always wins but that doesn't mean someone can't profit in the long term.
936  Other / Meta / Re: Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys) on: November 17, 2015, 05:18:28 PM

Can you please let me know what exactly made you include me in the list?

Yes I can and I did already. In my post it clearly says why, you constantly spam on the games and rounds section aswell as the investor based games one, it's obvious that you only post there to get paid from yobit.
937  Economy / Speculation / Re: Has anyone ever predicted bitcoin price 100% of the times? on: November 17, 2015, 03:50:30 PM
Surely the whales did predict that, but they won't share their information...
Just kidding, honestly I think (like stocks) nobody can predict it all the time right, some have luck, some have some skill.

In most cases trusting your gut is a good way to speculate.

Yes but skill in bitcoins is not like in other investments. News about bitcoin dont happen everyday and even less if you only take in count news that could potentially change the price so how can you try to predict it without too many statistics either since bitcoin is a fairly new currency
938  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling can be profitable in the long run! It is possible! on: November 17, 2015, 03:47:08 PM

Flat betting would be just as hard as using any system, it actually seems that flat betting it's way harder because you only win the same amount of money in each of your bets, you would have better chances using a risky method because when you get lucky you win a lot, of course you have to be extremely lucky.

Actually from a risk standpoint, flat betting is the most efficient strategy.

Sure you can use martingale or all-in if you want the big buck , but in terms of survival rate, flat betting is the only option.

It seems pretty hard to win more than the house edge constantly with flat betting even if you are lucky. If i were to make a system to survive long term would be, bet on a really low % and get lucky, win a big amount and start betting flat after that, it's silly but it might work just to survive.
939  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: How to stay away from gambling? suggestions ? on: November 16, 2015, 10:14:43 PM
i would block all gambling websites on my pc

That would work if you couldn't unblock them but as far as I know there is always a way to unblock them and gamble again. If you don't have the mental strength to stop gambling by yourself why would you have the strength to not unblock the gambling websites?
940  Economy / Gambling / Re: casino should donate funds to charity? on: November 16, 2015, 10:12:37 PM
Should? Yeah, they should, but so what? You cannot control what the others think and what the others do.
Every corporation and every person should care about the poor and help them. Every person should do good stuff and should commit no crime. The world should be peaceful and there should be no war, no terrorism, no discrimination, no abuse, etc. From what I see, we don't have any of the above happening.

Yes but if we do nothing we are not helping, at least he is giving an idea and maybe some casino owners see it and agree with it. Not everyone thinks about donating all the time so a little reminder is never harmful
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 110 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!