ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 05, 2023, 03:01:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 8062
|
|
January 05, 2023, 03:03:16 PM |
|
Wonder what she would do for 200,000 BTC today. ... Probably colour her hair.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 05, 2023, 04:01:17 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 2494
|
Wonder what she would do for 200,000 BTC today. ... Probably colour her hair. I'll give her 0.1 BTC for wearing my cap for a year in public instead. Deadline offer: end of 2023. Hopefully she will listen this time and not regret it again in 10 years when 1 BTC is $100 million.
|
|
|
|
strawbs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1340
|
|
January 05, 2023, 04:34:24 PM Merited by vapourminer (1) |
|
I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate. https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunksSurely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen? I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
|
|
January 05, 2023, 04:39:36 PM Merited by vapourminer (1) |
|
Surely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen?
OpenSea does blacklist stuff if the original owner can clearly prove it was stolen. However, they can still be sold on other markets or P2P I suppose. CryptoPunks is one of the first series of "PFP collectible" NFTs on Ethereum, which is why they are worth big money. I think they look like crap but wouldn't say no if someone wanted to give me one. I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno.
You could also do a screenshot of the Mona Lisa. No one's stopping you, go right ahead.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 2494
|
I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate. https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunksSurely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen? I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno. Just a scam, like so many things these days. Oh I know, I'll make a shitty drink, call it shitface and get it pumped to the heavens by a shit "celebrity", you "need this in your life". Another scam.
|
|
|
|
krishnaverma
|
|
January 05, 2023, 04:40:31 PM |
|
I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate. https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunksSurely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen? I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno. I also do not know much about NFT but their is digital signature kind of thing to prove ownership. You cannot screenshot it and claim it to be yours.
|
|
|
|
strawbs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1340
|
|
January 05, 2023, 04:42:15 PM |
|
You could also do a screenshot of the Mona Lisa. No one's stopping you, go right ahead.
Yup, that's my point!
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
|
|
January 05, 2023, 04:45:55 PM |
|
You could also do a screenshot of the Mona Lisa. No one's stopping you, go right ahead.
Yup, that's my point! A bit different from owning the original tho innit.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 05, 2023, 05:01:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
eXPHorizon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 132
Precision Beats Power and Timing Beats Speed.
|
|
January 05, 2023, 05:58:12 PM |
|
I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate. https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunksSurely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen? I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno. Just a scam, like so many things these days. Oh I know, I'll make a shitty drink, call it shitface and get it pumped to the heavens by a shit "celebrity", you "need this in your life". Another scam. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rwsqb4B1lKY POV: Logan Paul Steals Your Wallet pretty funny
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 05, 2023, 06:01:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 05, 2023, 07:01:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 8062
|
|
January 05, 2023, 07:30:04 PM |
|
I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate. https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunksSurely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen? I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno. Just a scam, like so many things these days. Oh I know, I'll make a shitty drink, call it shitface and get it pumped to the heavens by a shit "celebrity", you "need this in your life". Another scam. What's in that stuff, Gwyneth Paltrow's urine?
|
|
|
|
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 2494
|
|
January 05, 2023, 07:31:43 PM |
|
I know next to nothing about NFTs, which my question below might demonstrate. https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-influencer-falls-victim-to-cyberattack-loses-300k-cryptopunksSurely one of the qualities of an NFT is that it is not fungible. Therefore, there is only one of its kind. So if this individual going by the name of "CryptoNovo" has had two "CryptoPunks" stolen and then apparently immediately sold onwards, surely the current owner is now in receipt of clearly stolen goods (since they are non-fungible)? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be that they therefore have no resale value and are therefore worth nothing? Much like the Mona Lisa being stolen - who would buy it when it's clearly been stolen? I just don't get it. In fact, I just don't get NFT 'art' (if it can be called that) at all, but that's another point altogether. You could just do a screenshot of it, if you wanted it that badly, and pretend it was 'original....I dunno. Just a scam, like so many things these days. Oh I know, I'll make a shitty drink, call it shitface and get it pumped to the heavens by a shit "celebrity", you "need this in your life". Another scam. What's in that stuff, Gwyneth Paltrow's urine? I hope she didn't eat asparagus.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 05, 2023, 08:01:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cygan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3150
Merit: 7806
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
January 05, 2023, 08:16:40 PM Last edit: May 15, 2023, 03:08:47 PM by cygan |
|
i miss ya....
|
|
|
|
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 2912
|
|
January 05, 2023, 08:26:47 PM |
|
i miss ya.... I miss you too buddy!!!
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 05, 2023, 09:01:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|