Still did not get my 0.93 BTC back I think you guys bashing him are not helping much ... Did you read? He owed 120 BTC he intends to pay 20 BTC of that. Even if he is being honest your expectation wouldn't be 0.93 it would be 0.93 * (20/120) = 0.155 BTC. Will you be happy with 0.155 BTC? Is that helpful? Should people stop "bashing" a scammer now? Yeah. All I know is that I mined on the PPS offer. In the "contract" he stated that for every share I will be paid regardless if a block is found or not ... The 20 BTC limit is for the proportional guys AFAIK. For proportional the terms are different. He claims no blocks were found but 2 clearly were found so I am like
|
|
|
Still did not get my 0.93 BTC back I think you guys bashing him are not helping much ...
|
|
|
OK. As said tens of times here is what I am owed on the PPS 120% offer ( not proportional ) : I mined for him a total of 205501 shares ( this was 2 days before he supposedly got hacked ; I stopped mining 2 days before the hack because my router broke ) He last paid me at 184168 shares. He owes me 21333 shares at rate ( 60 / 1,379,647 = 0.000043489385328276 ) so total of 0.92775905 BTC. Proof I submitted 205501 shares right here : http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Lr_rRazJ9zoJ:www.a1bitcoinpool.com/stats.phpAddress is 1M1Eo8upubkEmCqmhnMvVMfEyQiYbCXxKS
|
|
|
And there was silly me thinking these do not need huge fans blowing over them like you need for GPUs ... Guess I was wrong
|
|
|
I just want my $4 ( 0.93 BTC ) back ! 1M1Eo8upubkEmCqmhnMvVMfEyQiYbCXxKS
|
|
|
OK. As said tens of times here is what I am owed : I mined for him a total of 205501 shares ( this was 2 days before he supposedly got hacked ; I stopped mining 2 days before the hack because my router broke ) He last paid me at 184168 shares. He owes me 21333 shares at rate ( 60 / 1,379,647 = 0.000043489385328276 ) so total of 0.92775905 BTC. Proof I submitted 205501 shares right here : http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Lr_rRazJ9zoJ:www.a1bitcoinpool.com/stats.phpThank you and hopefully this will be resolved. Address is 1M1Eo8upubkEmCqmhnMvVMfEyQiYbCXxKS
|
|
|
Yeah. I have to admit it guys. I really could not sleep well at night because I was constantly wondering who CH / RS REALLY is. Thank you BCX, now I can sleep all right Now if you could figure out who coblee / ArtForz / lolcust is then you are a true genius !
|
|
|
I get your point about it increasing U parameter but would it be best to turn it on or off Normally it is best off. If cgminer detects a share is stale it doesn't submit it. Those shares are marked SS. Share submitted and designated invalid by pool are marked R. IF cgminer stale detection is correct then SS + R should be exactly the same w/ submit stale on or off. Turning submit stale on simply takes all the SS shares, sends them to the server who promptly rejects then. SS = 0 and R = (SS + R) There are a few instances where it might make sense a) merged mining pool which gives seperate credit for NMC & BTC (not just calculate NMC reward based on BTC shares). In that case an LP doesn't necessarily make both chains stale. A share could be stale for one chain and not the other. b) p2pool. p2pool builds a share chain just like bitcoin builds a blockchain. Since there can be re-orgs it is often useful to submit a stale share. If a re-org occurs (and with a 10 sec block time it certainly can) then what cgminer thinks is stale could end up being valid. TL/DR version: unless you have a specific reason you likely can keep it off. It can't "hurt" you to turn it on you will just see more rejects at the pool level instead of SS at cgminer level. Thank you for the detailed reply D&T ! I really appreciate your information. So if there is no harm in submitting them then I will enable the feature. It does not seem to clogg up the GPUs but rather the network so that is fine for me.
|
|
|
also you may want to buy extenders from cablesaurus instead of on ebay, his cables are probably better than most you find on ebay
*cough* I have bought cables from CablesSaurus, and eBay, and from other places. The ones from CableSaurus are the EXACT same cables that I bought in bulk on eBay. The ONLY benefit CableSaurus has is the fact you can pay in BTC, for a 30% mark up. Yeah but I bet you don't get the support from eBay you get from cablesaurus guy ... Also the ability to buy with BTC is pretty cool.
|
|
|
So what is that submit stale flag for ? Cheating PPS pool ops or what Thank you and forgive my ignorance but it does not really explain it in the man. It's for the very rare occasion where cgminer might miss an opportunity to score a share when it thinks it is already stale and doesn't send it out but the pool would have accepted it. The SS counter in cgminer windows tells you how many times cgminer didn't bother with sending a calculated share. You can't cheat any pool because if the share is indeed stale, the pool will just classify it as such. P2pool is specific because it uses a much higher difficulty than the rest of the pools, therefore all shares are of a much higher value. Conman, I don't feel like delving through the code right now but wasn't the fact that --submit-stale influences Utility the reason it's off by default? I mean the situation where a share that would otherwise be locally discarded gets sent out increasing the rating even though that share gets tossed away by the pool?
I get your point about it increasing U parameter but would it be best to turn it on or off I have really shitty internet so I think for me it might be worth turning it on but I am not sure. Thanks !
|
|
|
Due to high value or each high-diffigulty p2pool share, I recommend you use --submit-stale. This will make cgminer submit every share it finds, even if it thinks it is already stale. This won't make a huge difference but might net you an additional share every now and then.
This is no longer necessary with the latest cgminer since p2pool will send the message "submitold" which cgminer now supports, so it will do it selectively for p2pool anyway. So what is that submit stale flag for ? Cheating PPS pool ops or what Thank you and forgive my ignorance but it does not really explain it in the man.
|
|
|
No, it's that price everywhere around here. If it was stolen it would be free..
Where is this "here" ? You live next to a nuclear power station More like hydroelectric powerplant More like India... No, I'm not far from Seattle.. Tell me your address because I am moving there
|
|
|
You should just send your rigs to someone with 2 cents per KW/h rates.
This being where? That's what I pay, I doubt I'm the only one.. Where is this Stealing it from overhead power lines No, it's that price everywhere around here. If it was stolen it would be free.. Where is this "here" ? You live next to a nuclear power station
|
|
|
So, 7770 is 1.5 times slower than 5770? What a waste of money on this junk. What do you expect ? It has got less shaders. GCN shaders are not faster than VLIW5 shaders ...
|
|
|
You should just send your rigs to someone with 2 cents per KW/h rates.
This being where? That's what I pay, I doubt I'm the only one.. Where is this Stealing it from overhead power lines
|
|
|
Seems like you could do 5 5970s in that with 7 single slot cards.
Might want to read the thread. We still have to deal with 8 gpu driver limit. Yeah might want to pressure ATI to remove this stupid ARTIFICIAL limit in their crap drivers. If more of us do it, then they will probably take their heads out of their asses and listen.
|
|
|
I just ran some numbers for Inaba's Single @ https://eclipsemc.com/mw.php?key=196e69b1afe10927460b22a8de1c0d: 3:23pm CST: 65612 shares 12:08am CST: 70949 shares (8h45m later) So the average hashrate during that 8h45m period was: 70949-65612 = 5337 shares in 31500 seconds (8h45m) 5337 shares * 2^32 hashes/share is 2.29e13 hashes 2.29e13 hashes / 31500s = 727MhpsNot too bad, but still 13% lower than the advertised specs of 832Mhps. Here's another numbers run, for a 15 hour period to 15:06 CST today. Inaba mentioned there are some issues with his unit that are causing throttling. @Inaba, have you had a chance to try the ufasoft miner to see if the unit behaves the same? It might provide clues on whether this is a cgminer-only issue, or if it is a fundamental issue with the unit. @kano, you had mentioned earlier that you were doing some work on icarus support in cgminer; have you seen anything in the code that might suggest a reason for the observed throttling behavior? start: 00:08CST, shares 70949 end: 15:06CST, shares 79630 So we have: 15:06 - 00:08 = 14h58m = 53880s 79630 - 70949 = 8681 shares 8681 shares * 2^32 hashes per share = 3.73e13 hashes 3.73e13 hashes / 53880s = 692MhpsThank you for these enlightening results. Thus, it seems that the overclocked 7970 can get more than this unicorn BS. I mean WTF 7970 | BFL Cost : 550 | 599 Performance : 700 | 700 Warranty : 3 years | 6 month Resale value : 50% | 0% The ONLY advantage I see is the consumption of power but surely that is not worth it for some US guys that have 0.10 prices. Maybe this is for EU market but VAT and import duty kills that as well so it is LAME right now from the promised holy 1000 MHash/s, 20W, $500 figures ... BFL deserves a medal for fail of the year. Thermal throttling due to bad design FTW !
|
|
|
Clarification: I have shipped extenders (the regular cables) to Goat. Not one of these splitter I'm still waiting for my own to arrive. OK. I think it would be great for you if you post some pictures and a proper review when you get your unit in. If people see that this is working properly they will be more inclined to buy some from you
|
|
|
Would someone be willing to purchase one for me, and send it to me?
BigPiggy has sent stuff from China to me in the past. I think he might be able to help you. I see he sent you one of these extenders : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64514Did you get it ? Does it work ? A little review with pictures would be epic. Thank you !
|
|
|
Keep Freddie alive! I just sent you half a bitcoin.
What the hell am I going to do with that?? As the last two days revealed only two new converts to the True Way of Freddie, and I only bought the dignity of users until today, I thought it would slowly fizzle as users eventually turn away from His great image. Only one member set their icon back after getting their money, the rest of us can take our place next to Jr. in the light of greatness. I have been touched by his teeny appendage: Added 0.5 BTC to the bounty to get the default new member avatar set to Freddie Jr. What is the default avatar now
|
|
|
|