Bitcoin Forum
October 21, 2017, 03:32:53 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 339 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [ETC] Ethereum Classic: Immutable Smart Contracts  (Read 622538 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Lazarus2016
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:16:55 AM
 #621

Excuse me, maybe I don't understand so I repeat the question.
 
Cannot this be dumped to nothing by VitalikEther followers?

1)   they have balances in ETHClassic and they will dump them
2)  they can mine ETHClassic with their equipment and they will dump.




One thing I don't understand (related to point 1.)..
If V. Buterin had let's say 1 million ETH before HF does it mean he has now 1 million ETH AND 1 million ETC?

exactly

But this is not the fault of V. Buterin that suddenly a second coin was created, no? This coin should never be created in the first place. Look how it is dropping, the thief is just dumping all his coins on us. He will runaway with $50,000,000 and we will have a worthless coin, correct?

I doubt he is already dumping. He is probably not that stupid.

The dumpers are probably people that do not understand what a hard fork means and consider this "free money" that appeared in their polo account.



What do you meran, not so stupid? The price has been dropping a lot, so most likely he already cash out. This coin is own 80% by the thief. Around 10% was still on this fork, correct? The thief stole for $50M when ETH was trading at 0.02 or so. Now ETC has a marketcap of $60M, how much do you really think is not part of the thief? Also most likely the people that didn't swap forgot about their coins in total. so almost all volume that is being created is coming from the thief. Strange that Poloniex added this coin. Really strange.
1508556773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508556773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508556773
Reply with quote  #2

1508556773
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508556773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508556773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508556773
Reply with quote  #2

1508556773
Report to moderator
1508556773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508556773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508556773
Reply with quote  #2

1508556773
Report to moderator
1508556773
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508556773

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508556773
Reply with quote  #2

1508556773
Report to moderator
snowboard789
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 552


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:22:51 AM
 #622

I don't understand why you think the HF chain (Eth) is the legit chain and that his is extra money.
Eth is extra money that emerged from hard forking to bailout their asses in a banker's way. Just the notion of a team controlling which chain is legitimate is wrong.

How can you exist in crypto world without understanding these concepts? Go back to your stock market
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2016, 09:22:57 AM
 #623



But this is not the fault of V. Buterin that suddenly a second coin was created, no? This coin should never be created in the first place. Look how it is dropping, the thief is just dumping all his coins on us. He will runaway with $50,000,000 and we will have a worthless coin, correct?

The 'thief' is not stealing, just exploiting a flawed set of rules within TheDao only....The 'second' coin is the fork created to reverse TheDao (and foil the'attack') , changing rules 'arguably' for the better. That will be accepted by the majority of course.

Within ETC, the Dao will be drained of Ether, but after that the original chain will still have value.

snowboard789
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 552


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:24:19 AM
 #624

Excuse me, maybe I don't understand so I repeat the question.
 
Cannot this be dumped to nothing by VitalikEther followers?

1)   they have balances in ETHClassic and they will dump them
2)  they can mine ETHClassic with their equipment and they will dump.




One thing I don't understand (related to point 1.)..
If V. Buterin had let's say 1 million ETH before HF does it mean he has now 1 million ETH AND 1 million ETC?

exactly

But this is not the fault of V. Buterin that suddenly a second coin was created, no? This coin should never be created in the first place. Look how it is dropping, the thief is just dumping all his coins on us. He will runaway with $50,000,000 and we will have a worthless coin, correct?

I doubt he is already dumping. He is probably not that stupid.

The dumpers are probably people that do not understand what a hard fork means and consider this "free money" that appeared in their polo account.



What do you meran, not so stupid? The price has been dropping a lot, so most likely he already cash out. This coin is own 80% by the thief. Around 10% was still on this fork, correct? The thief stole for $50M when ETH was trading at 0.02 or so. Now ETC has a marketcap of $60M, how much do you really think is not part of the thief? Also most likely the people that didn't swap forgot about their coins in total. so almost all volume that is being created is coming from the thief. Strange that Poloniex added this coin. Really strange.

You understand that the thief doesn't have access to his funds and cannot dump right? right??  Huh
frostminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2016, 09:24:54 AM
 #625



But this is not the fault of V. Buterin that suddenly a second coin was created, no? This coin should never be created in the first place. Look how it is dropping, the thief is just dumping all his coins on us. He will runaway with $50,000,000 and we will have a worthless coin, correct?

The 'thief' is not stealing, just exploiting a flawed set of rules within TheDao only....The 'second' coin is the fork created to reverse TheDao (and foil the'attack') , changing rules for the better. That will be accepted by the majority of course.

Within ETC, the Dao will be drained of Ether, but after that the original chain will still have value.



"No i didnt steal your car. I just abused the fact that u forgot to lock your garage"

Its abuse no matter how u turn and twist it.

snowboard789
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 552


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:28:03 AM
 #626



But this is not the fault of V. Buterin that suddenly a second coin was created, no? This coin should never be created in the first place. Look how it is dropping, the thief is just dumping all his coins on us. He will runaway with $50,000,000 and we will have a worthless coin, correct?

The 'thief' is not stealing, just exploiting a flawed set of rules within TheDao only....The 'second' coin is the fork created to reverse TheDao (and foil the'attack') , changing rules for the better. That will be accepted by the majority of course.

Within ETC, the Dao will be drained of Ether, but after that the original chain will still have value.



"No i didnt steal your car. I just abused the fact that u forgot to lock your garage"

Its abuse no matter how u turn and twist it.


Have you read the DAO initial announcement about saying the code is the law? Forgetting your car keys is very different that seeing the keys on your unlocked car and saying "yes this is correct, I will leave my car like that".
bitcoinbox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322


So far so good


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:29:02 AM
 #627

You understand that the thief doesn't have access to his funds and cannot dump right? right??  Huh

Do you mind to explain a bit more about that?

SERATIO
-


























...PRE-ICO.
..Sep 15th, 2017..













..ICO-START..
  ★..Oct 1st, 2017..
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2016, 09:30:53 AM
 #628

I don't understand why you think the HF chain (Eth) is the legit chain and that his is extra money.
Eth is extra money that emerged from hard forking to bailout their asses in a banker's way. Just the notion of a team controlling which chain is legitimate is wrong.

How can you exist in crypto world without understanding these concepts? Go back to your stock market

The Legit chain is ultimately the one accepted by the majority, and that is probably a long term decision. Most people in Crypto dont really understand it of course, or maybe it's just levels of understanding.

The support for ETC will focus attention on the issue of control, and will be helpful to people's understanding (but it might take some time for the penny to drop)
snowboard789
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 552


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:32:15 AM
 #629

You understand that the thief doesn't have access to his funds and cannot dump right? right??  Huh

Do you mind to explain a bit more about that?

Just read up the thread and see the dates
Lazarus2016
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:34:52 AM
 #630

Excuse me, maybe I don't understand so I repeat the question.
 
Cannot this be dumped to nothing by VitalikEther followers?

1)   they have balances in ETHClassic and they will dump them
2)  they can mine ETHClassic with their equipment and they will dump.




One thing I don't understand (related to point 1.)..
If V. Buterin had let's say 1 million ETH before HF does it mean he has now 1 million ETH AND 1 million ETC?

exactly

But this is not the fault of V. Buterin that suddenly a second coin was created, no? This coin should never be created in the first place. Look how it is dropping, the thief is just dumping all his coins on us. He will runaway with $50,000,000 and we will have a worthless coin, correct?

I doubt he is already dumping. He is probably not that stupid.

The dumpers are probably people that do not understand what a hard fork means and consider this "free money" that appeared in their polo account.



What do you meran, not so stupid? The price has been dropping a lot, so most likely he already cash out. This coin is own 80% by the thief. Around 10% was still on this fork, correct? The thief stole for $50M when ETH was trading at 0.02 or so. Now ETC has a marketcap of $60M, how much do you really think is not part of the thief? Also most likely the people that didn't swap forgot about their coins in total. so almost all volume that is being created is coming from the thief. Strange that Poloniex added this coin. Really strange.

You understand that the thief doesn't have access to his funds and cannot dump right? right??  Huh

Then this coin will be worthless, if the thief doesn't have access to the coins now and still need to dump all his coins then the price will drop to 10000sats?
redsn0w
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274


# Free market


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:36:31 AM
 #631

snowboard789
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 552


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:38:25 AM
 #632

I don't understand why you think the HF chain (Eth) is the legit chain and that his is extra money.
Eth is extra money that emerged from hard forking to bailout their asses in a banker's way. Just the notion of a team controlling which chain is legitimate is wrong.

How can you exist in crypto world without understanding these concepts? Go back to your stock market

The Legit chain is ultimately the one accepted by the majority, and that is probably a long term decision. Most people in Crypto dont really understand it of course, or maybe it's just levels of understanding.

The support for ETC will focus attention on the issue of control, and will be helpful to people's understanding (but it might take some time for the penny to drop)

I like your input. It's like a theorhetical issue. The majority could be for example a 51% attack on bitcoin. We would call it an attack but is it really? It is just the way it was designed. Same with the theft. Was it a theft really?

So if that was a theft and a 51% is an "attack" then the hard fork majority is a result of extortion. The dev team gave no choice but a directive: Let's vote but we are pro fork and all our wallets are ready so if you don't want to create a mess and you want your money to have value and keep us happy to provide you with software (which is supposedly open source) then you know what to vote.
So about 5% of eth holders voted (which in democracies would null the voting process) and some whales had 25% stake of that vote (apparently from the foundation).

Sorry about ranting all over the thread but I really have strong feelings over this.
szachta
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


A Decentralized Social Marketplace


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 09:50:00 AM
 #633

Try to rent some rig witch pool and miner i rent?


        ▄██▄▄▄▄▄▄██
      ▄███████████▄
     ██████▀▀████████▄
    ███████▄▄ ▀▀
    ▀██████████████▄▄▄
     ▀█████████████████▄
        ▀▀██▀████████████
          ██ ██ ▐█████████
  ▄▄███▄▄ ██ ██ ▐█████████
 ███████████▄█████████████
▐████████████████████████▀
▐███████████████████████▀
 ▀███████████████████▀▀
   ▀▀████████████
       ▀▀███████
           ▀▀██

.
Soma
║║
║║
║║
.
║║
║║
║║
║║
║║
║║
║║
║║
║║



             ▄██▄
     ▄      ▐████   ▄▄
   █████     ██████████
    █████████████████▀
 ▄████████████▀████▌
██████████     ▀████    
 ▀▀   █████     ██████████
      ▀████▌▄████████████▀
    ▄▄▄███████████████▌
   ██████████▀    ▐████
    ▀▀▀  ████▌     ▀▀▀
         ▀███▀



                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀



       ▄▄▄▄▄▄
    ▄████████
    █████▀▀▀▀
   ▐████
   ▐████
████████████
████████████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
   ▐████
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2016, 09:50:55 AM
 #634


So if that was a theft and a 51% is an "attack" then the hard fork majority is a result of extortion. The dev team gave no choice but a directive: Let's vote but we are pro fork and all our wallets are ready so if you don't want to create a mess and you want your money to have value and keep us happy to provide you with software (which is supposedly open source) then you know what to vote.
So about 5% of eth holders voted (which in democracies would null the voting process) and some whales had 25% stake of that vote (apparently from the foundation).

 

All fair...These points need airing.

The reason ETH will probably win out over ETC is the same as one of the obstacles to mass adoption of Crypto. Most laypersons (general population) want to be assured against loss (including from their own stupidity) and have become accustomed to Govt looking after them.  They need a trusted team of 'leaders' to advise them . Open Source works not because the majority can read and vet the code, but because they trust a minority to oversee it.
_Django05_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 233


Commander of the Armies of the North


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 10:05:54 AM
 #635

price is skydiving.  Huh
what do you guys think about etc?
AKKP
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 10:08:00 AM
 #636

Here is my opinion

The problem was DAO because it has been hacked and now it is a problem of Ethereum because there was a fork ...
DAO is the problem and the price of DAO is still nothing! DAO must disappear from the market!!!
Only the old ETH chain is the only true and real chain!!!
Best regards
kirilvvbg
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 10:13:02 AM
 #637

Hm, no one is answering my question about ETH in exchanges, in my case Kraken, but isn't it possible that the exchange(s) can dump my ETH prior the fork (converted into ETC) at the Polo exchange?
I am not that good in crypto, but I found out some strange (at least for me) transactions:
1. My ETH Kraken address according to etherchain.org has only the amount I mined/deposited after the HF;
2. I seems to have 1 (one) transaction 6 days ago (19.07) - to the following address: 0x53d284357ec70cE289D6D64134DfAc8E511c8a3D. The amount is 2144.0360455659216 Ether. For sure I did not have so much ETH at that time. I suppose it is the overall amount of ETH I have deposited in my Kraken account.
3. As you can see, the "recepient" address is empty - with one big transaction (8335689 Ether) to 0x341e790174e3A4D35b65fdC067B6b5634A61caEA. This has do something with fork, but as I said, I am not that good in crypto, I am just an ordinary miner.
4. This second address is empty too. But the balance is difficult the "read and understand", at least for me. Anyway some coins are heading to Poloniex in the last hour.

So, is this all normal?
Beside other things, at the moment my ETH address in etherchain.org shows 50ETH when Kraken shows 325?! And since these 50ETH are from after HF, where are my rest 275ETH?
snowboard789
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 552


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 10:22:19 AM
 #638

I also wrote this on the subject:

https://medium.com/@arisAlexis/painfully-strict-logic-d0d1cd0a0a27#.7uhws8d6x
Perryl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 10:49:37 AM
 #639

Excuse me, maybe I don't understand so I repeat the question.
 
Cannot this be dumped to nothing by VitalikEther followers?

1)   they have balances in ETHClassic and they will dump them
2)  they can mine ETHClassic with their equipment and they will dump.




One thing I don't understand (related to point 1.)..
If V. Buterin had let's say 1 million ETH before HF does it mean he has now 1 million ETH AND 1 million ETC?

exactly

But this is not the fault of V. Buterin that suddenly a second coin was created, no? This coin should never be created in the first place. Look how it is dropping, the thief is just dumping all his coins on us. He will runaway with $50,000,000 and we will have a worthless coin, correct?

I doubt he is already dumping. He is probably not that stupid.

The dumpers are probably people that do not understand what a hard fork means and consider this "free money" that appeared in their polo account.



What do you meran, not so stupid? The price has been dropping a lot, so most likely he already cash out. This coin is own 80% by the thief. Around 10% was still on this fork, correct? The thief stole for $50M when ETH was trading at 0.02 or so. Now ETC has a marketcap of $60M, how much do you really think is not part of the thief? Also most likely the people that didn't swap forgot about their coins in total. so almost all volume that is being created is coming from the thief. Strange that Poloniex added this coin. Really strange.

Can you explain the math behind your logic here? I'm curious, how does the "thief" now own 80% of ETC?


ecawyna
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294


🌟 æternity🌟 blockchain🌟


View Profile
July 25, 2016, 11:02:11 AM
 #640

So it's scam or not?
Or this is the original plan of the attacker?


        ▄▄█████████▄                    ▄▄████████▄▄
     ▄█████████████████▄             ▄████████████████▄
   █████            ▀█████        ▄█████            █████
  ████                 █████    █████                 ████
 ███                    ▀████    ██                     ███
▐███                      █████                         ▐███
███▌                        ████           ▐████████████████
▐███                         ▀████          ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
 ████                   ██▄    █████                    ▄▄▄
  ████                ██████    ▀████▄                ▄███
   ▀█████          ███████        ▀█████▄          ▄████▀
      █████████████████              ▀████████████████▀
         ▀▀██████▀▀                      ▀▀██████▀▀
  æ t e r n i t y
  The Oracle Machine
          ██
      ▄██ ██ ██▄
     ▐██  ██  ██
     ▐██      ██
     ▐██  ▄▄  ██
     ▐██▄▐██ ▄██
       ▀▀▐██ ▀▀
      ▄▄▌▐██ █▄
     ▐██ ▐██ ▀██
     ▐█▌  ▀▀  ██
     ▐██     ▐██
     ▐██ ▐██ ▄██
      ▀█ ▐██ █▀
         ▐██
✅ Unchained Smart Contracts
✅ Decentralized Oracle
✅ Turing-Complete
✅ State-Channels
✅ Infinitly Scalable
     ██
 ▄██ ██ ██▄
▐██  ██  ██
▐██      ██
▐██  ▄▄  ██
▐██▄▐██ ▄██
  ▀▀▐██ ▀▀
 ▄▄▌▐██ █▄
▐██ ▐██ ▀██
▐█▌  ▀▀  ██
▐██     ▐██
▐██ ▐██ ▄██
 ▀█ ▐██ █▀
    ▐██
[ WHITEPAPER]                     ██
                   ▄██▌
                  ████
                ▄█████
              ▄██████▌
             ████████
           ▄█████████   ▄▄▄▄
          █████████████████▀
        ▄████████████████▀
       ██▀▀▀▀▀ █████████
              ▐███████▀
              ██████▀
              █████▀
             ▐███▀
             ███
             █▀
(en)Lightning
Smart Contracts
|TESTNET|
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 339 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!