Bitcoin Forum
March 04, 2024, 11:44:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
$65,000 - 55 (87.3%)
$48,000 - 8 (12.7%)
Total Voters: 63

Pages: « 1 ... 31612 31613 31614 31615 31616 31617 31618 31619 31620 31621 31622 31623 31624 31625 31626 31627 31628 31629 31630 31631 31632 31633 31634 31635 31636 31637 31638 31639 31640 31641 31642 31643 31644 31645 31646 31647 31648 31649 31650 31651 31652 31653 31654 31655 31656 31657 31658 31659 31660 31661 [31662] 31663 31664 31665 31666 31667 31668 31669 31670 31671 31672 31673 31674 31675 31676 31677 31678 31679 31680 31681 31682 31683 31684 31685 31686 31687 31688 31689 31690 31691 31692 31693 31694 31695 31696 31697 31698 31699 31700 31701 31702 31703 31704 31705 31706 31707 31708 31709 31710 31711 31712 ... 33094 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26318255 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
cygan
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3080
Merit: 7351


🔐Icarus CEO💳


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2023, 06:49:12 PM

1709552660
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709552660

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709552660
Reply with quote  #2

1709552660
Report to moderator
1709552660
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709552660

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1709552660
Reply with quote  #2

1709552660
Report to moderator
If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1711


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 07:01:18 PM


Explanation
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3682
Merit: 3745



View Profile
January 11, 2023, 07:04:22 PM
Merited by NeuroticFish (3), philipma1957 (1), JayJuanGee (1), HI-TEC99 (1)

FTX have found some "change" in the couch:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ftx-says-it-has-located-more-than-5-billion-in-cash-liquid-assets-11673452986

facepalm
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 9879


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 07:15:25 PM
Merited by bitebits (1)

__snip__
JJG you must be using the speech to text or something like that as I know you definitely, you are the first one who gave merit to me and advised me to improve post quality. As your post length is amazing, there are two ways that I assume from your post length one of them is you may be one of the fastest typers another one is you might be using some voice-to-text tools. For such lengthy posts, I would like to know how many words you an type in 1 min.

I type my posts.  I do not use speech to text.

I type around 40 to 50 words per minute.. and also depending on if I am better rested or if I might be a bit slower on some days, too.

I do feel that I ramble some times, and surely I have been criticized for being repetitive.. which I cannot really deny the factual truth of that accusation.. not that I am going to agree to change what I had already decided to do in terms of what I chose to post or how much I choose to read back over my posts before I submit them..

Regarding post quality.. each of us will have a differing view in regards to what we might consider to be better or worse post quality, so I personally consider posting from personal experiences to be good and then trying to back up what you say is also a good thing.

Also, generally speaking, I do consider it to be better to say why you are posting a link or to explain if you support it or if you are against it... but I will still send merits to low quality posts that are posting links to decently good linked information that might NOT have been previously posted.. which is not always so much of a great idea to encourage those kinds of not so great posts.. but still, I appreciate when there is quality contents that seem to be on-topic or otherwise good information that somehow resonates with me or even with my then current mood, even if the substance is coming from the information contained in an outside link...

Also how many posts on average do you post on Bitcointalk? 

26k+ posts imagine a person from 3200+ days active on BTT and if you consider no leave its around 8 posts daily.

Yes.. that 8 per day is about right.. and it is not even close to the quantity that Philipma posts.. not that I am trying to catch up to either him or to chartbuddy.  When I first got on the forum.. I purposefully tried to limit the quantity of my posts to just a couple per day.. but I stopped limiting myself in more recent years... even though just like a lot of other peeps (or wannabe peeps) sometimes I do have to carry out some other real world activities, too.

I think its enough to at least have a chat with every active BTT account. 

Of course, if we are somewhat interactive, through the years, we do end up exchanging communications with several of the main forum members.. but at the same time, I try (or prefer) to do most of my communications with other forum member publicly rather than  through PMs... even though every once in a while there does seem to be a need or a preference to take things to PM... I also prefer to try to talk more about substance.. such as bitcoin rather than getting into squabbles, but sometimes the squabbles are difficult to avoid.. each of us have egos.. and sometimes my own ego becomes a problem, too.. not that I would admit that publicly in terms of any specific incident... hahahaha I remember recently agreeing that I was wrong about something with Franky1.,. .. hahahahaha.. Can you imagine that?  Actually, I did not exactly admit that I was wrong, even though.. I mostly did.

[edited out]
200 weeks of dca'ing!! dude thats crazy, don't do that

Buy ~50% of what you ideally would want to invest right now.
then buy more if price is significantly lower then your initial buy price.

That's a kind of retarded suggestion that you have in terms of general applicability.

In udder words, generally speaking, the financial and psychological practicalities of normies no doesn't work like the way that you are wanting them to work.

In udder words, you seem to be wanting to push normies more into gambling than they already tend to want to do.. which is emphasizing the wrong kinds of tendencies that no does not work out too good for actual long term investing...


Yeah.. I posted a general response about that recent revelation, here.
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1386
Merit: 2274



View Profile
January 11, 2023, 07:57:31 PM

More weapons to the black hole called Ukraine.

Britain discusses how to send ‘game-changing’ tanks to Ukraine
https://www.politico.eu/article/british-tanks-game-changing-ukraine-uk-no-10-says/

 Roll Eyes

Everything is "game changing".

They just need that next thing and after that the next game changing thing until we accept western boots on the ground.

Mark my words.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1711


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 08:01:17 PM


Explanation
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2436
Merit: 11562


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 08:04:15 PM
Merited by fillippone (3), xhomerx10 (1), Paashaas (1), d_eddie (1), DdmrDdmr (1), bitebits (1)

Let’s grind up brothers
TrustedBitcoiner
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 8


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 08:06:10 PM

[edited out]
200 weeks of dca'ing!! dude thats crazy, don't do that

Buy ~50% of what you ideally would want to invest right now.
then buy more if price is significantly lower then your initial buy price.

That's a kind of retarded suggestion that you have in terms of general applicability.

In udder words, generally speaking, the financial and psychological practicalities of normies no doesn't work like the way that you are wanting them to work.

In udder words, you seem to be wanting to push normies more into gambling than they already tend to want to do.. which is emphasizing the wrong kinds of tendencies that no does not work out too good for actual long term investing...


Imagine bitcoin will be worth $0 10 years from now, weather you dca'ed in or not, you lose 40K period the end. DCA does NOTHING to mitigate the risks

it does however mitigate your ability to "get in early"... which I heard is kind of a big deal when it comes to investing  Cheesy

hit the allin button people, its not safe, but it's your only hope!
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 4795


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 08:40:01 PM

today's airspace over america and over europe... Grin



I remember back in the late 90's finding out they were still using windows 3.11 and being shocked that not only they were using such an old Os but that they relied on Microcrap to begin with so I have just been waiting for this day.

*I think it was while we were doing the Y2K rollout.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 9879


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 08:42:03 PM

[edited out]
200 weeks of dca'ing!! dude thats crazy, don't do that

Buy ~50% of what you ideally would want to invest right now.
then buy more if price is significantly lower then your initial buy price.
That's a kind of retarded suggestion that you have in terms of general applicability.

In udder words, generally speaking, the financial and psychological practicalities of normies no doesn't work like the way that you are wanting them to work.

In udder words, you seem to be wanting to push normies more into gambling than they already tend to want to do.. which is emphasizing the wrong kinds of tendencies that no does not work out too good for actual long term investing...
Imagine bitcoin will be worth $0 10 years from now, weather you dca'ed in or not, you lose 40K period the end. DCA does NOTHING to mitigate the risks

it does however mitigate your ability to "get in early"... which I heard is kind of a big deal when it comes to investing  Cheesy

hit the allin button people, its not safe, but it's your only hope!

DCA does mitigate the risk, you dumb twat.

Furthermore, each person has the ability to apportion DCA, buying on dip, lump sum and HODL... some of that is likely to change with the passage of time, so if you are in a position that Philip had been seeming to suggest to invest, which is $100k over 4 years, you may well not even have half of that at the moment that you start it.

But even a normie might only have something that is closer to $40k for the whole budget, but they also do not have $20k that they can apportion right away, an they might be lucky if they have $4k or $5k that they could apportion right away, but no one is saying that they necessarily need to make radical changes to their investment portfolio, so it may well be the case that DCA is the only real practical way to get in without causing too many psychological and/or financial difficulties.

Maybe we are back to describing the hypothetical, TrustedBitcoiner.  What are the circumstances of the hypothetical person that you are wanting to describe TrustedBitcoiner?  You are talking about a person who already has half of the amount that they are planning to invest over 4 years, or you want them to take out a loan or what?  What does the rest of the investment portfolio look like this supposed hypothetical person that you are wanting to describe?

Are you talking about someone who already has an investment portfolio of $100k and they are trying to get to a 10% bitcoin allocation?  Or what?  Maybe we need some particulars instead of your spouting out nonsense about putting up 50% in advance as if you were at some kind of a roulette table.  hahahaha.. you unrealistic pie in the sky gambling nincumpoop.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 4795


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 08:44:40 PM


Translation: hidden/stolen assets being bartered for leniency.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1711


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 09:01:21 PM


Explanation
TrustedBitcoiner
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 8


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 09:39:54 PM

[edited out]
200 weeks of dca'ing!! dude thats crazy, don't do that

Buy ~50% of what you ideally would want to invest right now.
then buy more if price is significantly lower then your initial buy price.
That's a kind of retarded suggestion that you have in terms of general applicability.

In udder words, generally speaking, the financial and psychological practicalities of normies no doesn't work like the way that you are wanting them to work.

In udder words, you seem to be wanting to push normies more into gambling than they already tend to want to do.. which is emphasizing the wrong kinds of tendencies that no does not work out too good for actual long term investing...
Imagine bitcoin will be worth $0 10 years from now, weather you dca'ed in or not, you lose 40K period the end. DCA does NOTHING to mitigate the risks

it does however mitigate your ability to "get in early"... which I heard is kind of a big deal when it comes to investing  Cheesy

hit the allin button people, its not safe, but it's your only hope!

DCA does mitigate the risk, you dumb twat.

Furthermore, each person has the ability to apportion DCA, buying on dip, lump sum and HODL... some of that is likely to change with the passage of time, so if you are in a position that Philip had been seeming to suggest to invest, which is $100k over 4 years, you may well not even have half of that at the moment that you start it.

But even a normie might only have something that is closer to $40k for the whole budget, but they also do not have $20k that they can apportion right away, an they might be lucky if they have $4k or $5k that they could apportion right away, but no one is saying that they necessarily need to make radical changes to their investment portfolio, so it may well be the case that DCA is the only real practical way to get in without causing too many psychological and/or financial difficulties.

Maybe we are back to describing the hypothetical, TrustedBitcoiner.  What are the circumstances of the hypothetical person that you are wanting to describe TrustedBitcoiner?  You are talking about a person who already has half of the amount that they are planning to invest over 4 years, or you want them to take out a loan or what?  What does the rest of the investment portfolio look like this supposed hypothetical person that you are wanting to describe?

Are you talking about someone who already has an investment portfolio of $100k and they are trying to get to a 10% bitcoin allocation?  Or what?  Maybe we need some particulars instead of your spouting out nonsense about putting up 50% in advance as if you were at some kind of a roulette table.  hahahaha.. you unrealistic pie in the sky gambling nincumpoop.

fair enough, I'm think more along the lines of Philip has X amount (cash in hand) he's comfortable putting into bitcoin and how best to go about that. to which i say put in half Now and hope that it dips below where you bought so he can put in the rest.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1711


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 10:01:16 PM


Explanation
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4046
Merit: 7476


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2023, 10:56:04 PM
Merited by Hueristic (1)


Translation: hidden/stolen assets being bartered for leniency.

so IIRC 8 billion is missing.

He gives back 5 billion
He gambled away 2 billion
Has a billion stashed

Get 3-5 years.

Or 200 million a year to say in a "nice" prison.

I know his parents put up a 2 million house for part of the bail.

I did see a quick note online that 2 others put up bail money and their names are hidden to "protect" them from harassment.

I would love to know who they are.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1711


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 11:01:17 PM


Explanation
Xian01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067


Christian Antkow


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 11:44:16 PM
Merited by El duderino_ (10)

I think it's time for the running of the bulls.
Gachapin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1765


bitcoin retard


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 11:48:24 PM

I think it's time for the running of the bulls.

question is, if or better to where we fall back afterwards
TrustedBitcoiner
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 8


View Profile
January 11, 2023, 11:54:47 PM

holy crap

my short isnt looking so good  Undecided
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1711


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 12, 2023, 12:01:20 AM


Explanation
Pages: « 1 ... 31612 31613 31614 31615 31616 31617 31618 31619 31620 31621 31622 31623 31624 31625 31626 31627 31628 31629 31630 31631 31632 31633 31634 31635 31636 31637 31638 31639 31640 31641 31642 31643 31644 31645 31646 31647 31648 31649 31650 31651 31652 31653 31654 31655 31656 31657 31658 31659 31660 31661 [31662] 31663 31664 31665 31666 31667 31668 31669 31670 31671 31672 31673 31674 31675 31676 31677 31678 31679 31680 31681 31682 31683 31684 31685 31686 31687 31688 31689 31690 31691 31692 31693 31694 31695 31696 31697 31698 31699 31700 31701 31702 31703 31704 31705 31706 31707 31708 31709 31710 31711 31712 ... 33094 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!