|
yugo23
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:07:55 AM |
|
BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM!!!! That's the 380$ for you baby <3 Ok now the 400 next stop: 
|
|
|
|
|
Dekker3D
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:11:56 AM |
|
BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM!!!! That's the 380$ for you baby <3 Ok now the 400 next stop:  Yes, $400 is quite elusive these past few weeks. I hope once it reach $400, it'll stay a bit longer so make it a new floor.
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:12:45 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:14:25 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't? All I see is a bunch of missing names.
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:18:19 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't? All I see is a bunch of missing names. Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:20:05 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't? All I see is a bunch of missing names. Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power. What about social consensus? Too wishy-washy?
|
|
|
|
|
Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:20:49 AM |
|
I believe the consensus will be reached this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:24:40 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. That piece is the reason we are having this debate - from the first line its looking for consensus in the sense of "do not attempt to make any changes..." In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening. But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames. The only comfort is that Hilliard and Corem are signatories, and anything with their name on it usually stinks of deceit.
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:29:46 AM Last edit: February 11, 2016, 04:49:28 PM by BlindMayorBitcorn |
|
^Aww come on now. Its been a soothing back and forth, an intricate ballet of balancing incentives and such like. There were no lazers. I think things turned out pretty well.
|
|
|
|
|
BitUsher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1035
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:32:10 AM Last edit: February 12, 2016, 11:12:16 PM by BitUsher |
|
Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.
~67-70% hash power actually. F2Pool — 29% AntPool (Bitmain) — 20% Bitmainwarranty BitFury — 17% BTCC Pool — 14% BW — 8% He was playing politics , while his CTO disagreed with him . From his own words he never switch to classic ... just deployed some classic node along side his core nodes- https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/697600458441887745 Fin
I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.
Good Idea to hodl, Bitcoin will do very well under Core's Scaling plan. But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.
That is not helpful to move things forward. This is a moment to celebrate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:34:49 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. Why does this seem so self-evident? What do you guys see I don't? All I see is a bunch of missing names. Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power. If you remember a few weeks ago, Classic had around 70% of hashing power, but apparently, that was "not the issue" and was not "indicative of emerging consensus" etc. etc. I have a feeling that letter is a fraud ( or at least grossly misrepresents certain views) based on at least 2 of the signatories. Its the kind of thing you would expect when Classic has almost 1/3 the nodes of Core 11.2. I imagine a whole lot of frantic canvassing/pleading has been going on in the background, and people like to keep people happy when they call to the door. The real vote will be adoption. It either gets 75% or it does not.
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2350
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:35:04 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening. But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames. So. A.N.G.R.Y?
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:37:15 AM |
|
*zing* 
|
|
|
|
|
BitUsher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1035
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:40:40 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:50:04 AM |
|
Those companies represent over 70% of the hashing power.
~88% hash power actually. F2Pool — 29% AntPool (Bitmain) — 20% BitFury — 17% BTCC Pool — 14% BW — 8% He was playing politics , while his CTO disagreed with him . From his own words he never switch to classic ... just deployed some classic node along side his core nodes- https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/697600458441887745 Fin
I'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am.
Good Idea to hodl, Bitcoin will do very well under Core's Scaling plan. But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames.
That is not helpful to move things forward. This is a moment to celebrate. I would be more comfortable if Bitcoin had more headroom in the next couple of years, but it is what it is. GG
|
|
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:51:22 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening. But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames. So. A.N.G.R.Y? Absolutely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yugo23
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:52:10 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. That piece is the reason we are having this debate - from the first line its looking for consensus in the sense of "do not attempt to make any changes..." In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening. But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames. The only comfort is that Hilliard and Corem are signatories, and anything with their name on it usually stinks of deceit. Why is it a bad thing? If all miners agree on that well it's more or less the only thing that can be done no?
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2350
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:55:58 AM |
|
FinI'd be hodling BTC for dear life now. In fact, I am. That piece is the reason we are having this debate - from the first line its looking for consensus in the sense of "do not attempt to make any changes..." In what universe is that consensus? That is coercion. If you are so happy that you are on the right side, then let this happen. If everyone ignores it and carries on as before, then it is a non issue. But why this fear? Because they know this has a real chance of happening. But seriously, if that letter is in any way legit, then this mofo deserves to go down in flames. The only comfort is that Hilliard and Corem are signatories, and anything with their name on it usually stinks of deceit. Why is it a bad thing? If all miners agree on that well it's more or less the only thing that can be done no? Impotent buttrage quit is an option. Also known as "flouncing off stage right" in a wake of fake taffeta.
|
|
|
|
|
BitUsher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1035
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:56:20 AM |
|
Bram Cohen , Inventor of bit-torrent, shares his opinion on the CEO of coinbase not listening to his CTO on technical manners: https://twitter.com/bramcohen/status/697705876337995776
I would be more comfortable if Bitcoin had more headroom in the next couple of years, but it is what it is.
GG
LN is scheduled to start rolling out 3rd quarter 2016 for more capacity layered ontop of segwit. We all want more capacity, we just want to insure it is done in a safe manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yugo23
|
 |
February 11, 2016, 10:57:49 AM |
|
Damn I'm feeling something strong is happening with this Bitcoin Classic released and being adopted by some. I fear I might miss something big >< Why can't I understaaaaaaaaaaand? 
|
|
|
|
|
|