Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Last of the V8s]

I'm not a zoologist.

A dyslexic skier forgets which way to go down the mountain.
He goes up to the nearest fellow, "Excuse me, can you remind me which way to go down. Is it zig-zag or zag-zig?"
"Well, I wouldn't know, I'm a tobogganist."
"Oh in that case can I have 20 Benson & Hedges and a box of matches please?"

[Last of the V8s]

Not every fat kid with a mousey-coloured pudding haircut is Barry Silbert.

[Last of the V8s]

I hope someone will post this.

I still think the chain that can provide more utility to more people has the long-term greater value proposition, regardless.

If you measure utility in fungible money, then given fungible resources are always power-law distributed, then clearly the higher valuation will be the chain that provides more utility to the uber wealthy. In that case, they need the looong history of immutability as prima facia evidence of secure store-of-value that won’t be debased nor disrupted. I am thinking the stock-to-flows model is all tied up into this prima facia driven confidence:

https://medium.com/@shelby_78386/apparently-not-400244cca3cc

If you measure utility some other way, then perhaps an altcoin for the masses has more utility. But do not expect to get more “wealthy” in fungible units of money from it. I am doing a deep think now on that notion. Actually the Bible comes into this in a major way. My next blog post will go into this and also explain how Bitcoin is very clearly a WMD created by the banksters.

uh

[HairyMaclairy]

Should we believe, the US registration and move on with Craig Wright being the real Satoshi ? Or its just another fud which will go around in some days ? What can we do to stop this shit?

A simple registration is enough for you to believe someone who has constantly lied and refused to simply sign the Genesis block? It hasn't been approved by the copyright office just a registration, it can still be denied.

Well, the copyright office does not 'approve' claims. The registration is merely prima facie evidence of a superior claim. Any further action is contingent upon court action. Only such would lead to 'denial'.

It’s not prima facie evidence of anything other than evidence of a claim having been made,

That's exactly what I said.

Not to put too fine a point on it, you said it was prima face evidence of a superior claim.  Which it is not.  

It is evidence of a claim.  

It is not evidence of superiority, nor strictly speaking, is it prima facie.  

Unless of course like the egg in Alice, words mean whatever you intend them to mean, in which case carry on.

A dog capable of filling out a copyright registration application would seem to be a pretty unique animal. Of course, I'm not a zoologist.

I saw a dog surfing on YouTube once so I wouldn’t underestimate them

[Toxic2040]

I have been thinking about this truism for awhile now after seeing jbreher's continuing efforts to gain a platform. Found this quote about it after some digging. I tell you true, this has served me well over the years.

Here’s the “inspired” insight: Sometimes it’s better to move towards an objection rather than away from it, to embrace a charge, rather than run from it.

I was first exposed to this maneuver in a movie. In the opening scenes of “Clear and Present Danger,” a man with connections to the president was found dead in what appeared to be a drug deal gone bad. To contain the PR damage, the president’s advisors suggested he immediately downplay the relationship and distance himself from the problem.

Analyst Jack Ryan (played by Harrison Ford) suggested just the opposite. “If they ask if you were friends,” he counseled, “say, ‘No, he was a good friend.’ If they ask if he was a good friend, say ‘We were lifelong friends.’ It would give them no place to go. Nothing to report. No story. In other words, don’t run from the problem; run towards it and defuse it. Don’t evade; invade. Embrace it, undermine its relevance, and take the wind out of its sails.”

In this particular case it is somewhat more subtle. I dont agree with him and instead of arguing over points that neither side is likely to budge from I have decided to just not engage.

Anyway..something to ponder.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bitcoin




9 years later we celebrate Piza Day with bitcoin trading above $7.9k   Seems legit.

That is all.
#dyor
1h



4h


D

#stronghands'19

[Hueristic]

You guys think we will ever see BCash @$4k again within any bullrun? I feel like I lost a fortune by not selling @4k and kept that scam hodling.

You will not find anyone here who thinks that BCH will ever be $4k again

False statement is false.

XD

False statement is false.

Are you really that obtuse?

I believe BCH will again attain $4K. I am here. Ergo...

I seriously believe that even you do not believe that.
You are lying to yourself and trying to convince yourself and you are failing at both.



On another note...

It looks like Bitstamp got recognized by NY, I think I may do the KYC there now.

So sad bittrex,

https://news.bitcoin.com/new-york-orders-bittrex-cease-operations-approves-bitstamp/

[Hueristic]

let´s quickly check how sustainable bSV is rewarding miners with fees to secure the network:

Today's earned fees across Bitcoin forks...

Bitcoin: $1.8M of fees earned by miners
Bitcoin Cash: $461 of fees earned by miners
Bitcoin SV: $16 of fees earned by miners
Bitcoin Gold: $2 of fees earned by miners

Yet the SV blockchain continues. Funny, that.

Looks like a ripe target to me.

Indeed it does. Why does nobody attack it?

Is it perhaps because SV miners have hash power in reserve at the moment, and could easily re-revert any reversion made with the assumption that the reversion would stand due to lack of hashpower to re-revert?

I don't doubt they would, they could care less about immutability as well as a myriad of factors that make BTC the king.

Centralized hash on demand to rollback the chain is a thing now. LOL

I like the direction they are crumbling in.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Good evening WO brothers!
Observing $7,829

Around 10 pages to catch up. What have I missed?

[Last of the V8s]

Good evening WO brothers!
Observing $7,829

Around 10 pages to catch up. What have I missed?

Hi!
A hairy old dog created bitcoin.

[MrFreeRoMan]

Good evening WO brothers!
Observing $7,829

Around 10 pages to catch up. What have I missed?

Silence) Everything is quiet and calm, like a spring evening on the ocean) drinking a cocktail on the beach and listening to the sound of the surf) Nothing new)

[Hueristic]

Good evening WO brothers!
Observing $7,829

Around 10 pages to catch up. What have I missed?

It's Wednesday so we are talking with jbreher about how BTSABCV or whatever its called today is worthless.

[Toxic2040]

1h



1h

#stronghands'19

[cAPSLOCK]

::le sigh:: ...aaaand we're back to 'Aussie man bad!'

Truth is a defence to defamation

Yet, only in honest discourse is understanding to be reached.

You seem to be a lovely chap.  I don’t know why you persist in defending such comic book villains.

Lodging a copywright claim over the Bitcoin whitepaper which has an MIT open source license printed on the front page?  It’s both hilarious and pathetic.

Could be, or you just too naive to realize that you aren't the intended audience. These papers are not for you to consume, all of his actions can be easily explained if you think of him as a man preparing a case for litigation. He's just preparing documents that he'll be submitting to court. Probably will try to trademark "Bitcoin" next.

Unfortunately this is most likely the truth.  I just wonder how far down the deception we can go before it finally crashes into the bottom of depravity.  I hope the courts can see the real truth.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

It's Wednesday so we are talking with jbreher about how BTSABCV or whatever its called today is worthless.

It really is confusing LOL

A hairy old dog created bitcoin.

Who let the dogs out 🤪

[jbreher]

You guys think we will ever see BCash @$4k again within any bullrun? I feel like I lost a fortune by not selling @4k and kept that scam hodling.

You will not find anyone here who thinks that BCH will ever be $4k again

False statement is false.

XD

False statement is false.

Are you really that obtuse?

I believe BCH will again attain $4K. I am here. Ergo...

I seriously believe that even you do not believe that.
You are lying to yourself and trying to convince yourself and you are failing at both.

Haha.

Thank you Dr Freud














....wannabe.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Jbreher for some reason using this thread to defend his shitcoin.

Give him something to keep him busy. May be this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145827.0

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Silence) Everything is quiet and calm, like a spring evening on the ocean) drinking a cocktail on the beach and listening to the sound of the surf) Nothing new)

It's the bitcoins price I guess. It's not moving at all.

[Toxic2040]

Good evening WO brothers!
Observing $7,829

Around 10 pages to catch up. What have I missed?

Hi!
A hairy old dog created bitcoin.

[jbreher]

You guys think we will ever see BCash @$4k again within any bullrun? I feel like I lost a fortune by not selling @4k and kept that scam hodling.

You will not find anyone here who thinks that BCH will ever be $4k again

False statement is false.

XD

Well have you been to the Altcoins section? Everyone and their mother thinks Shitcoin X is going to upser Bitcoin and be worth 1mil.

Yes, but Shitcoin X can't trace back to the Satoshi Genesis block, and Shitcoin X's protocol does not have more in common with the original Bitcoin protocol than does that of BTC.

Like our little reality tv show move of trying to copy write Bitcoin and the Genesis paper. The fucker can't prove he's Satoshi and hell has essentially disproved it, but knows how to rile up new comers to crypto during runs doesn't he?

::le sigh:: ...aaaand we're back to 'Aussie man bad!'

And we still have not discussed the fact that Majormax was flamingly wrong in his/her blanket statement.

PLENTY of shitcoins are forks of Bitcoin that doesn't mean anything, fuck I could fork Bitcoin and put a 1 minute block with 1tb max blocks and feel like goofey everything chainer's would be drooling at it.

Yes, but that would be an even more grievous diversion from the original Bitcoin protocol. Try again.

Aussie man is the only reason the coin is still even discussed or betted on.

False statement is false.

Please show me news of BSV that doesn't involve Aussieman,

https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-sv-version-0-2-0-takes-the-next-step-towards-unlimited-scaling/

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

You guys think we will ever see BCash @$4k again within any bullrun? I feel like I lost a fortune by not selling @4k and kept that scam hodling.

You will not find anyone here who thinks that BCH will ever be $4k again

False statement is false.

XD

False statement is false.

Are you really that obtuse?

I believe BCH will again attain $4K. I am here. Ergo...

I seriously believe that even you do not believe that.
You are lying to yourself and trying to convince yourself and you are failing at both.

Haha.

Thank you Dr Freud














....wannabe.

jb I feel bad for me to sell my bCash other day LOL

By the way, don't you think Ver needs to stop using bitcoin.com domain?