Yes..


I agree, I am just saying that it's pretty likely they have at least some coins on hot/intermediate/deposit wallets, just saying before everyone panics or something. Obviously we would have to wait for SafeDice to process everything and show it's all good (well that's what I expect at least.)

Well prior the bet the BR was 150, so they should have 150. Cold wallet is 111, so it seems normal/possible to have 39 in hot and intermediate wallets. But yeh hope SD checks that bet, look if it was all good, process withdrawal and hopefully top up cold wallet just a bit too - to show everything is okay.

Seems like dynamic house edge isn't that Safe. Damnnn. Total invested amount from BTC150 to BTC35. There goes my holiday funds.

- Added Nitrogen Dice verifier @ https://dicesites.com/nitrogendice/verifier

Well I can only track the public cold address :p


Also "solvency" is technically wrong/dramatic, it's indeed just "public (cold) address(es)" - most sites do try to keep it between 80-90% though.

Correct, VIP is finished (was announced some months in advance too.)



Still lot of free money to get in the promo "3rd anniversary double profit giveaway" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424115 Basically easy free BTC0.02 (or less if u don't want to risk too much.)

"highest winning multiplier payout" (with at least 49x)

That 514K was just example, so J_ROC's bet is highest right now.

Sounds cool GL all

Glad you like my site

This is lifetime (or potentially when they started investments.) You could click "More stats" for each site to figure out wagered/profit amount within last month/year on the graphs.

Actually even on https://dicesites.com/graphs you could go to "Total profit", zoom out and figure out the difference of profit now vs. 1y ago for each site. The wagered amount (and therefor "expected profit" should be more relevant for investors though.)

Not really, mostly just interesting/fun to see if players have been lucky.

In theory it could indicate if the site is fair or not, but the reality is that all sites still have a relatively very small sample size to truly "beat" the variance. So one should definitely not make any conclusion like that based on those stats. Even just 1 whale can completely "mess up" this stat on any of the sites within a few hours.

I feel this topic is relevant enough to cross-link this suggestion:

- Bitcointalk is it possible to separate businesses and gambling discussion?

This isn't a real solution to OP (only solution seems actively banning those spammers.) But a separate "Gambling Discussion" forum would seriously improve the quality of the main Gambling forum (that is overcrowded with sig-spammers).


edit: nice find btw, hope the guy gets banned.

- Added Nitrogen Dice @ https://dicesites.com


One of biggest sportsbook, they have a dice game for ~6 months now, seems pretty popular in my "manual observations".. so let's see how well they do against the biggest dice sites Stats on my site are from their dice game only.

It probably depends on your risk/kelly level.

Gotta love your "remove reply, bump" method... each time I think there is some exciting news hehe



But seriously though: people should play a bit here... I still really like this game I made BTC0.4 play-profit when site was just online

Added temporary negative trust:


I want to emphasize again, that I do fully believe vit1988 will come back online and resolve every issue. I just think it is fair to put a temporary warning on bitcointalk since depositing doesn't seem like a good idea till vit1988 is back active again.

Frequently I use Expedia.com (note: must be US site, but it's fine from any country) for booking of hotels with bitcoin payment. But I just noticed that the Filipino site https://www.travelbook.ph also accepts bitcoin. A lot of time Travelbook.ph is cheaper than all international competitors for hotels in PH, so it's pretty nice if you plan some holiday here

I just booked a hotel and payment was pretty easy, it works through SCI/BitMarket, exchange rate was good, I was a bit surprised they waited for 1 confirmation (unlike Rebit), but was okay.




Maybe nice to list them separate, since it's a pretty big site:

I have this when I try to login on https://bitdice.me instead of https://www.bitdice.me, so you could check if there is www. in your URL. Seems only on some browsers (Alex couldn't reproduce it.)

Yes, on http://epochtalk.org/map.html "Activity System" is under "Planned Features".

I don't know but today this was posted:


So if you really want to test the new software, it's still possible

Yeh, always a minute, but maybe he had to upgrade several versions or something like that

On first look the bets have incremental nonces so that's normal. What you should do is 1) Reset your serverseed to reveal the serverseed that you made those bets with 2) Fill the details in on my verifier: https://dicesites.com/safedice/verifier This way you can check if the bet results are really true and therefor know if you have been cheated or not. No need to trust the site operator You can learn more about the provably fair mechanism on my article: https://dicesites.com/provably-fair


Also note: dice sites combined have tens of millions of bets every day. Just imagine how many bets that is and based on that, it's pretty normal that sick-looking streaks happen. The longest known losing streak was 32 bets!