Bitcoin Forum
August 21, 2019, 12:11:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What do you think about more?
Sex - 41 (39.8%)
Bitcoin - 62 (60.2%)
Total Voters: 103

Pages: « 1 ... 23579 23580 23581 23582 23583 23584 23585 23586 23587 23588 23589 23590 23591 23592 23593 23594 23595 23596 23597 23598 23599 23600 23601 23602 23603 23604 23605 23606 23607 23608 23609 23610 23611 23612 23613 23614 23615 23616 23617 23618 23619 23620 23621 23622 23623 23624 23625 23626 23627 23628 [23629] 23630 23631 23632 23633 23634 23635 23636 23637 23638 23639 23640 23641 23642 23643 23644 23645 23646 23647 23648 23649 23650 23651 23652 23653 23654 23655 23656 23657 23658 23659 23660 23661 23662 23663 23664 23665 23666 23667 23668 23669 23670 23671 23672 23673 23674 23675 23676 23677 23678 23679 ... 24814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21331403 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (104 posts by 20 users deleted.)
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 924
Merit: 1497


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:12:50 AM

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

If it was urgent it could probably be done in 48 hours.   But it won’t be urgent.  

And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.
1566346302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1566346302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1566346302
Reply with quote  #2

1566346302
Report to moderator
1566346302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1566346302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1566346302
Reply with quote  #2

1566346302
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1566346302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1566346302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1566346302
Reply with quote  #2

1566346302
Report to moderator
1566346302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1566346302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1566346302
Reply with quote  #2

1566346302
Report to moderator
1566346302
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1566346302

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1566346302
Reply with quote  #2

1566346302
Report to moderator
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1224


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:12:54 AM

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

Not long, lots of shitcoin examples of doing it wrong out there. Smiley
jbreher
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2478
Merit: 1321


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:13:17 AM


For the IOTA? smh
jbreher
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2478
Merit: 1321


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:22:10 AM
Merited by MirkoIta (5)

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

If it was urgent it could probably be done in 48 hours.   But it won’t be urgent.  

It ain't just a river in Egypt.

Quote
And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.

You've already banished it from your revisionist history?
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 1039



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:38:39 AM




4h
#dyor



#stronghands'19
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 924
Merit: 1497


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:43:18 AM

And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.

You've already banished it from your revisionist history?

There were some high fees in 2017. There was no need for a block size increase as demonstrated by the failure of BCH.

If it was “necessary”, BCH would have won. 
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 1039



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:48:05 AM

So we have the world’s slowest run on the bank on Bitfinex, and it’s slowly dragging the Bitstamp price up with it.

No guesses so far are close.  This one is hard mode. 

Pat..I'd like to buy a continent.
JSRAW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 399



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 04:51:43 AM

Looks India to me.
nanobtc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 398
Merit: 170



View Profile WWW
April 29, 2019, 04:54:14 AM


Pat..I'd like to buy a continent.

No need to buy, you can just own one.  https://www.amazon.com/Stealing-Network-How-Own-Continent/dp/1931836051
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 1039



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 05:00:43 AM


interdasting  did hairy fly up to sri lanka after the incident?


whoops..possible freudian slip there..disregard please and give me a vowel instead.
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 569


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 05:05:33 AM

I think the secwit was implemented in order to prevent the translation of already signed transactions from Satoshi's wallets

a small block at same reason, it was necessary to create a valid cause of secwit

if increase the block, you will have to cancel the secwit, so bitcoin does not want to leave the small block
somac.
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 578
Merit: 177


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 05:10:59 AM

And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.

You've already banished it from your revisionist history?

There were some high fees in 2017. There was no need for a block size increase as demonstrated by the failure of BCH.

If it was “necessary”, BCH would have won. 

Hahaha, very true. The proof is in the pudding.
Icygreen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 414



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 05:12:21 AM
Merited by HairyMaclairy (5), infofront (1)


Its Vietnam, somewhere along the Mekong delta near Hcmc? Dude playing a bamboo flute in sandals for tips with the Vietnamese 'cam on' meaning thank you written on the case.
infofront
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1772


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 05:21:18 AM

This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.

Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence.

Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change?

If it was urgent it could probably be done in 48 hours.   But it won’t be urgent.  

It ain't just a river in Egypt.

I would mostly agree with the bear here.
The last full block crisis resulted in inaction, to force people onto segwit. I presume the next full block crisis will result in inaction, to force people onto lightning.
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1991
Merit: 1375



View Profile
April 29, 2019, 05:24:14 AM

And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not.  The need may never surface.

You've already banished it from your revisionist history?

There were some high fees in 2017. There was no need for a block size increase as demonstrated by the failure of BCH.

If it was “necessary”, BCH would have won. 

Even when Bitcoin had high fee's nobody switched to shitcoins.
Phil_S
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 302


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 05:49:30 AM

Lines have been crossed down under
Australia is awesome. Feral cats are killing native marsupials like koalas and wallabies, so locals eliminate the invasive species by eating them.
She makes further points which I don't get. Maybe humour?
Cats r good hunters

pls don't eat them
Is that's cats face Photoshopped? Looks a bit off.

Not just cat's face! The whole cat! And more!

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 299


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 06:25:45 AM

I just saw the most ludicrous Volkswagen commercial.  It had a bimbo walk in to the apartment she lives in (which would probably be paid for by the dude in any real world scenario) and she saw him playing some sort of Occulus Rift video game and instantly leaves him.  LOL?  What type of message is this supposed to be?  That a guy is supposed to spend 24 hours a day being a woman's servant or you're a bad person?  I mean, that is exactly how women think in real life, but putting it in a commercial and pretending it's okay for them to think like that is just nauseating.
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 924
Merit: 1497


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 06:31:14 AM


Its Vietnam, somewhere along the Mekong delta near Hcmc? Dude playing a bamboo flute in sandals for tips with the Vietnamese 'cam on' meaning thank you written on the case.

Damn you guys are good.  I knew you wouldn’t let me down.  Yes it’s Vietnam.  More pixels pending.
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 924
Merit: 1497


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 06:33:45 AM

realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 299


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
April 29, 2019, 07:08:10 AM

K, next up on the HairyMclarry name that street contest:

Pages: « 1 ... 23579 23580 23581 23582 23583 23584 23585 23586 23587 23588 23589 23590 23591 23592 23593 23594 23595 23596 23597 23598 23599 23600 23601 23602 23603 23604 23605 23606 23607 23608 23609 23610 23611 23612 23613 23614 23615 23616 23617 23618 23619 23620 23621 23622 23623 23624 23625 23626 23627 23628 [23629] 23630 23631 23632 23633 23634 23635 23636 23637 23638 23639 23640 23641 23642 23643 23644 23645 23646 23647 23648 23649 23650 23651 23652 23653 23654 23655 23656 23657 23658 23659 23660 23661 23662 23663 23664 23665 23666 23667 23668 23669 23670 23671 23672 23673 23674 23675 23676 23677 23678 23679 ... 24814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!