Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 02:05:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 122 »
1281  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 26, 2014, 08:44:25 PM
The fans give a speed indication output.  I don't know what kind, digital or analog.  The fan speed is controlled by pulse width modulation.  I don't see a corresponding hashing board temperature and fan speed though one goes up so does the other.  If I saw three miners having a 40° board temperature and all three have the same speed, I'd say there was a digital feedback loop but this is not the case.  So, one might assume that there is a ramp or curve that says when the temperature is A the fan speed supply voltage will be X, temp B gets voltage Y and temp C gets voltage Z.  The speed indication just giving an indication of change versus temperature to the user.

The bad hashing board having a declining hashrate and a declining temperature might indicate the fault is elsewhere except that even after a cold start, after significant cooling time such that hashing starts over 442 and works its way down over hours, shows a lower temperature and fan speed early on.  If that slower fan speed causes errors away from the temperature sensor, those ASICs may shut down engines and slow hashrate but not quickly effect temperature indication.

So the slow fan speed relative to temperature should be addressed.  The problem may be in the pulsed width voltage supply line.  A partial open, high resistance, in a plated thru hole, e.g. dull drill bit left fiber in the hole, the hole only partly plated.  So, that's where I'll look first when I troubleshoot.  I'll follow the pulsed with fan voltage first, then the ground and perhaps the speed indication pair, looking for something amiss.  But not today.

Way overly optimistic without a schematic.  I shut it down and inspected.  Inspected and check grounds.  I'd have liked to trace the fan lines but the multilayered board precluded that and without a schematic that's that.  The only thing I found amiss is between pins 1 and 20 of the ribbon cable connection - the green covering had been lifted between the two pins as if those pins had carried quite a bit of current at one time and heated that area.  So no joy.

I would imagine that might happen if someone tried powering the S3 putting connectors to only the one side and the other side tried to hash with current across the controller board.
1282  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 26, 2014, 06:55:42 PM
I was directed here as maybe a quick fix for a problem. Please point me elsewhere if appropriate.

Just set up two s3 b9's with identical PSU's and ran fine for 4 days till I needed to change one of the configuration settings on both devices.

I changed the setting (password field for the first pool, actually getting used as a hashing control for a lower limit of payout acceptable) and then clicked the "Save&Apply". I monitored for a while and just got to wondering "did the setting actually take effect properly" as things didn't seem kosher, so I used the reboot option from the web page on both devices.

On reboot one would not display a good status LED (although the NIC LED's look good). Both the red and green LED's are dark, not even brief flashing (even though they did light till the NIC cycled). If I try to access it with the browser I get the initial page "LuCI - Lua Configuration Interface" but the auto link to the status overview eventually times out. It also doesn't generate heat (I have them side by side and there is a big difference in heat output between the working one and the failing one)

I tried leaving the failing one off for 20 minutes or so. That didn't help. I then swapped the PSU's on the theory that there wasn't enough electrical output on one PSU. That made no difference, working one with the other PSU still worked, failing one with the "working" PSU still failed.

Thoughts on what I could try that won't make it so I can't return it?

For those with S3's acting up, try to go back to the original image. Or, if its slow, try the S3+ firmware. These are nice miners, but they are not consistent. In order to get all miners going, either go backwards or forwards with the firmware. Just my 2 cents for you to try. Have you tried the S3+ firmware yet?
Given the length of time since purchase, I'm hesitant. Like I said. I'd rather not do something that makes it impossible to return. If I brick it, then I'm stuck. I'll wait and see what others have to say that might help and are less drastic. (An additional diagnostic that is more information would be great, even if the diagnostic really does then point at a firmware upgrade. I'd then be willing to go there.)

I doubt you will brick it, I have done many S3+ compatible firmware update, and I also went backwards. No issues. Email tech support, and if they ask if you should upgrade it, that way you can say you were just following their instructions.  I think there was a security issue with the original firmware.

I just tried an SSH access and the one device just times out the connection, the working one lets me log on as root. I think it's interesting that the first LuCI page comes up even though other pages and SSH don't work. At this point, without better diagnostics, I'd be inclined to let bitmain tell me what to do.

Trouble is that the downed miner won't bring up the HTTP interface, so there is no possibility at installing different firmware. Anyone know how to reset the device? We've tried the instructions for reset shown here, but no joy.

Can you ping it? If so try another browser? Default should be 192.168.1.99.


I've noticed that if I ssh into an S3 and command halt, unless I cold boot I can't get in.  The device will acknowledge a ping but port 80 seems closed.  And the halt command stops the cgminer-monitor so it doesn't restart at otherwise 3 minutes most.
1283  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 26, 2014, 06:47:37 PM
I was directed here as maybe a quick fix for a problem. Please point me elsewhere if appropriate.

Just set up two s3 b9's with identical PSU's and ran fine for 4 days till I needed to change one of the configuration settings on both devices.

I changed the setting (password field for the first pool, actually getting used as a hashing control for a lower limit of payout acceptable) and then clicked the "Save&Apply". I monitored for a while and just got to wondering "did the setting actually take effect properly" as things didn't seem kosher, so I used the reboot option from the web page on both devices.

On reboot one would not display a good status LED (although the NIC LED's look good). Both the red and green LED's are dark, not even brief flashing (even though they did light till the NIC cycled). If I try to access it with the browser I get the initial page "LuCI - Lua Configuration Interface" but the auto link to the status overview eventually times out. It also doesn't generate heat (I have them side by side and there is a big difference in heat output between the working one and the failing one)

I tried leaving the failing one off for 20 minutes or so. That didn't help. I then swapped the PSU's on the theory that there wasn't enough electrical output on one PSU. That made no difference, working one with the other PSU still worked, failing one with the "working" PSU still failed.

Thoughts on what I could try that won't make it so I can't return it?

For those with S3's acting up, try to go back to the original image. Or, if its slow, try the S3+ firmware. These are nice miners, but they are not consistent. In order to get all miners going, either go backwards or forwards with the firmware. Just my 2 cents for you to try. Have you tried the S3+ firmware yet?
Given the length of time since purchase, I'm hesitant. Like I said. I'd rather not do something that makes it impossible to return. If I brick it, then I'm stuck. I'll wait and see what others have to say that might help and are less drastic. (An additional diagnostic that is more information would be great, even if the diagnostic really does then point at a firmware upgrade. I'd then be willing to go there.)

I doubt you will brick it, I have done many S3+ compatible firmware update, and I also went backwards. No issues. Email tech support, and if they ask if you should upgrade it, that way you can say you were just following their instructions.  I think there was a security issue with the original firmware.

I just tried an SSH access and the one device just times out the connection, the working one lets me log on as root. I think it's interesting that the first LuCI page comes up even though other pages and SSH don't work. At this point, without better diagnostics, I'd be inclined to let bitmain tell me what to do.

Trouble is that the downed miner won't bring up the HTTP interface, so there is no possibility at installing different firmware. Anyone know how to reset the device? We've tried the instructions for reset shown here, but no joy.

The reset button is a bit below the hole, not aligned well.  And I found on the S3 as well as a miner from another company that the reset doesn't work all that well.  What I try is holding it in for 30 seconds, then mashing it every few seconds for a while, then turning it off, letting it sit a  minute then rebooting while mashing the reset every few seconds a couple of times then letting it boot.

1284  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 26, 2014, 06:39:48 PM
I was directed here as maybe a quick fix for a problem. Please point me elsewhere if appropriate.

Just set up two s3 b9's with identical PSU's and ran fine for 4 days till I needed to change one of the configuration settings on both devices.

I changed the setting (password field for the first pool, actually getting used as a hashing control for a lower limit of payout acceptable) and then clicked the "Save&Apply". I monitored for a while and just got to wondering "did the setting actually take effect properly" as things didn't seem kosher, so I used the reboot option from the web page on both devices.

On reboot one would not display a good status LED (although the NIC LED's look good). Both the red and green LED's are dark, not even brief flashing (even though they did light till the NIC cycled). If I try to access it with the browser I get the initial page "LuCI - Lua Configuration Interface" but the auto link to the status overview eventually times out. It also doesn't generate heat (I have them side by side and there is a big difference in heat output between the working one and the failing one)

I tried leaving the failing one off for 20 minutes or so. That didn't help. I then swapped the PSU's on the theory that there wasn't enough electrical output on one PSU. That made no difference, working one with the other PSU still worked, failing one with the "working" PSU still failed.

Thoughts on what I could try that won't make it so I can't return it?

Try disconnecting the power supply from the S3 while you leave it off for some period before you retry.
1285  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 26, 2014, 06:32:15 PM
Ah, my problem S3 has been running 1d 16h and has slowed to 418.15.  Three hours ago it was 418.80.

I have been in an acrimonious email exchange with the reseller.  So, for me to ask him to submit the slow hashing blade for exchange would beg an extended delay.  To request an exchange from Bitmain would probably be met by an instruction to return the slow hashing board to the reseller.

I'm not certain it would be in my interest to return the hashing board.  If Bitmain would accept the board directly what is the estimated turn around time?  What is the estimated shipping from the US?  Answers to these questions would help inform my decision how to proceed.  Thanks.

soy


I realise that you may have tried this, but one of my S3s is similar to yours and gets slower and slower, eventually ending up in the 300s, so when I can see that its average is going down towards 420 again, I reboot it.  On the first or second reboot, it starts hashing at around 460 or more, with good speed for hours until it gradually starts sinking again over the next day or so.  With this method, I keep it averaging 440 for most of the time, which I can't complain about.  Sorry if you already tried and discounted this!  Smiley

Yes, a cold boot restores relatively normal hashrates but there is a continual decline.  I'm hoping it will settle out at a hashrate that is a stable floor.  I had tried anticipating when it would hit 5% less than 441, knowing that end point, 418.5, if the plot tracked a capacitor charging track a single timeconstant predicted five timeconstants would have expired this afternoon.  It finished early because the cold boot was late afternoon and much of that first timeconstant the S3 was in a cooler environment so the prediction was long.

Does either of your fan speeds seem slow relative to temperature?

Rebooting will restore the hashing for a while I suppose and cost less than a return.  
1286  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 26, 2014, 01:50:09 PM
Ah, my problem S3 has been running 1d 16h and has slowed to 418.15.  Three hours ago it was 418.80.

I have been in an acrimonious email exchange with the reseller.  So, for me to ask him to submit the slow hashing blade for exchange would beg an extended delay.  To request an exchange from Bitmain would probably be met by an instruction to return the slow hashing board to the reseller.

I'm not certain it would be in my interest to return the hashing board.  If Bitmain would accept the board directly what is the estimated turn around time?  What is the estimated shipping from the US?  Answers to these questions would help inform my decision how to proceed.  Thanks.

soy
1287  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 25, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
The fans give a speed indication output.  I don't know what kind, digital or analog.  The fan speed is controlled by pulse width modulation.  I don't see a corresponding hashing board temperature and fan speed though one goes up so does the other.  If I saw three miners having a 40° board temperature and all three have the same speed, I'd say there was a digital feedback loop but this is not the case.  So, one might assume that there is a ramp or curve that says when the temperature is A the fan speed supply voltage will be X, temp B gets voltage Y and temp C gets voltage Z.  The speed indication just giving an indication of change versus temperature to the user.

The bad hashing board having a declining hashrate and a declining temperature might indicate the fault is elsewhere except that even after a cold start, after significant cooling time such that hashing starts over 442 and works its way down over hours, shows a lower temperature and fan speed early on.  If that slower fan speed causes errors away from the temperature sensor, those ASICs may shut down engines and slow hashrate but not quickly effect temperature indication.

So the slow fan speed relative to temperature should be addressed.  The problem may be in the pulsed width voltage supply line.  A partial open, high resistance, in a plated thru hole, e.g. dull drill bit left fiber in the hole, the hole only partly plated.  So, that's where I'll look first when I troubleshoot.  I'll follow the pulsed with fan voltage first, then the ground and perhaps the speed indication pair, looking for something amiss.  But not today.
1288  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 24, 2014, 09:19:57 PM
Butterfly Labs has been Shut Down by the FTC. Closed.

Just happened. That's one less ASIC Miner Company.

Strato

And what is the point of posting this into the  Antminer S3 Thread ?

The point is this news will impact Bitmain and any purchasers of Bitmain as it will impact the bitcoin network in general.

It's also relevant as some of us were unfortunate enough to have had dealings with BFL in the past.


So you think with all the presence of the (multiple) "BFL got shut by the FTC" Threads anyone would overlook that and would not be informed without that OT posting here ??!

If so, they are definitely doing the wrong thing...

Certainly didn't mean to offend you OCMINER by posting about BFL getting shut down. I figured the story was relevant due to the fact that there are only a small handful of companies producing this niche hardware, and secondly, just to further connect the dots, that BFL, despite their many problems, would be considered a main competitor to BitMainTech. Thus, the point.

Strato

Busy myself and only reading two Bitmain threads on bitcointalk.org.  I was informed by the post.  Thanks for posting.

soy
1289  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 23, 2014, 06:25:09 PM
Butterfly Labs has been Shut Down by the FTC. Closed.

Just happened. That's one less ASIC Miner Company.

Strato

And what is the point of posting this into the  Antminer S3 Thread ?

I appreciate the info.  Won't hijack the S3 thread to dwell on those (see a series of shift up characters from the number row here) Kansas frauds.  Suffice it to say they were not ethical in their dealings.
1290  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 23, 2014, 02:38:46 PM
Having already repasted the heat sinks in the past today's effort was aimed at cleaning the ASIC pins and anything near components that might effect operation like perhaps compound on capacitors.  Since the inside heatsink paste is assumed good, I removed the cover, the fans, the outside heatsinks, the controller board.  I found the ASICs are numbered from 2 to 17 starting at the upper left then to the lower left then to the next lower ASIC then up then across to the next upper ASIC so it finishes with 17 at the upper right.  Putting the miner without fans or controller board upside down outside I used a can of brake cleaner with straw to clean the board and it's inside then used a second can to clean the other board and its inside with a little cleaner left over for the controller board.  Then firing up my air compressor I blew off the boards.  Hoping it left the controller board okay.  Experience showed me compressed air hitting an asicminer blade FPGA could cause it to lose programming.  Now to reassemble....

Note there's a void in the outside heatsink over the LM75A and a channel for the line of capacitors.

...has awakened with all ASICs o's.

Can't ask for better conditions for this to be running right.  63°F outside, 72°F in the room with miners and that's at 20%rh.

Considering right now if I were to do this again I'd put the spring screws back in place without the heatsink before cleaning the board with the brake cleaner so the cleaner doesn't get into the screwholes.  Worth mentioning clumps of thermal paste on the ASIC pins, e.g. if the heatsink had been slid sideways in removal, might be removed CAREFULLY with a wooden toothpick.  The spray brake cleaner gets used up pretty quickly.

At 30 minutes it's doing 440.82GH/s.  I suspect it will continue to be reasonable most of the day unless it warms then drop tonight again to the mid-430's.  Engines turning off in one of the ASICs for some reason and all the cleaning and reapplication of thermal paste won't fix it.  I could be wrong and maybe it will stay good but I doubt it.

...maybe

40 min 444.29(avg)
 1 hr  443.72
 2 hr  441.60
 3 hr  441.22
 4 hr  440.74
 5 hr  439.68
 6 hr  434.89
 rebooted due to low hashrate

If I were still in the game I'd look for an open.  The low fan speed is an indicator of something amiss as well.  A plated thru hole that fails would fit the bill.  Tough to find without a schematic but not impossible.

If it's a charge buildup then a complete shutdown would be more effective than a restart.

I had adjusted the cgminer-avg-monitor script to look for a hashrate of 432 rather than 439 and run the program only on the hour not every 30 minutes as there were too many restarts and changed the script to reboot instead of cgminer restart.  It triggered at 431.

I'll see how this rebooting works out.  There is a 60 second delay added before rebooting.  The loss, as someone has accurately pointed out, in not much in dollars and cents so troubleshooting it isn't high on my list of things to do.  If I do opt to troubleshoot, I have the other board with which to compare.

 18 m   438.35
 31 m  437.63
 1 hr   439.67     Temps dropping
 2 hr   440.24     Room Temp 76°
 2h59m  431.83  Room Temp 75°
 3h rebooted due to low hashrate

 30 m  437.51 75.0°
 1 hr   440.45  75.0°
 2 hr   435.66  73.7°
 3 hr   438.18  73.9°  Lower room temperature does slow the decline.  Utility down to 14.  ~Midnight.

So with the sleep I added to let it cool it takes 2 minutes before it's hashing again.  Booting at 431GH/s, when it's 10GH/s down, the 10GH/s*120s=1200GH's which is like the miner not running for 2.72 seconds.  So, triggering a reboot with delay that takes ~ 2 minutes loses 117 seconds of hashing.

1291  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 23, 2014, 02:10:41 AM
The cgminer-avg-monitor restart cgminer at low hashrate is functioning but my S3 isn't cooperating.  I went out to shop and returned after a few hours.  It was restarting cgminer every half hour due to low hashrate until 5PM then passed at 5:30 and at 6PM but  then the hashrate started to drop.  It restarted again for low hashrate and woke up with two x's, one in each chain so no way it was going to pass the next restart. 

I think this might be memory that isn't cleared or chips that aren't reset rather than bad ASICs.  I've tried adding delay, e.g. sleep 60, but it still fails to restart properly.  I know a cold boot works.

What I have to do with my cable box and routers when there's an internet disconnect is use the br command & an X-10 transmitter on a linux machine to cycle cable modem and routers off and wake those up in order with the proper timeouts.  This works efficiently albeit the cycling is a bit noisy and I'd wish X-10 would move up to solid state relays.

Since a cold boot works almost every time, I'd like to use the same X-10 idea with an S3 but there is no ftp and although /etc/services lists ftp, connections are refused.  I don't know if I can just add any repository to whatever angstrom program lists repositories, this without fouling up the system with incorrect version programs.  I'm not even sure there is a br command for angstrom.

This all may be moot as I've purchased additional thermal compound and cleaner so I'm going to address the problem S3 once again tomorrow.  None the less I'd like to know how to get in and out of the S3 via ftp.  Assistance would be appreciated.
1292  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 23, 2014, 02:06:07 AM

They aren't overclocked. They are straight outta the box. My wife is an interior designer, so all my miners MUST remain in my office so as not to interfere with her masterpiece haha. Not worried, though. I've got an electrician coming out here tomorrow and he's gonna put another circuit in here and I'll be back in business. Need a pro to look at it anyway. If the wiring is crap I need to know now before something terrible happens anyway. Thank you, mindtrip, for saving my family's life LOL

If your electrician is running a complete new circuit you may consider a 220v circuit (or two) dedicated for your mining hardware.  You can run more off a 220v circuit, plus it's a little more efficient  (which is always an upside) to run the power supplies off of 220 vs 110.  I ran 2x220v circuits to where my miners are located and it was the best thing I ever did.  If you do this, just be sure that it is recognizable as a 220v circuit.  I have orange outlets and red stickers warning of the 220v circuit so 110v equipment isn't mistakenly plugged in (although I'm the only one that uses that area of the basement).





You should have used receptacles and matching plugs that make plugging in 120 V device impossible.

To each their own.  For me, since I'm the only one that uses that part of the basement, a simple label and or color code is just fine.  Not to mention that everything in that section can work off 220v.  If I were to sell the house, I'd most likely revert the breaker or remove the circuit altogether.

+1. 220V can run safely using 120V outlets/plugs and is often more cost-effective to use than the $20-100 alternative of specialty NEMA 6 equipment and adapters.

The real risk is absent-mindedly plugging something 120V in and overloading it. A coloured outlet with a warning label in the mining farm should be pretty safe from this concern

Bull.  That would be like storing rubbing alcohol in a vodka bottle.
1293  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 11:40:54 PM
Thanks, mindtrip. Obvious answer to a stupid question

Your welcome not to get into a lot of detail but usually outlets are all linked together on a circuit so if your wiring gauge is incorrect or an outlet is not wired correctly it can cause a high load at a particular point in the line in your case that hot outlet is probably in between the outlet your using and the breaker. If the wiring is old this is a concern. I personally ran new dedicated 20 AMP Circuits for all my mining locations to ensure 1> Correct gauge wire and outlets were used 2> nothing else i wasn't aware of was on that circuit 3> Peace of mind Smiley

Yep.  Smiley
1294  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 11:31:15 PM
Need help here. Anyone running multiple S3s on the same circuit, and if so, what are you powering them with? I have 6 of the new batch 8 S3's, and they are all on the same circuit. Running two pairs with a Corsair CX750M each and the other two with an EVGA bronze 1300W. Thought this would work well, and they mine perfectly, but the one outlet in the room that isn't being used for anything is warm to the touch. This obviously isn't good. I was a noob before this running two overclocked S1s with one Corsair CX750M and have apparently bit off more than I can chew.

Any help from one of you vets would be highly appreciated  Wink

Couple of ways to run the cable to outlets.  Although a 20 amp circuit with 12-2 might have 15 amp outlets, the total allowed wouldn't change.  The 15 amp outlets have a couple of ways to clamp the wire.  They could have the solid #12 looped around an outlet screw and clipped, then another length of #12 wrapped around the other screw on that side and clipped, and run to another outlet, same on the other side of the outlet.  Or they could have pre-built the circuit for the room and stripped back the #12 for 3/4" and made a loop and only attached it to one screw, not clipping the wire but tough to route if you're using holes cut in the studs before the drywall goes up.  If looped and clipped the 15 amp outlet could conceivably see more than 15 amps thru the metal on the side having the two screws.  Or, and this is more likely to cause outlet heating, the electrician ran the cables to the empty boxes, the cables cut a foot or so beyond the box.  He stripped the #12-2, both the black and white, a half inch and pressed the wire into the hole in the back of the outlet, black to the side having the gilt colored screw and white to the side having the silver colored metal screw.  Then took the cable to the next outlet and did the same to the other pair of holes on the back of the outlet.  This type of daisy-chaining, using the push in holes, likely see the solid conductor making contact with a metal tab pressing on its side and is more likely to heat.  Not sure if a standard 15 amp outlet would accept #12, hold on I'll check...nope, #12 won't fit the hole in a 15 amp outlet.
1295  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 06:12:22 PM
Does an x mean that the chip has shut down?  Or is it burning up? Wink

Likely means that it's completely shut down.  Not sure what the "-" means as a comparison.  I've found that completely turning off the miner and letting it cool generally gets an x to revert to an o.

Just rebooting works for me..

Just tried that and an x was changed to a -.  Wonder if they ever change to an o without a reboot or restart.

...the auto reboot for low hashrate by cgminer-avg-monitor at the half hour didn't clear the -.
1296  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 05:53:11 PM
Does an x mean that the chip has shut down?  Or is it burning up? Wink

Likely means that it's completely shut down.  Not sure what the "-" means as a comparison.  I've found that completely turning off the miner and letting it cool generally gets an x to revert to an o.
1297  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 05:37:08 PM
Yes, this is better.  Before it barely got up to 435GH/s with the low hashing board on the right side when looking at the RJ45 connector end.  The right side is the top chain and generally has the higher temperature and faster fan.  In this case it had lower temperature and slower fan than the lower chain.  So, taking the end plates and their fans, swapping ends and moving the controller board, put it back the way it was shipped, the questionable board on the cooler side.  

Almost right away the average went above 441GH/s and has remained above 440GH/s for the last 3h 23m and is presently 442.04 tho the utility is only 15.  No hardware errors in that time.  It was started as the afternoon cooled.  It remains to be seen what happens tonight as the humidity increases.

Oh well.  A minor improvement over yesterday morning and there's even greater humidity as it rained.  This morning the problem S3 is hashing at 434.15GH/s.  A nice improvement over finding it down at 419GH/s in the AM.  Guess I'll just have to settle with this hashrate.  The good S3 immediately next to it is at 440.85.


...1½ hrs after running /etc/init.d/cgminer stop, it restarts automatically after a minute or two, the hashrate of the problem is up to 442.18GH/s(avg).  It restarts with a fresh Elapsed duration.  So, I'll schedule this to run middle of the night and again in the AM.

Okay, I see this problem has been address in message #482 this forum with cgminer-avg-monitor script.  Kudos.

Okay, have written/modified the scripts and changed scheduled tasks.  By the time I was done the hashrate was down to 435.09GH/s  So, in about 22 minutes the script will run and it should restart leaving a record in /usr/bin/avg.log.  Nah, will try running from the command line...failed, typing errors I presume.

Okay, the lower case L was actually a one.  Runs fine.

darn, restarted with an x at position 8 of the 16 representing the problem board.


A cold reboot with the machine off a minute allowed it to wake to 441.05GH/s and the x gone.  An x in the 8 position can only be in the center of the board if upper left ASIC is 1, lower far left ASIC is 2, second upper left ASIC is 3, etc.  This would put the eighth position of the chain at the center left bottom ASIC.  Next time I take it one apart I'll look at the component numbering and finding a component common to each ASIC, see how they progress.  Who knows, the ASICs themselves might be numbered.

Up 11 minutes and there's an x in a different position, now in the #2 position of the top chain.
1298  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 05:24:32 PM
Sorry I don't mean to seem lazy, but I have looked and can't find it. Can someone kindly post where the instructions are to set the frequency setting above/outside what is listed on the drop down menu using the new firmware?

I know some of you have had decent results with frequency settings above 250. ie. 262.5.

Would like to give it a shot.

Thanks!

Strato

Miner Configuration, you'll see a gray'd out Advanced Setting to the right of General Settings.
1299  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 05:09:29 PM
Yes, this is better.  Before it barely got up to 435GH/s with the low hashing board on the right side when looking at the RJ45 connector end.  The right side is the top chain and generally has the higher temperature and faster fan.  In this case it had lower temperature and slower fan than the lower chain.  So, taking the end plates and their fans, swapping ends and moving the controller board, put it back the way it was shipped, the questionable board on the cooler side.  

Almost right away the average went above 441GH/s and has remained above 440GH/s for the last 3h 23m and is presently 442.04 tho the utility is only 15.  No hardware errors in that time.  It was started as the afternoon cooled.  It remains to be seen what happens tonight as the humidity increases.

Oh well.  A minor improvement over yesterday morning and there's even greater humidity as it rained.  This morning the problem S3 is hashing at 434.15GH/s.  A nice improvement over finding it down at 419GH/s in the AM.  Guess I'll just have to settle with this hashrate.  The good S3 immediately next to it is at 440.85.


...1½ hrs after running /etc/init.d/cgminer stop, it restarts automatically after a minute or two, the hashrate of the problem is up to 442.18GH/s(avg).  It restarts with a fresh Elapsed duration.  So, I'll schedule this to run middle of the night and again in the AM.

Okay, I see this problem has been address in message #482 this forum with cgminer-avg-monitor script.  Kudos.

Okay, have written/modified the scripts and changed scheduled tasks.  By the time I was done the hashrate was down to 435.09GH/s  So, in about 22 minutes the script will run and it should restart leaving a record in /usr/bin/avg.log.  Nah, will try running from the command line...failed, typing errors I presume.

Okay, the lower case L was actually a one.  Runs fine.

darn, restarted with an x at position 8 of the 16 representing the problem board.
1300  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: September 22, 2014, 05:06:13 PM
One of my new S3+ shows 0 temp and high fan speed. Has someone an idea were the sensor is located? Still mines flawless. RMA would take too much time and efforts.

The LM75A is in the center of the ASICs, halfway between the upper and lower rows.  I'd guess a connector fault and would try swapping ribbon cables to see if the problem changes chains.
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 122 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!