Bitcoin Forum
December 12, 2024, 01:42:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 489 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [ETC] Ethereum Classic: Immutable Smart Contracts  (Read 821133 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (1 post by 1+ user deleted.)
serje
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002



View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:23:08 PM
 #961

Archive.is doesn't play nice with Poloniex so I'll just use a picture for archival purposes:



Never thought I'd see ETC volume overtake ETH on Poloniex. But then again, I never thought I'd see bitpop doing this thread so I have an abysmal track record on thinking  Grin

i don't know how much passed since you made this screenshot but now it at 341%



Space for rent if its still trending
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3892
Merit: 9106


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:25:51 PM
 #962

I sent etc to polo and they found eth someone accidentally sent me but better to use one of the tutorials on Reddit

Here is one (I have NOT tried this - use at your own risk):

https://m.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/4uo5iz/the_nobrains_trick_to_separate_your_eth_and_etc/

The one I tested - but still use at your own risk ;-) - and you can see the source code of the contract, which is fairly simple:

http://etherscan.io/address/0xaa1a6e3e6ef20068f7f8d8c835d2d22fd5116444#code
kirilvvbg
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:27:05 PM
 #963

Well another night of problems with pools.  This time it is etc.nanopool.org.  First they weren't making payments, then at 3am my time they finally made a payment, and since then they claim I haven't mined but .48 ETC, and are not showing my miners hashing.  So I don't know what is going on with nanopool, but this isn't cool.

Yep, pool owners - wake up...
Perryl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:27:12 PM
 #964

https://blog.ethereum.org/2016/07/26/onward_from_the_hard_fork/

Vitalik speaks on ETC

Value is about to fly.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3892
Merit: 9106


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:27:25 PM
 #965

i don't know how much passed since you made this screenshot but now it at 341%

10 minutes. Looks like panic buying now.
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:28:10 PM
 #966

I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..


./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1


Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...

Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed.


Edit:
Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores.

Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular?

Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1)


Seems ok.

I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for  while to compare reported and actual hashrate.

ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]}
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!

Thats normal, you just did some stale work and that share got rejected - as long as your hashrate is correct and shares after that get accepted all is fine.

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
frostminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 505


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:30:01 PM
 #967

I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..


./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1


Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...

Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed.


Edit:
Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores.

Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular?

Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1)


Seems ok.

I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for  while to compare reported and actual hashrate.

ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]}
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!


Update.

@ ocminer
I noticed a "problem"

Im not sure if its the claymore miner or the nicehasd stratum.
But the hashrate is 40-50% lower there.

Example pic.
http://imgur.com/a/g4p97

Miner 1 = genoils
Miner 3&5 = claymores

They should all be 110-130
As u can see the claymores are way lower.


Should i test the low diff?

frostminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 505


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:35:54 PM
 #968

Man there will be many burned ppl here, very scary to think. Sad


We all know the rules of the game. Burning is part of it.

Some people even like it hot and risky.

Perryl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:37:45 PM
 #969

ETC coming to Bittrex

http://prntscr.com/bxq22f
bitpop (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:39:09 PM
 #970

Archive.is doesn't play nice with Poloniex so I'll just use a picture for archival purposes:



Never thought I'd see ETC volume overtake ETH on Poloniex. But then again, I never thought I'd see bitpop doing this thread so I have an abysmal track record on thinking  Grin

When paycoin was foaming at the mouth thinking they'd beat bitcoin i joined in. When ethf started foaming also and looked like gawtards and losing immutability, I declared war. Even Homero didn't pull a centralized coin like ethf or onecoin. Or maybe he was just too dumb.

bitpop (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:40:27 PM
 #971

ETC coming to Bittrex

http://prntscr.com/bxq22f

Bittrex is my favorite! Though polo was nice and first time using it. But bittrex doesn't require verification and may have more traders.

kirilvvbg
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:44:07 PM
 #972

I sent etc to polo and they found eth someone accidentally sent me but better to use one of the tutorials on Reddit

Here is one (I have NOT tried this - use at your own risk):

https://m.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/4uo5iz/the_nobrains_trick_to_separate_your_eth_and_etc/

The one I tested - but still use at your own risk ;-) - and you can see the source code of the contract, which is fairly simple:

http://etherscan.io/address/0xaa1a6e3e6ef20068f7f8d8c835d2d22fd5116444#code

I've checked my address on both chains (like in reddit was advised) and I don't have any balance at ETC chain. But I do have ~300ETH in Kraken. Should I ask them? What I suppose to do? Or my ETC now belong to Kraken?
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:47:43 PM
 #973

I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..


./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1


Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...

Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed.


Edit:
Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores.

Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular?

Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1)


Seems ok.

I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for  while to compare reported and actual hashrate.

ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]}
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!


Update.

@ ocminer
I noticed a "problem"

Im not sure if its the claymore miner or the nicehasd stratum.
But the hashrate is 40-50% lower there.

Example pic.
http://imgur.com/a/g4p97

Miner 1 = genoils
Miner 3&5 = claymores

They should all be 110-130
As u can see the claymores are way lower.


Should i test the low diff?



Hmm, when you use this genoil:

https://github.com/nicehash/cpp-ethereum

It works 100% as it's the native implementation for nicehash's stratum.

I'll try Claymore now again, and adapt my stratum to the native claymore protocol too, the problem is just, that it uses Wallet adresses instead of usernames which is a bit uncommon on MPOS pools but i'll get something around it... 

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
Perryl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:50:52 PM
 #974

ETC coming to Bittrex

http://prntscr.com/bxq22f

Bittrex is my favorite! Though polo was nice and first time using it. But bittrex doesn't require verification and may have more traders.

The only regret I have about not having a ton of ETH is I didn't get a ton of ETC for "free" like so many others. lol

Don't get me wrong, I profited, but nowhere near as much as so many other people did, and they didn't put in the work to keep the chain alive for days before it got added.

Well, that leads me to another regret. Selling around 200k. lol. It hit 500k briefly. Let's see what happens when it hits more exchanges.
Perryl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:51:32 PM
 #975

I sent etc to polo and they found eth someone accidentally sent me but better to use one of the tutorials on Reddit

Here is one (I have NOT tried this - use at your own risk):

https://m.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/4uo5iz/the_nobrains_trick_to_separate_your_eth_and_etc/

The one I tested - but still use at your own risk ;-) - and you can see the source code of the contract, which is fairly simple:

http://etherscan.io/address/0xaa1a6e3e6ef20068f7f8d8c835d2d22fd5116444#code

I've checked my address on both chains (like in reddit was advised) and I don't have any balance at ETC chain. But I do have ~300ETH in Kraken. Should I ask them? What I suppose to do? Or my ETC now belong to Kraken?

It depends if Kraken decides to award their users with the ETC they rightfully own.
JUSTDLISK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250


Bancor


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:52:57 PM
 #976

I am confused as not all Eth was stolen from the DAO. What happens with the rest of the ETH? how would a DAO holder claim the other fraction of ETH classic which was locked up in the DAO.

frostminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 505


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:53:50 PM
 #977

I just realized it's already possible to mine with latest Claymore on Suprnova's Nicehash Port..


./ethdcrminer64 -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal suprnova.1 -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1


Is there any disadvantage of using it like this ? Seems to work fine for me...

Hmm, earlier there were some reports that "extranonce.subscribe disabled", when mining with claymore on nicehash, reduced speed.


Edit:
Gotta walk the dog.. but i can put some rigs to test with claymores.

Should i mine on the nicehash settings or regular?

Regular won't work, but Nicehash Mode should work fine.. (-esm 3 -allpools 1 -allcoins 1)


Seems ok.

I got this line on of the miners. But only once.. and its finding shares right after. So i guess its ok. Ill watch it for  while to compare reported and actual hashrate.

ETH: Received error: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[21,"jobnotfound"]}
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:36 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
ETH: 07/26/16-14:52:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!


Update.

@ ocminer
I noticed a "problem"

Im not sure if its the claymore miner or the nicehasd stratum.
But the hashrate is 40-50% lower there.

Example pic.
http://imgur.com/a/g4p97

Miner 1 = genoils
Miner 3&5 = claymores

They should all be 110-130
As u can see the claymores are way lower.


Should i test the low diff?



Hmm, when you use this genoil:

https://github.com/nicehash/cpp-ethereum

It works 100% as it's the native implementation for nicehash's stratum.

I'll try Claymore now again, and adapt my stratum to the native claymore protocol too, the problem is just, that it uses Wallet adresses instead of usernames which is a bit uncommon on MPOS pools but i'll get something around it... 

Tried low diff too (3332) but got even lower rate.

But!!!

Isnt this just the reported rate. The miner mines at 125mh, even tho the pool says 55mh.
And it finds share like f**k.. every 5th second or something.

Isnt it the shares that count? I dont get any rejected.. just low reported hashrate, but still finding shares (locally) very fast.

bitpop (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:53:51 PM
 #978

Governments can make addresses valueless

http://bitlegal.io/2016/07/24/eu-commission-to-propose-central-database-of-virtual-currency-users/

Will vitalik be forced to fork addresses out? Civil asset forfeiture is a crime against humanity and the only thing cryptos have is being immutable.

TrueAnon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 26, 2016, 01:54:48 PM
 #979

You delete my msg of just "ppl may be burned here!"...really?!?!?

Now we know you guys are scammers! HAHA
bitpop (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2016, 01:55:23 PM
 #980

You delete my msg of just "ppl may be burned here!"...really?!?!?

Now we know you guys are scammers! HAHA

Depends on if you are an ethf shill

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 489 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!