ghostfaceuk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:34:02 PM |
|
I only get 101 H/S on (stock bios) hd 7970 (r9 280x equilavent?) on claymore v.8. Is that normal or should i be getting more? My ram is ddr3 16gb, my cpu i7-4790 and i´m not using risers. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I get more than that on a r9 280 (non x version) RX 470 4GB - 170ish h/s (bounces around this figure on -i6) stock settings what drivers do you use? mine is 16.10.2 I'm using the 15.12 version of the drivers. Using v.7 I was getting about 160h/s using -1 4
|
|
|
|
neosmining
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:34:49 PM |
|
r9 390x and r9 390 ZEC - Total Speed: 1107.696 H/s, Total Shares: 539, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08 ZEC: GPU0 292.936 H/s, GPU1 272.592 H/s, GPU2 272.434 H/s, GPU3 269.813 H/s ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
Raja_MBZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1505
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:35:21 PM |
|
185-190 H/s with my each XFX RX 480 8 GB... Again, great work done by Claymore. However I still have not tried the intensity 5/6 option yet.
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:36:50 PM |
|
R9 380 4G 1000/1300 - 140H/s
r9 380 2 gb 1100/1500 152 h/s (sapphire nitro itx, samsung memory) r9 380 4 gb 1040/1600 -i5 151 h/s (XFX, elpida)
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
MrJaekin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:37:50 PM |
|
280x ~210 H/s 480 ~210 H/s 390 ~290 H/s 290x ~277 H/s fury ~285 H/s
210 H/s is amazing for a 480! Can you let us know your config? I've got 6 8GB ref 480s in a rig but can't get over 180 or so. Is the vbios stock? thanks!
|
|
|
|
Shizzle my dizzle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:39:29 PM |
|
@Claymore
Question, on startup the namen of the first (of last, don't know) is not being reported.. Is this a known issue?
AMD Cards available: 2 GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 36 compute units GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 480 POOL version GPU #0 intensity 4 GPU #1 intensity 4
|
|
|
|
thiagobangu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:40:33 PM |
|
In my gpu -5, -6 made no difference in relation -4. But powers rose. 280x 205 h / s 295x2 527 h / s Congratulations Claymore, we are waiting for V10.0 Standard clocks, -i 4:
207 H/s 280X 200 H/s 480 8GB
|
|
|
|
markus124
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:40:52 PM |
|
7950 - 172 h/s with intensity 6. Thanks claymore. Let's see for how long we can sustain the value of zec. Atleast windows miners are getting some nice boost in speed.
|
|
|
|
neosmining
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:41:35 PM |
|
-i 6 390x= 310 h/s 390=285 h/s
That's what I do 390x = 293 h/s 390 = 273 h/s How did you do. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
|
naeme18720
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:42:00 PM |
|
I only get 101 H/S on (stock bios) hd 7970 (r9 280x equilavent?) on claymore v.8. Is that normal or should i be getting more? My ram is ddr3 16gb, my cpu i7-4790 and i´m not using risers. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I get more than that on a r9 280 (non x version) RX 470 4GB - 170ish h/s (bounces around this figure on -i6) stock settings what drivers do you use? mine is 16.10.2 I'm using the 15.12 version of the drivers. Using v.7 I was getting about 160h/s using -1 4 I'm using the 16.11 version of the drivers using v.8 claymore... getting about 170h/s rx 470 4gb sapphire
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1059
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:42:52 PM |
|
280x ~210 H/s 480 ~210 H/s 390 ~290 H/s 290x ~277 H/s fury ~285 H/s
210 H/s is amazing for a 480! Can you let us know your config? I've got 6 8GB ref 480s in a rig but can't get over 180 or so. Is the vbios stock? thanks! stock bios core 1380, 2200 memory maybe the samsung rams of this HIS rx 480 roaring oc helped, it can do 1400 core but i'll play it safe for stability.
|
|
|
|
nowaltcoin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:43:51 PM |
|
Wow
6 * 7790 from 350 H/s to 405 H/s
Great work
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:46:44 PM |
|
I only get 101 H/S on (stock bios) hd 7970 (r9 280x equilavent?) on claymore v.8. Is that normal or should i be getting more? My ram is ddr3 16gb, my cpu i7-4790 and i´m not using risers. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I get more than that on a r9 280 (non x version) RX 470 4GB - 170ish h/s (bounces around this figure on -i6) stock settings what drivers do you use? mine is 16.10.2 I'm using the 15.12 version of the drivers. Using v.7 I was getting about 160h/s using -1 4 I'm using the 16.11 version of the drivers using v.8 claymore... getting about 170h/s rx 470 4gb sapphire Whoopps should possibly clarify. The drivers response was with regards to the 280 card. Getting 170 on 470 4GB Sapphire with 16.3 drivers
|
|
|
|
_javi_
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:48:26 PM |
|
how`s the power usage doing?? i feel the heat of the LTC mining era... ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:49:40 PM |
|
Too much incorrect data in v8! -i 5 and -6.
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:49:58 PM |
|
how`s the power usage doing?? i feel the heat of the LTC mining era... ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) With it being this time of year does that mean chestnuts roasting on a open miner?
|
|
|
|
naeme18720
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:51:57 PM |
|
I only get 101 H/S on (stock bios) hd 7970 (r9 280x equilavent?) on claymore v.8. Is that normal or should i be getting more? My ram is ddr3 16gb, my cpu i7-4790 and i´m not using risers. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I get more than that on a r9 280 (non x version) RX 470 4GB - 170ish h/s (bounces around this figure on -i6) stock settings what drivers do you use? mine is 16.10.2 I'm using the 15.12 version of the drivers. Using v.7 I was getting about 160h/s using -1 4 I'm using the 16.11 version of the drivers using v.8 claymore... getting about 170h/s rx 470 4gb sapphire Whoopps should possibly clarify. The drivers response was with regards to the 280 card. Getting 170 on 470 4GB Sapphire with 16.3 drivers 75wats on gpu-z rx 470 4gb and 170 h/s...very very good.Thanks claymore
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1059
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:53:14 PM |
|
how`s the power usage doing?? i feel the heat of the LTC mining era... ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) heat in version 7 and version 8 is almost very the same..so the power is almost the same with version 7 i suppose. LTC is a real power hog it maxes out the GPU max power draw, it is hotter also..ZEC is still cooler than ETH/ETC.
|
|
|
|
ghostfaceuk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:54:48 PM |
|
I only get 101 H/S on (stock bios) hd 7970 (r9 280x equilavent?) on claymore v.8. Is that normal or should i be getting more? My ram is ddr3 16gb, my cpu i7-4790 and i´m not using risers. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I get more than that on a r9 280 (non x version) RX 470 4GB - 170ish h/s (bounces around this figure on -i6) stock settings what drivers do you use? mine is 16.10.2 I'm using the 15.12 version of the drivers. Using v.7 I was getting about 160h/s using -1 4 I'm using the 16.11 version of the drivers using v.8 claymore... getting about 170h/s rx 470 4gb sapphire Whoopps should possibly clarify. The drivers response was with regards to the 280 card. Getting 170 on 470 4GB Sapphire with 16.3 drivers 75wats on gpu-z rx 470 4gb and 170 h/s...very very good.Thanks claymore What settings are you using?
|
|
|
|
naeme18720
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 24, 2016, 01:58:14 PM |
|
I only get 101 H/S on (stock bios) hd 7970 (r9 280x equilavent?) on claymore v.8. Is that normal or should i be getting more? My ram is ddr3 16gb, my cpu i7-4790 and i´m not using risers. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I get more than that on a r9 280 (non x version) RX 470 4GB - 170ish h/s (bounces around this figure on -i6) stock settings what drivers do you use? mine is 16.10.2 I'm using the 15.12 version of the drivers. Using v.7 I was getting about 160h/s using -1 4 I'm using the 16.11 version of the drivers using v.8 claymore... getting about 170h/s rx 470 4gb sapphire Whoopps should possibly clarify. The drivers response was with regards to the 280 card. Getting 170 on 470 4GB Sapphire with 16.3 drivers 75wats on gpu-z rx 470 4gb and 170 h/s...very very good.Thanks claymore What settings are you using? GPU 1130 / Memory 1945 -75 mv
|
|
|
|
|