+1 WOsMerit I have to concur. The right shoulder pattern was broken on the 28th imho. I do think however that this downward channel we seem to have been traveling hasn't tested either the upper or lower boundaries sufficiently as of yet. Actually pretty excited for the the first time in awhile at whats ahead of us. --- I think we can call Dec. 2nd @$4.265 as the monthly high unfortunately.  --- It seems accurate to me, and it's nice to see my nae at the top of the list.
Its the actual timeline of issuance from genesis to the present. At least counting the first WOsM that was given to a person. Multiples of course are stacked so complete chain analysis is non-trivial. 
What's Proof of Keys?
I'm not ready for it whatever it is.
Taking your coin off of exchanges so fuckery with the books can be exposed/mitigated. Happening January 3rd. |
|
|
|
wait TC you handed out fake fake internet points to Giancarlo and the SEC?  you sir are a monster Well..yes... It was in a moment of weakness to my defense..  Best we not speak of it again. |
|
|
|
I felt the need to start doing some end of the year compilations. Here is a look at the first year distributions of WOsMerit's. If you feel there are errors in the chain analysis feel free to post your correction or PM me. Let it be noted these are only WOsM's that I personally issued, if you have issued any the same rules apply as above. Submit for verification and they will be added to the chain asap. 2018 WOsMerit distribution
Genesis Block created on January 26th 2018, 8:12pm pst
user plus minus
-----------------------------------------
community airdrops - 149 1
cofefeGandalf - 1
HairyMaclairy - 2 1
criptix - 1
Last of the V8s - 23
explorer - 1
Torque - 13
Ibain - 4
Ivor Biggun - 2
JayJaunGee - 21
xhomerx - 13
lodse - 1
mfort312 - 28
Sitarow - 10
infofront - 105
fragout - 1
JimboToronto - 32
BlindMayorBitcorn - 6
Icygreen - 3
jojo69 - 11 1
Phil_S - 6
Paashaas - 10
koryu - 1
bitserve - 50
MNDan - 1
d_eddie - 22
BobLawblaw - 27 1
TERA2 - 5
bitcoinPsycho - 1
ErisDiscordia - 10
anhzaibro - 2
marcus_of_augustus - 3
mike4001 - 10
dmwardjr - 2
Biro Bob - 1
cAPSLOCK - 3
undeadbitcoiner - 1
Agapios - 1
Vlada69 - 1
samson - 1
Arriemoller - 2
Rosewater Foundation - 2
Biodom - 1
anon123 - 4
micgoossens - 23
vroom - 1
kurious - 1
fabiorem - 1
SEC - 1
C. Giancarlo - 1
Raja_MBZ - 2
exstasie - 2
BitcoinNewsMagazine - 1
jmcorgan - 10
theymos - 1
ssmc2 - 1
4rt3m - 1
toknormal - 1
mindrust - 1
Majormax - 1
STT - 1
kingcolex - 1
kenzawak - 1
FractalUniverse - 1
VB1001 - 1
bitmover - 10
luckyenough56 - 1
Wekkel - 1
|
|
|
|
Last charts of the year WO's , have a safe and happy New Year. 30m  1h  4h  W  #stronghands2019 ---- As an aside on a personal note, I created over 1,080 images this last year for your viewing pleasure. That is even with the 6 month sabbatical I enjoyed over the summer. I plan on starting fresh charts after new years but will break out the OR when appropriate. Cheers tc |
|
|
|
  It is fairly trivial to produce reactions in this day and age. Confinement is another story. What makes this process interesting is a couple of things imho. The high fidelity achieved in initiating collisions and the low emission of alpha particles in the zone of interest during collisions. tl;dr We are still not close enough to consider viable energy production in the near to medium time frames.
|
|
|
|
Never really could understand the idea behind those video walls built out of multiple monitors. Why not use a huge projector instead? And he really needs to replace that rug... looks terrible...  My setup can support over 40 simultaneous video player instances...don't ask how I know. I think the rug really ties the room together. Yea, me too..plus I cant stand cold feet. No accounting for taste is there. Looks like a Iranian carpet to me.. Authentic ones can be quite pricey.  ----- 1h  2h  |
|
|
|
|
@gmaxwell
Never doubt that your hard work with bitcoin is unappreciated...it is very much so. That your taking the time to form coherent rebuttal's against a obvious troll is commendable as well.
Thank you.
tc
|
|
|
|
I couldn't draw if my life depended on it lol
img-snip-img
Anyway, what I mean is that the price could complete an V, this week closing around this range, next week closing over slightly over or around $4K and the following one breaking $4.5 up to $5K+.
It would be such a beautiful symmetric graph that it would be a pity it doesn't follow that path...
Any chance?
It could be called a vee bottom or it might be considered at cup and handle forming. What your seeing is the downward resistance of the moving average encountering the oversold conditions of the market. The only thing I am really certain about is the honeybadger goes where it wants too. That place is where the most profit is and seldom where you expect it to be. There is always a chance. If so, I could see something like this happening.  |
|
|
|
You guys know I donno shit about real TA.... but the weekly chart is looking as it could complete a very interesting (and bullish) symmetry pattern that could get us over $5000 in a couple of weeks. Only thing that's needed is that the price closes next week over dat blue line thingy (around $4000) and boom.
Someone more versed in this witchery that could corroborate my ramblings and (if so) express it in proper words and graphs?
Show us. I am sure we would be more than happy to bash..err..comment on your charts. Regardless this is what I am seeing. #dyor 1W  |
|
|
|
Hovering between the 0.618 support and the 0.5 resistance in a extremely narrow channel. I think support will be tested before rebounding upwards to finish off the year. 30m  Deep in the Cloud, floating underneath $3.9kish. Perhaps a little dip into liquidity to quench the thirst prior to the festivities on the horizon. 1h  A mighty jump from cloud to cloud leaves our hero with hackles raised. He gathers strength for the rocky road ahead. 4h  #stronghands2019 |
|
|
|
^ If you get a proper answer (maybe including a detailed how-to and some additional tips and tricks as a bonus) for THAT question it will be clearly demonstrated that this thread actually delivers.
https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/420/420-897/420-897.html |
|
|
|
Global Warming Observer
A free service brought to you by the bitcoin community
After stepping back and contemplating the inputs and outputs going on in this thread, it dawned upon me once again just how diverse the constituents of the bitcoin ecosystem are. There is no "center" or ideology that has majority over another. It seems to draw from all walks of life, political and economic variance is the norm not the exception. I think it might be bitcoins greatest strength. That we can all have such divergent philosophies and still reach consensus in a mathematically proven way is truly a gift beyond compare. I do find it strange that this threads participation and viewership rises considerably when such off topic posts are made however... I am sure it is just a coincidence. |
|
|
|
jojo69 I'm going to reply because I respect your contributions, good humour and seemingly easy grasp of common sense of most complicated matters (you may have imbibed a little too much of the eco-facist Kool-aid to see the forest for the trees here though) Just because the globalists are using a crisis to expand their power it does not necessarily follow that the crisis does not exist.
This is sloppy logic Marcus, try harder.
You've got the cart before the horse, logically speaking. In hindsight, the IPCC was set-up with the goal of creating a manufactured crisis (or hijacked), any dissenting scientists of the initial IPCC were hounded out of the organisation over the years, sometimes viciously. More than a few of the most effective dissenters have had curiously early-age heart attack deaths, but that's hard to say if there is a 'statistical fingerprint' of foul-play afoot. Of the "97%" consensus, it takes only 1 lone voice of the remaining 3% to be correct for them all to be wrong, that's science, ask Einstein. the more concerning threat is not climate change anyway its rising co2 levels.
ocean acidification, species loss, collapsing fisheries stocks, depleting fresh water aquifers, the list goes on I really have to take issue with the implied idea that there is some specific lever we can throw, in this case co2, and continue on our merry way. We need to completely rethink our relationship with our, very finite, biome and stop behaving like petulant valley girls with daddy's credit card. let's take these one at a time; 1) ocean acidification ... this is a bogus made up term to begin with, the oceans are alkali with pH around 8.2, they are not acid, have never been acid. It's a typical scary word propaganda trick to think humans are making the oceans acid ( zero OMG!! bad humans), the correct scientific term if you were referring to a tiny change in pH from dissolved CO2 would be dealkalinization ... btw CO2 dissolving in the oceans is a major route for permanent sequestration of carbon into lime, chalk, etc deposits via calcium carbonates used structurally by invertebrates and crustaceans. 2) species loss ... ok maybe this is an issue, it's subjective and depends on your feelings though. Massive extinction events have happened regularly in the Earth's past from various means. How much species diversity is exactly the right amount? do you feel like playing god to determine that? humans have cultivated huge quantities of biomass in the form of crops, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, there are probably more animals alive on the planet today than at any time in the past, let's celebrate mammalian abundance husbanded by humans! ... are they just not the "right" animals for your liking? my liking? his liking? should we all be living in teepees and hunting the roaming meager herds of buffalo in competition with wolves and large cats? Who really knows what is the right balance for number of species and quantities of each species that should be alive on earth at any particular time? It's just an excessively complicated question to believe anyone who claims to know the answer, they are just bullshitting you to gain an advantage over you somehow. 3) collapsing fisheries stock ... yep totally agree with you here, it sucks, people are stupid and greedy and the tragedy of the commons will prevail any time you get a shared resource situation like this. I think inevitably aquaculture will alleviate this in the near to not-too-distant future. Fish-farming has come a long way fast since price of wild fish started spiking after stocks collapse, locally I've seen some great ventures in exotic fish species, delicacies that were always thought too hard to be farmed, lobster, abalone, white-bait, scallops, etc. In fact, I suggest invest, aquaculture is going to have a great profitable future and its good for our local habitat (I mean who doesn't love to go fishing for realz?) 4) depleting fresh water aquifers ... yep totally agree again. Tragedy of the commons strikes again, mix in brain-dead socialist politicians looking to milk tense local water rights situations and the resulting mess is all but inevitable. I don't know any good solutions to fresh water problems, historically they are solved by wars, reduced populations, enforced conservation (rationing), then dams. Desalination from an abundant energy discovery is a fringe possibility (fusion or etc). Now this is better trolling...almost epic. Your arguments seem almost reasonable. But have to tell you Marcus..still not buying. Just goes to show you things are not always what they appear at first glance. ftfy. 1- This is not a bogus term. It is describing exactly what is happening to the pH balance of the oceans not what state they are in currently. http://www.whoi.edu/ocean-acidification/What is Ocean Acidification?
Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, when humans began burning coal in large quantities, the world’s ocean water has gradually become more acidic. Like global warming, this phenomenon, which is known as ocean acidification, is a direct consequence of increasing levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in Earth’s atmosphere. 2- Source? or is just another "fact" your pulling out of your ass? Unless you are over 5 decades old I do not thing you have enough personal experience to draw a sound conclusion. Again..I disagree. Yes..someone(we?) have to draw a line and say this is enough. I will use a first hand experience of fishing when I was a child. The salmon that would come into the Sound and up rivers with odds names like the Cowlitz and the Nooksack seemed endless. I fantasized I could walk across their backs to the other shore without hardly getting my feet wet. I personally caught a 37lb king and was told it might be to small to keep, 40 and 50 pounders were common. Today, a 30+lb king is considered massive. This trend is found throughout our entire ecosystem as species are displaced, disrupted and outright destroyed by human activities worldwide. 3- See above 4- So you see the problem as just a political one? No matter that microscopic plastic particles are found in 94% of the fresh water tested? Ever hear of the Love canal? Again, first hand experience. A large aerospace company has a facility near a small town. They would prep aircraft parts for painting by first using a solvent. As these things happen, a huge plume of this stuff was released and it dispersed over a large portion of this town. 30 years later there is a team that does nothing but go around and test bore holes throughout the town for elevated levels of this toxin. Once I learned of this I quickly moved my family out of the area. Not before having to explain to my kids why it was a bad idea to be outside after a heavy rain or why not to splash through the mud puddles as small children are want to do. 5- Oh wait..there is no five...as you dodged the original question entirely. Rising co2 levels... |
|
|
|
the more concerning threat is not climate change anyway its rising co2 levels.
ocean acidification, species loss, collapsing fisheries stocks, depleting fresh water aquifers, the list goes on I really have to take issue with the implied idea that there is some specific lever we can throw, in this case co2, and continue on our merry way. We need to completely rethink our relationship with our, very finite, biome and stop behaving like petulant valley girls with daddy's credit card. +1 WOsMerit Like I didn't explain very well, a holistic multidisciplinary approach is probably best. My problem with the co2 thing is like I posted awhile back..I thought I did anyway... Meh..regardless once co2 levels reach a certain threshold there is a possibility of cognitive loss in homo sapiens. If we get to stoopid to deal with ever mounting and complex issues..well..the next iteration that comes along in a few hundred million years give or take can start trying to figure it out all over again. Despite all of this I have hope. More than that, I have conviction in what I am saying. I believe societies can live in harmony and that together we can solve these problems. I reinforce these convictions not only to my peers but also to my representatives every way I can, not only vocally but with my wallet as well. I highly encourage everyone to do the same. +1 WOsMerit @Arriemoller |
|
|
|
At maximum resistance. Tenken sen encountering cloud. Lagging span at edge of cliff. Crossed MACD. Interesting times.  #stronghands2019 |
|
|
|
... and straight in there with the usual bodged data and smear tactics tricks.
"Man-made climate change" was never about the science, they were just some useful idiots for the socialists to push their shabby agenda of control and shared mediocrity.
Any chance of useful debate or reasoning is gone now ... perhaps that is just how the socialists like it?
weak sauce This is why I advocate inter-disciplinary training. Cherry picking one data point and crafting it to a narrative is old hat. However if you stand back and take a look at the whole picture it is much more obvious...to some. Be that as it may..I have the feeling Marcus that you are half into your cup and just looking for a punching bag. So be it. Peace p.s. the chart was of a model that was projected in 2006 I believe with actual data well within the 2 sigma delta. these models have been refined and are even more highly accurate today but i could not be arsed to find the latest. the more concerning threat is not climate change anyway its rising co2 levels. |
|
|
|
You can choose gay frogs guy or you can choose NASA. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. If you trust gay frogs guy over NASA, then I can’t help you. Since when is scientific truth decided by majority vote? The day IPCC get one of their endless predictions right I will consider contemplating their hypothesis.  |
|
|
|
... ever seen what happens ...
-snipped-
Sorry..ain't buying it. I think you know something is happening and is continuing to happen this century. The data is sound and has been reviewed many times. While I agree with you that the Earth will continue its orbit regardless of what humanity does I think it naive to doubt what hard science has proven. Co2 levels are rising at a extraordinary rate. Pumping billions of barrels of hydrocarbons from beneath the ground and then burning it just does not sound like a good idea any more. Are innovation and change difficult? Yes.. Is it expensive to be a first mover in a nascent market? Yes..extremely so.. Things change and we grow wiser. ... when the lying and shilling becomes too much in the face of cool factual analysis, all that is left is demented rage and violent incoherence I guess. ... climate science never is and never will be a 'hard science', it's full of charlatans and political appointees. It's basically a renegade academic cult masquerading as a branch of science now, with fully-developed propaganda and PR smearing units targetting dissenters ("deniers"). That escalated quickly... en garde Do not put words into my mouth, I never said or implied that. I said and was implying that scientific principles have been brought to bear on these problem's and the results are pretty conclusive in my "humble" opinion. If you wish to use incendiary rhetoric and some non-tangential quote from the Post(the Post for God's sake man!) be my guest. If you think my responses are demented and incoherent feel free to ignore me. Otherwise, perhaps listen to what I am saying because not only can I(and have) pull up reams of accredited papers by the worlds leading scientists. I have seen it with mine own eye's. 30+ years in the field in not only hazardous remediation but the energy sector as well. It's not a pretty site. The cavalier attitude many people seem to have towards responsible, sustainable shepherding of this planet..this Earth we call home is sickening to me on a fundamental level. |
|
|
|
... ever seen what happens ...
-snipped-
Sorry..ain't buying it. I think you know something is happening and is continuing to happen this century. The data is sound and has been reviewed many times. While I agree with you that the Earth will continue its orbit regardless of what humanity does I think it naive to doubt what hard science has proven. Co2 levels are rising at a extraordinary rate. Pumping billions of barrels of hydrocarbons from beneath the ground and then burning it just does not sound like a good idea any more. Are innovation and change difficult? Yes.. Is it expensive to be a first mover in a nascent market? Yes..extremely so.. Things change and we grow wiser. |
|
|
|
The biggest problem I see with the partial government shutdown is that it won't be permanent. The other problem is that it's too small in scope.
Well...there is that. I however think with population densities what they are, some form of government is necessary. Democratic electoral voting seems to be fairest but has certain inefficiencies that can be hard to swallow at times. Just look at this graph of the US budget surplus/deficit ratio. Its been 2 generations since there was a surplus and even that is questionable as some say monies were borrowed against the SS trust fund or something along those lines. I am just sick and tired of being ripped off and lied too...pretty simple really. Is it to much to ask that "they" not do this anymore?  https://www.davemanuel.com/history-of-deficits-and-surpluses-in-the-united-states.phpLots of statistics here..interesting if your into that sort. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
