Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Gachapin]

AI generated photos of AI generated people.





(The fingers give it away, but other than that I would sleep with all of them, if they existed, even if they had too many fingers. Just upload me to the singularity and have it done with.)

why do they all look so greasy..

Something or someone clearly did something to/with them before those photos were taken.

dirty AI...

[psycodad]

The EU has legalized putting these bugs in foods:



https://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Fachmeldungen/01_lebensmittel/2023/2023_01_25_Fa_Getreideschimmelkaefer.html

They need to be listed on the ingredients so that people allergic to it can avoid them.
Better get yourself a looking glass to read the 4pt fineprint on your next trip to the grocery.

* psycodad heads back to his mealworm yoghurt, sipping on his cricket tea and celebrating the great advance we make in fighting climate change...

[BitcoinBunny]

Marty! You gotta come back with me! Back To The Future!



What happens to us in the future?
Do we end up like assholes, investing in a cryptocurrency, it fails and we have to work at McDonald's?

Is that McDonald's in the UK, or McDonald's in America?

[BitcoinBunny]

If you invest in BTC you can have all 3. 

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Gachapin]

The EU has legalized putting these bugs in foods:



https://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Fachmeldungen/01_lebensmittel/2023/2023_01_25_Fa_Getreideschimmelkaefer.html

They need to be listed on the ingredients so that people allergic to it can avoid them.
Better get yourself a looking glass to read the 4pt fineprint on your next trip to the grocery.

* psycodad heads back to his mealworm yoghurt, sipping on his cricket tea and celebrating the great advance we make in fighting climate change...

another reason to avoid processed food

[Gachapin]

pretty strong arms, especially the left one

she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right?

[AlcoHoDL]

[...]

https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ is a site which generates faces. the results are amazing,

At least the AI renders teeth alright, or it would look pretty weird...


BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English).

It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question.

Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.

[BitcoinBunny]

pretty strong arms, especially the left one

she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right?

I wasn't looking at the arms. 

[Gachapin]

pretty strong arms, especially the left one

she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right?

I wasn't looking at the arms.  

better do, or you might end up with a surprise these days  

[BitcoinBunny]

pretty strong arms, especially the left one

she is not one of the recent trans-athletes popping up everywhere, right?

I wasn't looking at the arms.  

better do, or you might end up with a surprise these days  

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[d_eddie]

Crypto these days 😂😂


Soruce: TGM

Poets hodling?
O que será que será?
Chico Buarque?



#haiku

[nutildah]

BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English).

It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question.

Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.

Apparently its really good at coming up with creative solutions to coding problems. The way it "thinks" about coding is uninhibited by traditional concepts of what commands can or should be used for what, allowing it to generate sleek, perfectly-functioning code.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[AlcoHoDL]

BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English).

It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question.

Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.

Apparently its really good at coming up with creative solutions to coding problems. The way it "thinks" about coding is uninhibited by traditional concepts of what commands can or should be used for what, allowing it to generate sleek, perfectly-functioning code.

Very nice, but here's an important question: is the resulting code generated by the AI itself, or is it just being pulled off some page on the internet, based on the real (human) programmer's description and how well it matches the query? In any case, how can one be sure that the code is bug-free? Also, is the AI engine capable of avoiding, detecting, and possibly correcting, bugs that are more complex than syntax errors or simple overflow/memory corruption cases? I'm talking generally here, and not specifically about the code you posted.

The possibilities of an AI generating efficient code that goes beyond conventional coding practices is very exciting, but I would avoid using the generated code in a copy/paste fashion. I'd prefer to have the AI check my own code, in case it can spot bugs I missed. But then, not everyone would want to send their own code to an AI.

Regardless of the above concerns, I'm sure we'll see significant and very exciting developments in the AI field.

[nutildah]

is the resulting code generated by the AI itself, or is it just being pulled off some page on the internet, based on the real (human) programmer's description and how well it matches the query?

Its completely novel.

In any case, how can one be sure that the code is bug-free? Also, is the AI engine capable of avoiding, detecting, and possibly correcting, bugs that are more complex than syntax errors or simple overflow/memory corruption cases? I'm talking generally here, and not specifically about the code you posted.

I haven't seen it put into wide practice yet but for this particular problem the answer was extremely straight-forward and doesn't leave room for error. I'm sure it is also capable of making buggy code as well.

The possibilities of an AI generating efficient code that goes beyond conventional coding practices is very exciting, but I would avoid using the generated code in a copy/paste fashion. I'd prefer to have the AI check my own code, in case it can spot bugs I missed.

The difference is it is capable of putting things together that don't normally go together, that most programmers would never consider as a possibility. But yes it is all highly context dependent. I just thought it was really interesting that it was even capable of such a thing.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[jojo69]

BTW, don't blindly trust what OpenAI says. I asked it a technical question, and the answer was totally wrong (albeit with perfect English).

It learns though. I challenged its response, citing a source that proved it was wrong. It apologized, and answered correctly the next time I asked the same question.

Based on the few interactions I've had with it, it's a natural language-polished source of raw data, without much "concern" about their accuracy or even correctness. Don't rely on it. Not yet anyway.

Apparently its really good at coming up with creative solutions to coding problems. The way it "thinks" about coding is uninhibited by traditional concepts of what commands can or should be used for what, allowing it to generate sleek, perfectly-functioning code.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation