Why do Atheists Hate Religion?

[BitNow]

Complexity is the anti-thesis of entropy. Perhaps there are other things that are virtually the opposite of entropy, but complexity is one of the basic ones.

The opposit of entropy is negentropy not complexity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negentropy


Best regards.

[BADecker]

Complexity is the anti-thesis of entropy. Perhaps there are other things that are virtually the opposite of entropy, but complexity is one of the basic ones.

The opposit of entropy is negentropy not complexity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negentropy


Best regards.

There is no system in which complexity doesn't break down in the presence of entropy.

[romero121]

To show them high and as religious belief is opposite to them they hate religion. Another reason religious followers are very high in count according to them. They try to attract more people by creating trends of religious opposition. This makes people to avoid atheists in several situations which make them completely hate religion.

[BADecker]

To show them high and as religious belief is opposite to them they hate religion. Another reason religious followers are very high in count according to them. They try to attract more people by creating trends of religious opposition. This makes people to avoid atheists in several situations which make them completely hate religion.

But in having a belief that is opposite to religious belief, shows that they have belief. This means that they have a religion... a religion of atheism.

Since they oppose religion, and since they are religion, this shows that they oppose themselves.

[BADecker]

Religious people have my sympathy.  They are insane. They need professional help.

Feeling sorry for yourself again, eh?   

[RoomBot]

Does anyone else find it ironic that BADecker will (re)define every word from Atheist to Theory, but refuses to define his "proof that God exists" even once?

I just find it totally incredible that anyone spends so much time here spouting faulty arguments about the Universe.
I come by once in a while to see who's still at it.

Debating God & Atheism on BCT.

Priceless.

Must be nice to know EVERYTHING & have ALL THE ANSWERS,

(LMAO)

 

[RoomBot]

Does anyone else find it ironic that BADecker will (re)define every word from Atheist to Theory, but refuses to define his "proof that God exists" even once?

Or "complexity".

But it is very obvious that atheists will avoid looking at and using the dictionary definitions, and the scientific laws that prove that God exists. They would rather tell lies about theists to promote their stupidity. In fact, they can't even see that by promoting atheism they are setting themselves up as gods, claiming that they have God-like authority to make accurate atheistic claims.

We would love to do that, but you simply refuse the definition!

entropy: A thermodynamic quantity representing the unavailability of a system’s thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work, often interpreted as the degree of disorder or randomness in the system

Which means there is NO LINK with complexity! Only with order or randomness. But you don't give a fuck about this official definition...

He cannot define it because it is not in the Bible.

BSDecker, you should just concentrate on the Bible and forget all the science stuff. 

Science is confusing the issues for you.  If you just stay focused on the Bible, you will be able to live your life like Jesus.  You know, broken sandals, rags for clothes, beard and long hair, no money etc.  Spend weeks in the desert, get together with your other hippy, gay friends, maybe smoke a joint or poke each other.  Get high and go to heaven and back.

Why do you need to prove that God exist?  You (and more than 2 billion people like you) believe it without any scientific proof, why bother if it is true or not, you have shown us that you don't care if it is true.
You'll believe it no matter what.

Praise the Lord and pass the bullets!!!

A-MEN!!

Put your HANDS on the RADIO!

[BADecker]

Does anyone else find it ironic that BADecker will (re)define every word from Atheist to Theory, but refuses to define his "proof that God exists" even once?

I just find it totally incredible that anyone spends so much time here spouting faulty arguments about the Universe.
I come by once in a while to see who's still at it.

Debating God & Atheism on BCT.

Priceless.

Must be nice to know EVERYTHING & have ALL THE ANSWERS,

(LMAO)

 

Since you know that the arguments about the universe are faulty, you must know a little about the ones that aren't. Please elaborate.

Thanks.

[RoomBot]

Taking BADecker defense I think I understood his reasoning.

He says that thermodynamic energy is everywhere. And that with time it can only decrease in things. And that leads him to think that with this the complexity of things will decrease too because for him complexity = thermodynamic energy level!

Which would mean that at the origin the most complex thing was in fact God. Am I right?

LOL.  So Black Holes are just pregnancy vessels for future Gods?  They absorb energy so the energy has to go somewhere...

Anyway, we don't really know for sure where the energy to start the Big Bang came from, but we have some theories:

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Just because we are amazed by the fact that the universe was somehow created and don't know exactly where the energy came from does not justify belief in supernatural God.

Which God? Allah, Holy Trinity, Jewish God, Hindu Gods, Greek Gods.  Which one you want to believe?

You can believe in "unexplained energy" that caused the Big Bang, that is all you can really do.  Anything else added that God created Earth, us and other animals, Noah's ark and flood, Adam & Eve, Heaven and Hell, Muslim flying horses are just products of human imagination.

Are you saying that MAN created GOD in his own image?

Agreed.

[BADecker]

Taking BADecker defense I think I understood his reasoning.

He says that thermodynamic energy is everywhere. And that with time it can only decrease in things. And that leads him to think that with this the complexity of things will decrease too because for him complexity = thermodynamic energy level!

Which would mean that at the origin the most complex thing was in fact God. Am I right?

LOL.  So Black Holes are just pregnancy vessels for future Gods?  They absorb energy so the energy has to go somewhere...

Anyway, we don't really know for sure where the energy to start the Big Bang came from, but we have some theories:

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Just because we are amazed by the fact that the universe was somehow created and don't know exactly where the energy came from does not justify belief in supernatural God.

Which God? Allah, Holy Trinity, Jewish God, Hindu Gods, Greek Gods.  Which one you want to believe?

You can believe in "unexplained energy" that caused the Big Bang, that is all you can really do.  Anything else added that God created Earth, us and other animals, Noah's ark and flood, Adam & Eve, Heaven and Hell, Muslim flying horses are just products of human imagination.

Are you saying that MAN created GOD in his own image?

Agreed.

Of course, that's not the real God. The god man creates is himself, whenever he sets himself up higher than the real God, like atheists do all the time.

Atheism is self-contradictory, because the atheist is saying that there is no God, when he clearly knows that he doesn't know that there is no God. So, he is setting himself above the possible God. And it is all the more poignant now that science has proven God to exist through the three-law combination, cause and effect, complex universe, universal entropy.

[JesusHadAegis]

They hate religion because they judge people.

[BADecker]

They hate religion because they judge people.

If someone hits you in the face with his fist, aren't you going to judge him enough to at least run, but maybe fight? Everybody judges other people, except the hermit on top of the mountain, because he doesn't know about other people.

[mrflibblehat]

Taking BADecker defense I think I understood his reasoning.

He says that thermodynamic energy is everywhere. And that with time it can only decrease in things. And that leads him to think that with this the complexity of things will decrease too because for him complexity = thermodynamic energy level!

Which would mean that at the origin the most complex thing was in fact God. Am I right?

LOL.  So Black Holes are just pregnancy vessels for future Gods?  They absorb energy so the energy has to go somewhere...

Anyway, we don't really know for sure where the energy to start the Big Bang came from, but we have some theories:

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Just because we are amazed by the fact that the universe was somehow created and don't know exactly where the energy came from does not justify belief in supernatural God.

Which God? Allah, Holy Trinity, Jewish God, Hindu Gods, Greek Gods.  Which one you want to believe?

You can believe in "unexplained energy" that caused the Big Bang, that is all you can really do.  Anything else added that God created Earth, us and other animals, Noah's ark and flood, Adam & Eve, Heaven and Hell, Muslim flying horses are just products of human imagination.

Are you saying that MAN created GOD in his own image?

Agreed.

Finally someone making sense.

[BADecker]

Taking BADecker defense I think I understood his reasoning.

He says that thermodynamic energy is everywhere. And that with time it can only decrease in things. And that leads him to think that with this the complexity of things will decrease too because for him complexity = thermodynamic energy level!

Which would mean that at the origin the most complex thing was in fact God. Am I right?

LOL.  So Black Holes are just pregnancy vessels for future Gods?  They absorb energy so the energy has to go somewhere...

Anyway, we don't really know for sure where the energy to start the Big Bang came from, but we have some theories:

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Just because we are amazed by the fact that the universe was somehow created and don't know exactly where the energy came from does not justify belief in supernatural God.

Which God? Allah, Holy Trinity, Jewish God, Hindu Gods, Greek Gods.  Which one you want to believe?

You can believe in "unexplained energy" that caused the Big Bang, that is all you can really do.  Anything else added that God created Earth, us and other animals, Noah's ark and flood, Adam & Eve, Heaven and Hell, Muslim flying horses are just products of human imagination.

Are you saying that MAN created GOD in his own image?

Agreed.

Finally someone making sense.

And the god that he created is himself. But nature and cause and effect show that there is a far greater God, making man's self-image god to be an idol.

[mrflibblehat]

Taking BADecker defense I think I understood his reasoning.

He says that thermodynamic energy is everywhere. And that with time it can only decrease in things. And that leads him to think that with this the complexity of things will decrease too because for him complexity = thermodynamic energy level!

Which would mean that at the origin the most complex thing was in fact God. Am I right?

LOL.  So Black Holes are just pregnancy vessels for future Gods?  They absorb energy so the energy has to go somewhere...

Anyway, we don't really know for sure where the energy to start the Big Bang came from, but we have some theories:

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Just because we are amazed by the fact that the universe was somehow created and don't know exactly where the energy came from does not justify belief in supernatural God.

Which God? Allah, Holy Trinity, Jewish God, Hindu Gods, Greek Gods.  Which one you want to believe?

You can believe in "unexplained energy" that caused the Big Bang, that is all you can really do.  Anything else added that God created Earth, us and other animals, Noah's ark and flood, Adam & Eve, Heaven and Hell, Muslim flying horses are just products of human imagination.

Are you saying that MAN created GOD in his own image?

Agreed.

Finally someone making sense.

And the god that he created is himself. But nature and cause and effect show that there is a far greater God, making man's self-image god to be an idol.

The god he created is himself because there is no other god than man.

[BADecker]

Taking BADecker defense I think I understood his reasoning.

He says that thermodynamic energy is everywhere. And that with time it can only decrease in things. And that leads him to think that with this the complexity of things will decrease too because for him complexity = thermodynamic energy level!

Which would mean that at the origin the most complex thing was in fact God. Am I right?

LOL.  So Black Holes are just pregnancy vessels for future Gods?  They absorb energy so the energy has to go somewhere...

Anyway, we don't really know for sure where the energy to start the Big Bang came from, but we have some theories:

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Just because we are amazed by the fact that the universe was somehow created and don't know exactly where the energy came from does not justify belief in supernatural God.

Which God? Allah, Holy Trinity, Jewish God, Hindu Gods, Greek Gods.  Which one you want to believe?

You can believe in "unexplained energy" that caused the Big Bang, that is all you can really do.  Anything else added that God created Earth, us and other animals, Noah's ark and flood, Adam & Eve, Heaven and Hell, Muslim flying horses are just products of human imagination.

Are you saying that MAN created GOD in his own image?

Agreed.

Finally someone making sense.

And the god that he created is himself. But nature and cause and effect show that there is a far greater God, making man's self-image god to be an idol.

The god he created is himself because there is no other god than man.

I don't blame you for not accepting science. Some of the theories they have these days are plain nuts.

[mrflibblehat]

Taking BADecker defense I think I understood his reasoning.

He says that thermodynamic energy is everywhere. And that with time it can only decrease in things. And that leads him to think that with this the complexity of things will decrease too because for him complexity = thermodynamic energy level!

Which would mean that at the origin the most complex thing was in fact God. Am I right?

LOL.  So Black Holes are just pregnancy vessels for future Gods?  They absorb energy so the energy has to go somewhere...

Anyway, we don't really know for sure where the energy to start the Big Bang came from, but we have some theories:

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatpowered.htm

Just because we are amazed by the fact that the universe was somehow created and don't know exactly where the energy came from does not justify belief in supernatural God.

Which God? Allah, Holy Trinity, Jewish God, Hindu Gods, Greek Gods.  Which one you want to believe?

You can believe in "unexplained energy" that caused the Big Bang, that is all you can really do.  Anything else added that God created Earth, us and other animals, Noah's ark and flood, Adam & Eve, Heaven and Hell, Muslim flying horses are just products of human imagination.

Are you saying that MAN created GOD in his own image?

Agreed.

Finally someone making sense.

And the god that he created is himself. But nature and cause and effect show that there is a far greater God, making man's self-image god to be an idol.

The god he created is himself because there is no other god than man.

I don't blame you for not accepting science. Some of the theories they have these days are plain nuts.

I do accept science bitch. Just not your science. Only real science. You know - the one that you can prove over and over again with the same results.

[mainpmf]

I don't blame you for not accepting science. Some of the theories they have these days are plain nuts.

Why don't you accept science too Badecker? If you did you would know that science has already proven that Newton 3rd law is wrong. That it's an excellent law to describe the world around us, but that if you look in details, it doesn't work.

[BADecker]

I don't blame you for not accepting science. Some of the theories they have these days are plain nuts.

Why don't you accept science too Badecker? If you did you would know that science has already proven that Newton 3rd law is wrong. That it's an excellent law to describe the world around us, but that if you look in details, it doesn't work.

When you look all over the Internet, and when you look in the science books, the closest you can come to finding Newton's 3rd Law to be proven wrong is in science theory. Since science theory does not have the strength of science law, Newton's 3rd Law has not been proven wrong.

[BADecker]

I don't blame you for not accepting science. Some of the theories they have these days are plain nuts.

I do accept science bitch. Just not your science. Only real science. You know - the one that you can prove over and over again with the same results.

Ah. Then you accept Newton's 3rd Law, which is in evidence all around us, and has only been negated by Quantum Mechanics probability, which is really only theory.

So, go the next easy step and accept the scientific proof that God exists. You will feel so much better, and will even have a chance to live forever, in glory and goodness, with God.

Is science bitch the name you give to your wife? Or is she just your girlfriend? What does she call you by? Or am I too presumptuous, and she is a he?