Why do Atheists Hate Religion?

[BADecker]

What's an all-might skydaddy? What is this fairytale?

The Christian idea of "father".

But then you knew the answer to this already didn't you.  Why lie and pretend you didn't? Unless it was rhetorical of course.

I guessed the answer someone like you would say. But that is not what God is scientifically. Read my above explanation in a previous post. What's the matter? You can't refute the science either, can you?

[1715694908]

1715694908

[1715694908]

1715694908

[1715694908]

1715694908

[1715694908]

1715694908

[1715694908]

1715694908

[Buffer Overflow]

What's an all-might skydaddy? What is this fairytale?

The Christian idea of "father".

But then you knew the answer to this already didn't you.  Why lie and pretend you didn't? Unless it was rhetorical of course.

I guessed the answer someone like you would say. But that is not what God is scientifically. Read my above explanation in a previous post. What's the matter? You can't refute the science either, can you?

"Someone like me", what, as in truthful you mean? The answer is the answer who ever says it. If I wasn't here someone else would answer the same.

Still going on about your pseudoscience I see. Everybody else figured out years ago true science cannot prove or disprove God. Get over it and moved on. It's boring.

[sidroast]

What's an all-might skydaddy? What is this fairytale?

The Christian idea of "father".

But then you knew the answer to this already didn't you.  Why lie and pretend you didn't? Unless it was rhetorical of course.

There's no lie in his statement or interrogative. I challenge you to pinpoint the "lie" in the above statement to which you reference. He did however, get you to expose your own bigotry, and it is bigotry.

Bigotry: "intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself."

Just because you believe something different from someone else is no reason to belittle someone, act intolerant or other ways that are equally unbecoming of a gentleman, I am confident that you are better than that, especially if you are willing to take such a bold and definitive statement about your origin and demise.

[BADecker]

What's an all-might skydaddy? What is this fairytale?

The Christian idea of "father".

But then you knew the answer to this already didn't you.  Why lie and pretend you didn't? Unless it was rhetorical of course.

I guessed the answer someone like you would say. But that is not what God is scientifically. Read my above explanation in a previous post. What's the matter? You can't refute the science either, can you?

"Someone like me", what, as in truthful you mean? The answer is the answer who ever says it. If I wasn't here someone else would answer the same.

Still going on about your pseudoscience I see. Everybody else figured out years ago true science cannot prove or disprove God. Get over it and moved on. It's boring.

Obviously, you can't tell the difference between science backed by scientific laws and science theory.

The only science you are using is political science, the only science that is based on how much you can talk.

[Buffer Overflow]

What's an all-might skydaddy? What is this fairytale?

The Christian idea of "father".

But then you knew the answer to this already didn't you.  Why lie and pretend you didn't? Unless it was rhetorical of course.

There's no lie in his statement or interrogative.

There are dozens of types of lying. Half-truths, lying by omission, noble lies, to name just a few.
Not sure what the offical name is of the type BADlogic just used,  but it was a lie as in lying to himself pretending he doesn't know something, when actually he knows full well what that something is.

Don't ask me why. I've know BADlogic a long time. I know exactly how he operates.

[BADecker]

What's an all-might skydaddy? What is this fairytale?

The Christian idea of "father".

But then you knew the answer to this already didn't you.  Why lie and pretend you didn't? Unless it was rhetorical of course.

There's no lie in his statement or interrogative.

There are dozens of types of lying. Half-truths, lying by omission, noble lies, to name just a few.
Not sure what the offical name is of the type BADlogic just used,  but it was a lie as in lying to himself pretending he doesn't know something, when actually he knows full well what that something is.

I've know BADlogic a long time. I know exactly how he operates.

And you operate by blah, blah, blah without any science or even a point behind it. Show the science that opposes the science I have shown, above. You can't. Because there isn't any. The closest thing that comes to opposing the science I show, is pseudoscience theories. And you haven't even shown any of these.

You are proving yourself to be ignorant over, and over, and over... since the beginning of the time I started in this forum.

[Buffer Overflow]

The closest thing that comes to opposing the science I show, is pseudoscience theories.

EXACTLY. You can only fight pseudoscience nonsense with more pseudoscience nonsense.

Now join up the dots. 

[BADecker]

The closest thing that comes to opposing the science I show, is pseudoscience theories.

EXACTLY. You can only fight pseudoscience nonsense with more pseudoscience nonsense.

Now join up the dots.  

Well, lets see some then. Because cause and effect is a scientific law as well as universal entropy, and complexity in the universe is understood completely by all sciences even though in may not have been formulated as a law.

Come on and refute with a little science or pseudoscience, rather than simply blabbing on and on. And don't tell me your blabber is political science, because we already know that.

[Buffer Overflow]

The closest thing that comes to opposing the science I show, is pseudoscience theories.

EXACTLY. You can only fight pseudoscience nonsense with more pseudoscience nonsense.

Now join up the dots.  

Well, lets see some then.

So you're asking me to have a pseudoscience argument debate with you. Sweet mother of God why? What the point of that?
Why not use your time more constructively and read up on pseudoscience. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

[BADecker]

The closest thing that comes to opposing the science I show, is pseudoscience theories.

EXACTLY. You can only fight pseudoscience nonsense with more pseudoscience nonsense.

Now join up the dots.  

Well, lets see some then.

So you're asking me to have a pseudoscience argument debate with you. Sweet mother of God why? What the point of that?
Why not use your time more constructively and read up on pseudoscience. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

Why are you continually avoiding the refuting of the science that shows that God exists? You say that it isn't true. But the scientific laws behind it show that it is true. What's the matter? Can't show that God doesn't exist scientifically?

[Buffer Overflow]

He did however, get you to expose your own bigotry, and it is bigotry.

Bigotry: "intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself."

Of course I'm a bigot, I'm human, it's part of my DNA.
Name a single person you know that isn't into bigotry. Spoiler alert: None.

Ask yourself:
      ISIS holds different opinions from yourself. Are you intolerant towards their beliefs?

See. 

[Buffer Overflow]

What's the matter? Can't show that God doesn't exist scientifically?

*Sign*  Not sure if your being delibrately insolent or just trolling. Here it is for the last time tonight:

"Science cannot prove or disprove God."

So the answer to your question is no. The same answer it's always been.

[BADecker]

What's the matter? Can't show that God doesn't exist scientifically?

*Sign*  Not sure if your being delibrately insolent or just trolling. Here it is for the last time tonight:

"Science cannot prove or disprove God."

So the answer to your question is no. The same answer it's always been.

Except that I showed you how science proves God exists. And you say that it doesn't. But you can't even refute one point of the science that I show.

So, you are not only a bigot, not only are you deceitfully using political science all the time, but you are a liar. However, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Because you are not required to refute anything. So it might be that you are simply presenting yourself as a liar, without being one.

On second thought, when you present yourself as a liar without really being a liar, yes, you are a liar.

[dippididodaday]

I have put further thought into the why Q of OP. Here are preliminary outflows for your consideration (I hope this can spark a lovely debate/discussion :

All knowledge is a posteriori [A posteriori knowledge or justification is dependent on experience or empirical evidence, as with most aspects of science and personal knowledge]

Since this is what I believe, I also believe that All language and its constructs are of the same kind (a posteriori).

Therefore I believe the construct "God" to also be of the same kind.

Is it real? For me it definitely is real - as real as I am. 

[RoomBot]

Who's your daddy?

Skydaddy?

LOL

Which came first, the sky-daddy or his daddy?

 

[dippididodaday]

Who's your daddy?

Skydaddy?

LOL

Which came first, the sky-daddy or his daddy?

 

I experience "family" with momma and dadda and sista and bro in an engrained fashion. In "family" there is care, nurture, nourishment, togetherness, guidance etc. So having these engrained unalterable experiences, it is highly likely that when I do imagine an initial cause, an architect of sorts, that the experiences of "family" is transferred to this initial cause if I choose to imagine this first cause, and do it in quite a positive manner. It's my personal choosing to widen my experience - to stretch it if you will, and do it in a wholesome way for my personal wellbeing.

[Moloch]

[BADecker]

God's biggest thing is perfection. He is perfect and requires us to be the same way.

If God ever sinned, He did it perfectly. We can't even sin perfectly, to say nothing about not sinning perfectly.

[dippididodaday]

God's biggest thing is perfection. He is perfect and requires us to be the same way.

If God ever sinned, He did it perfectly. We can't even sin perfectly, to say nothing about not sinning perfectly.

God sounds a bit like I used to be - didn't work out, the perfection thing. At least being a Sinner himself, He now can have compassion on me sinning too, and do it perfectly. Cool stuff.  

[BADecker]

God's biggest thing is perfection. He is perfect and requires us to be the same way.

If God ever sinned, He did it perfectly. We can't even sin perfectly, to say nothing about not sinning perfectly.

God sounds a bit like I used to be - didn't work out, the perfection thing. At least being a Sinner himself, He now can have compassion with my sinning too and do it perfectly. Cool stuff. 

God is not a sinner. He is ruler. Even if He did what looked like a sin, it isn't sin for Him, because He owns it all, and can do with everything as He wants.

However, God has had compassion on you in your sinfulness. He did it by sending Jesus to take away the effects of your sinning, so that you can be saved... if you believe.