|
pyata4ok
|
 |
October 27, 2016, 05:35:37 PM |
|
I would not mind having a weapon in his pocket. Now the streets are not very quiet. And by controlling want to say that if the villain will get to know that resistance, it may be not to attack.
The main issue is protection and safety. If people feels they are not safe, they will find a ways for them to be protected from their enemy or other bad people.I think the government is now strict in giving licenses,they are very careful in issuing it. How to be a guide when the gun at you? Here, or you, or you. So legal weapon is the salvation for the people. Bandits always use illegal weapons. With your opinion, would have to agree. Because really, in order to commit a crime, no one is taking the gun from the safe home, and buy on the black market. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mihho
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:23:31 PM |
|
I would not mind having a weapon in his pocket. Now the streets are not very quiet. And by controlling want to say that if the villain will get to know that resistance, it may be not to attack.
The main issue is protection and safety. If people feels they are not safe, they will find a ways for them to be protected from their enemy or other bad people.I think the government is now strict in giving licenses,they are very careful in issuing it. The government should be a touching on this issue. It is necessary to establish a clear list who can authorize the purchase of weapons, and who does not. This will ensure control and security |
|
|
|
|
|
birareru1988
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:28:50 PM |
|
This approach puts people at a disadvantage.Someone can protect themselves with weapons, and some don't. It is not correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
daiyuba1971
|
|
October 27, 2016, 06:37:25 PM |
|
Free people always have weapons. And limitations of the rules of acquisition of weapons is a restriction of freedom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tripplewarz
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:24:03 PM |
|
Free people always have weapons. And limitations of the rules of acquisition of weapons is a restriction of freedom.
If we consider how much domestic crimes with the help of legal weapons carried in the broken country, it can be concluded that the weapon at home is very bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
Karloff
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:31:20 PM |
|
And how many such cases? They all say, but there are no official statistics. Without numbers it's just words. I don't believe them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Klima
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:43:16 PM |
|
And I believe that guns do not kill, people kill. You can't restrict people. You need someone that will always find guns, but law-abiding citizens will be unarmed.
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:53:43 PM |
|
This approach puts people at a disadvantage.Someone can protect themselves with weapons, and some don't. It is not correct.
Right! Let the rest of the people arm themselves.  |
|
|
|
|
Klima
|
|
October 27, 2016, 07:58:16 PM |
|
I have the pistol and assault rifle. But I'm not going to shoot people. And to my house no one goes in. What's wrong with that?
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
October 27, 2016, 08:08:22 PM |
|
I have the pistol and assault rifle. But I'm not going to shoot people. And to my house no one goes in. What's wrong with that?
That's the way it should be! Please post "No Trespassing" signs at the doors and windows so that people are warned in a fair way. Then, if they enter without being invited, shoot 'em dead. Just be careful that it isn't a family member. |
|
|
|
|
kreskko
|
|
October 27, 2016, 08:26:21 PM |
|
I have the pistol and assault rifle. But I'm not going to shoot people. And to my house no one goes in. What's wrong with that?
That's the way it should be! Please post "No Trespassing" signs at the doors and windows so that people are warned in a fair way. Then, if they enter without being invited, shoot 'em dead. Just be careful that it isn't a family member. This is especially necessary to also sign on the door to the villain saving his life knowing where to go to plunder, and where not? Let him think first before doing evil. |
|
|
|
|
tikboyhere
Member
 Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 100
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
|
|
October 27, 2016, 09:46:25 PM |
|
 Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill. I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it. Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem. Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent. After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically. Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights. Are gun control laws constitutional? What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms? I do agree that guns are made for one purpose which is to kill. Kill with purpose it can be self defense or intention. If we're going to do this just for the sake of killing people you should be aware as well that it can take ur own life as well. Before holding a gun you should be fully trained and be aware of the future consequences. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
October 28, 2016, 12:03:53 AM |
|
Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill. I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it. Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem. Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent. After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically. Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights. Are gun control laws constitutional? What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms? I do agree that guns are made for one purpose which is to kill. Kill with purpose it can be self defense or intention. If we're going to do this just for the sake of killing people you should be aware as well that it can take ur own life as well. Before holding a gun you should be fully trained and be aware of the future consequences. Target practice. |
|
|
|
Betwrong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3458
Merit: 2234
I stand with Ukraine.
|
|
October 28, 2016, 02:57:47 PM |
|
I think an adult person should have the right to have a gun if that person can successfully pass some tests on mental health. And in the case that person is caught doing anything illegal or showing mental unstability the gun should be confiscated immediately.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
Free people don't have to prove that wanting to exercise their human right to self-defense isn't a mental illness. Sorry, if I didn't make myself clear, but I didn't mean that the willing to have a gun to protect yourself can be somehow interpreted as a mental illness. I was just saying that only people in their right mind should be allowed to have guns. I think it's an obvious thing, we don't want armed lunatics on our streets. But who is going to allow them? Government? Government are the people who are NOT in their right mind, or there wouldn't be any gun control issue. Government are the people who we are voting for. At least in democratic countries things are more or less like that. Of course I know that some of them are not in their right mind, but it is scary to believe that all of them are mad, right?  So we better make them to decide what is better for us. ) |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
October 28, 2016, 03:34:05 PM |
|
I think an adult person should have the right to have a gun if that person can successfully pass some tests on mental health. And in the case that person is caught doing anything illegal or showing mental unstability the gun should be confiscated immediately.
I don't have a gun and I'm not going to, but I think free people should have the right to have it.
Free people don't have to prove that wanting to exercise their human right to self-defense isn't a mental illness. Sorry, if I didn't make myself clear, but I didn't mean that the willing to have a gun to protect yourself can be somehow interpreted as a mental illness. I was just saying that only people in their right mind should be allowed to have guns. I think it's an obvious thing, we don't want armed lunatics on our streets. But who is going to allow them? Government? Government are the people who are NOT in their right mind, or there wouldn't be any gun control issue. Government are the people who we are voting for. At least in democratic countries things are more or less like that. Of course I know that some of them are not in their right mind, but it is scary to believe that all of them are mad, right? So we better make them to decide what is better for us. ) From https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1135598.msg16709818#msg16709818 regarding the Bundy win at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1664078.msg16705981#msg16705981: In America, Presidential elections depend on on the electoral college... not the popular vote of the people. If Trump doesn't win enough of the electoral college votes, he will lose, no matter how many people vote for him.
If Trump loses when he has a great majority of the popular vote, but less than a majority of the electoral college vote, is for people to sue their local electoral college delegates for voting wrong. |
|
|
|
|
pseexh
|
|
October 29, 2016, 07:22:12 PM |
|
I can not imagine the American nation without weapons. This is the most important rule for America. I'm your gun will never hand over. And not only me there are millions.
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1382
|
|
October 29, 2016, 08:18:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
moonya
|
|
October 29, 2016, 08:43:29 PM |
|
Man can kill with a stick. So, now sticks to deny. If you take the statistics that the majority of murders committed with a knife.Maybe ban knives?
|
|
|
|
|
|
chachaa
|
|
October 29, 2016, 09:27:48 PM |
|
The weapon is a symbol of America. I think that will not work to restrict access to arms. Only people quarreled among themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aikonio
|
|
October 30, 2016, 06:18:00 AM |
|
The weapon is a symbol of America. I think that will not work to restrict access to arms. Only people quarreled among themselves.
Why is this symbol of American weapons? I believe that it should be sold only with government permission. It is only appropriate for people |
|
|
|
|
|
