What's your opinion of gun control?

[Lorik]

Some think guns give security. And there is a relation between guns and security, but it is the opposite of what gun owners think. Someone I know had guns in her home, and now she is dead, her son is dead, and 5 other people are dead. That is the kind of security that guns provide. A gun in the home is 6 times as likely to kill a family member as an intruder. That is the kind of security that guns provide.

That's only because intruders are smart enough to go to the homes where there aren't any guns.

If the offender is aware that it may meet in arms, it could have saved not only his life, but also those whom he was about to do harm. Guns in the home gives a person confidence and psychological fear of the perpetrator.

[Masha Sha]

Some think guns give security. And there is a relation between guns and security, but it is the opposite of what gun owners think. Someone I know had guns in her home, and now she is dead, her son is dead, and 5 other people are dead. That is the kind of security that guns provide. A gun in the home is 6 times as likely to kill a family member as an intruder. That is the kind of security that guns provide.

That's only because intruders are smart enough to go to the homes where there aren't any guns.

What little coward you didn't answer my question... so now you accept the use of violence?

Some think guns give security. And there is a relation between guns and security, but it is the opposite of what gun owners think. Someone I know had guns in her home, and now she is dead, her son is dead, and 5 other people are dead. That is the kind of security that guns provide. A gun in the home is 6 times as likely to kill a family member as an intruder. That is the kind of security that guns provide.

That's only because intruders are smart enough to go to the homes where there aren't any guns.

If the offender is aware that it may meet in arms, it could have saved not only his life, but also those whom he was about to do harm. Guns in the home gives a person confidence and psychological fear of the perpetrator.

Floridastyle, nothing less!

[Gyfts]

Pro 2nd amendment, but I see no reason for people on no-fly lists to be able to obtain weapons. The NRA (I believe) has advocated and lobbied for this type of legislation. I find it to be beyond moronic. As far as the talk about AR-15 bans, I'm in different. I don't need an AR-15 to defend me or my family from enemies.

[tvbcof]

Pro 2nd amendment, but I see no reason for people on no-fly lists to be able to obtain weapons. The NRA (I believe) has advocated and lobbied for this type of legislation. I find it to be beyond moronic. As far as the talk about AR-15 bans, I'm in different. I don't need an AR-15 to defend me or my family from enemies.

'no-fly' lists as implemented are a sick joke and as 'un-American' as anything to sprout up yet.  Binding any other policy about anything to them is a very bad idea.

Fix no-fly lists to align with the basic principles and protections of our constitution _then_, after a reasonable period of trail, think about whether the foundation makes sense to build other projects on top of.

Given the frequency of actual non-state-sponsored baddies doing shit on an airplane, it looks to me like 'no-fly lists' were invented for the sole purpose of political and social harassment and remain alive for that purpose.  Any student of history should get a chill down their spine when the government compiles and employs secret lists, and with good reason.

[birareru1988]

Pro 2nd amendment, but I see no reason for people on no-fly lists to be able to obtain weapons. The NRA (I believe) has advocated and lobbied for this type of legislation. I find it to be beyond moronic. As far as the talk about AR-15 bans, I'm in different. I don't need an AR-15 to defend me or my family from enemies.

And who do you impose it? Do not need do not buy. We are talking about that you can not take the opportunity to purchase AR-15 those who need it. Sense 2 amendments to it.

[BADecker]

Some think guns give security. And there is a relation between guns and security, but it is the opposite of what gun owners think. Someone I know had guns in her home, and now she is dead, her son is dead, and 5 other people are dead. That is the kind of security that guns provide. A gun in the home is 6 times as likely to kill a family member as an intruder. That is the kind of security that guns provide.

That's only because intruders are smart enough to go to the homes where there aren't any guns.

What little coward you didn't answer my question... so now you accept the use of violence?

Violence is the only thing that some people understand. For protecting your family, you need to use violence at times.

What was the question you had asked?

Some think guns give security. And there is a relation between guns and security, but it is the opposite of what gun owners think. Someone I know had guns in her home, and now she is dead, her son is dead, and 5 other people are dead. That is the kind of security that guns provide. A gun in the home is 6 times as likely to kill a family member as an intruder. That is the kind of security that guns provide.

That's only because intruders are smart enough to go to the homes where there aren't any guns.

If the offender is aware that it may meet in arms, it could have saved not only his life, but also those whom he was about to do harm. Guns in the home gives a person confidence and psychological fear of the perpetrator.

Floridastyle, nothing less!

Floridastyle has to do with a bunch of people who have never been armed. Arm all people for about 5 years straight, and Floridastyle won't happen any longer.

[groll]

Some think guns give security. And there is a relation between guns and security, but it is the opposite of what gun owners think. Someone I know had guns in her home, and now she is dead, her son is dead, and 5 other people are dead. That is the kind of security that guns provide. A gun in the home is 6 times as likely to kill a family member as an intruder. That is the kind of security that guns provide.

That's only because intruders are smart enough to go to the homes where there aren't any guns.

If they know that there is in the house of weapons will go. And not only in the house. And on the street as you feel calmer with a gun or without?

Definitely something that the smaller weapon in the hands of ordinary citizens, the killings and other crimes on the basis of household will be less committed. But other criminals need to be protected like that, because the police do not always do the trick.

Safety of every individuals are very important. For me, i agree with the gun control. Its so many people abusing their power to use gun. And there's some people using gun uncontolledly. Gun should be for those professional people who really needs gun to protect people and not for those people who are just using thier influence. Gun must have limits because there's so many people killing others because they had gun although they are not license to bring gun.

[BADecker]

If you agree that someone should force gun control on us, who will control the gun-controllers when they become bad?

[Sithara007]

Gun control is extremely difficult to implement nowadays, with the rise of the deep web. It is possible to buy extremely sophisticated fully-automatic machine guns from dark markets such as AlphaBay and Agora Marketplace. The government is not capable of stopping this trade.

[C10H15N]

Gun control is never about stopping illegal gun trafficking, it's all about controlling legal gun ownership by law abiding individuals.

Gangsters are gonna gangster.  They don't give a shit about past, present, or future laws.

[Tyrantt]

Gun control is extremely difficult to implement nowadays, with the rise of the deep web. It is possible to buy extremely sophisticated fully-automatic machine guns from dark markets such as AlphaBay and Agora Marketplace. The government is not capable of stopping this trade.

Well they took down silkroad didnt they? They can always find out whos the admin and shut down the site, now knowing the US, I wouldn't be surprised if the government wasn't involved in that black gun market.

[BADecker]

Gun control is extremely difficult to implement nowadays, with the rise of the deep web. It is possible to buy extremely sophisticated fully-automatic machine guns from dark markets such as AlphaBay and Agora Marketplace. The government is not capable of stopping this trade.

Well they took down silkroad didnt they? They can always find out whos the admin and shut down the site, now knowing the US, I wouldn't be surprised if the government wasn't involved in that black gun market.

Not really. If Ross was still free, the Silk Road would still be up. Why isn't Ross free? Because his attorney screwed him.

In order for there to be a guilty verdict, there has to be an injured person who can point to Ross and say Ross did it. There has to be a witness and evidence. Ross's attorney knows this, but he didn't bring up the point in Ross's favor.

Ross's attorney is a criminal.

[Kvazimoda]

Gun control is extremely difficult to implement nowadays, with the rise of the deep web. It is possible to buy extremely sophisticated fully-automatic machine guns from dark markets such as AlphaBay and Agora Marketplace. The government is not capable of stopping this trade.

If you ban guns or tighten gun laws, in the hands of the population will sharply increase the number of illegal guns. It's better to be legal. If anything it will be easier to find.

[pyata4ok]

Who would not say that, I still want to have their own weapons to protect themselves, their family and property. It is my right and nobody can take it away from me.

[beafheart]

Who would not say that, I still want to have their own weapons to protect themselves, their family and property. It is my right and nobody can take it away from me.

It is the right of every free man. In ancient Rome slaves were not allowed to have weapons. Now, too, really want politicians to turn people into unarmed slaves. Will not work! We have a right to protection!

[tripplewarz]

Who would not say that, I still want to have their own weapons to protect themselves, their family and property. It is my right and nobody can take it away from me.

It is the right of every free man. In ancient Rome slaves were not allowed to have weapons. Now, too, really want politicians to turn people into unarmed slaves. Will not work! We have a right to protection!

Maybe that gun you can afford to keep the house for protection. And that relates to the rifled barrel, there is a ban very topical. This will limit their movement and use in public places.

[BADecker]

Who would not say that, I still want to have their own weapons to protect themselves, their family and property. It is my right and nobody can take it away from me.

It is the right of every free man. In ancient Rome slaves were not allowed to have weapons. Now, too, really want politicians to turn people into unarmed slaves. Will not work! We have a right to protection!

Maybe that gun you can afford to keep the house for protection. And that relates to the rifled barrel, there is a ban very topical. This will limit their movement and use in public places.

Time to ban the banning of all kinds of guns.   

[kwuccduck]

Who would not say that, I still want to have their own weapons to protect themselves, their family and property. It is my right and nobody can take it away from me.

It is the right of every free man. In ancient Rome slaves were not allowed to have weapons. Now, too, really want politicians to turn people into unarmed slaves. Will not work! We have a right to protection!

Maybe that gun you can afford to keep the house for protection. And that relates to the rifled barrel, there is a ban very topical. This will limit their movement and use in public places.

Time to ban the banning of all kinds of guns.   

If the ban, then it is necessary to have security guarantees for all people. To date, this guarantee no one can. Situation in the US or in France, this is proof.

[Alfa123]

Who would not say that, I still want to have their own weapons to protect themselves, their family and property. It is my right and nobody can take it away from me.

It is the right of every free man. In ancient Rome slaves were not allowed to have weapons. Now, too, really want politicians to turn people into unarmed slaves. Will not work! We have a right to protection!

Maybe that gun you can afford to keep the house for protection. And that relates to the rifled barrel, there is a ban very topical. This will limit their movement and use in public places.

Time to ban the banning of all kinds of guns.   

If the ban, then it is necessary to have security guarantees for all people. To date, this guarantee no one can. Situation in the US or in France, this is proof.

Mass shootings happen in zones free of weapons. The terrorists know that there will not give them back. Why not attack on police stations and military bases? Because they are afraid to fight back. Here is the answer to your fears.

[Clement Kaliyar]

Who would not say that, I still want to have their own weapons to protect themselves, their family and property. It is my right and nobody can take it away from me.

It is the right of every free man. In ancient Rome slaves were not allowed to have weapons. Now, too, really want politicians to turn people into unarmed slaves. Will not work! We have a right to protection!

Maybe that gun you can afford to keep the house for protection. And that relates to the rifled barrel, there is a ban very topical. This will limit their movement and use in public places.

Time to ban the banning of all kinds of guns.   

If the ban, then it is necessary to have security guarantees for all people. To date, this guarantee no one can. Situation in the US or in France, this is proof.

Mass shootings happen in zones free of weapons. The terrorists know that there will not give them back. Why not attack on police stations and military bases? Because they are afraid to fight back. Here is the answer to your fears.

so do you carry your gun where ever you go,i not sure whether it is possible to do so unless you are walking down the street but if you are going to a mall or something i am sure they will confiscate your weapon before letting you inside and i do not know how you guys will handle those situations.