Welche Gesetze?


Spekulationen sind natürlich deine eigene Sache. Das ist auch nicht deren Argument. Die Begründung der Raiffeisen ist vermehrtes Risiko der Geldwäsche in Zusammenhang mit Bitcoin (vgl. "Silk Road", "CryptoLocker", etc.).

Nein, aber wir sind ein relativ freies Land und ich glaube nicht, dass eine Bank gezwungen werden kann Zahlungen / Geschäfte durchzuführen, welche von ihnen als hoch riskant eingestuft wurden (auch wenn die Einstufung übertrieben sein mag)  - letztlich sollte es im eigenen Interesse der Bank liegen Zahlungen abzuwickeln um Gebühren zu kassieren.

Bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass die Rechtsgrundlage dies zulässt.

Etwa so hab ich das gemacht. Ich rate auch Freunden und Bekannten die bei Raiffeisen sind die Bank zu wechseln.

Of course I'm using IRC - not every day, but frequently.

My guess: Jim Harper, Michael Perklin, Vinny Lingham

My first phone was from Sony CMD J5 (pre-Sony Ericsson) -  first phone with a camera was the NEC E616 in 2003

Die Mycelium Bitcoin Wallet hat eine integrierte Handelsfunktion (Local Trader) ich denke das funktioniert weiterhin in Deutschland wenn du ein Android Gerät hast.

- Bitcoin and Litecoin are not companies

- I will definitely consider buying a Nokia phone if they're offering a phone that is running free software (I just returned a Nexus 5  and my experience with Apple products was more than just disappointing)

Where did you get this number? It seems difficult to estimate the amount of Bitcoins that has been destroyed permanently and to see how the distribution of Bitcoins on exchanges and other services breaks down and how addresses belonging to the same person are connected… Of course: if your money is on an exchange it's technically a single place in control of it…

Some (especially those with several billions or even trillions) might avoid Bitcoin as a currency with public information available about two people owning ~1% of it – knowing they bought "low" compared to the current exchange rate and they might need some money to get their IPO started. It simply can't go – or at least it won't stay at $40,000 with a wealth distribution like this – greed and the risk of someone dumping 1% holds it down – that's why you diversify…

That being said: I think their intentions are good.

If something becomes very popular those who are wealthy are buying it up and you won't hear about it  - and dump it when it's getting very expensive - followed by a large amount of paid media articles to get fools to sell after them so they can rebuy at low rates just to repeat the cycle. They're not giving up their powers, if they can take control of many Bitcoins.

Are you time travelling?

Of course it's not "tied on a fundamental level", but precious metals are the winner if other financial assets are failing - that's why we've seen them going up during the financial crisis.

Otherwise you'd have to bet a certain amount of money against Bitcoin (and also be sure that the other party is reliable) in which case you can also lose.

Too lazy to read all this - bought more precious metals.

I highly doubt that you started using Bitcoin on the very first day.

Yes, spending makes Bitcoin more valuable, but you can spend them on something that is also valuable like precious metals or real estate.

What's your definition of a 'Long Term Trend'?

1-3 days is not a 'Long Term Trend'.

I agree. If anything happens to Bitcoin and it 'collapses' - it doesn't mean that other types of online payment will be successful.

pandas are coins:

Bitcoin is like a stock and we're the company so we can support it's share price (value) by making successful business with it.