Flat Earth

[CVD]

Given the trends in politics and controversies on topics such as a Flat Earth shows that we very soon will go through the plot of the film Idiocracy.

[1714983995]

1714983995

[1714983995]

1714983995

[odolvlobo]

Is a round-the-world trip okay?

Yup.

https://i.imgur.com/l6kMNBP.jpg

That map is weird. It looks like a FE map, but the continents are from a different kind of map.

[Astargath]

^^^ Where's my fucking 2 TH/s bitcoin miner I paid $5k cash for back in 2013? The one that left me high and dry unable to make any investment in BTC?

The fucking company was named after a UK space program, the miner was named after a "satellite" the "Prospero".



"The Prospero satellite, also known as the X-3,[2] was launched by the United Kingdom in 1971. It was designed to undertake a series of experiments to study the effects of space environment on communications satellites and remained operational until 1973, after which it was contacted annually for over 25 years.[3] Although Prospero was the first British satellite to have been launched successfully by a British rocket, the first British satellite placed in orbit was Ariel 1, launched in April 1962 on a U.S. rocket.

Prospero has the COSPAR (NSSC ID) designation 1971-093A and the US Space Command satellite catalogue number 05580." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospero_(satellite)



Where's my fucking X-3 miner? Why didn't I get my money refunded so I could make other BTC investment arrangements?



".. now you don't need to do anything productive" <--- You're a massive piece of shit, you fucking leftist retard.

Now it makes sense, you lost all your btc and went insane, thats why you started this thread. You are not a liar after all, just delusional, posting the globe map as proof for the flat earth lmao.

[Pesobit-Central]

We are going back to the moon soon, with many people who will be able to testify. Will this flat earth argument finally go away, along with creationism?

[—]

We are going back to the moon soon, with many people who will be able to testify. Will this flat earth argument finally go away, along with creationism?

No technology is lost https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtTMxKE4Gv4
Every modern Mobile phone has a stronger computer than was available in 1969

I think we will soon fly to Mars and not to the moon)

You where doing alright before you started thinking


Still correct
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg49656611#msg49656611

[Astargath]

We are going back to the moon soon, with many people who will be able to testify. Will this flat earth argument finally go away, along with creationism?

No technology is lost https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtTMxKE4Gv4
Every modern Mobile phone has a stronger computer than was available in 1969

I think we will soon fly to Mars and not to the moon)

You where doing alright before you started thinking


Still correct
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg49656611#msg49656611

We will be laughing at you from Mars when elon musk finally makes it there. Might not be in the next few years but 10-20 for sure.

[suchmoon]

That map is weird. It looks like a FE map, but the continents are from a different kind of map.

I've asked a few times what's the distance from Valparaiso, Chile to Sydney, Australia (by plane or ship) and notbatman obviously doesn't have an answer.

[—]

That map is weird. It looks like a FE map, but the continents are from a different kind of map.

I've asked a few times what's the distance from Valparaiso, Chile to Sydney, Australia (by plane or ship) and notbatman obviously doesn't have an answer.

    11330 km

33° 3′ 0″ S,       71° 37′ 0″ W   Valparaiso
33° 51′ 54″ S,  151° 12′ 34″ E  Sydney


You can always verify on the proper map of the world
https://imgur.com/yI94ewM


Here enjoy 4 PLANE view.

[—]

We are going back to the moon soon, with many people who will be able to testify. Will this flat earth argument finally go away, along with creationism?

No technology is lost https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtTMxKE4Gv4
Every modern Mobile phone has a stronger computer than was available in 1969

I think we will soon fly to Mars and not to the moon)

You where doing alright before you started thinking


Still correct
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg49656611#msg49656611

We will be laughing at you from Mars when elon musk finally makes it there. Might not be in the next few years but 10-20 for sure.

Are you a "Ball" Globot, or "Oblate Spheroid" Globot (At least this one has the distances correct, proven every second by millions traveling)

[exemplaar]

We are going back to the moon soon, with many people who will be able to testify. Will this flat earth argument finally go away, along with creationism?

Nobody was ever or will ever be on the moon. Moon is not a ball of rock you can land on, but a hyperdimensional - part physical, part spiritual.
You can read more here: https://www.ccel.org/c/charles/otpseudepig/enoch/ENOCH_3.HTM

Moon landing was staged in remote hollywood studio. It is a fraud, hoax...

I think we will soon fly to Mars and not to the moon)

Sure, here is a man who has already been to mars along with nasa:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hg_u_dXsQjY&

bonus:


Earth is flat motionless plane covered with a firmament-dome. 

[Astargath]

We are going back to the moon soon, with many people who will be able to testify. Will this flat earth argument finally go away, along with creationism?

Nobody was ever or will ever be on the moon. Moon is not a ball of rock you can land on, but a hyperdimensional - part physical, part spiritual.
You can read more here: https://www.ccel.org/c/charles/otpseudepig/enoch/ENOCH_3.HTM

Moon landing was staged in remote hollywood studio. It is a fraud, hoax...

I think we will soon fly to Mars and not to the moon)

Sure, here is a man who has already been to mars along with nasa:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hg_u_dXsQjY&

bonus:


Earth is flat motionless plane covered with a firmament-dome. 

So water being still proves the earth is flat? Would then water moving prove the earth is moving and a globe? You only need to go to the sea then, check how the water moves, boom, flat earth disproved.

[BADecker]

bonus:


Earth is flat motionless plane covered with a firmament-dome. 

So water being still proves the earth is flat? Would then water moving prove the earth is moving and a globe? You only need to go to the sea then, check how the water moves, boom, flat earth disproved.

Besides, anybody can go to the Panama Canal to see that water isn't flat. If water were flat, you wouldn't need locks at the Canal. The thing that the Canal proves is that water is different levels, but depending on where it is, the changes in levels are so tiny that they are not noticeable.

What this does is makes the level water idea insufficient for determining if the earth is flat or some other shape.

[notbatman]

The Flat Earth - The Panama Canal 2017 -- https://youtu.be/XSYPl0lcSzU

[BADecker]

https://i.imgur.com/JxlHE7N.jpg


The Flat Earth - The Panama Canal 2017 -- https://youtu.be/XSYPl0lcSzU

Not commonly known is the fact that the two oceans have different sea levels, and different levels of high tide. At the entrance to the Panama Canal, the Pacific Ocean can rise as much as 20 feet, but 45 miles away, the difference between high tide and low in the Atlantic is just three feet.

http://www.yourpanama.com/panama-canal.html

[sirazimuth]

lol this topic is still discussed? hha

Why yes... it's the longest running ever  4 year old April Fools prank thread on the internet (and counting because,well, why quit now?), the topic is alive and well... starring our beloved champion bitcointalk troll Batty..

.....
No I'm not still calculating it.....
All that's missing is a compiled diagram detailing all the steps.

I'm holding my breath... I can't wait for the comedy gold....

Look around you, knucklehead. Evidence is stockpiling everywhere you travel.
Maybe you do need some travel tips...duh.

[silliness]

Distance proofs make the FlatEarth irrefutable. Mt. Hood and Mt. St. Helens are 189 miles apart, but can both be seen here. That's 9,000 feet of missing curvature.

bonus:
[more silliness]

Zempy doooode! another bonus! I love ya bro!!!

...
I've asked a few times what's the distance from Valparaiso, Chile to Sydney, Australia (by plane or ship) and notbatman obviously doesn't have an answer.

Well he's still doing the calculations, doncha know....

[notbatman]

An airplane flies over the plain in Spain because the air above the plain in Spain is a plane.

[Astargath]

An airplane flys over the plain in Spain because the air above the plain in Spain is a plane.

Are you still calculating that shit? Its taking a bit too long, perhaps the fact that its wrong is a big issue? Please update us on how its going.

[BADecker]

An airplane flys over the plain in Spain because the air above the plain in Spain is a plane.

Well, of course the air is a plane. It flies, doesn't it? Why are you picking on Spain? The air-plane flies over Sicily, as well, doesn't it?

[notbatman]

@Astargath,

No, you don't get it, there's no calculation I'm still trying to working out. I've stated the proof in at least three posts now. I haven't provided a diagram yet because of the work involved, I completely botched the first attempt and I'm in no hurry to repeat that even though I know what I was missing now.

Let me try and break it down here:

1. Measure the Sun with a sextant (use a marine sextant as it has the welding glass for looking at the Sun) at sunrise or sunset when the Sun is 50% visible i.e. 0 degrees elevation. The result will be 16 minutes. This is the Sun's refracted size and it can very slightly based on weather conditions. I believe this type of refractive magnification is also called looming.

2. Calculate the Sun's un-refracted size at 0 degrees elevation based on the angular size limitation of the human eye (1 minute). The result is unsurprisingly, 1 minute as there is in fact no calculation involved.

3. Calculate the distance to he horizon through the atmospheric plane with a 1 foot eye elevation. The result is unsurprisingly, 1 nautical mile. The angular limit of the eye being 1 minute equates to being able to see a 1 foot object at a maximum distance of 1/2 nautical miles.

4. Measure the Sun at 90 degrees elevation with no refraction. The result is 32 minutes.

5. Use a right angle trigonometry calculator and enter the Sun's radius in nautical miles (16) and an angle from one side (59.73333). The result is a distance of 3440 nautical miles. We know the Sun's radius in nautical miles because we proved 1 minute equals 1 nautical mile with the calculation in step #3.

That's it, proof beyond a reasonable doubt the Sun is a close small object.

[BADecker]

4. Measure the Sun at 90 degrees with no refraction. The result is 32 minutes.

The only time you can measure the sun at 90 degrees, is when it is halfway sunk below the horizon. At that position, there is always refraction. What are you even talking about?