AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
January 09, 2018, 12:40:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ragnar0k
|
|
January 09, 2018, 12:46:37 PM |
|
When bitcoin first appeared I imagined a world of peer to peer payments with no central institutions. LN is most definately not that.
The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank.
I always said LN will be supported by big money. No doubt there will be an epic pump, because 'scalability is solved'. I don't like it but I can profit from it. The original dream of bitcoin doesn't exist though.
Wrong. LN is just a spec, how it is implemented will be up to the service. For example, it could go through a series of TOR nodes (slower), or could be implemented by the likes of expressvpn and such - or vendors will choose a solution for that, hopefully making a choice will be easy. There are tons of options, and if you don't like any of them, you can still stick to segwit
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 2766
Far, Far, Far Right Thug
|
|
January 09, 2018, 12:49:48 PM |
|
Segwit. Bech32. MAST. Signature aggregation. Key aggregation. Batch validation. Covenants. CT & bullet proofs. Dandelion. Neutrino. Tx compression. Set reconciliation for tx relay. Block template delta compression. NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED. UTXO commitments. TXO commitments. TXO bitfields. Rolling UTXO set hashes. Client-side validation. Peer encryption & auth. Fraud proofs. Scriptless atomic swaps. Zerolink/tumblebit. [Cut:] layer 2, HF rsrch, bip 8. (@rusty_twit) and a paaartridge in a pear tree
<huge image deleted>
That's exactly what I'm talking about, that just made my brain hurt, without telling me how to use it. A few observations about the graphic. The picture of the network is highly distorted, showing only 3 end users! when really theres hundred of thousands or millions potentially. HIghly connected hubs will be numbered in the hundreds (I feel I'm being generous with that number). That is a highly centralised network, nothing like the depiction. I doubt many people use a hot wallet for everyday spending. The use case in which people have a spending wallet is already defunct. Who spends bitcoin when the fees are more than the cost of the purchase, you don't spend it. The promise of low fees on LN was also made onchain in the early days. When I first used bitcoin most people didnt even put a fee. I suspect fees will not be low on LN, only lower than onchain fees. When the internet appeared I was sure it would fail because I could not imaging a scenario where companies would pay to run expensive undersea cables that keep up with the demand (and all the other infrastructure) - and let me use it for 'free'. Somehow it works. This time I'm am keeping an open mind. There is enough money on the table so I'm sure something workable will emerge. When bitcoin first appeared I imagined a world of peer to peer payments with no central institutions. LN is most definately not that. The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank. I always said LN will be supported by big money. No doubt there will be an epic pump, because 'scalability is solved'. I don't like it but I can profit from it. The original dream of bitcoin doesn't exist though. I actually would regard using LN as the natural progression of scaling up peer to peer payments. Consider that much of the peer to peer traffic on the internet itself which we used to have has moved more to peer - "cloud" - peer system. Can't remember the last time I used a torrent program to get data. Of course I wouldn't want banks involved in LN but if BTC is really going to replace all digital payments I think LN will have to exist. Vendors already usually only get paid out no more than once per day from payment gateways etc. Also this would make it possible to accept BTC in a plane or even in space, who the hell knows what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 3402
|
|
January 09, 2018, 12:51:58 PM |
|
Translation of SEC concerns: "Futures as implemented now are totally inadequate since they can't manipulate the price." At least the way I understand it.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 3402
|
|
January 09, 2018, 12:54:48 PM |
|
I actually would regard using LN as the natural progression of scaling up peer to peer payments. Consider that much of the peer to peer traffic on the internet itself which we used to have has moved more to peer - "cloud" - peer system.
Good parallel. Can't remember the last time I used a torrent program to get data.
... but if some data should get censored everywhere from "cloud peer" systems, it would spread through torrents like wildfire. That is, base blockchain transfers will always be an option, no matter what.
|
|
|
|
afbitcoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2101
Merit: 1061
|
|
January 09, 2018, 01:17:11 PM |
|
I actually would regard using LN as the natural progression of scaling up peer to peer payments. Consider that much of the peer to peer traffic on the internet itself which we used to have has moved more to peer - "cloud" - peer system.
Good parallel. Can't remember the last time I used a torrent program to get data.
... but if some data should get censored everywhere from "cloud peer" systems, it would spread through torrents like wildfire. That is, base blockchain transfers will always be an option, no matter what. Not sure if I understood that correctly but if I did, I could view torrents being replaced by cloud services as a regression from a decentralised system back towards a more centralised one. Cloud services are provided by a small number of large companies. Anyway I still find torrents useful. But anyway, thanks for a civilised response. I prefer reasoned debate than being told to fuck off.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
January 09, 2018, 01:24:44 PM |
|
Naw. The price is way too low now. I'm calling it.
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
|
January 09, 2018, 01:40:49 PM |
|
WTF bitcoin selling off again. Just go up you bastard, it's the future for christs sake.
But what date in the future is bitcoin the future and what price will it be? Lets say in 10-20 years it will be $1M and will be the dominant currency. 15 years is actually a short amount of time for so many public systems to be changed - look how long it took grandma to adopt the internet or use a credit card. Is the current trajectory sustainable? No. At the current rate it would reach that level in only 1-2 years. It is going way too fast and needs to pull back and have retracements.
|
|
|
|
fluidjax
|
|
January 09, 2018, 01:42:31 PM |
|
The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank.
Explain why you think that statement is true, and I will explain why you are wrong.
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1880
Merit: 3046
All good things to those who wait
|
|
January 09, 2018, 01:47:18 PM |
|
Regarding that noobs are boasting with alt profits: Looking at the charts of those that are at least 3 years old, you can see that the price is constantly declining with 1 or 2 pumps (mostly in May 2017 and in Dec 2017/Jan 2018). Between the pumps there is a huge drop. In other words, even if one gets lucky to chose one of those alts and waits years with 60-90% loss in terms of fiat, at the end he may earn at most ten fold. On the other hand, if one bought BTC and holded for 3 years... you can do the math. Now, the noobs are too emotional and buy these alts at current prices waiting for the next pump. But my questions are: Do you know when the next pump will be? In May 2018, or Jan 2019, or Jan 2020? Do you be comfortable to wake up each morning and see another 10% drop in price for months/years? In the meantime, BTC will steadily rise to prices that now may seem unimaginable. After all, BTC is still in its early adoption phase with a cap of 21 mln coins, 80% of which are now in circulation.
|
|
|
|
Paashaas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3517
Merit: 4562
|
|
January 09, 2018, 01:50:46 PM |
|
The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank.
Explain why you think that statement is true, and I will explain why you are wrong. Afbitcoins is a Bcash shill/shit noob.
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
January 09, 2018, 02:38:45 PM |
|
Naw. The price is way too low now. I'm calling it.
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
|
January 09, 2018, 02:49:46 PM |
|
low? you must have the chart upside down. it's up 1400% in the last year since it broke ath, 10,000% in 2 years. It's still at this ridiculous enormous peak. I don't you know what you mean by low. Are you zoomed into 1 minute?
|
|
|
|
ragnar0k
|
|
January 09, 2018, 02:52:10 PM |
|
Did we just defeat a gigantic head and shoulder? Or I am being too optimistic?
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
January 09, 2018, 03:03:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
|
January 09, 2018, 03:12:29 PM |
|
I just don't get how something at an all time peak can be a "bottom". it's not physically possible
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
January 09, 2018, 03:13:33 PM |
|
I just don't get how something at an all time peak can be a "bottom". it's not physically possible
|
|
|
|
Imbatman
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 13
|
|
January 09, 2018, 03:27:07 PM |
|
Does anyone think it's interesting that the CBOE futures -- which started a month ago today --- had an opening set price at $14,800 --- It's my understanding that the first month of pricing predictions will close today at 4pm EST, and the price is hovering right around --- $14,800?
|
|
|
|
Rosewater Foundation
|
|
January 09, 2018, 03:32:21 PM Last edit: January 09, 2018, 04:03:35 PM by Rosewater Foundation |
|
What the fuck is up with that crackers johnson ? It looks like it was stung by a swarm of bees. (sings) The ouzel cock, so black of hue With orange-tawny bill, The throstle with his note so true, The wren with little quill— Idk.
|
|
|
|
pfrtlpfmpf
|
|
January 09, 2018, 03:33:23 PM |
|
low? you must have the chart upside down. it's up 1400% in the last year since it broke ath, 10,000% in 2 years. It's still at this ridiculous enormous peak. I don't you know what you mean by low. Are you zoomed into 1 minute?
Yep, now i´m getting the next problem: how do i spend all that shit ? First, you make the dosh, then you ask yourself how to spend it. It´s really hard, guys . . . I spent all my thoughts making it, while i completely forgot how to spend it. Is there a button on my computer ? Buying a lambo is just to lame.
|
|
|
|
|