If your concern is security of your Bitcoin, then what you should do is choosing good wallet. Hardware wallet (such as Ledger Nano S and Trezor One) is best choice if you could afford them, you just need to backup the mnemonic phrase (sometimes also called recovery phrase or seed phrase) and store the backup on secure location.
Agree. Even so, it is better to use a Segwit address in almost every situation. I don't have funds in Legacy addresses anymore. The only downside of segwit addresses is that they do not allow to sign messages. Only Electrum does, and its signature is not recognized by Bitcoin Core. |
|
|
|
The Nano X has a few improvements, but I wouldn't call any of them essential improvements. As long as the S is compatible with all your coins and has enough room for all the associated apps, that's really all you'll ever need.
Personally, I don't even see that extra room for apps an advantage. As installing/uninstalling apps is pretty fast and easy. I can do uninstall/install my whole life to save 150 usd lol Hardware wallets are important for me due to their security, which is the same in Nano X and Nano S. |
|
|
|
Even if the OP did indeed have two accounts registered in this specific campaign, no rule violations occurred. Merely having an alt is no reason to get red-tagged.
I think that having two alts in the same campaign, when rules of the campaign clearly state that this is not allowed, should be red tagged. If someone does that, he is clearly trying to cheat the campaign, this is not an honest person. So this would be a justified red tag, because trading with a dishonest person is high-risk of losing money situation. However, as I said, this doesn't look to be the case here. |
|
|
|
Did you maybe restart the wallet during wallet creation?
First of all, is the phone rooted or not? There are several tools that lets you examine the phone file system, but in order to be able to examine app data you might need to root it. What version of android is it and what phone model?
The only thing you should NOT do is re installing another version. A very useful tool to clone the phone data is Disk Drill from celeverfiles
E
This is all wrong. it is watch only because the wallet doesn't hold the private keys. It wasn't created properly. Watch-only wallets are walelts which hold only public addresses. |
|
|
|
Between books and courses which should I focus more on?
I would always focus on books, no matter the subject. Reading a book is like talking to the author. Well not really talking, but listening. Antonopoulos is a great person, listen to him is amazing. Watch his youtube videos in his YouTube channel as well. |
|
|
|
|
Friendly hump
Hood read for new comers who want to learn about bitcoin and how it works, why it expands energy and so on.
|
|
|
|
Certainly a must read Satoshi explains everything in the whitepaper, wallets, nodes pow... I read it several times already and I always learn more each time I read. I made a quick summary on pow based on the whitepaper, take a read later https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3317586.0 |
|
|
|
i cannot find the 870 amount, there are over 100 posts, which one is it?
It was distributed among those addresses he mentioned in the first post. 870bitcoin wasn't all that money in that time, back in 2014. It was a pretty high amount of money, but not as near as it is today. Anyway, that was a very honest act from joehoe |
|
|
|
What are the most important things to consider before pursuing a career in blockchain and cryptography development industry?
Welcome to the forum. I joined for the same reasons about 2years and a half ago. I suggest that you begin with the free book Mastering Bitcoin, by Andreas Antonopoulos. You can read it for free at github. https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook |
|
|
|
I am not defending fiulpro. The whole thing is very complicated, too many details in his story. I would remove him from the campaign as well if I were the manager. But this user might be a complete newbie and not a scammer. Maybe he is really holding his btc in that custodial wallet Zebpay and he doesn't understand anything about how bitcoin works. Please do not upload any documents to the forum and do not send them to anybody random asking you to do so anywhere. This is a classic privacy mistake people do trying to defend themselves here.
I agree. In my opinion you shouldn't even send any documents to anyone, even the campaign manager. My suggestion to fiulpro: Study about bitcoin, understand how it works, and come back to the forum. Try to be useful here and you will get some earning from signatures campaigns. I think CryptopreneurBrainboss should really remove him from the campaign, as a newbie like that should not represent any brand. Additionally, I would also remove the red trust, and he looks harmless imo. Just move it to neutral. My 2 cents. |
|
|
|
|
Também não acho haver necessidade de critério de mérito
Afinal o pessoal vem fazer arte. Não dá pra spammar arte. Talvez até de mas aí ngm vai meritar
|
|
|
|
They all allege that the token issuers took advantage of the market’s lack of understanding and awareness of how cryptocurrencies worked. And they sold these alleged illegal securities to US citizens. From this phrase, do I understand that they allege these companies because some users are unaware of how these tokens work? Or their ignorance or delusion that they are illegal securities? The law does not protect the dupes. I think that as there are so many scams out there, and those companies like Bitmex, binance, etc know (or at least should know) that some of them are scams, they could be responsible. It is a lawsuit, they have not been condemned yet. These kind of lawsuit are more often than most people think in financial markets. For example, the biggest company in Brazil, a stated owened oil company Petrobras, is under a legal lawsuit because the CEO knew about corruption and did nothing to stop. Investors are demanding money, because companies stocks crashed and the CEO lied about corruption. The investors said that if the CEO said there was corruption, they wouldn't have bought... something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Many of those books are free for download on github or other more trusted sources, like mastering bitcoin can be downloaded from github.
Isn't google drive unsafe for download? We don't know exactly what may be in those files.
|
|
|
|
Tem que analisar se a quantidade disponibilizada para a compra e venda são limites definidos pela Binance para cada usuário ou é uma limitação do proveniente do ofertante. Outra possibilidade é que o limite aumente conforme a utilização do cliente.
Deve ser limitação da conta sem kyc Você mostrou agora outros limites, bem mais folgados. Deve se feito kyc já né. |
|
|
|
P.S: Citei todas as funcionalidades vísiveis dos sites, sem deixar nada de fora (até onde eu sei).
Você esqueceu de mencionar os global charts (capitalzação, dominancia de bitcoin, etc.) https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/Dai entrei no https://coinlib.io/global-crypto-charts, e não aparece no brave. Provavelmente o ad-block deu pau. Não vou nem tentar desativar pra ver, não gosto desse procedimento. Pra mim os graficos mais importantes estão ali e a pagina esta bugada. Nem vi o que tem. Prefiro usar o CMC que não pede pra desativar meu adblock e não bug no browser. Sobre as funcionalidades extras que o coinlib tem: Essas funcionalidades extras, tirando uma ou outra que parece interessante (como o grafico de ranking), não mudam muita coisa. Pode ter mais funcionalidades mas é uma cópia do original ne, e nem sao funcionalidades importantes na minha opiniao. Dai fui olhar com calma o Coinlib, já vi que o ranking é diferente um pouco. Qual será mais confiável? Valeu, mas continuo usando o CMC. Não é a toa que é o #500 e o coinlbi deve estar pra lá de 10.000-100.000 Edit: Falando em funcionalidades extras inuteis, CMC tem um block explorer de uma porrada de moeda e acho que o coinlib não tem. Não que seja grande coisa, mas enfim... Pra mim o importante são as funcionalidades básicas estarem funcionando e isso o CMC faz muito bem. Eu por exemplo depois dessa dos charts do coinlib no brave, dificil eu voltar no site. Edit 2: Entrei novamente no site para ver o tal gráfico de rank da moeda, que me pareceu muito itneressante. Entrei numa token que eu gosto de acompanhar, ERC-20, e não tem o gráfico dela x Eth. Tá dificil competir com o CMC mesmo kkk isso é básico po. Mais uma funcionalidade que o CMC tem e a coinlib nao. Mas vi o gráfico de performance, muito bom. CMC da binance vai copiar. kkk |
|
|
|
|
Sinceramente, eu acho o Coinmarketcap o melhor site relacionado a preços e excahnges de criptomoedas internacional.
Localmente, no Brasil, eu uso o bitvalor.com.
Fico triste do coinmarketcap ter sido comprado pela Binance. Em um mercado com maior regulacao, isso nao seria permitido...
Pelo menos é uma empresa de qualidade que adquiriu. Espero que o CMC continue sendo um portal de qualidade.
Me desculpem os idealistas, mas CMC é mil vezes melhor do que qualquer outro desses portais ai.. coingecko, coinlib etc....
carrega rapido, tem charts com informacoes super varias, um monte de informacoes de excahnges, dados historicos....
|
|
|
|
Now let's take another example: did you take a look at nullius?  He is the best example. Not to mention anymore that he also had a topic on a similar matter - Suggestion: Raise merit requirements at the lower and highest ranks (@theymos). Let's remember some of his words from that time: Starting with 17 merits awarded to some of my old Jr. Member posts by people who remember them, I reached the Hero threshold of 500 merits within 27 days, 8 hours, 16 minutes, 22 seconds of active posting. All in all, from the moment that theymos announced the merit system, it took me 32 days, 9 hours, 14 minutes, 51 seconds to go from zero to Hero Meanwhile, nullius has 1517 merits and 1260 posts. Posts, not activity! His activity is 280. Nullius deserves a rank by his name. He writes very well. He put so much effort in his posts. It is a privilege to have a member such as him in this forum. He has knowledge, will to share, time, patience... He can't be an example for anything. Not including theymos and satoshi, there are only 83 members who have earned 1000 merit ever, in the >2 years since merit was introduced. That's not even 1 new legendary a week. I don't think that's an unreasonable position. Increasing the limit to 3,000 would give a grand total of 5 legendary members on the entire forum (again, not including theymos). I don't see the benefit of doing that. The merit system was supposed to prevent spammers from ranking up, not create a new rank which is only obtainable by <0.001% of the forum. I agree with this. You can create a new rank for those 3000k merited members, or members who are here for a long time (i.e, very high activity). But to become a legendary you need 1000 merits, which was done only by 83 members in this forum is already very unobtainable. Maybe there should a badge or something for each 1000 earned merits. |
|
|
|
Everything about my cryptocurrency is decentralized.
How does YOUR cryptocurrency is decentralized? I think you don't know what decentralized means. Do you know that bitcoin is not satoshi's cryptocurrency, right? Bitcoin is almost a public good, a commonweal. There was no ICO, for example. Your cryptocurrency just looks like something private that you own. As you described. Of my total supply these percentages is for
2% Developers
3% Commission fees
5% Costs like servers etc.
70% is for mining You own the mining as well? You are going to decide what to do with the money, how much you are going to spend on mining, who will mine, etc... This doesn't look decentralized at all. |
|
|
|
That's a good point even though I have no idea what "contabilize" means I think I have created a new word mixing Portuguese and English lol. Just made a correction TL/DR: Airdropped merit were not "merited", even in official bitcointalk statistics. in my opinion, there should be other name or other way to contabilize consider it in BPIP statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
