Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 07:59:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 »
1761  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [OPEN IN-STOCK] batch #33 0.38 btc per Blade, 49-port HUBS, backplanes on: December 06, 2013, 10:19:07 PM
No joy.  Here it is at 12.8V:

Total MHS:   00000
Received:   0000000000
Accepted:   0000000000
Per Minute:   000.00
Efficiency:   000.00%
Up Time:   0d,00h,00m,51s

Current Server: 192.168.1.4:8332
Chip: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------

I switch the server:

Total MHS:   00000
Received:   0000000000
Accepted:   0000000000
Per Minute:   000.00
Efficiency:   000.00%
Up Time:   0d,00h,02m,53s

Current Server: :19501
Chip: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I Switch the server again:

Total MHS:   00000
Received:   0000000000
Accepted:   0000000000
Per Minute:   000.00
Efficiency:   000.00%
Up Time:   0d,00h,03m,26s

Current Server: 192.168.1.4:8332
Chip: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I've seen others report the 19501 previously.


1762  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [OPEN IN-STOCK] batch #33 0.38 btc per Blade, 49-port HUBS, backplanes on: December 06, 2013, 10:07:56 PM
I measure 11.8vdc in and 1.04volts on the copper pads mid board.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.

soy

Might want to give it a stable 12v... the backpane PSU provides 12.7v
If your power wires are getting hot, you're putting too much load through the power wires.  Use more wires.  Each 18ga wire is only rated for 2.3a worth of power transmission.  That's only about 27w of power.  you'll need 4 power lines if you're using 18ga wiring high quality pcie cables ise this, molex may have 20ga wiring which is only rated for about half)



Okay, will up the voltage to 12.7V.  I had been running fine on 11.8V.  Would make less sense to raise the voltage given the board failed because we had an exceptionally warm winter's day here in Georgia and the room went up to 76°F after weeks at low 60°'s and that even with switching supplies/buck converters, the greater the voltage difference the more power lost at the supply.  But I will give it a try.   
1763  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: December 06, 2013, 07:06:02 PM
I'm mourning a dead Blade today, my one and only.  It's come up with all xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for the ASICs.  We had a warm December day in Georgia, 71.6°F out and 76.0°F in the room.

I couldn't bring myself to buy a Neptune.  Just too much for me.  That the Neptunes aren't sold out yet tempts me right now.  But no.  Ah, the falling BTC harvest, now accelerated losing 10GH/s.  It's like aging.
1764  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: December 06, 2013, 06:51:36 PM
Does anyone know what the typical support e-mail reply time is nowadays?  I had a nice fireworks display on one of my Oct. Jupiter's when upgrading PSUs and haven't heard anything from them for a couple of days now aside from the auto reply. Just curious how long it will take to issue RMA.

What the bloody did you do? All you have to do is swap cables.

And that is precisely what i did.  I was going from a Coolermaster v1000 to a nice Corsair AX1200 gold.  Brand new out of the box never used, plug it all in, hit the switch and poof.......Fire!  That was my good Jupiter too. Sad

Here is the aftermath.


For this reason I think the plugs having both a jumper and a power resistor to the 3v line are a very good bet.  I know you followed instructions, but did you put in the jumper then fire up the supply and check that the voltage was there on the 12V, then shut down the supply, plug the power supply into the Jupiter, then switch on the supply?

If my theory that the current ramp, preventing current surge producing a voltage spike sufficient to blow the caps, the current ramp to ramp up current on the 12V line is actually controlled by a voltage ramp of 0 to 1V produced on the 3.3V line (because the 3.3V will be up to regulated voltage before the 5V or 12V) then putting in the jumper, turning on the supply to check if the jumper is correct and voltage being supplied, then shut down before plugging into Jupiter, since the supply expects that it is plugged into a motherboard having a load on the 3.3V line, it expects that when the supply is turned off the 3.3V line filter capacitors will drain out thru the motherboard.  That can't happen without a motherboard or a resistor to ground from the 3.3V line as well as the jumper.  

So, if  you check the jumper was correctly placed by looking for 12V on the 12V line, then shut down, plugged the supply into the Jupiter, and turned it on, the supply 3.3V line never drained and still had full voltage on its filter caps and the timed ramp voltage that controlled the ramp for the 12v current had remained at max, as if already having timed out its ramp, and BANG, instant max current.
1765  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Diagnosing Broken BE Blade on: December 06, 2013, 05:42:57 PM
Or IC70 bad.
1766  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Diagnosing Broken BE Blade on: December 06, 2013, 05:38:27 PM
Thanks for that.  I have not fixed the 3.3V line.

I believe there is a short past the regulator that I haven't found.  The symptom is that the both resistors in the divider (R120,R121) are reading around 1.8k as if they were in parallel.

If you measure the test points on your board in each lane, what voltage are you getting?  Should be about 1.05V not overclocked, 1.25V overclocked.  Those voltages should be good for a clock anywhere from 12Mhz to 16Mhz respectively.









I'm getting 1.04v and at best it was hashing at something under 12MH/s. (Edit: I misspoke, it was getting just under 11GH/s.)

R121, across - 2.31k, IC102 side of R121 to 12V neg into board 2.31k, far side of R121 to neg 0k

R120, across - 5.64k, IC102 side of R120 to neg into board same as above as that side of the resistor pair is common; this far side of R120 is interesting in that reading resistance to neg into the board in one polarity I get 5.91k, reverse polarity I get 9.77k.

I have the far side of R120 to the in side of C127 an the far side of C127 to ground.  Check for a shorted C127.

Meanwhile I'm not making any progress clearing my ASICs xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx problem.  I think perhaps the PIC may have gotten its program scrambled when I blew it off with compressed air because not only are the ASICs showing inoperable but the board can't Switch Servers, coming up with a Current Server: :19501
1767  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Diagnosing Broken BE Blade on: December 06, 2013, 07:39:50 AM
No go.  Swapping out the synchronous buck regulator was not the solution. 

Does anyone have a working blue back v2 blade they can measure R120 and R121 ohms in circuit while the blade is powered off?  Mine are measuring identical and one should be approximately 3 times the other.

2.31k R121
7.41k R120

Inexpensive meter.

Have any luck getting your 3.3v?

I have a Chip:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx problem.
1768  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 06, 2013, 02:25:33 AM
Interesting.  When I click Switch Server, I get this: Current Server: :19501

Total MHS:   00000
Received:   0000000000
Accepted:   0000000000
Per Minute:   000.00
Efficiency:   000.00%
Up Time:   0d,00h,04m,24s

Current Server: :19501
Chip: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

1769  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [OPEN IN-STOCK] batch #33 0.38 btc per Blade, 49-port HUBS, backplanes on: December 06, 2013, 01:13:50 AM
Hi Canary,

My Blade had been running 4 days shy of three months then started acting up.

It was only giving me double digits "accepted" as viewed on the proxy for a few seconds after powering up before hashrate dropped to zero and it started rebooting.  I changed power supplies.  I've reconfigured the routing a number of times and my other miners are running okay so the router shouldn't be the problem.

Then the ASIC chip display changed from all "O"'s to all "x"'s.  I've reset to factory defaults repeatedly, the new config showing 192.168.1.2,btcguild.com, but still all "'x"'s.  Reconfiguring to my proxy's I still see no indication of requesting work.  The web interface works fine.

I note that soon after getting the Blade 3 months ago I soldered a tantalum capacitor between the + & - pins at the power plug.  That is fine.

I measure 11.8vdc in and 1.04volts on the copper pads mid board.

I would almost guess it's the PIC acting  up.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.

soy

1770  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 06, 2013, 12:45:33 AM
Two supplies in parallel are no help.  Same string of x's.

I feel bad.  This Blade had been running for 4 days shy of 3 months.
1771  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 05, 2013, 11:27:39 PM
Now the problem is that no ASICs are working.

I have 1.something volts across the copper pads near the coils.  So I assume the ASICs are getting  voltage.  There isn't a fuse on the 1 volt supply as well I suppose.

There is no indication on the proxys that any communication to them is taking place however the configuration web page is up.  I did manage a factory reset and accessed the webpage at 192.168.1.254:8000 and did change the configuration to have the proxy addresses.

Refreshing the configuration tells me the miner has been up 5 minutes, zero hashing, no asics, all x's.
1772  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 05, 2013, 11:01:19 PM
How long is one suppose to reset these for?
1773  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 05, 2013, 10:31:52 PM
tried different pool?

Are you using bfgminer proxy or slush's proxy?

slush


Okay, now it's different.  Cleaned the board, started it up, a quick 40 or so getworks and 28 accepted's now it says no aSICs at all, all x's
1774  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 05, 2013, 09:58:55 PM
Welp, a replacement power supply was in my post office box today.  Just got back.  Swapped supplies.  Fired up.  No change.  Shut it down,   Took a high speed 4 port switch I have half way across the room for my WDTV, put that to the gateway router with a short cat5 jumper, ran the Blade to the newly placed switch, watched the proxy, it quickly ran off 40 get works and just as quickly came back with 28 accepted, then it stopped.  Sitting dead.  Asks for new work, I look at the configuration page and it has rebooted.


ASICs all "O".

When I reset to factory defaults and it didn't, I had the cat5 out, power off, jumper to the ground/factory_reset pins, fired up, watched the flashing LED, same one as the regular reset, shut down, took the switch off the reset, rebooted and it still had the previous IP address which tells me it didn't reset.  

1775  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 05, 2013, 09:52:40 PM
voltage?

12.1VDC.
1776  Bitcoin / Mining support / v2 Blade, asks for work 8x, then nothing on: December 05, 2013, 08:02:02 PM
My Blade stopped working.  It's to stratum-mining-proxys.  On either one the same thing happens.  I fire up the Blade, it requests work 8 or 10 times and then nothing.  This last time it asked 8x, then ~14x then submitted, got a single accepted back, then after 8 more getworks, another submitted, 2 more getworks, then a single accepted.  Now four New jobs....  Diff1.

It appears to be resetting.

I took off the heatsink, added some compound to the away side of the sheet, smoothed, reassembled.

I tried a factory reset with the cat5 cable removed.  Saw the flashing of the single LED multiple times which then stopped.  Shut it down.  Put the jumper back on the center pin.  Plugged in the cat5, restarted, then couldn't find the device on 192.168.1.254 but did find it on the earlier IP address it had been assigned before the "reset".

Total MHS:   00182
Received:   0000000008
Accepted:   0000000001
Per Minute:   001.17
Efficiency:   012.50%
Up Time:   0d,00h,00m,51s

It shows up 51 seconds but it's been up 10 minutes.

There are two 120mm fans hitting the heatsink.

So, it would seem to be a resetting issue.  May I ask the most common cause of a resetting issue?  Power supply or routing?
1777  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: December 05, 2013, 02:11:32 AM
All November units arrived in a reasonable time and function as (or above) advertised.  Just like batch one.

Five stars KnC, really good stuff.

 Huh they still assembling and hopefully deliver until end of this week the Nov batch! toxic coffee in the morning?

nooooooo... I don't know if all the Nov units are out, but I think most of them must be.  My nov units were order #92xx, got them Friday (USA).

Slush hashrate up and return on blocks has dropped.  I'd say they're out and mining.
1778  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: December 05, 2013, 02:09:53 AM
I understand that the first batch of Jupiters had to make over 70 coins to break even in BTC and that was going to be tough...  but how can you look at a Neptune and say that it will produce less than 10 coins.    My two jupiters today still create 1 coin a day (combined).      The risk is very different than it was with purchasing Jupiters when BTC was at $100.  


unless you've got 2 November Jupiters pushing 700GH/s each I find it had to believe you can mine 1 BTC a day.

please explain how you're doing this if it's true.
or is it a mistake and you're calculations are incorrect.



I have less than 200gh pointed to slush right now, and I'm making .25btc/day. I have no doubt he's making 1btc/day.


All the profit calcs that i've tried tell me that at current diff 200gh will produce 0.1422 btc a day

*shrug*, variance and luck. I'm getting confirms of just over .01X btc/hr, as I have been for a couple weeks now. It'll lower in a few days, of course.

Right.  So OP's comment, while technically correct, was completely misleading.  His pool had a lucky string of days.  He will not make that day in/day out.

It certainly seems like some of you say intentionally misleading/inflammatory shit, in the hopes someone will call you out on it.  Then we get to have a multi-page, retarded debate on semantics.   Roll Eyes

Looks like the pool gods heard you.  Slow block turnover on Slush.
1779  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Bitcoin-QT paying from specific address-in coins on: December 03, 2013, 09:41:18 PM
In Bitcoin-QT, is it possible to send BTC to an address from coins in the wallet that arrived to one address but not take coins that arrived to other addresses within Bitcoin-QT?  

I've had coins arriving to one address for some time.  I've started a new address for receiving the bitcoin.

Right now if I want to comply with a last in first out spending policy it would look like I need to establish a new Bitcoin-QT instance on a machine, send mined bitcoins to that new instance, and spend when I've accumulated the amount of bitcoin I wish.   

Or remove the wallet.dat, put that in cold storage, restart Bitcoin-QT, rebuild the blockchain and accept coins to it.


Any other way to do this?

Thanks.
1780  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: November 27, 2013, 10:05:40 PM
I have paid for two neptune miners, but just waiting on confirmation.
It is a bit of a risk i'll suppose but he who dares Rodney and all that.

If the price keep rising like this then it should pay dividends if they arrive in Q1

By this Time Next year Rodney we will be Millionaires

$3000 btc by February perhaps?
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!