This is why Paul Revere is awesome.

I think he was overestimating for the sake of argument. Like, "even if it took nine man hours, ..."

That's not the problem. The problem is arguing about listing a coin when the issue is whether to take a payment that ties gives you a vested interest in promoting one coin, one version of one coin at that, over others.

Cryptsy should really give the PC to Paul Revere.

Why? Because it would be hilarious.

Yeah, whether or not to list a scam coin is a complete different question than whether to take a bribe.

*rolls over to hit snooze, looks at the time*

o shit it's time for that paycoin hangout

*grabs laptop, logs on, not wanting to miss a moment*

At least she wasn't topless like Garza in that oft-posted image.

If someone for some reason wants to save XPY and eliminate Prime Controllers, what's the chance of that now that the #1 XPY exchange has one?

Not just dump XPY, either. I'm pretty sure almost all of his wealth is in BTC. Buttercoin wouldn't let him sell, and Coinbase dropped him. My guess is that Cryptsy is where Garza dumps BTC for USD. There aren't many places left.

Garza can't speak out against Cryptsy because there are precious few places left to go, and he doesn't want to be some poor muggle.

I know it's hard to turn down free money, but cryptsy should have turned down free money.

Unlike some others, my experience with cryptsy has been largely positive. I'm not a high roller, but it was my primary exchange. I like the UI, they make working in USD really easy, they (eventually) handle every ticket, and withdrawal checks are sent immediately. That last one is huge because they're like a quarter of the cost of coinbase.

I don't know if I can use them anymore. They really need to explain this or give it back immediately. This is just too dirty.

See, that's what separates HashKings from muggles. He's willing to put the work in to defraud thousands of people.

Will you do it by starting an online wallet? Maybe you could sell Moonstakers has a mechanism for spreading the stake around, then "reinvest" the proceeds in Paycoin startups.

Why suchmoon and not Paul Revere?

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PLAY FAVORITES.

Unfortunately, this kind of stuff is far too normal. I had to do an eviction once, and while I was in a different league, $9,000 of damages on a $90,000 home is pretty rough stuff. We didn't even list crap like rocks in the sinks that just took a bit of effort to clear out. I mean, they took the closet bars.

If my experience is any guide, Garza was probably pissed about being evicted.

o shit

(I'm not touching this.)

"Sara", apparently. She seems to be of note because she's a bagholder who's pretty.

A lot of people lost a lot of money due to his fraud, and each second he stays at large, people are at risk of losing more. They really need to put this guy away as soon as they can.

They have a ton of evidence. It seems like there should have at least been an indictment by now.

An acronym antonym?

Demonstrate Value - Run a legitimate retail business, then underprice initial Hashlets so a number of customers profit quickly.

Engage Virtually - Frequently post on your forum and twitter, interacting with customers directly.

Nurture Dependence - Modify your product so the only way customers can even hope to break even is to be paid in Hashpoints that are worthless without your help.

Neglect Emotionally - Continually underdeliver on promises and ban anyone who questions that.

Inspire Hope - Come up with a number of successive features that could possibly enhance the value of your product and keep your customers out of bankruptcy when they're released.

Separate Entirely. - This is where Garza has a hard time. He keeps Hashtalk open and keeps coming extending the Inspire Hope phase far too long. Most scammers would be gone by now.

Since when is a small local telecom "a few national companies?"

He wasn't in charge of very much in 2013, as far as I can tell, and that quote is from Jan 2014.