Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2026, 03:34:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 14670 14671 14672 14673 14674 14675 14676 14677 14678 14679 14680 14681 14682 14683 14684 14685 14686 14687 14688 14689 14690 14691 14692 14693 14694 14695 14696 14697 14698 14699 14700 14701 14702 14703 14704 14705 14706 14707 14708 14709 14710 14711 14712 14713 14714 14715 14716 14717 14718 14719 [14720] 14721 14722 14723 14724 14725 14726 14727 14728 14729 14730 14731 14732 14733 14734 14735 14736 14737 14738 14739 14740 14741 14742 14743 14744 14745 14746 14747 14748 14749 14750 14751 14752 14753 14754 14755 14756 14757 14758 14759 14760 14761 14762 14763 14764 14765 14766 14767 14768 14769 14770 ... 35724 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26963019 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
yugo23
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 252


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:07:55 AM


BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM!!!!

That's the 380$ for you baby <3

Ok now the 400 next stop: Grin
Dekker3D
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:11:56 AM


BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM!!!!

That's the 380$ for you baby <3

Ok now the 400 next stop: Grin

Yes, $400 is quite elusive these past few weeks. I hope once it reach $400, it'll stay a bit longer so make it a new floor.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:12:45 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:14:25 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't?

All I see is a bunch of missing names.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:18:19 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't?

All I see is a bunch of missing names.

Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:20:05 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't?

All I see is a bunch of missing names.

Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.

What about social consensus? Too wishy-washy?
Hunyadi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000


☑ ♟ ☐ ♚


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:20:49 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


I believe the consensus will be reached this time.
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2016, 10:24:40 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

That piece is the reason we are having this debate - from the first line its looking for consensus in the sense of "do not attempt to make any changes..."

In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening.

But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.

The only comfort is that Hilliard and Corem are signatories, and anything with their name on it usually stinks of deceit.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:29:46 AM
Last edit: February 11, 2016, 04:49:28 PM by BlindMayorBitcorn

^Aww come on now. Its been a soothing back and forth, an intricate ballet of balancing incentives and such like. There were no lazers. I think things turned out pretty well.
BitUsher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1035


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:32:10 AM
Last edit: February 12, 2016, 11:12:16 PM by BitUsher

Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.

~67-70% hash power actually.


    F2Pool — 29%
    AntPool (Bitmain) — 20% Bitmainwarranty
    BitFury — 17%
    BTCC Pool — 14%
    BW — 8%




He was playing politics , while his CTO disagreed with him . From his own words he never switch to classic ... just deployed some classic node along side his core nodes-

https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/697600458441887745


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

Good Idea to hodl, Bitcoin will do very well under Core's Scaling plan.

But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.

That is not helpful to move things forward. This is a moment to celebrate.
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2016, 10:34:49 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't?

All I see is a bunch of missing names.

Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.


If you remember a few weeks ago, Classic had around 70% of hashing power, but apparently, that was "not the issue" and was not "indicative of emerging consensus" etc. etc.

I have a feeling that letter is a fraud ( or at least grossly misrepresents certain views) based on at least 2 of the signatories. Its the kind of thing you would expect when Classic has almost 1/3 the nodes of Core 11.2.  I imagine a whole lot of frantic canvassing/pleading has been going on in the background, and people like to keep people happy when they call to the door.  The real vote will be adoption. It either gets 75% or it does not.

marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2350


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:35:04 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening.

But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.

So. A.N.G.R.Y?
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:37:15 AM

*zing* Grin
BitUsher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1035


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:40:40 AM



I have a feeling that letter is a fraud ( or at least grossly misrepresents certain views) based on at least 2 of the signatories.



Don't let your feelings get in the way of facts -

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-February/012412.html
https://twitter.com/BitfuryGeorge/status/697707919241043968
https://twitter.com/excellion/status/697608149096771584
https://twitter.com/btcroundtable/status/697672824282939393
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:50:04 AM

Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.

~88% hash power actually.


    F2Pool — 29%
    AntPool (Bitmain) — 20%
    BitFury — 17%
    BTCC Pool — 14%
    BW — 8%




He was playing politics , while his CTO disagreed with him . From his own words he never switch to classic ... just deployed some classic node along side his core nodes-

https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/697600458441887745


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

Good Idea to hodl, Bitcoin will do very well under Core's Scaling plan.

But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.

That is not helpful to move things forward. This is a moment to celebrate.


I would be more comfortable if Bitcoin had more headroom in the next couple of years, but it is what it is.

GG
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2016, 10:51:22 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening.

But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.

So. A.N.G.R.Y?

Absolutely.  
yugo23
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 252


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:52:10 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

That piece is the reason we are having this debate - from the first line its looking for consensus in the sense of "do not attempt to make any changes..."

In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening.

But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.

The only comfort is that Hilliard and Corem are signatories, and anything with their name on it usually stinks of deceit.

Why is it a bad thing?

If all miners agree on that well it's more or less the only thing that can be done no?
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2350


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:55:58 AM

Well , I am glad this is over and we can move on to improving the bitcoin ecosystem?

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/a-call-for-consensus-d96d5560d8d6#.3219xm7af


Fin

I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.

That piece is the reason we are having this debate - from the first line its looking for consensus in the sense of "do not attempt to make any changes..."

In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening.

But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.

The only comfort is that Hilliard and Corem are signatories, and anything with their name on it usually stinks of deceit.

Why is it a bad thing?

If all miners agree on that well it's more or less the only thing that can be done no?

Impotent buttrage quit is an option.

Also known as "flouncing off stage right" in a wake of fake taffeta.
BitUsher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 1035


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:56:20 AM

Bram Cohen , Inventor of bit-torrent, shares his opinion on the CEO of coinbase not listening to his CTO on technical manners:

https://twitter.com/bramcohen/status/697705876337995776





I would be more comfortable if Bitcoin had more headroom in the next couple of years, but it is what it is.

GG

LN is scheduled to start rolling out 3rd quarter 2016 for more capacity layered ontop of segwit. We all want more capacity, we just want to insure it is done in a safe manner.
yugo23
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 252


View Profile
February 11, 2016, 10:57:49 AM

Damn I'm feeling something strong is happening with this Bitcoin Classic released and being adopted by some. I fear I might miss something big ><

Why can't I understaaaaaaaaaaand?  Cry
Pages: « 1 ... 14670 14671 14672 14673 14674 14675 14676 14677 14678 14679 14680 14681 14682 14683 14684 14685 14686 14687 14688 14689 14690 14691 14692 14693 14694 14695 14696 14697 14698 14699 14700 14701 14702 14703 14704 14705 14706 14707 14708 14709 14710 14711 14712 14713 14714 14715 14716 14717 14718 14719 [14720] 14721 14722 14723 14724 14725 14726 14727 14728 14729 14730 14731 14732 14733 14734 14735 14736 14737 14738 14739 14740 14741 14742 14743 14744 14745 14746 14747 14748 14749 14750 14751 14752 14753 14754 14755 14756 14757 14758 14759 14760 14761 14762 14763 14764 14765 14766 14767 14768 14769 14770 ... 35724 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!