What's your opinion of gun control?

[criptix]

Im for gun control but only for other people then me.

Reason is that i believe 90-99% of people dont have the brains to handle a gun carefully enough.

[1714223114]

1714223114

[1714223114]

1714223114

[1714223114]

1714223114

[BADecker]

Im for gun control but only for other people then me.

Reason is that i believe 90-99% of people dont have the brains to handle a gun carefully enough.

I believe that I am the one who has the brains to handle a gun carefully. I believe that you are the one who doesn't know how. Should we have a gun duel to see who is right?

 

[blackbird307]

Im for gun control but only for other people then me.

Reason is that i believe 90-99% of people dont have the brains to handle a gun carefully enough.

I believe that I am the one who has the brains to handle a gun carefully. I believe that you are the one who doesn't know how. Should we have a gun duel to see who is right?

 

Now now, what does God say about killing people?

[criptix]

Im for gun control but only for other people then me.

Reason is that i believe 90-99% of people dont have the brains to handle a gun carefully enough.

I believe that I am the one who has the brains to handle a gun carefully. I believe that you are the one who doesn't know how. Should we have a gun duel to see who is right?

 

See that is exactly what i meant.
I never would use my gun for something like what you just asked for.

90% of people have the emotional level of teenagers in puberty. Giving them a gun - very smart.

Ps: it is not directly about intelligence this time more about common sense which sadly a lot of people are missing now a days

[pancho_villa]

In my country, the possession of firearms is controlled . But enforcement is very poor and the traffic is intense.
There is a strong campaign for gun possession to release any citizen . But I think it would only bring more problems for the population.
True security will come only when education is globally accessible to all citizens .
No good arm people , just what we have is a greater civil war.

[yugo23]

Im for gun control but only for other people then me.

Reason is that i believe 90-99% of people dont have the brains to handle a gun carefully enough.

I believe that I am the one who has the brains to handle a gun carefully. I believe that you are the one who doesn't know how. Should we have a gun duel to see who is right?

 

Or none of you get a gun, seems both fair and secure to me.

[TECSHARE]

Gun control in a nutshell.

[craked5]

Gun control in a nutshell.

Ahah! xD

Well shot. But not IMHO.
You gotta have both. Where is your limit is what defines my position. For me gun control isn't that far, but the emergency state we currently are in to "prevent terrorism" and other useless shit of defending against something not important are indeed in this case.

[bonski]

My opinion about gun control is the policemen and military men should only the one to carry guns with permission of law. Since they are using it to protect people and if someone will use for judicial killings the government can easily track the people with guns.

[bitbunnny]

My opinion about gun control is the policemen and military men should only the one to carry guns with permission of law. Since they are using it to protect people and if someone will use for judicial killings the government can easily track the people with guns.

I completely agree. I think that "ordinary" people who are carrying guns could be as much dangerous on the streets as the criminals are and this is not an meassure that can improve their security. Security is very complex issue and by allowing everyone to carry guns just won't do anything to improve it.

[craked5]

My opinion about gun control is the policemen and military men should only the one to carry guns with permission of law. Since they are using it to protect people and if someone will use for judicial killings the government can easily track the people with guns.

I completely agree. I think that "ordinary" people who are carrying guns could be as much dangerous on the streets as the criminals are and this is not an meassure that can improve their security. Security is very complex issue and by allowing everyone to carry guns just won't do anything to improve it.

Agreed too.
But people advocating gun freedom talk about the case of a dictatorship and a point where police and military are no longer protecting people...
We should have some emergency stocks for the people, in case of dictatorship "break the glass" ^^

[bonski]

My opinion about gun control is the policemen and military men should only the one to carry guns with permission of law. Since they are using it to protect people and if someone will use for judicial killings the government can easily track the people with guns.

I completely agree. I think that "ordinary" people who are carrying guns could be as much dangerous on the streets as the criminals are and this is not an meassure that can improve their security. Security is very complex issue and by allowing everyone to carry guns just won't do anything to improve it.

Agreed too.
But people advocating gun freedom talk about the case of a dictatorship and a point where police and military are no longer protecting people...
We should have some emergency stocks for the people, in case of dictatorship "break the glass" ^^

Yeah, you need it for your self-defense but if gun will still exist in the world then peace will be hard to claim with the countries who are in war. This is the sad truth.

[cluit]

A lot of people have misused and abused this system of owning a dangerous weapon and the government needs to crack down on who and who cannot own a gun. So, in my view Government should not allow any weapons to public.

[UNOE]

Gun control, as defined by anti-2nd
I am against gun control 100%. I think those for gun control are missing the real reason behind crimes with a weapon. And that reason is criminals don’t care about laws

[morantis]

Perhaps with less gun control we would have fewer annoying users on this site, just saying..........

[redsun114]

A lot of people have misused and abused this system of owning a dangerous weapon and the government needs to crack down on who and who cannot own a gun. So, in my view Government should not allow any weapons to public.

You are right, it's better banning all type of weapon completely without any negotiation of incenses and all, this must be a good long term solution in my view too.

[TheButterZone]

Governments have killed and maimed many times more people than all "civilians" have ever, per capita, but governments should be the only ones with guns? Fuck you to death, you pro-democide freaks.

[xslugx]

Governments have killed and maimed many times more people than all "civilians" have ever, per capita, but governments should be the only ones with guns? Fuck you to death, you pro-democide freaks.

What an argument...

You're talking about governments like they were some independent entity!
Government NEVER KILLED ANYONE! People did! When a government wants to kill part of the population or another country's population, they send the army, the people! And the people are more than willing to kill! What would gun control change to that?

[mOgliE]

Governments have killed and maimed many times more people than all "civilians" have ever, per capita, but governments should be the only ones with guns? Fuck you to death, you pro-democide freaks.

Because you actually think it will change anything if people have guns?

Look at WWII. During WWII there was no gun control. Did it change ANYTHING?
I guess if you have only a few notions of history you already know it didn't.

[TheButterZone]

Governments have killed and maimed many times more people than all "civilians" have ever, per capita, but governments should be the only ones with guns? Fuck you to death, you pro-democide freaks.

What an argument...

You're talking about governments like they were some independent entity!
Government NEVER KILLED ANYONE! People did! When a government wants to kill part of the population or another country's population, they send the army, the people! And the people are more than willing to kill! What would gun control change to that?

Distinction without a difference. If the government (the minority of the people) wants to kill people, it does, over all objections by the majority of the people, who have been disarmed by "gun control".