I think people should stop speculating about a possible world war lll when they are not sure what will happen, right now it is unclear the direction this political conflict will go. However, it is indirectly affecting the market because of fear of what people are reading from the Internet, there are already different versions of this conflict making people panic. People should be calm.

They feel btc not environmentally friendly so they will probably ban it in 2025 if no better option is provided.  The target is to ban btc and other proof of work crypto out there. According to the article, soon "businesses would be prohibited from offering any services associated with proof-of-work cryptocurrencies".
Although they are yet to conclude, it seems they are pretty determined. I just hope they don't reach that conclusion to ban.

@Mk4 is right, some people just use any wallet they come across to store their assets, maybe they are not aware of using wallets with good reviews from users and something other people are familiar with, it will go to some extent to minimize loss because you are able to read the experience of other users.
It doesn't sound like the customer service of this wallet provider is active otherwise 6 months and still no good reply. Too bad.

Such a bold step on the part of the US president, it's about time they pay attention to digital currency and recognize it's importance in any country's economy,  and I kinda wonder though, if the El-Salvador stand on btc has some kind of influence on this proposal, I mean El-Salvador really display a strong determination in the face of pressure from a powerful organization like the IMF.


It is very possible this will happen, at the most majority of the 3rd world countries will change views and come up with their own regulation methods, I can tell this no longer far away.

"He wrote for different sites" i guess @op was paid to write for these authors, this sites are not directly his but some of the work he has done for others, because clearly there are like 3-4 different authors from the links.

Don't just hold stake if you can, find out in their official telegram group to know more about their staking program, this will help you accumulate more sand while the market recover, selling in my opinion is not a good option at this point, the whole market is affected and almost all investors are in the same situation as you. The market will recover but it will take some time.

It is difficult to tag the entire project in the nft space scam or a waste of investment because of the hacks or scams involved, otherwise we would use the same logic to view the entire crypto space. just like the ico days, the defi's now we have nft's, we have equally heard several hacks, exit scams or rug pull during ico's, same thing happening in defi, in fact, till now we are still experiencing many defi hack, same as non defi projects, now nft is the latest trend with lots of hype and it is very natural to see scammers and hackers trying to take advantage of this new trend.

if we talk about wash trading, then we should look at where it all started even before nft came into the picture, many exchanges where accuse of wash trading and that was not because of nft, open sea is a platform like any other who has suffered in the hands of hackers whether trading on nft or not, am just trying to be objective.

Couldn't agree more, it is highly ridiculous to think of banning btc, the federal government should stop thinking about banning and and look for better ways to incorporate it into the economy, after several failed attempt it is pointless to keep trying, we are in the digital era where many things are done digitally, technological advancement is taking over and btc is part of that advancement.

Have they found anything incriminating in those wallets address under investigation or they just love to exercise their judicial rights on btc holders regardless if they actually committed a crime or not,
It is one thing to sanction any wallet address found wanting and another to go pressuring any address btc on it,
I think it was because of the way they go about with the wallet address sanctions thar the Nonchuk team gave such statement at the end of the letter, (although not very professional but deserving)

The way things are already going, if strict measures are not put in place could be very dangerous, people will pay a high price for that, the government as the sole protector of Its citizens must take the necessary decisions required,
Many scams already taking advantage of decentralization and free to everyone to carry out crimes, if the government doesn't carry out its executive responsibilities now in a few years things will really get ugly in this space.

And a little congestion just mess the network up, lately, polygon has been very difficult to transact with, getting confirmation in your transaction will stay pending, speeding up the transaction doesn't help things in most cases,
If they are supporting another chain is a good idea, but most of them also have issues,  eth is facing constant high fees, bsc much better, polygon really needs to get it together.

A well calculated exploitation from some greedy teams, it is a complete waste of time to participate in those so-called airdrops these days,
The worst part is - all the participants are required to carry out some social media task, imagine if half of 300k actually did the task and then just only 1000k got selected then the rest participants must have carried out the task for free without getting anything in return.
Out of every 10 airdrops, only 2 can be considered worth the time and effort, the rest of them are a waste of time.

I really have to disagree to some extent with 1&2 -
1. Bogus total supply
2. Large airdrop amount
There are several projects with a huge total supply like tron for example, can't use supply as guaranteed yardstick,
Also large airdrop amount, there are projects that mainly airdrop their tokens to dedicated community members and never did any sales, just a community driven project, that's also not enough to term such project as a scam.
I think, these days it is very difficult to attribute certain characteristics to determine a scam project because these scammers are getting better daily and they go the extra length to try and fool investors.
Since they know people are constantly looking out for these signs, they keep changing and updating their cruel methods.

The truth is scammers are getting good on their game of scamming people, a look at the website the @op present will wow any new and old investor into thinking the project is legit, they spend money designing the website and making it look worthy of a top project, unfortunately it was all a big scam, reason why it is important to keep learning and understanding the signs to look out for in a project to determine if it is authentic or just a well design scam project, it is always devastating to invest in a project that end up rug pull on the investors, another reason why it is advisable not to put all you have in one project especially new ones with no credibility.

It is not a new ecosystem per say, it is just rebranding and making bnb center focus, in bsc or binance chain it was the same bnb that is use for transaction fees, so the new brand will now be bnb beacon chain and bnb smart chain and bnb will no longer be seen as just an exchange coin but will have a whole ecosystem under it, according to binance statement "bnb chain will provide several features for users including being open, multi-chain, permissionless and forever decentralized, it will also embrace large-scale applications, including Gamefi, Socialfi and metaverse." i see it as a good way of strengthening the bnb coin and make it more decentralized.
Besides i don't see any exchange that has come close to binance in terms of achievement and advancement, do you know how many local currency bianance currently support and at what cost, cz is a real business man, if he invested such amount on forbes it is because he knows what he can possibly gain out of it,
Not only that, "the Association of Banks of Russia have accepted binance membership into the association to further strengthen relationship in the cryptocurrency industry". Binance always take things to the next level.
I don't know what polo and bittrex did to go down the ladder but i doubt binance will ever end up like them.

Small good project, not just any shit project with no clear goal, instead of yielding high returns you will end up losing a lot, actually some projects already look suspicious enough for anyone to quickly tell the amount of risk involved, the problem is, even when all the signs are there some people still prefer not to take note, they want to gamble with their investment to that they will have the opportunity to point fingers. i hope you always get lucky with your strategy.

Simply put, El-Salvador are unstoppable on their quest to make btc the number one currency in the country, if they didn't back down to imf threats i don't think they will for anything else, just the mare display of not being weak is something commendable, i think the president already made it clear enough to the whole world their stand in digital currency, i have nothing but respect for El-Salvador especially president bukele, Bitcoin City is already making history.

And developed countries will legalize it without additional tax....
you are required to pay tax anyways whether you trade on btc or not.



if you don't want government control then don't dream of adoption, if government is in control of political, economic and social aspect of a country, shoulder the responsibility of protecting its citizens from internal and external treats, then expect them to do same in this regard, it may not surprise you, but it surprises me that countries find it important to legalize btc even when many people never thought it will happen 10 years back. 

This must be new, i have some couple of them i put on my list both for ido and igo and so far polkastarter seem to be the best for ido and seedify seem to be the best for igo in my opinion. i dont know anything about AdLunam yet, i will probably take a look to see what they have to offer, launchpads are more efficient way to participate in ido and igo this days more than haunting down this project and trying to research about them, the launchpad team already has that responsibility to fully vet these projects before sale.

imo it is much safer to invest through some of the known launchpad we have in the space this days, reason why is most of the vetting of this new project are already being done by the launchpad you decided to use, so you can a little bit be assured you are not walking into a straight scam, the only down side of this launchpad is you must hold their tokens and be in a tier to participate, still way better than taking unnecessary risk. i hope you will recover your loss from another reputable project soon.