Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 03:50:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 [113] 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 »
2241  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [353 GH] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, hop OK, BTC+NMC merged! on: November 08, 2011, 01:18:28 PM
So what is the NMC minimum payout value ?
2242  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: See ya on: November 08, 2011, 12:12:29 AM
bottom line:
If you not hashing fast enough at some point the rate of declineing payoff will exceed the shares your miner can submit and you loose to the big boys (especially when's hard to find a share)

You are quite wrong about that because you misunderstand how a proportional pool works.

You will get less variance with a PPS pool but a lower average payout. PPS pools need to give you a lower average payout by design as they are covering the variance.



What about 0% fee PPS pools like ABC pool etc. !? Diminished earnings compared to prop system or not ?
2243  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: See ya on: November 07, 2011, 10:54:46 PM
If you don't see the point it's your loss mine here & loose

NO possible way to lose more than the Deepbit PPS scheme.  It is for fools and their money.  I mean any other pool would be better.  A 10% loss on every share.  No possible way to make up for that.

well so much for you
my miners are slow and I do better on deepbit with pay per share

How much do you loose here

I mined here for a LOONG time... getting less and less
us little miners are getting screwed
Sorry to you fan boys Thats the way it is


I guess since you mine at Deepbit that makes you a Deepbit fanboy...

If that's all there is too it, then I guess I am a slush fanboy.

Why does nobody become a p2pool fanboy Tongue
2244  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 0.5 rc3 binaries available for testing on: November 07, 2011, 09:35:54 PM
Hopefully I won't get my wallet deleted like with ScamCoin. Joking Grin.

Great work dev. team ! Version 1.0.0 coming soon then Wink ?

One thing I can report on Win7 x64 is much faster start up time compared to Luke-Jr's rc1 version so that is good.

Thanks !
2245  Other / Off-topic / Re: 1GH/s, 20w, $500 — Butterflylabs, is it a scam? on: November 07, 2011, 09:32:42 PM
i was told i will be banned by an admin of this site unless i put up $10,000 in escrow. please trust the other kc member who runs eclipse mc mining as i am about to be banned.

i would give 10k to a trusted escrow site but i wont give $10 to the admin "maged" who will ban me!

I think you mean Inaba guy ?
2246  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Minimalist Spartan6-LX150 board on: November 07, 2011, 09:30:36 PM
FPGA is much better for me than GPUs because less heat and noise right now but the price and performance leaves much to be desired.

Guess you can say the GPUs are old, inefficient, powerful gas guzzler motors while the FPGAs are new electric vehicles to keep the car analogy going Smiley
2247  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: November 07, 2011, 09:25:05 PM
In all fairness, it'd be impossible to 'prove' what code the control nodes are running. In order to bridge the gap from believing the same source we have is the source the majority of control nodes are running, it takes trusting in people who have zero accountability.
We know that the trusted nodes are synchonized somehow, so that only one is signing blocks at any given time. I'm not sure if this would require any changes to the client itself - possibly not - but the software to do this synchronization definitely isn't public.

Which is an interesting case: RS previously stated that the CPF would be used to legally pursue control account operators if they act 'malicious'.  That would be fine and dandy if there were some kind of public, notarized contract (with legalese I can't even begin to imagine), signed by 10 different real, verifiable people, who would take financial responsibility for anything their control account, of the initial 10, puts/denies into the network.

POLL: Who here who has looked at the source would sign that contract? Roll Eyes
I certainly wouldn't. In fact, that seems like a seriously bad idea.

The King controls the land and castles ( trusted nodes ). The peasants ( miners ) only bow down to his majesty. All hail King RealScam !!!

We are probably never going to see the trusted node source code.
2248  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); Pool back in action! on: November 07, 2011, 09:23:21 PM
IMHO I mined on both Deepbit and Slush but I found that the deepbit fee is too much and I was getting better luck with slush Smiley
2249  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1291 GH] BTC Guild - Pure PPS, LP, SSL, Instant Payout, No Invalid Blocks on: November 07, 2011, 09:18:11 PM
Always like your quick response times mate. How do you do it ?

I wake up regularly during the night to check on my miners at about 2 hours interval Grin
2250  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: namecoin are low, why? on: November 07, 2011, 09:16:29 PM
Just as in bitcoin.  Supply and demand.  The reason solidcoin is now ahead of bitcoin is the 5 per block.  All mining is basically printing money.  The price will only rise if people have to buy with cash , goods or services.  In other words, 5 years from now.  If demand exceeds new supply then they will also rise.

ScamCoin is only ahead of Bitcoin in your mind.  I guess the 5 per block ignores the 12M premined.  The 1M mined in first 24 hours and the other 1.5M mined before bait and switch to later users.

14.5M premined & mined before switching the rules = ~11 years worth of coins generated before the rules changed.  I would like to point out that Bitcoin still doesn't have 14.5M coins mined and it certainly didn't have a early adopter orgy where "broken" difficulty adjustment resulted in 1M coins minted in 24 hours. 

LOLZ.

King RealScam begs to differ Grin.
2251  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: November 07, 2011, 09:15:30 PM
I spent the past week working on getting p2pool ported over to Litecoin. I'm happy to announce that we now have a distributed Litecoin pool!
A lot of thanks goes to forrestv, the creator of p2pool.

And we have found our first block: (check out how the generated coins are split!)
    http://explorer.liteco.in/block/90f392478c1764b0ba29a4ab551c7943e2f8a9c791f32c9b893f2571a2e5e63f

See here for details about the Litecoin p2pool:
    http://liteco.in/threads/120-kh-s-distributed-litecoin-pool-using-p2pool.29/

Here's more info about p2pool in general: (You should run your bitcoin miners against p2pool!)
    https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool

Some more info about p2pool:
http://liteco.in/threads/130-kh-s-distributed-litecoin-pool-using-p2pool.29/#post-121

Quote
We found another block!
http://explorer.liteco.in/block/6d316e0684f9e2f8796f47e2737a7d8f3961326ab3a99e936a611ca12931fa01

Here are some interesting stats: (thanks to terrytibbs for setting this up)
Current p2pool hashrate: http://explorer.liteco.in/q/p2phashps
Current users and payouts: http://explorer.liteco.in/q/p2pusers

If you want to contribute to p2pool but don't want bother setting up a p2pool node yourself, you can actually mine against the liteco.in node. Please do this as a last resort, and there's no implied guarantee that the node will stay up or that things will work perfectly. All you need to do is point your minerd at liteco.in:9327 with the user set to a Litecoin address like this:

minerd --url http://liteco.in:9327 --userpass Ler4HNAEfwYhBmGXcFP2Po1NpRUEiK8km2:pass

To make sure it works, after you find a share, make sure your address appears in http://explorer.liteco.in/q/p2pusers
Please remember that this is not the recommended way to run p2pool. You should run your own p2pool node so that you don't rely on liteco.in being up.

Good information mate. Like to be able to watch my miners on a website automatically from remote site.
2252  Other / Off-topic / Re: 1GH/s, 20w, $500 — Butterflylabs, is it a scam? on: November 07, 2011, 09:11:31 PM
by the way, im a kansas city missouri guy, also, i can pay in silver, gold or us dollars in the kansas city area in 24 hours for any reasonable bet if need be!

god bless!

We need more people like you here with the amount of scammers in this community. Hopefully this turns out to be real Smiley Grin
2253  Economy / Goods / Re: WTS TorrentLeech invite 3BTC each!!! EXTREMELY FAST SPEEDS! EVERYTHING AVAILABLE on: November 07, 2011, 09:08:13 PM
Let me first say that I live after "try before you buy" myself and have a few TB in ratio over several sites. But:


Quote
No fears of MPAA/RIAA/DICK LAWYERS there.


How do you know this? It seems to me that they could also buy an account and get in fairly easy.

Scammer tag seems just around the corner. Torrents are for people that don't know any better.

Best solution is DDL. Torrents are slow. Torrents can get you found. Torrents need ratios for upload.

I personally use free services like megaupload and wupload Smiley

Don't waste your time with torrents. Even Usenet is much better than torrents.
2254  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Squeezing 2-slot cards into a single slot, help me asplode my cards! on: November 07, 2011, 08:59:38 PM
Nice watercooling tips here but too bad it is not really that cheap.
2255  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched! on: November 07, 2011, 01:33:51 PM
I spent the past week working on getting p2pool ported over to Litecoin. I'm happy to announce that we now have a distributed Litecoin pool!
A lot of thanks goes to forrestv, the creator of p2pool.

And we have found our first block: (check out how the generated coins are split!)
    http://explorer.liteco.in/block/90f392478c1764b0ba29a4ab551c7943e2f8a9c791f32c9b893f2571a2e5e63f

See here for details about the Litecoin p2pool:
    http://liteco.in/threads/120-kh-s-distributed-litecoin-pool-using-p2pool.29/

Here's more info about p2pool in general: (You should run your bitcoin miners against p2pool!)
    https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool


Good work on this implementation.
2256  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tenebrix, a CPU-friendly, GPU-hostile cryptocurrency on: November 07, 2011, 01:29:03 PM
Where did lolcust go?  Not seen a post in some time?

I am quite alive and messing around with things (some TBX related, some plain IRL related).


Any ETA for laundry or something to boost the price ?
2257  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alternate cryptocurrencies forum section improvement suggestions on: November 07, 2011, 01:28:34 PM
I had a license of XenForo laying around from an old failed project of mine so I took the plunge and set everything up: http://liteco.in/

I think it may be time to analyze this whole scammer tag and figure out what can be done lol.  I believe you have enough supporters of the community of Litecoin itself where you could probably set up a donation page to cover the costs to buy whatever it is that the people who got from you feel was ripped off. I am purposely staying out of more specifics than that, don't want to derail this thread, but just based on the idea of whatever the issue is, the people would take care of it, your name is clear, your links now have a chance to be clicked by users who do not know your history.

Quite like the SCAMMER tag. It is quite rare and exclusive on here Grin.
2258  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: namecoin are low, why? on: November 07, 2011, 01:27:14 PM
NMC client ( namecoind ) does not currently support wallet encryption OR -rescan command so you can download blockchain from other place.

No wonder price is dropping. Current DNS system is working just fine.
2259  Other / Off-topic / Re: Investment, a way to increase capital on: November 07, 2011, 01:24:50 PM
No one cares dude.
I don't think so. Just I see it in my partner account)))

LOL.
2260  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1291 GH] BTC Guild - Pure PPS, LP, SSL, Instant Payout, No Invalid Blocks on: November 07, 2011, 01:24:01 PM
So how come your pool gets me more NMC than Eligius pool Huh Different implementation or what.

Well, this is highly offtopic and I don't want to hijack eleuthria's thread, but short (and last) response. It's simply because both pools are mining namecoins with all their hashpower, but they spread namecoins only for people who claimed their interest in namecoins by providing nmc wallet. As far as Eligius members are mostly geeks (well, it's a compliment), their interest in nmc is higher than interest of members on my pool. Which means that every nmc miner on my pool get more coins, because majority of pool members don't care or don't understand what namecoin is. When all pool members claim their namecoin address, average namecoin reward should be same or similar as on Eligius.

OK this makes sense. Thank you.
Pages: « 1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 [113] 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!